Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIS Benchmark for Ubuntu 16.04 has been released #132

Open
erickt opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

CIS Benchmark for Ubuntu 16.04 has been released #132

erickt opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@erickt
Copy link

erickt commented Jan 18, 2017

FYI in case you all haven't seen that the latest benchmark has been released for Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial.

@adespain
Copy link

adespain commented Feb 6, 2017

Does this ansible role work with 16.04?

@awailly
Copy link
Owner

awailly commented Feb 6, 2017

Thanks for the pointer. I think it does not work for 16.04 out of the box. This project was focused on 14.04. Did you give it a try?

@adespain
Copy link

adespain commented Feb 9, 2017

@awailly I have tried it but it looks like a lot of them get skipped...I still need to play around with it, also do you know why the cis benchmark pdf download only shows 6 sections but your ansible playbook has 13 sections?

@eastokes
Copy link
Contributor

eastokes commented Feb 9, 2017

@adespain Version 1.0 of the CIS PDF has 13 sections, which this repo is written for. CIS PDF Version 2.0 for 14.04 was released along with the new 16.04 recommendations and was re-written with 6 sections. I haven't looked through what has changed with 2.0 yet.

@rubenrodr-versia
Copy link

I have adapted the new CIS version for 16.04 using your previous work and uber's mountopts library:
https://github.com/grupoversia/cis-ubuntu-ansible

@awailly
Copy link
Owner

awailly commented Mar 20, 2017

Awesome!

@elaske
Copy link

elaske commented Apr 18, 2017

@rubenrodr-versia Nice. However, your naming in that is off compared to the CIS PDF. I'll open an issue on your repo if you'd like.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants