Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in golang.org/x/net: CVE-2018-17142 #192

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In CVE-2018-17142, the reference URL [Go Standard Library (package not identified)](Go Standard Library (package not identified)) (and possibly others) refers to something in Go.

module: std
package: Go Standard Library (package not identified)
description: |
  The html package (aka x/net/html) through 2018-09-17 in Go mishandles <math><template><mo><template>, leading to a "panic: runtime error" in parseCurrentToken in parse.go during an html.Parse call.
cves:
- CVE-2018-17142
links:
  context:
  - https://go.dev/issue/27702
  - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LREEWY6KNLHRWFZ7OT4HVLMVVCGGUHON/
  - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UKRCI7WIOCOCD3H7NXWRGIRABTQOZOBK/

See doc/triage.md
for instructions on how to triage this report.

@julieqiu julieqiu self-assigned this Jan 7, 2022
@julieqiu julieqiu changed the title x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in "Go Standard Library (package not identified)": CVE-2018-17142 x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in net/html: CVE-2018-17142 Jan 7, 2022
@julieqiu julieqiu changed the title x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in net/html: CVE-2018-17142 x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in golang.org/x/net: CVE-2018-17142 Jan 7, 2022
@julieqiu julieqiu removed their assignment Jan 7, 2022
@neild neild self-assigned this Jun 29, 2022
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/415215 mentions this issue: x/vulndb: add reports/GO-2022-0192.yaml for CVE-2018-17142

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants