-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verify Government accounts and service card use for misc reg/crown charges #6848
Comments
Relationships team to do analysis. PPR users can have a secondary level of access which would allow them to miscellaneous crown charge liens. These are essentially liens on behalf of the government. Currently these users are identified with a flag in BCOL. To look at
@PatrickAHeath @janisrogers to confirm if this access is for BCSC/BCeID and 2/FA accounts or Ministry Accounts (ministry government partners accessing with IDIR). |
PPR users have a flag similar to Vital Stats users in BCOL. It says whether a user has PPR access or not in their profile. <p32:queryProfileFlag name="PPR">Y</p32:queryProfileFlag> |
@amit4610 your comment above suggests the answer to the question I posed (#1 above) is yes, we can import flags. Knowing a flag exists is step 1. Did you verify we can import? Can we use the existing process for E-Wills (Vital Stats)? You'll need to confirm what effort this takes / whether a dependency ticket is needed. Next, you'll need to tackle the granting additional access (#2). The goal is to ensure there is full understanding of the other teams requirements so we can support our devs. Maybe you should plan a quick meeting with @PatrickAHeath and @janisrogers. It is also pertinent that you confirm timelines. Ideally we need these in the dependency tickets so @jyoti3286 has information for planning. |
@janisrogers says that there are two flags in BCOL currently:
These are only these two flags currently that restrict access to PPR. There will be people who don't have an IDIR, and also need access to the misc registration and crown charges. @PatrickAHeath @janisrogers to discuss with @Kaineatthelab what is good for MVP |
|
Fee structure (stat fee, service fee) for different products/type of filings for gov and non-gov users in PPR needs to be defined. @janisrogers @PatrickAHeath |
@sumesh-aot to put existing PR fee codes. |
|
Fee Code for Crown/Miscellaneous Act registrations: Type Code: PPR |
No stat fees, no service fee. These are only available to specific accounts, but everyone who has access to this have no fees. No payment at all. @amit4610 FYI. This ticket is to just implement:
Can this be placed in your next sprint, 9.2? @jyoti3286 Let @janisrogers know if not |
|
Fee code details sent to PPR team: • Number of fee codes, one or more : Asked Louise for the access to products for the 2 product types in BCOL for PPR |
@PatrickAHeath Which fee codes are the variable ones? |
@amit4610 variable fee code is something which we create in BCOL to use different amount combinations from the new system. Can you please clarify what exactly we are trying to find out here? PPR application doesn't need to know whether the fee code we use in BCOL is variable or not, that's abstracted away from PPR and is kept on the pay side. What we need here is; request a variable fee code to BCOL team with GL codes for PPR. |
@amit4610 FSREG and FSREN are the variable fee codes with fees of $5 per year for 1 to 25 years. |
Since FSREG and FSREN are the only variable fee codes from PPR, were these set in BCOL under a variable fee code? I see these 2 fee codes were worked upon in 6232. Does anything needs to be done for these two? By this "What we need here is; request a variable fee code to BCOL team with GL codes for PPR." you mean for FSREG and FSREN ? @sumesh-aot |
@amit4610 in new system there is no concept called variable fee code. For the above requirement, they can supply quantity to multiply with the base fees. |
Ok, your comments imply that we did not ask BCOL about the variable fee code in 6232. I will ask them. @sumesh-aot |
Tested and verified in TEST:
|
@sumesh-aot Is the RPPR product visible when viewing the account? Or is it hidden from the client? (Just trying to determine how to confirm it's active) |
Its not visible in UI, its hidden from client. That's what we have been told, @amit4610 please confirm. |
Yes, correct. The RPPR is only for those who already have access to it in the old system. So it is hidden for a new client. @PatrickAHeath @sumesh-aot |
@amit4610 @sumesh-aot For testing in PPR, how can we tell if it's set? Is it in a table somewhere? Also, we have TEST accounts already setup with a BCOL Account linked in prior to this enhancement - what do we have to do to link in the RPPR access? |
@PatrickAHeath So any account who linked BCOL account with PPR access will have this flag, its not displayed anywhere in UI, in auth-db you can see this in |
Who will do this work
Relationships team
for Assets team
Background
There are certain registrations in PPR under the Miscellaneous Registration Act that need to be restricted to certain users (I think these are mostly government users, could include others)
User story
Restrict access to certain registrations in PPR to certain groups of users
Acceptance Criteria
~~#### Scenario 1: ~~
* GIVEN I am a user who needs to access restricted registrations in PPR`* WHEN I set up access to PPR* THEN I can request access to restricted registrations(not for MVP)Scenario 1
Scenario 2:
Scenario 3:
Scenario 4:
Deadline
End of April 2021
Impact if deadline not met
Users will be unable to file restricted registrations
Contact Person
@janisrogers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: