Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2019. It is now read-only.

Custom {chainName} support #102

Closed
MicrowaveDev opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Custom {chainName} support #102

MicrowaveDev opened this issue Apr 17, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@MicrowaveDev
Copy link

Is it possible to support custom {chainName} by pass some parameters or configuration with network ports and the chain on which the network is based?

@hleb-albau
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Jonybang,
Do you mean add new chain(not ethereum based, or bitcoin based)? If so, then you need to write "pump" module(like for ethereum). Each chain has unique entities with unique fields, so there is no common chain integrator. Watch #92 issue progress for new chains integration guide.

@MicrowaveDev
Copy link
Author

For a start, I'd like to try to add my chain as ethereum based. In this case, do I need to write my own pump?

@hleb-albau
Copy link
Contributor

@Jonybang Yeah, nice catch, Right now it is possible to index only ethereum and ethereum classic chains. But, you can also index you chain under Ethereum name. So all api will be under /ethereum/xxxx. I think we should not use this enum and just take name from parameter.
We will do it next sprint, stay tuned and index under Ethereum name right now.

@hleb-albau
Copy link
Contributor

Should also provide same logic for cassandra service, search api, dump and contract summary.

@asadovka asadovka modified the milestone: Sprint 9 Apr 21, 2018
@hleb-albau hleb-albau removed this from the Sprint 9 milestone Apr 23, 2018
@cyberadmin cyberadmin added the Epic label May 8, 2018
@cyberadmin cyberadmin added this to the Sprint 10 milestone May 8, 2018
@hleb-albau
Copy link
Contributor

@asadovka asadovka modified the milestones: Sprint 10, Sprint 11 May 18, 2018
@arturalbov arturalbov modified the milestones: Sprint 11, Sprint 12 May 20, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants