You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Top N chains should have an active set size cap once inactive provider validators are allowed to validate on them.
Without an active set size cap, those chains would potentially have an arbitrary number of validators.
Additionally, the active set size cap must not be smaller than the MaxProviderConsensusValidators, because of issues around
validators being forced to keep their nodes for the chain running without having an option to get rewards.
An alternative would be to make it so top N chains disable the inactive provider validator feature completely.
Closing criteria
The inactive validator set feature has a mitigation for this problem implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
Top N chains should have an active set size cap once inactive provider validators are allowed to validate on them.
Without an active set size cap, those chains would potentially have an arbitrary number of validators.
Additionally, the active set size cap must not be smaller than the
MaxProviderConsensusValidators
, because of issues aroundvalidators being forced to keep their nodes for the chain running without having an option to get rewards.
An alternative would be to make it so top N chains disable the inactive provider validator feature completely.
Closing criteria
The inactive validator set feature has a mitigation for this problem implemented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: