-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: IPv6 support #6
Comments
Hey, @M96268004! On the ZeroTier VL1 level, all IPv6-enabled devices will work as expected, so you'll do not have any issues with IPv6-only public address devices. If you have special IPv6-only workflow, I'd like to know. Thank you! |
There hasn't been any activity on this issue recently, so we clean up some of the older and inactive issues. |
Hi, IPv6 Support would still be a desirable feature, atleast for some. |
Thanks for sharing your usecase. Well, I should reconsider about the IPv6 support in ZeroUI. |
One thing I'd like to mention is the optimisation of IPv6 in terms of big networks. With your support of taggs and flow rules and the use of IPv6 6plane in Zerotier Networks, I haven't digged deeper into the security yet, so I am not sure if this would hold up against possible security consernes, but this is the purpose for the tag and flowrule feature, right ? This could be done with one bigger IPv4 Network aswell of course, something like 172.30.0.0/16 would satisfy most, if not all networks that consider deploying something like Zerotier I'd assume. But using v4 one would loose the routable /80 network assigned to each node, which comes in as a big bonus for Server side networking imo. Adding to that, IPv4 was never really designed to handle such massive networks afaik. Btw, I currently deploy separate networks and use routing nodes for inter-network communication Another thing I'd like to add is the use of custom Global Unicast Addresses, And because this is inside Zerotier, every Node in that networks has its own static globally routable IPv6 address |
There hasn't been any activity on this issue recently, so we clean up some of the older and inactive issues. |
I have a specific use-case for IPv6 myself, we use it in production and use it in ztncui, it would be awesome to see it. Awesome work by the way! 👍🏻 |
There hasn't been any activity on this issue recently, so we clean up some of the older and inactive issues. |
There are a couple of levels of IPv6 support, I suspect the biggest missing feature is just a checkbox to enable:
Actually setting up IPv6 assignment pools is a separate issue that could be done at a later phase. For those of us using 6PLANE having just a checkbox to set the |
How do you do this? I would be interested in this feature too. |
Something like this (this is completely untested but should get you closer).
|
Feature Request
Describe the Feature Request
Thanks, the ui are great, will you plan to adding IPv6 support?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: