Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sensor config.on not implemented? #90

Closed
ebaauw opened this issue Aug 5, 2017 · 13 comments
Closed

Sensor config.on not implemented? #90

ebaauw opened this issue Aug 5, 2017 · 13 comments
Labels
Backlog This label is assigned if it is implemented later. Confirmed Bug

Comments

@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator

ebaauw commented Aug 5, 2017

When I set a sensor's config.on attribute to false, it's state continues to be updated. On the Hue bridge, setting config.on to false blocks updates to the sensor state. This is used by the Hue app to disable the Hue motion sensor.

@manup
Copy link
Member

manup commented Aug 5, 2017

Added to the todo list. Currently this is only possible by disabling the rules. The config.on makes sense and simplifies the task.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 23, 2018

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the WONTFIX label Nov 23, 2018
@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Nov 23, 2018

Still on the list, I hope.

@manup manup removed the WONTFIX label Nov 23, 2018
@manup
Copy link
Member

manup commented Nov 23, 2018

I thought this is already working :) need to check, so basically rules shouldn't be processed when the sensor is off. Should web socket events also be stopped?

@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Nov 23, 2018

If memory serves, the Hue bridge sets the state attributes to 0 or null or "none" or something and no longer accepts PUTs to CLIP sensors state.

@manup
Copy link
Member

manup commented Nov 23, 2018

Ok guess this should be compared in more detail, can be handy to disable some automations without messing too much with the existing rules.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 23, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Mar 23, 2019
@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Mar 23, 2019

Bump

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Mar 23, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 21, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Jul 21, 2019
@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Jul 21, 2019

Bump

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Jul 21, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 18, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Aug 3, 2020

Not solved.

@Mimiix Mimiix added the Backlog This label is assigned if it is implemented later. label Aug 3, 2020
@ebaauw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ebaauw commented Sep 4, 2024

I suppose we just need to document that setting config/on only disables firing of rules.

@ebaauw ebaauw closed this as completed Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Backlog This label is assigned if it is implemented later. Confirmed Bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants