-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different results in production #508
Comments
Hiya—would you be able to provide more information, such as, the full log output, or the directory of files that are producing the unexpected results? |
Sure, here is a snippet from my dev build
I didn't see much more useful information from including And in production
|
Hmm, two things:
One possible discrepancy for this is that |
@gjtorikian Thanks for your responses!
|
One thing that stands out is that Nokogiri, if possible, should be updated ASAP -- there have been a number of CVEs reported on anything below 1.8 as of late. Otherwise, I'm sort of inclined to believe this is an environment issue. The error reporting is correct, and the error detection comes from a third-party library--that there's a discrepancy between two hosts is all a bit out of my control. 😿 What do you think? |
I tried debugging this for a while, and had no luck However, I agree with you that this error probably isn't because of this tool, it must be something further down in the stack. Thanks for your help! |
I've been seeing a problem with my builds in development that I'm not seeing in production 😀 Might be related to #485, but not sure
In development, I'm seeing this error
ID known-issues already defined
. I do not see the error in production. Note that I see the error in development even if I run a production build.I'm fairly sure of how to fix this error, but right now what I would like to do is make sure that I have consistent results between development and production.
Is there something that could be swallowing this error in production? Are there any debugging tips you could recommend? Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: