Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't use Cake 2.0.0 due to dependency chain of Cake.Frosting.Issues.Recipe 1.3.2 #253

Closed
donker opened this issue Feb 1, 2022 · 6 comments
Milestone

Comments

@donker
Copy link

donker commented Feb 1, 2022

We use Cake.Frosting.Issues.Recipe 1.3.2 and with VS 2022 need to update to Cake 2.0.0. But we're getting stuck as we also rely on Cake.Frosting.Issues.Recipe which in its chain doesn't accept Cake 2.0.0.

@pascalberger
Copy link
Member

Official support for Cake 2.x will come with Cake.Issues 2.0. In the meantime I'll release a version of Cake.Frosting.Issues.Recipe which contains a version of Cake.Frosting.Issues.Reporting.Generic which is still built against Cake 1.0 but is not restrict to be used with Cake 1.x only.

@bdukes
Copy link

bdukes commented May 5, 2022

Thanks! Is there an issue we can watch that's tracking Cake.Issues 2.0?

@pascalberger
Copy link
Member

There are issues for the different Cake.Issues addins. For some there are already 2.0 Beta versions available. If you want to track Cake.Issues.Recipe #256 would be the issue.

@pascalberger
Copy link
Member

Fixed with #257

@pascalberger
Copy link
Member

@bdukes Version 1.3.3 of Cake.Frosting.Issues.Recipe is now available which no longer restricts dependencies to Cake 1.x.

Please note that While this makes it possible from a technical point of view to use it with Cake 2.x, all addins in this version are still built against Cake 1.0 and there might be cases where it fails when running on Cake 2.x (I haven't experienced any yet)

@bdukes
Copy link

bdukes commented May 5, 2022

Thanks so much, we appreciate it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants