Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REQUEST]: Add example of Fleet read only user and more #1688

Closed
tailorzed opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1697
Closed

[REQUEST]: Add example of Fleet read only user and more #1688

tailorzed opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1697

Comments

@tailorzed
Copy link

tailorzed commented Feb 21, 2025

Description

We would like to have an updated picture and example here, as we have Fleet with Read privilege in the UI as well. I checked version 8.16.0, but I suspect I have in an earlier version already.

Resources

  1. The page https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/fleet/current/fleet-roles-and-privileges.html contains info which is not up to date. The mention Read-only access to Fleet is not currently supported but is planned for development in a later release. seems to be incorrect as we have Read Fleet permissions

Image

  1. We should offer the JSON body which describes the permissions required to grant Fleet (all, read) and Integrations (all, read)

Collaboration

Please choose a preferred collaboration model.

Point of contact.

Main contact: @tailorzed

Stakeholders: @lucabelluccini

@lucabelluccini
Copy link
Contributor

FYI @kilfoyle - not urgent but it would be good to track

@kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor

@tailorzed
I've updated the Roles and Privileges page to show correct screen captures, and we now have examples of creating a full access and a read-only user. Thanks for letting me know that the page was outdated!

Required roles and privileges

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants