-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal to add EIP-2935 to Shanghai fork #279
Comments
Suspended until the Merge |
@tkstanczak re-opening just so that we have the list of currently proposed EIPs as open issues to go over it once the merge work has progressed more :-) |
Where is the latest info about the history accumulator that could serve as an alternative to this? I'm interested to see how involved of a change that is |
@tkstanczak note that on #616 we agreed to use Ethereum Magicians to discuss potential Shanghai EIPs async over the next few weeks. See here for more info. |
Can this be closed given the latest state from ACD yesterday? |
We finalized the scope for Shanghai on ACD151, and discussions about Cancun inclusion should be moved to https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/cancun-eip-consideration/12060 |
This EIP has been discussed on Peep an EIP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH5yuNd3B6o
https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2935
It improves our ability to deliver various stateless client constructions and provides opportunity for smart contracts to use fact about the past state (without requiring additional storage)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: