Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal to add EIP-2935 to Shanghai fork #279

Closed
tkstanczak opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Proposal to add EIP-2935 to Shanghai fork #279

tkstanczak opened this issue Mar 18, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@tkstanczak
Copy link
Contributor

tkstanczak commented Mar 18, 2021

This EIP has been discussed on Peep an EIP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH5yuNd3B6o
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2935

It improves our ability to deliver various stateless client constructions and provides opportunity for smart contracts to use fact about the past state (without requiring additional storage)

@tkstanczak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Suspended until the Merge

@timbeiko timbeiko reopened this Oct 1, 2021
@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

timbeiko commented Oct 1, 2021

@tkstanczak re-opening just so that we have the list of currently proposed EIPs as open issues to go over it once the merge work has progressed more :-)

@RatanRSur
Copy link

Where is the latest info about the history accumulator that could serve as an alternative to this? I'm interested to see how involved of a change that is

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

@tkstanczak note that on #616 we agreed to use Ethereum Magicians to discuss potential Shanghai EIPs async over the next few weeks. See here for more info.

@holgerd77
Copy link

Can this be closed given the latest state from ACD yesterday?

@timbeiko
Copy link
Contributor

timbeiko commented Dec 8, 2022

We finalized the scope for Shanghai on ACD151, and discussions about Cancun inclusion should be moved to https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/cancun-eip-consideration/12060

@timbeiko timbeiko closed this as completed Dec 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants
@tkstanczak @holgerd77 @RatanRSur @timbeiko and others