Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deals without --verified-deal parameters are also regarded as Verified Deal #5073

Closed
imageorbit opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5074
Closed

deals without --verified-deal parameters are also regarded as Verified Deal #5073

imageorbit opened this issue Dec 1, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #5074

Comments

@imageorbit
Copy link

Describe the bug
deal without --verified-deal parameters are also regarded as Verified Deal

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Run 'lotus client deal ' to submit deal
  2. the parameters:
    --verified-deal indicate that the deal counts towards verified client total (default: false)
    So I didn't add it. But the submitted deals are in status of 'verified'

Expected behavior
the submitted deals should be in status of 'not verified'

Screenshots
屏幕快照 2020-12-01 上午10 56 37

Version (run lotus version):
lotus version 1.2.1+git.375b7a1c4.dirty

Additional context
I use this verified address to send deal:

Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
Message sent to Filecoin Network
bafy2bzaceaatcccylxlvavnxwzasajzhtitg3ncv57s3po35wru7dfym7oode
Address
f3vsg65k7fs365uueavmfnwcd2wzxq62vdhh7ydgws6oi2xliwjenyp75cg4ynxjez3i2migafpgv26iyee74q
Datacap Allocated
1 TiB

@magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

magik6k commented Dec 1, 2020

Also appears as verified on-chain:

$ lotus state get-deal 1404983

{
  "Proposal": {
    "PieceCID": {
      "/": "baga6ea4seaqnt46rt7ra73dhs4g5se46o57awrkoq7la34onvfwnwqx7u2a42aa"
    },
    "PieceSize": 17179869184,
    "VerifiedDeal": true,
    "Client": "f042612",
    "Provider": "f048135",
    "Label": "mAXCg5AIg4ZiigtmuGgio7hy6gdD4nBuEvkQdwF+CD8QNPa+ey5Q",
    "StartEpoch": 284472,
    "EndEpoch": 805791,
    "StoragePricePerEpoch": "8000000000",
    "ProviderCollateral": "5077138586530522",
    "ClientCollateral": "0"
  },
  "State": {
    "SectorStartEpoch": -1,
    "LastUpdatedEpoch": -1,
    "SlashEpoch": -1
  }
}

@magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

magik6k commented Dec 1, 2020

Were you using the interactive deal CLI (lotus client deal with no arguments), or did you call that command with arguments (data cid/miner/etc.?)

@magik6k
Copy link
Contributor

magik6k commented Dec 1, 2020

Looks like the helptext for that command was wrong, fixed in #5074

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants