Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding support for direct byte-buffers #41

Open
luxbock opened this issue Oct 24, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Adding support for direct byte-buffers #41

luxbock opened this issue Oct 24, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@luxbock
Copy link

luxbock commented Oct 24, 2015

I really like the synergy between byte-streams and gloss, so I found it a bit odd that while byte-streams supports converting to a DirectByteBuffer via the options map, there doesn't seem to be way for gloss to create DirectByteBuffers from its codecs. Perhaps encode could accept an optional option map similar to how byte-streams/convert does?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant