Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image License missing #2294

Open
marcofeltmann opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Image License missing #2294

marcofeltmann opened this issue Jul 29, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
̄\_(ツ)_/ ̄ Shrug - undecided or controversial

Comments

@marcofeltmann
Copy link

marcofeltmann commented Jul 29, 2022

Summary

Steps To Reproduce

Read all the license files in the repository.

The only file named LICENSE states the code and it's documentation, but not the gopass logo image file.

Expected behavior

Since an image is neither code nor documentation but some art I'd expected some licensing information on that image, too.

Environment

  • OS: Arch Linux 5.18.14

  • OS version: Linux REDACTED.local 5.18.14-arch1-1 Add template feature #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat, 23 Jul 2022 11:46:17 +0000 x86_64 GNU/Linux

  • gopass Version: gopass 1.14.3 go1.18.3 linux amd64
    root - gpg 2.2.36 - gitfs 2.37.1
    Available Crypto Backends: age, gpgcli, plain
    Available Storage Backends: fossilfs, fs, gitfs

  • Installation method: official pacman

  • sway: 1.7

  • swaylock: 1.6

Additional context

As a Go developer I recently switched gears from MacOS to Arch with Wayland on sway
When configuring swaylock to be a little less ugly I'd love to present the logo as a background image since this cute logo totally fits my Gopher daywork and the purpose of swaylock

Unfortunately I have no idea if I am allowed to use this image, as the belonging device will stay locked and presenting that logo at GopherConEU this weekend in Berlin, Germany.

@dominikschulz
Copy link
Member

That's a good question.

Using it in public if definitely OK. The logo was created specifically for use in this open source project by Vincent Leinweber.

But to "properly" license it I'm not sure. I'm not a lawyer.

@marcofeltmann
Copy link
Author

Guess Vincent Leinweber has to decide?

@dominikschulz dominikschulz added the ̄\_(ツ)_/ ̄ Shrug - undecided or controversial label Sep 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
̄\_(ツ)_/ ̄ Shrug - undecided or controversial
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants