Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[request]: A synchronous API #505

Open
jmklix opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 Discussed in #80 · 0 comments
Open

[request]: A synchronous API #505

jmklix opened this issue Apr 6, 2022 Discussed in #80 · 0 comments
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 This is a standard priority issue

Comments

@jmklix
Copy link
Member

jmklix commented Apr 6, 2022

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue, please leave a comment

Discussed in #80

Originally posted by rcoh May 13, 2021
In some cases, dealing with an async API is an unnecessary hassle. This discussion is a place to discuss the customer requirements for a sync API as well as general design considerations (eg. separate cargo feature, how does this work with streaming data, etc.)

@jmklix jmklix added the feature-request A feature should be added or improved. label Apr 6, 2022
@jdisanti jdisanti changed the title [request]: Pre RFC: A sync API [request]: A synchronous API Apr 7, 2022
@jmklix jmklix added the p2 This is a standard priority issue label Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request A feature should be added or improved. p2 This is a standard priority issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant