Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Aurora Serverless #980

Closed
dave-graham opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Feature Request: Aurora Serverless #980

dave-graham opened this issue Jun 17, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
area/new-resource Label for new resources being asked/proposed maintainer/need-response type/feature

Comments

@dave-graham
Copy link
Contributor

Hey,

Given the availability of aurora serverless and aurora serverless data api (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/AuroraUserGuide/data-api.html) making it simpler to manage permissions, are there any plans to pull aurora serverless into the SAM setup?

Dynamo is great for a number of things, but every now and then it would be useful to have a database we can run joins on.

Would also be great to have some aurora functionality in the SAM CLI.

If I have to set this up via another route, thats fine, just it would be nice to have all the infrastructure we can use for serverless in one place, as well as incorporate a number of bestg practice pieces that SAM provides.

@dave-graham dave-graham changed the title Aurora Serverless Feature Request: Aurora Serverless Jun 17, 2019
@keetonian
Copy link
Contributor

You can use the native cloudformation resources for Aurora in a SAM template. Are there any abstractions that you have in mind that you would like SAM to make for you when setting up an Aurora database?

@jfuss jfuss added the area/new-resource Label for new resources being asked/proposed label Mar 30, 2022
@aws aws locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 7, 2024
@jfuss jfuss converted this issue into discussion #3528 Feb 7, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
area/new-resource Label for new resources being asked/proposed maintainer/need-response type/feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants