You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to account for the cases where a validator is unbonded and delegators are passively withdrawing. As per the existing mechanism anytime a change in bonded stake occurs all the tokens must be simultaneously withdrawn - when a validator is removed from the validator set this - all the tokens are no-longer bonded so a full withdrawal from that validator must occur, however because we want this to happen passively the validator should withdrawal to a validator unique validator pool.
This pool should effectively act as the proposer pool which is already specified and should interact with the same delegation adjustment factors in the same way which the adjustment factors are already spec'd to work under the bonded situation. 👍
Under the situation that the validator has been unbonded (moving fee-rewards to the described new pool) but then is bonded while there is still tokens in the validator-pool -> tokens from this pool should be added back into the global pool and appropriate adjustment factors applied.
Not 100% sure on the math here - but I'm certain it's not to far off from the existing mechanism
For slashing - this same mechanism is application. When you are slashed your are also unbonded so the pooling occurs in the same way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to account for the cases where a validator is unbonded and delegators are passively withdrawing. As per the existing mechanism anytime a change in bonded stake occurs all the tokens must be simultaneously withdrawn - when a validator is removed from the validator set this - all the tokens are no-longer bonded so a full withdrawal from that validator must occur, however because we want this to happen passively the validator should withdrawal to a validator unique validator pool.
This pool should effectively act as the proposer pool which is already specified and should interact with the same delegation adjustment factors in the same way which the adjustment factors are already spec'd to work under the bonded situation. 👍
Under the situation that the validator has been unbonded (moving fee-rewards to the described new pool) but then is bonded while there is still tokens in the validator-pool -> tokens from this pool should be added back into the global pool and appropriate adjustment factors applied.
Not 100% sure on the math here - but I'm certain it's not to far off from the existing mechanism
For slashing - this same mechanism is application. When you are slashed your are also unbonded so the pooling occurs in the same way.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: