You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not really a feature request. more like a big thank you. I was searching for a way to integrate my Kamstrup multical 602 and just gave your integration a try. It works out of the box!!!
So my only suggestion is maybe add a "supported devices" list to the readme.md, and or remove 403 from the name of the integration.
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you @twasietsmetjeroen for your kind words and for informing me that this component works for your model.
This topic is something I gave a good thought to when my meter was replaced and I had to create a new component for the meter. I want to keep it to this specific model because I own this device and I can offer support for that. I won't be able to test against any other models as I don't have these, this is also why I dropped support for the component for my previous meter.
As you suggested, I did add a supported devices section to the readme with a little bit of information in there.
In case anyone owns a meter with a slightly different protocol, they could fork this repo and maintain that themselves.
Did you read the instructions?
The request
Not really a feature request. more like a big thank you. I was searching for a way to integrate my Kamstrup multical 602 and just gave your integration a try. It works out of the box!!!
So my only suggestion is maybe add a "supported devices" list to the readme.md, and or remove 403 from the name of the integration.
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: