You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I really like the synergy between byte-streams and gloss, so I found it a bit odd that while byte-streams supports converting to a DirectByteBuffer via the options map, there doesn't seem to be way for gloss to create DirectByteBuffers from its codecs. Perhaps encode could accept an optional option map similar to how byte-streams/convert does?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I really like the synergy between
byte-streams
andgloss
, so I found it a bit odd that whilebyte-streams
supports converting to a DirectByteBuffer via the options map, there doesn't seem to be way forgloss
to create DirectByteBuffers from its codecs. Perhapsencode
could accept an optional option map similar to howbyte-streams/convert
does?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: