Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Global Alliance Variant schema design decisions #61

Closed
larrybabb opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Global Alliance Variant schema design decisions #61

larrybabb opened this issue Mar 24, 2015 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@larrybabb
Copy link
Contributor

Here are some very interesting high level discussions on high level principles regarding variant representation that have a context in the fundamental principles of our canonicalization concept.

From Bob Millius at the National Marrow Donor Program

I showed the clingen model to some of our developers, and they asked me to share these links from the Global Alliance to the the HL7 CG group.

https://github.com/ga4gh/schemas

Much of the publicly accessible discussion is on github issues

basic standardisation - deletion alleles and start/stop coordinates
ga4gh/ga4gh-schemas#168

HGVS nomenclature benchmarking
ga4gh/ga4gh-schemas#215

Best practices for joining NGS-derived & clinical variation databases
ga4gh/ga4gh-schemas#159

but the real meat is in the schema itself

https://github.com/ga4gh/schemas/blob/master/src/main/resources/avro/variants.avdl

Bob


Bob Milius, Ph.D.
Senior Data Analyst, Bioinformatics Research
National Marrow Donor Program
3001 Broadway Street N. E. Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55413-1753

Office: 612-627-5844 | Cell: 612-810-2892

@larrybabb larrybabb changed the title Relevant external discussions from Global Alliance Global Alliance Variant schema design decisions Mar 24, 2015
@cbizon
Copy link
Contributor

cbizon commented Mar 24, 2015

Larry - other than the 0/1 discussion (and the relative size of the groups!) , is there a particular message that you would take from these discussions?

@larrybabb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did a cursory read through the the last issue on "Best practices for joining NGS-derived & clinical variation databases" and I came away thinking that we need to be involved with this group and these discussions. They seem to be moving very fast and have some great committed resources with tons of expertise. (but that's just an impression)

They do reference the idea of canonicalization along the way and seem somewhat dismissive of it, like it isn't available or can't be done realistically. Without a deep dive into the thread it is difficult to get a strong sense of the scope.

@larrybabb larrybabb modified the milestone: 0.1 May 1, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants