Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better handling of missing -feedstock #215

Closed
jakirkham opened this issue Jul 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Better handling of missing -feedstock #215

jakirkham opened this issue Jul 3, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

It is pretty nice to be able to run this in the feedstocks repo. However, it seems some operations in conda-smithy (maybe all) expect to find the exact name of the repo from the directory name. It would be better if did one of the following.

  1. Added the postfix -feedstock if not found.
  2. Figured out the repo name from the remotes.
  3. Allowed the repo name to be specified exactly.
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

So have handled that in one case. ( #323 )

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

IMHO this seems to work ok these days. So will close this out. If others need these other points, please let us know and we can reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jakirkham