-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automatic code formatting? #3920
Comments
"Considering" is the right label. |
Hi @Cyan4973 . For the git blame history impact, have you considered adding a You'd still need to decide on formatting convention, but I feel some formatting is better than none / manual formatting and you can tweak as you go after starting with one of the reasonable built-in styles If you did make a large formatting change in the future, just throw that in the |
That's an interesting option. It might do the trick. In term of formatting convention, I believe we have one now, since we have started using it on other (internal) projects. Now it's more a matter of finding the time to invest in this project. |
I tried searching on the issues page, but couldn't find anyone who mentioned it, so I figure I would.
Has it been considered to add an automatic code formatter and guidelines in the contributing and a formatter configuration to the repository? I know I have had problems in the past where I've had to disable my editor's auto-formatting and manually adjust code format when working in the repository. Perhaps something like
clang-format
or a suitable alternative? At this point, it would be a pretty massivegit diff
that would destroy the blame, so it may be too late if preservation is a priority.This is what sparked my question, as a CI/CD checker would prevent it: #3917 (comment)
Obviously, this project has done well without it, so "no" is a perfectly acceptable answer as well 🙂
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: