Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Invalid stac-model version on PyPI #13

Closed
Tracked by #4
fmigneault opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #16
Closed
Tracked by #4

Invalid stac-model version on PyPI #13

fmigneault opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #16
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@fmigneault
Copy link
Collaborator

🐛 Bug Report

The https://pypi.org/project/stac-model/0.1.2/ version is released.
However, the code still refers to the previous prerelease:

[tool.poetry]
name = "stac-model"
version = "0.1.1.alpha4"

📈 Expected behavior

Released versions should match the code.

There should also be a git tag specifically to stac-model-vX.Y.Z, since other vX.Y.Z tags are reserved for the specification.

📎 Additional context

A conditional stage in https://github.com/crim-ca/mlm-extension/blob/main/.github/workflows/stac-model.yml should probably be added to automate the poetry publish --build operation when some stac-model-vX.Y.Z tag is applied (or a corresponding release is generated).

The release of a stac-model version should not conflict with the release steps for the specification.
Maybe a vX.Y.Z (spec) condition would have to be added to https://github.com/crim-ca/mlm-extension/blob/main/.github/workflows/publish.yaml

@fmigneault fmigneault added the bug Something isn't working label May 2, 2024
@fmigneault fmigneault changed the title Invalid stac_model version on PyPI Invalid stac-model version on PyPI May 2, 2024
@fmigneault fmigneault mentioned this issue May 7, 2024
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
2 participants