-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal for single image production containers #1028
Comments
It also means no more frappe images. following images will be available:
Custom apps will be built from base anyway. So no need of frappe images. |
@revant Thank you for this great effort! But I think the current setup of 3 images is better than this, especially for custom app building, and management. This single image will make it a server application, I like the current images which seem to be simple microservices-like setup I think we have to discuss this proposal more... |
I don't use any VM. I use kubernetes. So it'll be microservices based. also, it'll be migration friendly. edit: for clarification, there will be 1 image, but there will be same number of containers, frontend, backend, 3 workers, schedule and websocket edit: check this https://github.com/castlecraft/frappe_containers/blob/main/docs/build-custom-image.md. Building images with custom apps is as easy as supplying |
Move discussion to PR |
Reasons:
nginx
,worker
,socketio
.bench
tooling.Pros:
bench
toolingCons:
Info:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: