-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 287
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WSL 1] Symlinks cause IO error on ntfs drive #6276
Comments
any update on this? |
We’ve fixed some file sharing bugs recently, have you tried with the latest Stable (2.3.0.3)? |
Issues go stale after 90 days of inactivity. Prevent issues from auto-closing with an If this issue is safe to close now please do so. Send feedback to Docker Community Slack channels #docker-for-mac or #docker-for-windows. |
@mat007 I've just upgraded to 2.3.0.5 from 2.1.x.x, and for me docker isn't even showing my symlinks: I'm using WSLv1, and would love to get this resolved - I also can't remove folders with symlinks, which causes commands like I've been stuck on 2.1.x.x due to a number of problems in the new file sharing system that I've been pleased to see get fixed - this looks like the last blocker so am very keen to see it resolved. (I'm hoping this is causing the problems in #7503 as well). Let me know if you'd like me to make a new ticket :) |
I've just downgraded to 2.1.0.5, which does result in the symlinks showing up but with the same problem described in the original issue: So @mat007 I'd say no 2.3.0.3 does not fix this :) I am at least able to remove these symlinks in 2.1.0.5, which means it's not as blocking. |
/lifecycle frozen |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Is the WSL 1 only? If so, it's a "Won't Fix". I know some people blogged about how to make WSL 1 work, but we have never supported it, and indeed advised against using it. |
@stephen-turner Yes this is with WSLv1 - I'll admit having it labeled as a "Won't Fix" is a little sad given that this was working enough in 2.1.0.5 to be usable, and that this is the first I've heard of WSLv1 not being supported and advised against. I know of a number of issues reported here for problems experienced on WSLv1 that were fixed - there was never any mention of it not being supported. As I've said this is the only blocker I know left for WSLv1 - is there any chance of getting some eyes on it to see if it could be an easy fix? I can't switch to WSLv2 until WSLG ships, which won't be for another year at least. |
Sorry, I'd love to say yes, but realistically we do not have capacity to look at any WSL 1 bugs. |
Closed issues are locked after 30 days of inactivity. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue. Send feedback to Docker Community Slack channels #docker-for-mac or #docker-for-windows. |
Short summary of issue
Creating a symlink on ntfs volume, and trying to access it within the container is causing IO error.
Repro steps below (Using ubuntu 18.04 bash on windows 10)
More details:
I noticed issue: #5582
I tried it on bleeding edge 2.2.3.0 also. similarly bad result.. The symlink is not even found..
I am able to consistently reproduce it..
This used to be working with
Docker Community Edition 18.06.1-ce-win73 2018-08-29
Stable - 2.2.05 & also edge 2.2.3.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: