[Branch View] show "Included" Tag if it is merged manualy or Cloned from default branch

[6543]

If a repository use pull request, the merged label is unusable. But for others with no pull request, merged label is very usable. I will find time to review your PR.

so if the last commit is includet in default branch and folowing commit on default branch has a message wich *[Mm]erge*<branch name>* then it is merged manualy and the merge flag sould also aperar

Originally posted by @6543 in #7454 (comment)

[6543]

EDIT: i try to implement a function called IsManualMerged ...

show at PR: #7979

[6543]

important question:

if a branch is 0 commits Ahead and at least 1 Behind default branch - indicates this a MERGE already?!?
@lunny @zeripath @sapk

becaue it would save a lot of lookups ... no need for new go routines

[lunny]

Maybe only 0 commits Ahead if it was just merged.

[6543]

Maybe only 0 commits Ahead if it was just merged.

no because a merge generates a merge-comit ... wich is only on the default branch ...

if we only check Ahead and and Behind, i know one "bug/miss info": if you create a branch at some point in default branch's history wich has now own commits ... but his should be rare and for this you normaly use tags! ...

[6543]

cc298fb is doing it the short way ...

Preview:

[6543]

Maybe only 0 commits Ahead if it was just merged.

if there is no commit between the branch to merge and the branch who is merged - without option --no-ff there is no merge commit ... you are right

[6543]

smal notes I'll work with:

• add new lable "Included" color:jelow
• string wich tells: "this branch was manualy merged or is in some way already included in the default branch"
• some code ...

[6543]

@lunny -> #8449