You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This version of the function does not get tested in testDynamics (instead, the no-argument version is tested), which is probably how this has gone unnoticed. For now, it's probably sufficient to just change each mV in the function to mA. The upcoming code where I created the Frame class already has tests for all of its different position, velocity, and acceleration functions, so we shouldn't have to worry about writing new tests to catch this stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noticed that this acceleration function has the same source code as this velocity function. This is most likely a copy/paste error.
This version of the function does not get tested in testDynamics (instead, the no-argument version is tested), which is probably how this has gone unnoticed. For now, it's probably sufficient to just change each mV in the function to mA. The upcoming code where I created the Frame class already has tests for all of its different position, velocity, and acceleration functions, so we shouldn't have to worry about writing new tests to catch this stuff.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: