Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create state for Client to equivocate "read by source" #100

Open
ninavizz opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Create state for Client to equivocate "read by source" #100

ninavizz opened this issue Mar 10, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Low team priority Others not quite convinced we should do this anytime in the near future, abreast other priorities. Needs Prioritization SDW Client UxD User Experience Design (content, visual, interaction) UxR User experience research preparation, execution, or synthesis task.
Milestone

Comments

@ninavizz
Copy link
Member

Problem

Feature exists in Web UI but needs to exist in Client UI.

Solution

Client Repo Issue's blurb summarizes it well:

There is a somewhat obscure feature in the classic SecureDrop experience, where a journalist reply will transition to "read" in the Journalist Interface once it has been deleted by the source:

Screenshot_2020-03-06_15-29-29
Screenshot_2020-03-06_15-29-44

The client should have feature parity with the Journalist Interface, so we should aim to preserve this behavior in the client, or remove the feature altogether. This is distinct from "read/unread" or "seen/unseen" status, which indicates whether a journalist has read a message or seen a document (#187).

@ninavizz ninavizz added Post-Beta Workstation UxD User Experience Design (content, visual, interaction) labels Mar 10, 2020
@ninavizz ninavizz added this to the Post-Beta milestone Mar 10, 2020
@ninavizz ninavizz self-assigned this Mar 10, 2020
@ninavizz
Copy link
Member Author

@martinshelton @eloquence This feature w/in the JWS had not been on my radar to inquire about with the Pilot research, but is something I'd like to ask journalist users about at some point... and, incorporate into design stuff in the near future.

@ninavizz
Copy link
Member Author

Tagging child issue w/in #102

@eloquence
Copy link
Member

Yes, I am definitely interested in whether journalists are even aware that this functionality exists; it's super subtle right now, so I doubt it. However, we can make it less subtle in the client, and it does it seem like a potentially useful feature -- provided sources do follow our instructions and delete replies (which serves as the "read receipt" for the journalist).

@ninavizz
Copy link
Member Author

Derp, we need to start asking journalist users about this.

@ninavizz ninavizz added Low team priority Others not quite convinced we should do this anytime in the near future, abreast other priorities. Needs Field Obvservation Things we need to track in the Pilot study UxR User experience research preparation, execution, or synthesis task. Needs Prioritization SDW Client and removed Needs Field Obvservation Things we need to track in the Pilot study Post-Beta Workstation labels Jul 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Low team priority Others not quite convinced we should do this anytime in the near future, abreast other priorities. Needs Prioritization SDW Client UxD User Experience Design (content, visual, interaction) UxR User experience research preparation, execution, or synthesis task.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants