Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gz sdf command-line tool should be in sdformat #85

Closed
osrf-migration opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

gz sdf command-line tool should be in sdformat #85

osrf-migration opened this issue Mar 5, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@osrf-migration
Copy link

Original report (archived issue) by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters).


The gz sdf command line tool really should be in this repository. It's a pain to compile all of gazebo just to use gz sdf, when it doesn't use anything special from gazebo.

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


Once ign-tools is released, sdf can make a plugin for it.

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Steve Peters (Bitbucket: Steven Peters, GitHub: scpeters).


ign sdf? Sounds good

@osrf-migration
Copy link
Author

Original comment by Nate Koenig (Bitbucket: Nathan Koenig).


Yup.

@catskul
Copy link

catskul commented May 4, 2020

ping

@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

The equivalent ign sdf tool was added to SDFormat on this PR.

@catskul
Copy link

catskul commented May 4, 2020

was kind of surprised this tool isn't directly a part of sdformat itself. Is that because of all the file system searching necessary that's tied to gazebo/ign? Also, sorry for blowing up your github inbox. I'm just getting spun up on ign related stuff prompting a lot of questions and observations.

@chapulina
Copy link
Contributor

I believe it was just more convenient to implement the command using ign-tools than duplicating a lot of the code inside SDFormat.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants