Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publishing Test Gap #5167

Closed
2 tasks
missymessa opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks

Publishing Test Gap #5167

missymessa opened this issue Mar 31, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@missymessa
Copy link
Member

missymessa commented Mar 31, 2020

  • This issue is blocking
  • This issue is causing unreasonable pain

Add a step in Arcade Validation to do the following:

  • Promote using darc's add-build-to-channel the last successful runtime build, using the version of Arcade we're validating.
  • Build should be published to the General Testing channel.
@missymessa missymessa self-assigned this Jun 16, 2020
@missymessa
Copy link
Member Author

Need to have a broader discussion about how to implement these tests, as changes to publishing are coming.

@missymessa
Copy link
Member Author

Chatting with the Publishing v-team, we identified tests that should cover this:

Tests #1 and #2 will be handled by the Publishing epic, while #3 will be covered by the Validation epic.

  1. Arcade-services should have good unit test coverage for darc add-build-to-channel, as we’re depending more and more in this command.
  2. Arcade should have tests for the publishing projects. We can’t really exercise the YAML, but we can try and cover the msbuild tasks and proj files.
  3. Arcade-validation should exercise the code from the publishing branch of Arcade.

@missymessa
Copy link
Member Author

Going to promote the Arcade Validation build to General Testing to validate this scenario.

@missymessa missymessa mentioned this issue Jun 25, 2020
2 tasks
@missymessa
Copy link
Member Author

Merged. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant