You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The 89 and previous version of Firefox under windows did not have the icon preceding the menu on the main bar.
The solution I'd like
Since some people may actually like the icon (I hate it, but I can see the appeal to some), a CSS property with a 1 or 0 might could be used to turn off the padding using multiplication. I am wondering if a negative margin can be used to hide the icon without removing it. Otherwise, notation as comment of the line number start for the rule to comment will have to suffice.
Alternatives I've considered
At the very least, add comment at the top that contains the line numbers to edit. Also, a prebuilt package with that variant would suffice as well, but yet one more thing to maintain.
Additional context
Thanks for making this in the first place. Saved me a ton of trouble.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wasn't aware of that particular feature, but I don't do a lot of work with the userChrome. It sounds like a plan at least. I'll take a look at the wiki in the morning. Thank you
Is your feature request related to a problem?
The 89 and previous version of Firefox under windows did not have the icon preceding the menu on the main bar.
The solution I'd like
Since some people may actually like the icon (I hate it, but I can see the appeal to some), a CSS property with a 1 or 0 might could be used to turn off the padding using multiplication. I am wondering if a negative margin can be used to hide the icon without removing it. Otherwise, notation as comment of the line number start for the rule to comment will have to suffice.
Alternatives I've considered
At the very least, add comment at the top that contains the line numbers to edit. Also, a prebuilt package with that variant would suffice as well, but yet one more thing to maintain.
Additional context
Thanks for making this in the first place. Saved me a ton of trouble.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: