From 0ea17f6f7b933e65e7dc23fd70d18a93c0fff215 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:51:38 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 01/17] Final copyedit of 6-0 --- .../6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" | 50 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git "a/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" "b/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" index 2192ef37..edde2cde 100644 --- "a/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" +++ "b/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" @@ -15,33 +15,47 @@ While we do not detail them here, we also expect fundamental effects in a wide r --- -The previous sections have sketched lofty visions of transforming a broad range of social systems. Yet however imaginative such futurism is, it can quickly feel empty and false if disconnected from the presently felt needs of real people today and pathways to address these needs while bringing systemic change. Furthermore, much of the rhetoric so far has focused on broad social systems like "democracy" that, while inspiring, can often feel distant from the lived experience or scope of agency of most people. +The previous parts of this book have sketched lofty visions of transforming a broad range of social systems. Yet however imaginative such futurism is, it can quickly feel impractical, empty, and false if disconnected from the presently felt needs of real people today and pathways to address these needs while bringing systemic change. Furthermore, much of the rhetoric so far has focused on broad social systems like "democracy" that, while inspiring, can often feel distant from the lived experience or scope of agency of most people. -In this section we therefore try to bring the potential impact of ⿻ down to the concrete challenges facing citizens, workers and leaders across a range of social activities and sectors. Before turning to specific such sectors, in this chapter we aim to sketch general contours of a ⿻ "theory of change", highlighting how these sectors are naturally and showing how and why experiments in these areas can prove both of direct value and capable of spreading to systemic, global empowerment of ⿻. +In this section we therefore try to bring the potential impact of ⿻ down to the concrete challenges facing citizens, workers and leaders across a range of social activities and sectors. Before turning to specific such sectors, in this chapter we aim to sketch general contours of a ⿻ "theory of change", highlighting how these sectors are natural starting points and showing how and why experiments in these areas can prove both of direct value and capable of spreading to systemic, global empowerment of ⿻. ### The graph structure of social revolutions -Radical social and technological change holds an irresistible allure to human imagination, yet so often ends in tragedy. Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way found in a recent analysis that not a single violent revolution in the twentieth century led to lasting democratic government.[^LevWay] Yet we can all think of many dramatic changes for the better in human history, from the dramatic advances in information and communications technologies of the twentieth century to the establishment of a diversity of free and democratic governments around the world over the last three hundred years. +Radical social and technological change holds an irresistible allure to human imagination, yet so often ends in tragedy, as the Beatles lamented in their social ballad "[Revolution](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGLGzRXY5Bw)". Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way found in a recent analysis that not a single violent revolution in the twentieth century led to lasting democratic government.[^LevWay] Yet we can all think of many dramatic changes for the better in human history, from the dramatic advances in information and communications technologies of the twentieth century to the establishment of a diversity of free and democratic governments around the world over the last three hundred years. -What allows for peaceful and beneficial revolutions? In her classic treatise on the topic, social philosopher Hannah Arendt contrasts the American and French Revolutions.[^OnRevolution] The American Revolution, she argues, grew out of local democratic experiments inspired by migrants exploring ancient ideals (both from their own past and, as we have recently learned, that of their new neighbors)[^GraeberWengrow] to build a life together in a new and often hazardous setting. As they traded ideas and built on related concepts circulating at the time, they came to a broad conclusion that they had discovered something more general about governance that contrasted to how it was practiced in Britain. This gave what Arendt calls "authority" (similar to what in our ["Association and ⿻ Publics"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/) chapter we call "legitimacy" or "common belief") to their expectations of democratic republican government. Their War of Independence against Britain allowed this authoritative structure to be empowered in a manner that, for all its inconsistencies, hypocrisies and failures, has been one of the more enduring and progressive examples of social reform. +What allows for peaceful and beneficial, yet dramatic, progress? In her classic treatise on the topic, social philosopher Hannah Arendt contrasts the American and French Revolutions.[^OnRevolution] The American Revolution, she argues, grew out of local democratic experiments inspired by migrants exploring ancient ideals (both from their own past and, as we have recently learned, that of their new neighbors) to build a life together in a new and often hazardous setting.[^GraeberWengrow] As they traded ideas and built on related concepts circulating at the time, they came to a broad conclusion that they had discovered something more general about governance that contrasted to how it was practiced in Britain. This gave what Arendt calls "authority" (similar to what in our ["Association and ⿻ Publics"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/) chapter we call "legitimacy") to their expectations of democratic republican government. Their War of Independence against Britain allowed this authoritative structure to be empowered in a manner that, for all its inconsistencies, hypocrisies and failures, has been one of the more enduring and progressive examples of social reform. -The French Revolution, on the other hand, was born of widespread popular dissatisfaction with material conditions, which they sought to redress immediately by seizing power, long before they had gained authority for, or even detailed, potential alternative forms of governance. While this led to dramatic social upheavals, many of these were quickly reversed and/or were accompanied by significant violence. In this sense, the French Revolution, while polarizing and widely discussed, failed in many of its core aspirations. By placing immediate material demands and the power to achieve them ahead of the process of building authority, the French Revolution burdened the delicate process of building social legitimacy for a new system with more weight than it could bear. +The French Revolution, on the other hand, was born of widespread popular dissatisfaction with material conditions, which they sought to redress immediately by seizing power, long before they had gained authority for, or even detailed, potential alternative forms of governance. While this led to dramatic social upheavals, many of these were quickly reversed and/or were accompanied by significant violence. In this sense, the French Revolution, while polarizing and widely discussed, failed in many of its core aspirations. By placing immediate material demands and the power to achieve them ahead of the process of building authority, the French Revolution burdened the delicate process of building social legitimacy for a new system with more weight than it could bear. The French revolution demanded, and got, bread; the American demanded, and got, freedom. -While Arendt's example is drawn from the political sphere, it resonates with literature on innovation in a wide range of fields from evolutionary biology to linguistics. While the precise results differ, this work all indicates that dramatic innovation thrives in environments where a diversity of "groups" (social or biological) that are internally tightly connected and externally loosely connected interact. This allows innovation to gain the necessary scale and show its resilience, and then to spread. More connected structures or more centralized ones either stifle innovation or make it dangerous, as changes are only occasionally net benefits. More disconnected structures do not allow innovation to spread. +While Arendt's example is drawn from the political sphere, it resonates with literature on innovation in a wide range of fields from evolutionary biology to linguistics. While the precise results differ, this work all indicates that dramatic innovation thrives in environments where a diversity of "groups" (e.g linguistic, economic or biological) that are internally tightly connected and externally loosely connected interact.[^NetworkStructure] This allows innovation to gain the necessary scale and show its resilience, and then to spread. More connected structures or more centralized ones either stifle innovation or make it dangerous, as changes are only occasionally net benefits. More disconnected structures do not allow innovation to spread. -While intuitive, these observations are a significant contrast to the model of experimentation and innovation increasingly discussed in both the science and social science literature on "randomized controlled trials" and the technology business literature on "blitzscaling", each of which we will consider in turn. Randomized controlled trials, derived primarily from individual, non-transmissible medical applications, focuses on the randomized testing of treatments across individuals or other social subgroups leading to an approval and then rapid disbursement of the treatment to all indicated patients as with, for example, Covid-19 vaccines. This literature has become increasingly influential throughout the social sciences, especially development economics and associated applied work on poverty alleviation. This has encouraged the spread of a model of "experimentation on" communities, where economic and design experts construct interventions and test them on communities that may benefit from them, evaluate them according to often preregistered metrics and then propagate thus-measured effective treatments more broadly. +[^NetworkStructure]: James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, "Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation", *Journal of Linguistics* 21, no. 2: 339-384. Gretchen McCulloch, *Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language* (New York: Riverhead, 2019). -This approach contrasts with "community-based", which also has provided a rough approximation to the way that many early digital technologies that laid the foundation for ⿻ later on(such as the time-sharing, personal computing, and many applications). As we discussed briefly in ["The Lost Dao"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/3-3/eng/) chapter, these began in communities of early adopters which usually included many of the system designers "experimenting with" digital tools. While these communities often had some nascent ideas of what their systems were good for, they rarely could reduce desired outcomes to pre-specified metrics and, in fact, many of the components of their systems were created by other early adopters. These systems spread to adjacent communities and eventually out to the public through many rounds of learning from the community in unexpected ways and feeding of such learning back into product designs, as well as the making available of applications created by communities. +While intuitive, these observations are a significant contrast to the model of experimentation and innovation increasingly discussed in both the science and social science literature on "[randomized controlled trials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trial)" and the technology business literature on "[blitzscaling](https://www.blitzscaling.com/)", each of which we will consider in turn. Randomized controlled trials, derived primarily from individual, non-transmissible medical and cognitive psychology applications, focuses on the randomized testing of treatments across individuals or other social subgroups leading to an approval and then rapid disbursement of the treatment to all indicated patients as with, for example, Covid-19 vaccines.[^Rubin] This literature has become increasingly influential throughout the social sciences, especially development economics and associated applied work on poverty alleviation.[^Poor] This has encouraged the spread of a model of "experimentation on" communities, where economic and design experts construct interventions and test them on communities that may benefit from them, evaluate them according to often preregistered metrics and then propagate thus-measured effective treatments more broadly. +[^Rubin]: Donald B. Rubin, "Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies," *Journal of Educational Psychology* 66, no. 5: 688-701. +[^Poor]: Abhijit V. Banerjee and Esther Duflo, *Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Poverty* (New York: PublicAffairs, 2011). -"Experimentation on" and "experimentation with" each clearly have their strengths and drawbacks. But the latter mode has become increasingly inconsistent and even dangerous given the style of adoption spread that is sought in today's venture capital fueled digital technology industry. Venture capitalists like LinkedIn Founder Reid Hoffman have celebrated the "masters of scale" who champion "blitzscaling", in which start-ups receive large, early injections of venture financing to allow them to invest in growing their user base rapidly and and then leveraging the benefits of this supermodularity (e.g. network effects, learning from user data, etc.) to achieve a dominant market position. Perhaps the most dramatic example of this was Hoffman-backed OpenAI, which achieved 100 million users within a few months of launching its ChatGPT. Such rapid adoption led to the widespread public concern about the potential social harms from such systems and regulation aimed at avoiding the cycle of "move fast and break things" and the earlier round of social backlash that accompanied comparatively slower-growing technologies (like ride hailing and social media). +This approach contrasts with "community-based innovation" allied to academic "Participatory Action Research" (PAR), pioneered in public rather than individual health research, which also has provided a rough approximation to the way that many early digital technologies that laid the foundation for ⿻ later on (such as the time-sharing, personal computing, and many applications).[^PAR] As we discussed briefly in ["The Lost Dao"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/3-3/eng/) chapter, these began in communities of early adopters which usually included many of the system designers "experimenting with" digital tools. While these communities often had some nascent ideas of what their systems were good for, they rarely could reduce desired outcomes to pre-specified metrics and, in fact, many of the components of their systems were created by other early adopters. These systems spread to adjacent communities and eventually out to the public through many rounds of learning from the community in unexpected ways and feeding of such learning back into product designs, as well as the making available of applications created by communities. -The basic challenge is that "experimentation with" is dangerous when paired with a fully capitalist market driven model of managing new technologies. Because it seeks to manage system harms, challenges and interdependencies as they arise, rather than by *a priori* testing, it requires that the development process itself be driven by a more holistic notion of the technology's impact on the adopting community than sales or adoption figures allow. This is precisely what many of the early ⿻ experiments discussed in ["The Lost Dao"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/3-3/eng/) aimed to provide, through involvement of many social sectors and standardization processes, with commercial involvement tightly circumscribed. Yet even this more balanced version of "experimentation with" falls short of the highest aspirations we might have for the safe and inclusive development of technologies that eventually aspire to be globally transformative, but which may carry significant risks. +[^PAR]: Fran Baum, Colin MacDougall and Danielle Smith, "Participatory Action Research", *Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health* 60, no. 10: 854-857. -In particular, even when technologies are successfully developed in the interests of the communities harnessing them, accounting for all the systemic harms they may create in these communities, they still may have significant spillovers on those not among this early adopter community. The key danger is that technologies may be usable as weapons or otherwise harnessed by the community to benefit at the expense of others, a far more common effect than may appear at first glance because even "helpful" and "harmless" tools may endow the (often-privileged) early adopted community with social and economic advantages that they can use to subjugate, marginalize or colonize others. This "competitive" effect has some benefits, in spurring adoption by and spread across communities seeking to harness the benefit of the tools partly in their rivalry and potentially by doing so creating pressure to harness and resolve resulting rivalries. But it can also, at best, create exclusion and inequality that undermines the basis of ⿻ freedom and, at worst, can lead to "arms race" dynamics that undermine the benefits of new tools and instead turn them into universal dangers. +"Experimentation on" and "experimentation with" each clearly have their strengths and drawbacks. But the latter mode has become increasingly inconsistent and even dangerous given the style of adoption spread that is sought in today's venture capital fueled digital technology industry. Venture capitalists like LinkedIn Founder [Reid Hoffman](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reid_Hoffman) have celebrated the "masters of scale" who champion "blitzscaling", in which start-ups receive large, early injections of venture financing to allow them to invest in growing their user base rapidly and and then leveraging the benefits of this supermodularity (e.g. network effects, learning from user data, etc.) to achieve a dominant market position.[^Blitz] Perhaps the most dramatic example of this was Hoffman-backed OpenAI, which achieved 100 million users within a few months of launching its ChatGPT. Such rapid adoption led to [widespread public concern](https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/) about the potential social harms from such systems and regulation aimed at avoiding the cycle of "move fast and break things" and the social backlash that accompanied comparatively earlier, slower-growing technologies (like ride hailing and social media).[^pause] + +[^Blitz]: Reid Hoffman and Chris Yeh, *Blitzscaling: The Lightening-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies* (New York: Currency, 2018). For a thoughtful and balanced evaluation see Donald F. Kuratko, Harrison L. Holt and Emily Neubert, "Blitzscaling: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly", *Business Horizons* 63, no. 1 (2020): 109-119. +[^pause]: Future of Life Institute, "Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter" March 22, 2023 at https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/. + +The basic challenge is that "experimentation with" is dangerous when paired with a fully capitalist market driven model of managing new technologies. Because it seeks to manage system harms, challenges and interdependencies as they arise, rather than by *a priori* testing, it requires that the development process itself be driven by a more holistic notion of the technology's impact on the adopting community than sales or adoption figures allow.[^Lensman] This is precisely what many of the early ⿻ experiments discussed in ["The Lost Dao"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/3-3/eng/) aimed to provide, through involvement of many social sectors and standardization processes, with commercial scaling circumscribed. Yet even this more balanced version of "experimentation with" falls short of the highest aspirations we might have for the safe and inclusive development of technologies that eventually aspire to be globally transformative, but which may carry significant risks. + +[^Lensman]: Daron Acemoglu and Todd Lensman, *Regulating Tranformative Technologies* (2023) at https://www.nber.org/papers/w31461. + + +In particular, even when technologies are successfully developed in the interests of the communities harnessing them, accounting for all the systemic harms they may create in these communities, they still may have significant spillovers on those not among this early adopter community. The key danger is that technologies may be usable as weapons or otherwise harnessed by the community to benefit at the expense of others, a far more common effect than may appear at first glance because even "helpful" and "harmless" tools may endow the (often-privileged) early adopted community with social and economic advantages that they can use to subjugate, marginalize or colonize others. As Microsoft's President Brad Smith frequently repeats, most tools can also be used as weapons.[^toolsweapons] This "competitive" effect has some benefits, in spurring adoption by and spread across communities seeking to harness the benefit of the tools partly in their rivalry and potentially by doing so creating pressure to harness and resolve resulting rivalries. But it can also, at best, create exclusion and inequality that undermines the basis of ⿻ freedom and, at worst, can lead to "arms race" dynamics that undermine the benefits of new tools and instead turn them into universal dangers. + +[^toolsweapons]: Brad Smith and Carol Ann Browne, *Tools and Weapons: The Promise and the Peril of the Digital Age* (New York: Penguin, 2019). A natural way to overcome this tendency is for the technology to develop in rough balance across primary existing social divides, allowing a network of participants to both govern its internal harms but also to resolve the potentially competing interests of the groups represented in accessing and directing the technology. At the same time, for such spread to be effective, early adopters have to hold sufficient prestige or be able to gain it through the benefits of the tools that, in a roughly balanced way across their respective networks, the technology can spread. @@ -53,7 +67,7 @@ This sketches an ambitious but reasonably clear picture of what a ⿻ strategy f 4. Seeds should be strong communities with institutions to manage and address the systemic harms and support the systemic benefits of the technologies. 5. Seeds should be diverse among themselves and have loose networks of communication between them to ensure a balanced diffusion, avoid conflict and address spillovers. -While it is obviously impossible to perfectly achieve these five goals simultaneously, each challenging in itself, they provide a rough "north star" to guide towards as we consider sectors for impact of ⿻. Furthermore, to illustrate that trying to achieve them is not impractical, we implemented using these criteria in marketing this book (viz. in choosing endorsements to pursue, media to seek coverage in, events to hold etc.), an approach we refer to as ⿻ Marketing. While fully illustrating this is complex, we illustrate our approach to the last criterion in the figure. We took our full audience, tried to consider the primary lines of division within it and then chose a marketing vector (such as an endorser) with respect across these lines of division, then recursively applied this approach to each sub-community; the figure shows the categories thus generated two levels deep into the associated "tree". As to whether the result of this approach was effective and whether we did a good job implementing this, you should be able to judge on reading this book and its endorsements better than we can at the time of writing this! +While it is obviously impossible to perfectly achieve these five goals simultaneously, each challenging in itself, they provide a rough "north star" to guide towards as we consider sectors for impact of ⿻. Furthermore, to illustrate that trying to achieve them is not impractical, we implemented using these criteria in marketing this book (viz. in choosing endorsements to pursue, media to seek coverage in, events to hold etc.), an approach we refer to as ⿻ Marketing. While fully illustrating this is complex, we show our approach to the last criterion in the figure. We took our full audience, tried to consider the primary lines of division within it and then chose a marketing vector (such as an endorser) with respect across these lines of division, then recursively applied this approach to each sub-community; the figure shows the categories thus generated two levels deep into the associated "tree". As to whether the result of this approach was effective and whether we did a good job implementing this, you should be able to judge on reading this book and its endorsements better than we can at the time of writing this! As in many parts of this project, we invite you to experiment and learn with us. @@ -65,13 +79,13 @@ While it is obviously impossible to perfectly achieve these five goals simultane ### Fertile ground -Let us first consider the question of scale. To realize the benefits of ⿻ technology within a community requires the community to contain at least a rough approximation of the diversity that technology aims to span. This differs dramatically across various directions of technology. The most intimate technologies of post-symbolic communication and immersive shared reality can be powerful even in the smallest communities and relationships, creating few constraints on scale and diversification of seeing and thus making it natural to prioritize other criteria above. At the opposite extreme, voting systems and markets are rarely used in intimate communities and require significant scale to be relevant, especially in their socially enriched forms, making entry points far scarcer, more ambitious, and potentially hazardous. +Let us first consider the question of scale. To realize the benefits of ⿻ technology within a community requires the community to contain at least a rough approximation of the diversity that technology aims to span. This differs dramatically across various directions of technology. The most intimate technologies of [post-symbolic communication](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-1/eng/?mode=dark) and [immersive shared reality](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-2/eng/?mode=dark) can be powerful even in the smallest communities and relationships, creating few constraints on scale and diversification of seeding and thus making it natural to prioritize other criteria above. At the opposite extreme, voting systems and markets are rarely used in intimate communities and require significant scale to be relevant, especially in their socially enriched forms, making entry points far scarcer, more ambitious, and potentially hazardous.
Bubbles filled with smaller bubbles, some of which contain symbols of the social areas of workplace, media, health and environment.
Bubbles filled with smaller bubbles, some of which contain symbols of the social areas of workplace, media, health and environment.


-However, given the reasonable flexibility across scales of most ⿻ technologies, the most broadly attractive sites for experimentation will be those that both contain enough diversity to enable most applications and are themselves sufficiently diverse to allow reasonable choice of diverse, safe, prestigious seeds. While any simplistic quantitative representation falls short of the richness needed to characterize such examples, a simple rule of thumb is to seek for roughly the same diversity *of communities* as *within communities* as quantified by the number of units as illustrated in the figure. In a world of (very roughly) 10 billion people, these would be units of roughly 100,000 people, as there are 100,000 such units if the whole world were partitioned into them: they have the scale of the square root of global population. There is, of course, nothing magic about 100,000, but it offers a rough sense for the scale of communities and organizations that are the most fertile ground in which to plant the seeds of ⿻. + However, given the reasonable flexibility across scales of most ⿻ technologies, the most broadly attractive sites for experimentation will be those that both contain enough diversity *within them* to enable most applications and are themselves sufficiently diverse *across them* to allow reasonable choice of diverse, safe, prestigious seeds. While any simplistic quantitative representation falls short of the richness needed to characterize such examples, a simple rule of thumb is to seek for roughly the same diversity *across communities* as *within communities* as quantified by the number of units as illustrated in the figure. In a world of (very roughly) 10 billion people, these would be units of roughly 100,000 people, as there are 100,000 such units if the whole world were partitioned into them: they have the scale of the square root of global population. There is, of course, nothing magic about 100,000, but it offers a rough sense for the scale of communities and organizations that are the most fertile ground in which to plant the seeds of ⿻. There are many kinds of communities at this scale. Geographically, this is roughly the scale of most middle-sized municipalities (large towns or small cities). Economically, it is the size of employees in a large corporation or, politically, in a median nation. Religiously, it is, for example, roughly the number of Catholics in a Diocese. Educationally, it is a bit larger than the number of students at a large university. Socially, it resembles the membership of many mid-sized civic organizations or social movements. Culturally, it is roughly the active fan base of a typical television program, performing artist or professional sports club. In short, it is a prevalent level of organization in a wide range of social spheres, offering rich terrain for surveying. @@ -80,14 +94,14 @@ There are many kinds of communities at this scale. Geographically, this is roug Perhaps the two most prominent sites of experimentation with ⿻ we have highlighted above are Taiwan and web3 communities. These two sites share some important characteristics, and yet also sharply diverge in many ways both in terms of their character and the ⿻ applications they have focused on. Both are roughly the same size. In 2021, web3 applications (dApps) had about 1.5 million monthly active users, though only a fraction of these have actively participated in the most ⿻-adjacent services, such as GitCoin. The ⿻ services of all kinds built by the g0v community in Taiwan have reached similar numbers [^TaiwanCommunity]. The types of diversity in each community, however, are radically different. -While statistics are not entirely reliable, web3 users are spread quite broadly around the globe according to patterns similar to the internet broadly. However, users tend to be extremely technically sophisticated, skew male, very young and, anecdotally based on our experience in the space [^StateofCrypto], tend to be atheistic, politically right of center and ethnically of European, Semitic and Asian origin. Participants in the Taiwanese digital ecosystem are obviously mostly from Taiwan and thus mostly of the ethnicities represented there. But they are more diverse in age, technical background, political perspective and religious background [^Web3Inclusivity]. +While statistics are not entirely reliable, web3 users are spread quite broadly around the globe according to patterns similar to the internet broadly. However, users tend to be extremely technically sophisticated, skew male, very young and, anecdotally based on our experience in the space , tend to be atheistic, politically right of center and ethnically of European, Semitic and Asian origin.[^StateofCrypto] Participants in the Taiwanese digital ecosystem are obviously mostly from Taiwan and thus mostly of the ethnicities represented there. But they are more diverse in age, technical background, political perspective and religious background.[^Web3Inclusivity] The two ecosystems have also focused on different sides of the spectrum of ⿻ we discussed in the previous part of the book. Taiwan has focused primarily on the deeper and narrower applications of ⿻ and the fundamental protocols (identity and access) that support these most strongly. Global web3 communities have focused on the shallower and more inclusive applications and the fundamental protocols (association, commerce and contract) that most support these. Both have been critical early testbeds for ⿻, yet measuring them against our criteria also illustrates their limitations. The Taiwan ecosystem is larger than required for many of the applications developed there, which is likely why it has hosted a range of subcommunities (that they often call "data coalitions") engaging in more advanced experiments supported by the broader ecosystem. The Taiwan ecosystem has strong potential for prestige in Asia and many of the countries typically called democracies, while the geopolitical conflicts surrounding it create some challenges in making it a seed for fully equitable global spread. Web3 communities, on the other hand, may actually be a bit small and homogeneous to allow for a fully robust test of whether new market institutions can rival the reach of capitalism. Furthermore, many of the scandals that have plagued the web3 space endanger its ability to generally serve as a beacon of innovation that can equitably spread. -It is therefore crucial to carefully consider which places might be the most promising for ⿻ to spread next. One obvious example, that pervades our discussions so far, is the governance of cities. Yet precisely because we have drawn on such public sector examples so heavily thus far, we focus in this part of the book on a diversity of social sectors where ⿻ can seed reality that touch a much broader range of life than the narrow definition of public sector "democracy". In doing so, we focus on matching the scales mentioned above and covering a broad range of life experiences, while attending to areas with respect and prestige in a broad range of societies. +It is therefore crucial to carefully consider which places might be the most promising for ⿻ to spread next. One obvious example, that pervades our discussions so far, is the governance of cities. Yet precisely because we have drawn on such public sector examples so heavily thus far, we focus in this part of the book on a diversity of social sectors where ⿻ can seed reality that touch a much broader range of life than the narrow definition of public sector "democracy". In doing so, we aim to match the scales mentioned above and covering a broad range of life experiences, while attending to areas with respect and prestige in a broad range of societies. In particular, we consider, as symbolized also in the figure above: 1. Workplace, which is a highly influential sector because so much of the capitalist economy is driven by it. Again, especially in the largest companies, finding scale matches is quite straightforward. @@ -100,8 +114,8 @@ In each of these domains we highlight through a series of vignettes and attempt [^LevWay]: Steven Levitsky, and Lucan Way, _Revolution and Dictatorship_, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2022). -[^GraeberWengrow]: David Graeber, and David Wengrow, _The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity_, (New York: Farrar, Straus And Giroux, 2021). -[^OnRevolution]: Hannah Arendt, _On Revolution_, (New York: Penguin, 1990). +[^GraeberWengrow]: David Graeber, and David Wengrow, op. cit. +[^OnRevolution]: Hannah Arendt, _On Revolution_, (New York: Penguin, 1963). [^Web3Inclusivity]: Austin, Sarah. “Web3 Is About More Than Tech, Thanks to Its Inclusivity.” Entrepreneur, June 3, 2022. https://www.entrepreneur.com/science-technology/web3-is-about-more-than-tech-thanks-to-its-inclusivity/425679. [^StateofCrypto]: a16zcrypto. “State of Crypto 2023.” Https://A16z.Com. Andressen Horowitz, 2023. https://api.a16zcrypto.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/State-of-Crypto.pdf. [^TaiwanCommunity]: Friedrich Naumann Foundation. “Examples of Civic Tech Communities-Governments Collaboration Around The World,” n.d. https://www.freiheit.org/publikation/examples-civic-tech-communities-governments-collaboration-around-world. From 382f47cbda42f62179df3520f8beef2c41cb8a0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:15:39 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 02/17] Adding a citation --- "contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git "a/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" "b/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" index edde2cde..4a1add00 100644 --- "a/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" +++ "b/contents/english/6-0-from-\342\277\273-to-reality.md" @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ The French Revolution, on the other hand, was born of widespread popular dissati While Arendt's example is drawn from the political sphere, it resonates with literature on innovation in a wide range of fields from evolutionary biology to linguistics. While the precise results differ, this work all indicates that dramatic innovation thrives in environments where a diversity of "groups" (e.g linguistic, economic or biological) that are internally tightly connected and externally loosely connected interact.[^NetworkStructure] This allows innovation to gain the necessary scale and show its resilience, and then to spread. More connected structures or more centralized ones either stifle innovation or make it dangerous, as changes are only occasionally net benefits. More disconnected structures do not allow innovation to spread. -[^NetworkStructure]: James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, "Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation", *Journal of Linguistics* 21, no. 2: 339-384. Gretchen McCulloch, *Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language* (New York: Riverhead, 2019). +[^NetworkStructure]: R. A. Fisher, *The Genetical Theory of Natural Seleciton* (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1930). James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, "Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation", *Journal of Linguistics* 21, no. 2: 339-384. Gretchen McCulloch, *Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language* (New York: Riverhead, 2019). Daron Acemoglu, Asuman Ozdaglar and Sarath Pattathil, "Learning, Diversity and Adaptation in Changing Environments: The Role of Weak Links" (2023) at https://www.nber.org/papers/w31214. While intuitive, these observations are a significant contrast to the model of experimentation and innovation increasingly discussed in both the science and social science literature on "[randomized controlled trials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomized_controlled_trial)" and the technology business literature on "[blitzscaling](https://www.blitzscaling.com/)", each of which we will consider in turn. Randomized controlled trials, derived primarily from individual, non-transmissible medical and cognitive psychology applications, focuses on the randomized testing of treatments across individuals or other social subgroups leading to an approval and then rapid disbursement of the treatment to all indicated patients as with, for example, Covid-19 vaccines.[^Rubin] This literature has become increasingly influential throughout the social sciences, especially development economics and associated applied work on poverty alleviation.[^Poor] This has encouraged the spread of a model of "experimentation on" communities, where economic and design experts construct interventions and test them on communities that may benefit from them, evaluate them according to often preregistered metrics and then propagate thus-measured effective treatments more broadly. From 20a5b25af0349c127adf0028c191a2a9dc7d05dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:38:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 03/17] Final copyedit of 6-1 --- contents/english/6-1-workplace.md | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/contents/english/6-1-workplace.md b/contents/english/6-1-workplace.md index 9d21ecf0..d82da565 100644 --- a/contents/english/6-1-workplace.md +++ b/contents/english/6-1-workplace.md @@ -2,43 +2,55 @@ -More than a billion people worldwide work outside their homes in formal organizations with at least a few other people. These "workplaces" produce about 70% of global output and are the first thing most people think of when they hear "economy". Just as we consider the vast contribution of workplaces to the global economy, it's essential to address inefficiencies that hinder productivity. U.S. workers spend an average of 31 hours per month in meetings deemed unproductive, a significant drain on both time and resources[^meeting-stats]. If ⿻ is to help re-imagine the economy, it must restructure formal work, which we turn to in this chapter. +More than a billion people worldwide work outside their homes in formal organizations with at least a few other people.[^Formal] These "workplaces" produce about 70% of global output and are the first thing most people think of when they hear "economy". Just as we consider the vast contribution of workplaces to the global economy, it is essential to address inefficiencies that hinder productivity. U.S. workers spend an average of 31 hours per month in meetings deemed unproductive, a significant drain on both time and resources.[^meeting-stats] If ⿻ is to help re-imagine the economy, it must restructure formal work, which we turn to in this chapter. + +[^ILO]: International Labor Organization, " World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends" (2023) at https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_865387.pdf. The advances we discuss, which are just a sampling of potential implications of ⿻ in the workplace, cover strengthening remote teams, designing effective corporate campuses, improving communication, accessing talent more inclusively and supporting more effective provision of common corporate infrastructure and more dynamic adaptation to changing industries. We estimate that the first four of these components could increase global gross domestic product by approximately 10% in total and that the last might permanently increase the GDP growth rate by half a percentage point a year.[^Calc] +--- + ### Strong remote teams -The Covid-19 pandemic transformed the world of work, bringing changes expected for decades to fruition in a year. A leading study by Barreto et al., for example, found that work from home rose from 5% of the American workforce to a high above 60%.[^Barreto] Perhaps the most extreme manifestation has been the rise of so-called "digital nomads", who have harnessed the increasing opportunity for remote work to travel continuously and work a variety of remote jobs as encouraged by programs like Sardinia regional program for digital nomads and Estonia and Taiwan's e-citizenship and gold cards respectively, that one author of this book holds. While there has been substantial return to physical work since the end of the pandemic, at least a part of the change appears here to stay; Barreto et al. find that after the pandemic, workers on average want to work about half the week from home and believe their productivity is similar or better in that setting. While some studies have found some evidence of mildly reduced productivity, these effects do not seem large enough to overcome the persistent demands for hybrid work styles.[^reduce-productivity] +The Covid-19 pandemic transformed the world of work, bringing changes expected for decades to fruition in a year. A leading study by Barreto et al., for example, found that work from home rose from 5% of the American workforce to a high above 60%.[^Barreto] Perhaps the most extreme manifestation has been the rise of so-called "digital nomads", who have harnessed the increasing opportunity for remote work to travel continuously and work a variety of remote jobs as encouraged by programs like Sardinia regional program for digital nomads and Estonia and Taiwan's [e-citizenship](https://www.e-resident.gov.ee/) and [gold cards](https://goldcard.nat.gov.tw/en/) respectively, that one author of this book holds. While there has been substantial return to physical work since the end of the pandemic, at least a part of the change appears here to stay; Barreto et al. find that after the pandemic, workers on average want to work about half the week from home and believe their productivity is similar or better in that setting. While some studies have found some evidence of mildly reduced productivity, these effects do not seem large enough to overcome the persistent demands for hybrid work styles.[^reduce-productivity] + +Yet there is little question that remote work has real downsides. Some of these, such as ensuring work-life balance, avoiding distractions and unhealthy at-home working conditions, are not easily addressed through remote collaboration tools. But many others are: lack of organic interactions with colleagues, missing opportunities for feedback or forming deeper personal connections with colleagues, etc.[^remote-shift-impact] While ⿻ can be used to address most of these, we will focus on one in particular: the building of strong and deeply trusting teams. -Yet there is little question that remote work has real downsides. Some of these, such as ensuring work-life balance, avoiding distractions and unhealthy at-home working conditions, are not easily addressed through remote collaboration tools. But many others are: lack of organic interactions with colleagues, missing opportunities for feedback or forming deeper personal connections with colleagues, etc. [^remote-shift-impact] While ⿻ can be used to address most of these, we will focus on one in particular: the building of strong and deeply trusting teams. +Remote immersive shared reality (ISR) significantly enhances team building and training across disciplines by facilitating collaborative and creative teamwork in virtual environments. Global collaboration in virtual environments has been effective for interdisciplinary teamwork, particularly in healthcare education[^healthcare], highlighting its utility in overcoming geographic barriers.[^GlobalCollab] Virtual worlds foster team creativity by providing avatars for personal expression, immersive experiences for co-presence, and tools for modifying environments, enhancing creative collaboration across distributed teams.[^TeamCreativityInVirtual] Furthermore, 3D virtual worlds and games, like those developed in [Second Life](https://secondlife.com/) for team building, offer cost-effective solutions for enhancing communication, emotional engagement, and situational awareness among team members, proving essential for teamwork in safety-critical domains.[^Game4TeamBuilding][^VirtualTeamWork] -Remote shared reality significantly enhances team building and training across disciplines by facilitating collaborative and creative teamwork in virtual environments. Global collaboration in virtual environments has been effective for interdisciplinary teamwork, particularly in healthcare education[^healthcare], highlighting its utility in overcoming geographic barriers [^GlobalCollab]. Virtual worlds foster team creativity by providing avatars for personal expression, immersive experiences for co-presence, and tools for modifying environments, enhancing creative collaboration across distributed teams [^TeamCreativityInVirtual]. Furthermore, 3D virtual worlds and games, like those developed in Second Life for team building, offer cost-effective solutions for enhancing communication, emotional engagement, and situational awareness among team members, proving essential for teamwork in safety-critical domains [^Game4TeamBuilding][^VirtualTeamWork]. +In-person teams often engage in a variety of joint learnings or other not-directly-productive activities to build team trust, connection and spirit. These range from casual lunches to various kinds of extreme team sports, such as "trust falls"[^TrustFall], simulated military exercises, ropes courses, etc. What nearly all these have in common is that they create a shared activity that benefits from and thus helps develop trust among members, in a similar manner to the way we discussed shared military service developing strong and lasting cooperative bonds in the [Post-Symbolic Communication](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-1/eng/?mode=dark) chapter. -In-person teams often engage in a variety of joint learnings or other not-directly-productive activities to build team trust, connection and spirit. These range from casual lunches to various kinds of extreme team sports, such as "trust falls"[^TrustFall], simulated military exercises, ropes courses, etc. What nearly all these have in common is that they create a shared activity that benefits from and thus helps develop trust among members, in a similar manner to the way we discussed shared military service developing strong and lasting cooperative bonds in the "Post-Symbolic Communication" chapter. +Obviously most such activities currently rely heavily on being in person, thus many hybrid and fully remote teams, especially those that have many members who started as remote employees, miss the team-building benefits created by such activities or can achieve them only at considerable travel expense. ISR offers significant potential for overcoming this challenge. Lunches among sufficiently realistic avatars, ones reflecting detailed facial expressions for example, may soon help bring the rich connections achieved in the office within the reach of remote teams. While it would seem impossible to achieve the vivid connections of parties or extreme sports in remote shared reality, there is increasingly strong evidence that real experiences of fear and trust can develop in sufficiently realistic simulated environments.[^fear] As "e-sports" begin to rival the popularity and, in the right ISR environments, physical intensity of in-person physical sports, the benefits of "campus athletics" may increasingly make their way to remote work. -Obviously most such activities currently rely heavily on being in person, thus many hybrid and fully remote teams, especially those that have many members who started as remote employees, miss the team-building benefits created by such activities or can achieve them only at considerable travel expense. Remote shared reality offers significant potential for overcoming this challenge. Lunches among sufficiently realistic avatars, ones reflecting detailed facial expressions for example, may soon help bring the rich connections achieved in the office within the reach of remote teams. While it would seem impossible to achieve the vivid connections of parties or extreme sports in remote shared reality, there is increasingly strong evidence that real experiences of fear and trust can develop in sufficiently realistic simulated environments. As "e-sports" begin to rival the popularity and, in the right remote shared reality environments, physical intensity of in-person physical sports, the benefits of "campus athletics" may increasingly make their way to remote work. +[^fear]: Jih-Hsuan Tammy Lin, "Fear in Virtual Reality (VR): Fear Elements, Coping Reactions, Immediate and Next-Day Fright Responses Toward a Survival Horror Zombie Virtual Reality Game", *Computers in Human Behavior* 72 (2017): 350-361. -Yet even more promising than what recreation-at-a-distance has to the approaches of in-person teams is the harnessing of digital tools to create even deeper connections than are possible without digital aids. The simplest examples would be extensions to extreme sports or military scenarios that would be unsafe or unreasonably costly to simulate in-person. But these are only the beginning; eventually, direct neural interfaces may allow colleagues to remotely share a level of intimate empathy that will be bounded primarily by professional propriety, rather than by the barriers of physical distance. +Yet even more promising how recreation-at-a-distance can mimic approaches of in-person teams is the harnessing of digital tools to create even deeper connections than are possible without digital aids. The simplest examples would be extensions to extreme sports or military scenarios that would be unsafe or unreasonably costly to simulate in-person. But these are only the beginning; eventually, direct neural interfaces may allow colleagues to remotely share a level of intimate empathy that will be bounded primarily by professional propriety, rather than by the barriers of physical distance. ### Designing inclusive campuses -Much work, especially white collar work, is physically localized to significant extents in large "corporate campuses". While many of the functions these campuses bring together are fairly separate or organizationally distant, broad co-location is often a goal because of the chance intersections it is thought to allow that may stimulate work across divisions of the company. Such "agglomeration" effects have been shown by a large economic literature to be an important source of the economic benefit of cities. A core role of corporate campuses is to capture these benefits within a company. +Much work, especially white collar work, is physically localized to significant extents in large "corporate campuses". While many of the functions these campuses bring together are fairly separate or organizationally distant, broad co-location is often a goal because of the chance intersections it is thought to allow that may stimulate work across divisions of the company. Such "agglomeration" effects have been shown by a large economic literature to be an important source of the economic benefit of cities.[^agglom] A core role of corporate campuses is to capture these benefits within a company. -Achieving this goal, however, requires careful design. Excessive segregation by organization and discipline or focus on core work undermines the benefit of agglomerative spontaneity. Excessive fragmentation by organization and discipline undermines productivity. Different elements of campus (walkways, dining facilities, offices, shared space, etc.) play diverse roles in fostering direct work and spontaneous connections. For instance, Steve Jobs redesigned Pixar's headquarters to include a large central atrium with a large theater, cafeteria, mailboxes, and viewing rooms[^PixarsHead]. By encouraging computer scientists, animators and other staff to mingle in a shared space, this layout boosts chance encounters and cross-pollination. Yet architectural revamps pose significant challenges: they're costly and need to support other elements that are specific to each company, such as nature of the work or brand identity. It is thus little surprise that there is no standard best campus design; campuses differ radically in their design, a leading exemplar being Apple's torus spaceship. Anything that could reduce the costs of exploration could significantly improve the quality. +[^agglom]: Jane Jacobs, *The Economy of Cities* (New York: Vintage, 1969). Edward L. Glaeser, Hedi D. Kallal, José A. Scheinkman and Andrei Shleifer, "Growth in Cities",*Journal of Political Economy* 100, no. 6 (1992): 1126-1152. -A natural way to make such experiments dramatically easier is to create immersive shared reality campuses in which employees can explore potential configurations and attend virtual meetings. These configurations can be prototyped far more rapidly and flexibly than building a physical campus, allowing for a range of exploration in the course of time employees spend attending virtual meetings. Based on feedback, employees can even help redesign the space and iterate on the layout. If a potential design seems to be achieving its goals reasonably well and fits a potential site well, it could then be "printed" through a more standard engineering and construction process. In short, these tools could make the design of physical space much more like what word processing and collaborative documents have made writing: a process that is able to engage in broad experimentation and accumulate diverse feedback before it has to be greatly scaled. +Achieving this goal, however, requires careful design. Excessive segregation by organization and discipline or focus on core work undermines the benefit of agglomerative spontaneity. Excessive fragmentation by organization and discipline undermines direct productivity. Different elements of campus (walkways, dining facilities, offices, shared space, recreational facilities etc.) play diverse roles in fostering direct work and spontaneous connections. For instance, Steve Jobs redesigned [Pixar](https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2018/11/16/pixar-s-critically-acclaimed-emeryville-campus.html)'s headquarters to include a central atrium with a large theater, cafeteria, mailboxes, and viewing rooms.[^PixarsHead] By encouraging computer scientists, animators and other staff to mingle in a shared space, this layout boosts chance encounters and cross-pollination. Yet architectural revamps pose significant challenges: they're costly and need to support other elements that are specific to each company, such as nature of the work or brand identity. It is thus little surprise that there is no standard best campus design; campuses differ radically in their design, a leading exemplar being Apple's torus spaceship. Anything that could reduce the costs of exploration could significantly improve the quality. + +A natural way to make such experiments dramatically easier is to create ISR campuses in which employees can explore potential configurations and attend virtual meetings. These configurations can be prototyped far more rapidly and flexibly than building a physical campus, allowing for a range of exploration in the course of time employees spend attending virtual meetings. Based on feedback, employees can even help redesign the space and iterate on the layout. If a potential design seems to be achieving its goals reasonably well and fits a potential site, it could then be "printed" through a more standard engineering and construction process. In short, these tools could make the design of physical space much more like what word processing and collaborative documents have made writing: a process that is able to engage in broad experimentation and accumulate diverse feedback before it has to be greatly scaled. ### Difficult conversations -Meetings are a central part of white collar work, consuming on average approximately a quarter of working time. Yet for all the time they take up, perhaps the greater cost is the meetings that do not happen because of how burdensome they are. Business leaders frequently misunderstand the needs of their customers, the challenges within their teams and the duplication of work because meeting with the relevant stakeholders would take too long. To make matters worse, many meetings are quite ineffective, as dominant personalities carry on and the wisdom of those who are less empowered or assertive is lost. In the realm of white-collar work, meetings are a notorious time sink, with office employees dedicating about 18 hours a week on average. This not only represents approximately $25,000 in annual payroll costs per employee but also encompasses meetings that 30% of employees find unnecessary. Moreover, a reduction in meetings by 40% has been linked to a 71% surge in productivity, underlining the critical need for streamlining communication [^meeting-stats2]. Anything that could significantly speed meetings and increase their quality could transform organizational productivity.[^Meetings] +Meetings are a central part of white collar work, consuming on average approximately a quarter of working time.[^Meetingstat] Yet for all the time they take up, perhaps the greater cost is the meetings that do not happen because of how burdensome they are. Business leaders frequently misunderstand the needs of their customers, the challenges within their teams and the duplication of work because meeting with the relevant stakeholders would take too long. To make matters worse, many meetings are quite ineffective, as dominant personalities carry on and the wisdom of those who are less empowered or assertive is lost. In the realm of white-collar work, meetings are a notorious time sink, with office employees dedicating about 18 hours a week on average. This not only represents approximately $25,000 in annual payroll costs per employee but also encompasses meetings that 30% of employees find unnecessary. Moreover, a reduction in meetings by 40% has been linked to a 71% surge in productivity, underlining the critical need for streamlining communication.[^meeting-stats2] Anything that could significantly speed meetings and increase their quality could transform organizational productivity.[^Meetings] + +[^Meetingstat]: Branka, "Meeting Statistics – 2024", *Truelist Blog* February 17, 2024 at https://truelist.co/blog/meeting-statistics/. -While meetings have a variety of goals and structures, perhaps the most common type is an attempt to share a variety of perspectives on a common project to achieve alignment and assignment of responsibilities. Such meetings are closely connected to the deliberative conversations we highlighted in our chapter on "Deliberation". An important reason why, despite the rise of asynchronous communication via services like Slack, Teams and Trello, synchronous meetings remain so prevalent is that asynchronous dialogs often suffer from the same lack of thoughtful time and attention management that are necessary to make synchronous meetings successful. Approaches like Polis, Remesh, All Our Ideas and their increasingly sophisticated LLM-based extensions promise to significantly improve this, making it increasingly possible to have respectful, inclusive and informative asynchronous conversations that include many more stakeholders. +While meetings have a variety of goals and structures, perhaps the most common type is an attempt to share a variety of perspectives on a common project to achieve alignment and assignment of responsibilities. Such meetings are closely connected to the deliberative conversations we highlighted in our chapter on [Augmented Deliberation](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-4/eng/?mode=dark). An important reason why, despite the rise of asynchronous communication via services like [Slack](https://slack.com/), [Teams](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/group-chat-software) and [Trello](https://trello.com/), synchronous meetings remain so prevalent is that asynchronous dialogs often suffer from the same lack of thoughtful time and attention management that are necessary to make synchronous meetings successful. Approaches like Polis, Remesh, All Our Ideas and their increasingly sophisticated LLM-based extensions promise to significantly improve this, making it increasingly possible to have respectful, inclusive and informative asynchronous conversations that include many more stakeholders. -Plural practices and tools can also enable more open and inclusive conversations about the biggest issues facing the organization. Today, the responsibility for setting direction is typically limited to the top of the pyramid. This simplifies strategy development, but at the cost of resilience and creativity: if a handful of executives are unwilling to adapt and learn, the whole organization stalls. And even if executives were all exceptional visionaries, their combined intellect is unlikely to suffice for the task at hand. What’s required instead is a process that harnesses the ingenuity of everyone who has a stake in the organization’s success. Imagine an open conversation that generates tens of thousands of insights and ideas (for instance around customers' needs or emerging trends) and uses collective intelligence to combine, prioritize, and ultimately distill them into a common point of view about what lies ahead. What are the big opportunities that can redefine who we are? What are the biggest challenges we need to tackle head on? What aspiration truly reflects our common purpose? By opening the conversation to new voices, encouraging unorthodox thinking, and fostering horizontal dialogue, it's possible to transform a top-down ritual into an exciting, participative quest to define a shared future. +⿻ practices and tools can also enable more open and inclusive conversations about the biggest issues facing the organization. Today, the responsibility for setting direction is typically limited to the top of the pyramid. This simplifies strategy development, but at the cost of resilience and creativity: if a handful of executives are unwilling to adapt and learn, the whole organization stalls. And even if executives were all exceptional visionaries, their combined intellect is unlikely to suffice for the task at hand. What is instead required is a process that harnesses the ingenuity of everyone who has a stake in the organization’s success, as highlighted by [W. Edwards Deming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Edwards_Deming)'s work on [Total Quality Management](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_quality_management).[^Deming] Imagine an open conversation that generates tens of thousands of insights and ideas (for instance around customers' needs or emerging trends) and uses collective intelligence to combine, prioritize, and ultimately distill them into a common point of view about what lies ahead. What are the big opportunities that can redefine who we are? What are the biggest challenges we need to tackle head on? What aspiration truly reflects our common purpose? By opening the conversation to new voices, encouraging unorthodox thinking, and fostering horizontal dialogue, it's possible to transform a top-down ritual into an exciting, participative quest to define a shared future. + +[^Deming]: W. Edwards Deming, "Improvement of Quality and Productivity through Action by Management", *National Productivity Review* 1, no. 1 (1981): 12-22. Beyond office politics, national politics are also increasingly entering and dividing workplaces, leading some executives to take extreme measures such as banning political discussions at work.[^Coinbase] A potential alternative to such stringent restrictions, which may suppress but not resolve tensions and undermine employee morale, might be to build channels such as the above to allow thoughtful and inclusive discussions of social issues, especially those relevant to corporate policies, to take place respectfully and at scale. Overall, these technologies promise to make workplaces more efficient, engaging, consensual and harmonious, providing the tools to help achieve the cultural goals many executives strive for. @@ -57,34 +69,40 @@ The capabilities of social identity systems, modern large language models (LLMs) They also may be able to provide a richer sense of the range of diversity spanned by a company's customer base that would be helpful to represent among employees and help them to empathize and connect with customers. It could also allow human resource departments to optimize for diversity in more sophisticated, intersectional ways rather than simply seeking to match population proportions in salient categories. Remote shared reality experiences can help them hold interactive recruiting events in a wider range of venues at lower cost and allow applicants a deeper sense of the work environment. They can also accelerate the acculturation and on boarding processes much as we described in the previous chapter. In short, these tools can together allow for a future of human resources that reaches a far wider range of talent and allows opportunities for everyone to shine as the unique intersectional contributor they are. - ### Aligning wisdom and influence [Or "Identifying natural leaders"] + ### Aligning wisdom and influence + +In most organizations, power—whether it's about controlling resources, making decisions, accessing important information, or having the power to reward or discipline others—is tied to one's position. Formal hierarchy provides clarity in terms of who is responsible for what, but this "legibility" has significant drawbacks. Positional authority can be too expansive, like a finance executive becoming CEO and suddenly claiming expertise in product design. It is also binary (you either have it or you do not), which means that incompetent managers retain power until they’re removed (often much later than ideal). Finally, traditional hierarchies don’t give employees a say in selecting their leaders. This is the opposite of the social web, where power emerges from the bottom up.[^Human] -In most organizations, power—whether it's about controlling resources, making decisions, accessing important information, or having the power to reward or discipline others—is tied to one's position. Formal hierarchy provides clarity in terms of who’s responsible for what, but this "legibility" has significant drawbacks. Positional authority can be too expansive, like a finance executive becoming CEO and suddenly claiming expertise in product design. It’s also binary (you either have it or you don’t), which means that incompetent managers retain power until they’re removed (often much later than ideal). Finally, traditional hierarchies don’t give employees a say in selecting their leaders. This is the opposite of the social web, where power emerges from the bottom up.[You could point people to Humanocracy, Ch. 9, for more on this]. +[^Human]: See Hamel and Zanini, op. cit. ch. 9. -In Plural workplaces, the traditional single hierarchy is replaced [or complemented, if you don’t want to be too radical] by multiple, issue-specific hierarchies. Power is fluid and shifts based on contribution. Emerging technologies can help match value added with decision rights. For example, natural language processing can sift through communication data to spot associates who consistently provide valuable insights on specific topics. Machine learning algorithms can create dynamic social graphs that pinpoint key network figures and provide rich context on the nature of their connections, and LLMs compile feedback from various sources to present a comprehensive assessment of an individual's "natural leadership." These approaches recognize and reward valuable contributions of people irrespective of role, and serve a reality check for those who still occupy formal positions of authority. Over time, they can reduce dependency on formal hierarchies altogether. +In ⿻ workplaces, the traditional single hierarchy can be complemented by multiple, issue-specific hierarchies in the spirit of the ⿻ theory of identity. Power can shift fluidly based on contribution. Emerging technologies can help match value added with decision rights. For example, natural language processing can sift through communication data to spot associates who consistently provide valuable insights on specific topics. Generative foundation models (GFMs) can create dynamic social graphs that pinpoint key network figures and provide rich context on the nature of their connections and compile feedback from various sources to present a comprehensive assessment of an individual's "natural leadership." These approaches recognize and reward valuable contributions of people irrespective of role, and serve a reality check for those who still occupy formal positions of authority. Over time, they can reduce dependency on formal hierarchies altogether. ### Supporting intrapreneurship -Most formal work is organized hierarchically, according to an "organizational chart", with authority flowing from a chief executive down through a dividing group of managers to workers. Especially in large organizations, those managed by different high-level managers come to form different organizations within the parent, each with their own cultures, goals and visions. While these internal distinctions are usually viewed as important to ensuring accountability, they are also often viewed as a barrier to organizational cooperation and dynamism, potentially undermining the collaborations needed to provide common infrastructure and meet the needs ("disruptions") of changing political, economic, social and technological environments. For example, the organization in which one of us works, Microsoft, has sometimes been satirized as illustrated in Figure X for its internal organization conflicts and, under the leadership of its current Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Satya Nadella has worked to forge a "One Microsoft" culture to overcome this. +Another effect of traditional hierarchies is that those managed by different high-level managers come to form different organizations within the parent, each with their own cultures, goals and visions. While these internal distinctions are usually viewed as important to ensuring accountability, they are also often viewed as a barrier to organizational cooperation and dynamism, potentially undermining the collaborations needed to provide common infrastructure and meet the needs ("disruptions") of changing political, economic, social and technological environments. For example, the organization in which one of us works, Microsoft, has sometimes been satirized as illustrated in Figure X for its internal organization conflicts and, under the leadership of its current CEO Satya Nadella has worked to forge a "[One Microsoft](https://careers.microsoft.com/v2/global/en/culture)" culture to overcome this.[^Refresh] + +[^Refresh]: Satya Nadella with Greg Shaw and Jill Tracie Nichols, *Hit Refresh: The Quest to Rediscover Microsoft's Soul and Imagine a Better Future for Everyone* (New York: Harper Business, 2017). Microsoft Organizational Chart **Figure X, Source: Adapted from "Organizational Charts" by Manu Cornet** -While much of this has been demonstrated through exemplars of such cooperation and inspirational leadership, Nadella has also helped establish some institutions intended to help achieve the organizational equivalent of the "solidarity and dynamism" we have discussed above. In particular, one of us had the honor to serve in the Office of Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) Kevin Scott, whose duties included coordinating cross-company investments that no one organization would find it in their interest to take on and stimulating "intrapreneurship", the building of new business lines often drawing on expertise across existing organizations. +While much of this has been demonstrated through exemplars of such cooperation and inspirational leadership, Nadella has also helped establish some institutions intended to help achieve the organizational equivalent of the "solidarity and dynamism" we have discussed above. In particular, one of us had the honor to serve in the Office of Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) [Kevin Scott](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Scott_(computer_scientist)), whose duties included coordinating cross-company investments that no one organization would find it in their interest to take on and stimulating "intrapreneurship", the building of new business lines often drawing on expertise across existing organizations.[^PEST] + +[^PEST]: An entertaining outgrowth of corporate acronyms in this case was that he had the title OCTOPEST (Office of the Chief Technology Officer Political Economist and Social Technologist), paralleling the title of his colleague Jaron Lanier who at the time of this writing remains Microsoft's [OCTOPUS](https://www.jaronlanier.com/general.html) (Office of the Chief Technology Officer Prime Unifying Scientist). + +While OCTO achieved much (including incubating the now well-known relationship with OpenAI) during the author's time there, a persistent challenge was harnessing a small staff that was necessarily much less informed than those "on the ground" about business needs and opportunities to decide on major investments and incubations intended to bring cross-cutting benefits. A leading example was the cross-company technical project he was most involved with, around Web3 strategy, where interested and expert employees were widely scattered across the company. This was particularly difficult because the intention was for many of these investments to accrue not directly to the bottom line of an internal start-up, but to other business lines. Because of this and the structure of jobs at Microsoft, the typical use of large incentives for eventual success to compensate for the likelihood of failure are hard to apply. Various organizations navigate this challenge in different ways; for example Google (now Alphabet) has traditionally given employees [20% of their time](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_project_time) free to pursue passion projects for the organization, outside their primary organizational role.[^Google20] Yet this suffers the obvious challenge that individuals may pursue idiosyncratic projects that at worst may not be aligned to the broader mission and at best usually fail to scale as they do not bring enough people together to cooperate on an ambitious project. -While OCTO achieved much (including incubating the now well-known relationship with OpenAI) during the author's time there, a persistent challenge was harnessing a small staff that was necessarily much less informed than those "on the ground" about business needs and opportunities to decide on major investments and incubations intended to bring cross-cutting benefits. This was particularly difficult because the intention was for many of these investments to accrue not directly to the bottom line of the internal start-up, but to other business lines. Because of this and the structure of jobs at Microsoft, the typical use of large incentives for eventual success to compensate for the likelihood of failure are hard to apply. Various organizations navigate this challenge in different ways; for example Google (now Alphabet) has traditionally given employees 20% of their time free to pursue passion projects for the organization, outside their primary organizational role. Yet this suffers the obvious challenge that individuals may pursue idiosyncratic projects that at worst may not be aligned to the broader mission and at best usually fail to scale as they do not bring enough people together to cooperate on an ambitious project. +[^Google20]: Annika Steiber and Sverker Alänge, "A Corporate System for Continuous Innovation: the Case of Google Inc.", *European Journal of Innovation Management* 16, no. 2: 243-264. A natural alternative to the extremes of centralized management and uncoordinated individual initiative would be to harness ⿻ conversational and funding tools. An organization like OCTO could have a much larger budget, but much less discretion, providing match-making and cross-pollination services and matching funds for investments with support from many organizations. It could use data from or posting within internal communication platforms to identify cross-organizational clusters of interests, host free and fun events to build connections across these organizations and then offer matching funds if a diversity of organizations are willing to invest employee time or other resources in supporting a shared investment or incubation. Compared to the "20% time model", this would offer much more "free time" to pursue projects that have genuine cross-organizational support, but that one's direct reporting chain sees as tangential, and less support for purely idiosyncratic interests. As such, it would empower employees to coordinate investments among themselves that could transform the business overall, allowing agility to avoid disruption. -Putting these together, we can imagine a future where remote teams can form the same strong bonds as in-person teams, where in-person teams can co-design inclusive workplaces that foster spontaneous connections while maintaining focus, where meetings are far more efficient and inclusive even when asynchronous, where a far wider range of talent can be placed into leading roles. Thus creating a more inclusive and representative workplace where employees can easily collaborate across divisions and with corporate support to overcome hurdles and build the common infrastructure and new ventures their employer needs to survive and thrive in a dynamic business environment. In short, it is not hard to see a future of truly ⿻ workplaces, embracing and harnessing collaboration across a wide range of internal and external diversity to achieve a more productive and inclusive future. +Putting these together, we can imagine a future where remote teams can form the same strong bonds as in-person teams, where in-person teams can co-design inclusive workplaces that foster spontaneous connections while maintaining focus, where meetings are far more efficient and inclusive even when asynchronous, where a far wider range of talent can be placed into leading roles. This could create a more inclusive and representative workplace where employees can easily collaborate across divisions and with corporate support to overcome hurdles and build the common infrastructure and new ventures their employer needs to survive and thrive in a dynamic business environment. In short, it is not hard to see a future of truly ⿻ workplaces, embracing and harnessing collaboration across a wide range of internal and external diversity to achieve a more productive and inclusive future. -[^Calc]: If, as noted in the chapter, about 50% of formal sector work will be remote and, as in this study, if team-building exercises increase team performance by about 25% (Klein et al., “Does Team Building Work?”[^team]), if this applies to about half of formal sector work and if about half the benefit goes into cost, we should expect a gain of about 2% of GDP from improved remote team-building. If agglomeration benefits are about 12% for work facilities (Greenstone, Hornbeck, and Moretti, “Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings.”[^agglomeration]) and this applies again to half of formal sector work and can be improved by 50%, again we get 2% of GDP. If meetings are 25% of formal sector work time and can be improved by 25%, this is about 4% of GDP. Standard economic estimates of the costs of labor search and matching are about 4% of GPD, similar to the cost spent on human resources; if mitigated by 50% this would raise GDP by 2% (not to mention significantly dampen the cost of business cycle unemployment). Finally, most GDP growth (of roughly 2-3% annually globally) has been traced by economists to technological advance through the research and development of new products, which is now about 80% in the private sector according to the figures we discussed in the introduction. If the efficiency of this could be increased by a quarter through more flexible intrapreneurship, this could raise global GDP growth annually by half a percent. -[^team]: Cameron Klein, Deborah DiazGranados, Eduardo Salas, Huy Le, Shawn Burke, Rebecca Lyons, and Gerald Goodwin, “Does Team Building Work?” _Small Group Research_ 40, no. 2 (January 16, 2009): 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328821. -[^agglomeration]: Michael Greenstone, Richard Hornbeck, and Enrico Moretti, “Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings,” _Journal of Political Economy_ 118, no. 3 (June 2010): 536–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/653714. +[^Calc]: If, as noted in the chapter, about 50% of formal sector work will be remote and, as in this study, if team-building exercises increase team performance by about 25%, if this applies to about half of formal sector work and if about half the benefit goes into cost, we should expect a gain of about 2% of GDP from improved remote team-building. If agglomeration benefits are about 12% for work facilities and this applies again to half of formal sector work and can be improved by 50%, again we get 2% of GDP. If meetings are 25% of formal sector work time and can be improved by 25%, this is about 4% of GDP. Standard economic estimates of the costs of labor search and matching are about 4% of GPD, similar to the cost spent on human resources; if mitigated by 50% this would raise GDP by 2% (not to mention significantly dampen the cost of business cycle unemployment). Finally, most GDP growth (of roughly 2-3% annually globally) has been traced by economists to technological advance through the research and development of new products, which is now about 80% in the private sector according to the figures we discussed in the introduction. If the efficiency of this could be increased by a quarter through more flexible intrapreneurship, this could raise global GDP growth annually by half a percent. Cameron Klein, Deborah DiazGranados, Eduardo Salas, Huy Le, Shawn Burke, Rebecca Lyons, and Gerald Goodwin, “Does Team Building Work?” _Small Group Research_ 40, no. 2 (January 16, 2009): 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328821. Michael Greenstone, Richard Hornbeck, and Enrico Moretti, “Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings,” _Journal of Political Economy_ 118, no. 3 (June 2010): 536–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/653714. [^Coinbase]: Ellen Huet, “Basecamp Follows Coinbase In Banning Politics Talk at Work,” _Bloomberg_, April 26, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-26/basecamp-follows-coinbase-in-banning-politics-talk-at-work. Ibid. [^Barreto]: Jose Barrero, Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. 2023, “The Evolution of Working from Home,” __Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR) Working Paper_ no. 23-19 (July 2023): https://siepr.stanford.edu/publications/working-paper/evolution-working-home. @@ -101,4 +119,4 @@ Ibid. [^VirtualTeamWork]: Heide Lukosch, Bas van Nuland, Theo van Ruijven, Linda van Veen, and Alexander Verbraeck, “Building a Virtual World for Team Work Improvement,” _Frontiers in Gaming Simulation_, 2014, 60–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04954-0_8. [^MRexample]: Lin Lu, Honglin Wang, Pengran Liu, Rong Liu, Jiayao Zhang, Yi Xie, Songxiang Liu, et al., “Applications of Mixed Reality Technology in Orthopedics Surgery: A Pilot Study,” _Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology_ 10 (February 22, 2022): https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.740507. Ibid. -[^PixarsHead]: Pixar Headquarters and the Legacy of Steve Jobs (date) https://officesnapshots.com/2012/07/16/pixar-headquarters-and-the-legacy-of-steve-jobs/ +[^PixarsHead]: Pixar Headquarters and the Legacy of Steve Jobs (2012) https://officesnapshots.com/2012/07/16/pixar-headquarters-and-the-legacy-of-steve-jobs/ From 9910d4368b14f2c9a5d9a9fe16f590c06f076ef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Evan Paul <163631078+gnomevan@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:51:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 04/17] image tags and backlinks 6-2-health.md This one has ** markup on the image captions which did the job of separating them from the body text. I left them, while adding the figcaption tag is this better than br tags? --- contents/english/6-2-health.md | 37 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/contents/english/6-2-health.md b/contents/english/6-2-health.md index aa69c566..0b183f10 100644 --- a/contents/english/6-2-health.md +++ b/contents/english/6-2-health.md @@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ Unlike past successes, these present challenges will not be overcome by biomedic ### The importance of ⿻ health agency In our ⿻, decentralized, and relational concept of health (Figure 1), the world will still need doctors, nurses, and other health workers to perform their usual services; just as it will need health facilities, laboratories, vaccines, drugs, and medical devices. But it will need something more: to empower the co-construction of *health agency* on the part of individuals and their pluralities. Jennifer Prah Ruger understands health agency as the promotion of individuals' capabilities to act in their own interests with respect to their own health[^PrahRuger]. While this is a good start, we conceive of health as *primarily* emergent, multiscale, embedded and complex (see our chapter [03-01 Living in a ⿻ World](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/3-1/eng/) ). +
+ RelationalConceptHealth -RelationalConceptHealth - -**Figure 1. The Relational Concept of Health** - + **
Figure 1. The Relational Concept of Health
** +
### Blockers to healthy flourishing The blockers to further transformative progress in health can be summarized as: 1. Lack of financing @@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ In the current environment, however, there is limited ability for funders of pro #### Health impact tokenization For the purpose of this discussion, *outputs* are the direct result of health services (e.g. people vaccinated); *outcomes* are the final intended result (e.g. deaths avoided through morbidity or mortality risk reduction); and *impacts* are the knock-on effects outcomes have in the world at large (e.g. future children born). Impact is thus an open-source commodity: it can be forked to whatever use the beneficiary can devise (Figure 2). Although impacts are a *causal* effect of health services (e.g. a child who otherwise would have died did not, and then went on to be a parent), impacts are not the primary *intended* effect of health services. The primary intended effect of health services is reducing morbidity or mortality risk, which as we have seen is an insurance function. Health services, which produce non-market-traded outcomes (e.g. lives saved *and* healthier lives, through the insurance function) and market-traded and non-market-traded impacts (e.g. more labour to sell *and* more time for visits with friends, through the open-source function), thus have an accounting problem: it is hard to measure the value of outcomes (e.g. the value of a life saved) but it is often still harder to measure the value of relevant impacts. Thus, since the full social value of health projects is in practice never counted, let alone captured or rendered tradeable, many win-win health investments remain blocked. This is, in effect, merely a restatement of the public-goods problem, a problem that results in health-financing systems oriented around closing the barn door only *after* the horse has bolted: since outcomes are mainly non-market traded and impacts are diffuse, unpredictable, and expensive to take to scale (because of their high fixed costs, see the discussion on increasing returns in [05-07 Social Markets](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-7/eng/)), pro-health interventions do not make an attractive investment in spite of their universally recognized value. This is even more true at international level, which explains why transformational successes in health have been limited to those noted at the outset and have often required, as in more than half of the examples, a bespoke international financing and governance mechanism. +
+ DifferentPathwaysImpact -DifferentPathwaysImpact - -**Figure 2. Different Pathways to Impact** - + **
Figure 2. Different Pathways to Impact
** +
For example, the Global Fund claims to have saved 44 million lives over 20 years at a cumulative cost of $55.4 billion in disbursements plus approximately $6 billion in operating costs. These costs have been financed through funds primarily derived from state-collected tax revenues that are pooled in successive 'replenishment rounds', where governments (and some philanthropies) make pledges of support. Median estimates for the insurance value of a mortality risk reduction of this scale would come in at about $200 trillion dollars, attributing to the Global Fund an (undiscounted) outcomes-based return on investment (ROI) of over 3000:1. Accordingly, if the Global Fund could have captured a fraction of the insurance value of the outcomes it produced, it would be one of the most valuable entities in the world today, and everyone would want to buy its shares. In fact, everyone in the world already *does* own shares in the Global Fund; unfortunately, these shares are non-tradeable assets distributed as a pure public function with no differentiation or segmentation for either costs and benefits (i.e. no incentive compatibility). We each benefit in our own way, not only due to the insurance value of globally lower rates of HIV, tuberculosis and malaria but also from the derivative impacts that 44 million people who otherwise would have died were able to realize in the world, for example, contributing to the rise in incomes in low- and middle-income countries from $6 trillion per year in 2002 to $36 trillion per year in 2022 (in constant dollars). Aside from the massive insurance value, there is thus an additional significant impact value. One component of impact value is the rise in real incomes; yet there are still other impacts that are objectively measurable but hard to value, such as better performance in social roles. Many subjective impacts, however, will be hard even in principle to measure and harder still to value (e.g. happy families). Consequently, representing and capturing in a tradeable way *just a tiny fraction* of the open-source value of health investments would have possibly made the Global Fund the most attractive investment in the world for private capital. How might such incentive compatibility be realized?[^Disc] *First*, represent and capture not only the insurance value of health projects (i.e. in terms of their mortality and morbidity risk reduction) but also represent and capture part of the open-source value of their broader social impact. Insurance value and open-source value can be tokenized (i.e. represented as part of a tradeable digital certificate that encodes verifiable project meta-data). The digital certificate leverages available outcome- and impact-based frameworks, but it also incorporates a bespoke verification function (i.e. an 'oracle') and also a crowd-sourced one. For the latter, predictive voting (see our chapter [04-02 Association and ⿻ Publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/)), or similar technologies where participants take stakes on the outcome- and impact-value of digital certificates (i.e. tokens), can be used to refine ex-ante estimates of insurance and open-source value. Participants thus own actual digital shares in the value of the outcome and impacts of health projects. Users who want to 'fork' impact to a derivative use can thus take an independent stake (i.e. provide private collateral) for bets on the future value that their fork can create. Tokens can be allocated (by purchase, assignment, or reward) to funders, implementers and beneficiaries. All health projects thus have access to blended finance without complex negotiations or significant start-up costs. @@ -79,17 +79,18 @@ For example, the Global Fund claims to have saved 44 million lives over 20 years **Figure 3. Open Impact Pools** Tokens can be used to participate in the governance of projects or of the funding pools. Projects can allocate tokens linked to contributions. Tokens can be used to participate in governance; to trade and invest; to exchange for selected services; or to fund further projects (Figure 4). +
+ ParticipationModes -ParticipationModes - -**Figure 4. Participants Trade, Exchange, and Reinvest.** + **
Figure 4. Participants Trade, Exchange, and Reinvest.
** +
*Third*, formalize and automate manual processes through the use of application ecosystems. Use technology to incentivize health production and to cut the friction costs and lower the high barriers to entry of financing and governance. Tokens can be bundled and traded, making it as simple to buy health impact as it is to trade carbon credits. Tokens can be reinvested into projects or used to purchase selected (standardized) health services. Value can be linked to specific projects or aggregated into blocks, supporting the development of cascading ('fractal') health-impact markets (Figure 5). +
+ StandardizedNestedImpactPools -StandardizedNestedImpactPools - -**Figure 5. Standardization of Nested Impact Pools** - + **
Figure 5. Standardization of Nested Impact Pools
** +
#### Empowering health agency through shared sense-making Under current health financing arrangements, there is no direct link connecting funders (who provide financing) either to implementers (who provide governance and/or technical know-how) or to beneficiaries (the 'target population' for the outcomes, and possibly also the impacts). The current system tries to address these sense-making gaps through the use of publicity agreements and the corollary use of communications, media, and public-relations services. Together, these services represent some of the centralized analogues of trust, gratitude, respect, and consideration. However, the framing of sense-making narratives, rather than being conceived as a common project involving all stakeholders, is skewed towards the specific needs of centralized actors with the resources necessary to make substantial investments in dedicated public-relations, media, and communications activities. Networking, relationship building, and knowledge exchange thus work (mainly unidirectionally) to serve the interests of those with significant market and non-market power (compare [05-07 Social Markets](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-7/eng/)). Furthermore, these activities need to be highly customized and built 'made to order' when they could be formalized according to a set of community-determined standards. @@ -106,7 +107,7 @@ The principle of democracy requires that all stakeholders (a partial list includ The world has experienced an increasing wave of pandemics, with 6 occurring already this century. In circumstances such as those in which COVID-19 emerged, one principle stands out: public health policy must be formulated in the presence of massive uncertainty about basic facts. For example, in early 2020, we knew we were confronted with two important unknowns: Q1. *How long would it take to develop an effective COVID vaccine?* and Q2. *Would populations tolerate the imposition of social distancing measures?* In the UK, as in many other settings, we got the answer to both of these questions badly wrong, with disastrous consequences. For example, policy-makers in the UK were convinced (though for no good reason) that the answer to Q1 was '*At least 18 months*' and that the answer to Q2 was '*No*'. With hindsight we now know that the correct answer to Q1 in March 2020 was '*About 5 months*' and that the correct answer to Q2 at that time was a clear '*Yes*'. Yet because there was no concerted effort to elicit what was known about these facts, or what could reasonably be conjectured, we reached mistaken conclusions and *as a direct result* of those errors delayed far too long in imposing social distancing measures. In the UK, we delayed so long, in fact, that people and organizations themselves - independently and without explicit guidance - started practicing widespread social distancing on Friday 13 March 2020, a full 10 days before the UK authorities officially called for such measures. -The single most important point that stands out from these facts is the following: if diffuse populations of individuals or loosely organized non-health associations, such as soccer clubs, can formulate *objectively better pandemic policy* than a government that is advised by the world's top epidemiological experts, then clearly governments are turning a blind eye to a critical source of information and analysis. The use of online tools such as expert-elicitation[^Cooke] databases maintained on a variety of collaborative, deliberative, voting or prediction-market (i.e. 'governance') technologies (see Section 5 on Democracy) would have multiplied by orders of magnitude the power of 'the wisdom of the crowd' such as witnessed in the UK between 10 and 23 March 2020. Indeed, in the long run, more important than 'getting policy right' is preserving social cohesion and public engagement with and trust in policy-makers, since without these 'policy' rapidly becomes meaningless. Taiwan followed a very different path, with rapid government support of citizen-led initiatives for, for example, tracking the supply of masks. By moving quickly to empower citizen-led online initiatives (g0v, Polis), Taiwan was able to harvest the power of localized and contextual knowledge as a ⿻ good without imposing centralized control but also while respecting privacy. Taiwan's extitutional approach was so successful it has now been institutionalized. With such clearly contrasting examples as these, it follows that policy during the next novel pandemic is certain not to be the sole province or prerogative of epidemiological experts in closed-room consultations. ⿻ technologies will be widely used for the large-scale formulation of and coordination around collective action. +The single most important point that stands out from these facts is the following: if diffuse populations of individuals or loosely organized non-health associations, such as soccer clubs, can formulate *objectively better pandemic policy* than a government that is advised by the world's top epidemiological experts, then clearly governments are turning a blind eye to a critical source of information and analysis. The use of online tools such as expert-elicitation[^Cooke] databases maintained on a variety of collaborative, deliberative, voting or prediction-market (i.e. 'governance') technologies (see Section 5 on [Democracy](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-0/eng/)) would have multiplied by orders of magnitude the power of 'the wisdom of the crowd' such as witnessed in the UK between 10 and 23 March 2020. Indeed, in the long run, more important than 'getting policy right' is preserving social cohesion and public engagement with and trust in policy-makers, since without these 'policy' rapidly becomes meaningless. Taiwan followed a very different path, with rapid government support of citizen-led initiatives for, for example, tracking the supply of masks. By moving quickly to empower citizen-led online initiatives (g0v, Polis), Taiwan was able to harvest the power of localized and contextual knowledge as a ⿻ good without imposing centralized control but also while respecting privacy. Taiwan's extitutional approach was so successful it has now been institutionalized. With such clearly contrasting examples as these, it follows that policy during the next novel pandemic is certain not to be the sole province or prerogative of epidemiological experts in closed-room consultations. ⿻ technologies will be widely used for the large-scale formulation of and coordination around collective action. #### Human-centered redesign of healthcare administration @@ -120,11 +121,11 @@ It would be futile to insist that such devices are not now an integral part of o #### Building healthy communities with XR technologies -Extended-reality (XR), or immersive, technologies encompass a suite of tools that provide BCI services in a quasi-complete sensory, motor, cognitive and relational/interpersonal package. To date, applications for health have been non-interpersonal and used to de-risk medical training for health workers, much as flight simulators for pilots. It is natural, however, to imagine the gamification of health-based XR so as to incentivize and reward the learning of complex cognitive, relational, and behavioural skills (such as self-care, self-insight, and self-management), as well as a suite of simulated interpersonal applications (see 05-02 Immersive Shared Reality). Similar to the examples cited there, new horizons of simulated and non-simulated social interaction can be opened to those with disabilities that less immersive, lower-throughput, traditional assistive technologies cannot address. +Extended-reality (XR), or immersive, technologies encompass a suite of tools that provide BCI services in a quasi-complete sensory, motor, cognitive and relational/interpersonal package. To date, applications for health have been non-interpersonal and used to de-risk medical training for health workers, much as flight simulators for pilots. It is natural, however, to imagine the gamification of health-based XR so as to incentivize and reward the learning of complex cognitive, relational, and behavioural skills (such as self-care, self-insight, and self-management), as well as a suite of simulated interpersonal applications ([see 05-02 Immersive Shared Reality](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-2/eng/)). Similar to the examples cited there, new horizons of simulated and non-simulated social interaction can be opened to those with disabilities that less immersive, lower-throughput, traditional assistive technologies cannot address. #### Big data and neural networks to assist diagnosis and treatment -A human radiographer can at the upwards limit view and interpret perhaps as many one million diagnostic imaging scans during a lifetime of practice. While this is sufficient to achieve expert status in diagnosing common conditions, neural networks can train on datasets orders of magnitude larger and thus outperform human readers for the diagnosis of rarely seen conditions. Of course, human beings might specialize in such conditions and dedicate themselves to viewing a collection of many rare images, but the need for ⿻ technologies then becomes more acute: it seems impossible to imagine how large diagnostic databases of rare conditions can be compiled without established data-sharing practices across many image centres. In this case too, we see diffuse pockets of diversity that show 'affinity' in terms of markers that cannot be organized into low-entropy pockets based merely on traditional variables such as place, profession, or parentage (see 05-00 Collaborative Technology and Democracy); in these cases, another organizing principle must be found, and online technologies are the obvious solution. Such technologies also need to respect privacy and confidentiality, both as a normative and legal principle. Various forms of privacy enhancing technologies (see our chapter [04-02 Association and ⿻ Publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/)) such as zero- (or low-) knowledge proofs, allow for specific kinds of information to be reliably shared without over-sharing. +A human radiographer can at the upwards limit view and interpret perhaps as many one million diagnostic imaging scans during a lifetime of practice. While this is sufficient to achieve expert status in diagnosing common conditions, neural networks can train on datasets orders of magnitude larger and thus outperform human readers for the diagnosis of rarely seen conditions. Of course, human beings might specialize in such conditions and dedicate themselves to viewing a collection of many rare images, but the need for ⿻ technologies then becomes more acute: it seems impossible to imagine how large diagnostic databases of rare conditions can be compiled without established data-sharing practices across many image centres. In this case too, we see diffuse pockets of diversity that show 'affinity' in terms of markers that cannot be organized into low-entropy pockets based merely on traditional variables such as place, profession, or parentage ([see 05-00 Collaborative Technology and Democracy](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-0/eng/)); in these cases, another organizing principle must be found, and online technologies are the obvious solution. Such technologies also need to respect privacy and confidentiality, both as a normative and legal principle. Various forms of privacy enhancing technologies (see our chapter [04-02 Association and ⿻ Publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/)) such as zero- (or low-) knowledge proofs, allow for specific kinds of information to be reliably shared without over-sharing. In Web2 applications such as Facebook and Google, users 'willingly' share their private information in exchange for the social benefits afforded by the platforms. That is, even knowing that their information is being harvested for profit by third-party entities, many individuals presumably still find that membership in online Web2 communities offers a net benefit. What if there was no trade-off between privacy and utility? What if accessing medical services did not incur an open-ended contingent liability for the privacy of the individual? Medical administrative data is 'safe' for everyone, until the system is hacked because of, for example, a phishing attack: in the long run, we all face data theft with Web2 systems. Rethinking medical practice (which requires patient data for the patient's own benefit) and medical research (which requires patient data for the benefit of others) so as to build in cryptographic principles from the foundation is an essential part of the web3 project, with important health implications: no doubt some diseases today are still fatal only because of our failure to build such applications. Extending the diagnostic example, medical notes of all kinds (e.g. admission, treatment, discharge) forming a part of a patient's record are a potentially vast source of information about care and outcomes that is not only highly diffuse and unstructured but also virtually unqueryable outside of a set of specific and restricted medicolegal contexts. If there is a way to extract weak, or highly confounded, signals as the basis for novel causal insights, generative foundation models are perhaps the only technology that might do so. Variations in medical practice and outcomes alone should in principle make it possible to identify and extract the relevant counterfactual, much as - at population level - regression discontinuity design does. From 63b869ed35ca92163175a4a7c736042eb15fca57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:41:57 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 05/17] Final copyedit of 6-3 --- contents/english/6-3-media.md | 24 ++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/contents/english/6-3-media.md b/contents/english/6-3-media.md index cf220ba5..ba0b5583 100644 --- a/contents/english/6-3-media.md +++ b/contents/english/6-3-media.md @@ -6,16 +6,22 @@ Immersive and telepathic media experiences promise to transform connection acros --- -The direct experiences most of us have in our everyday lives exposes us to only a tiny sliver of global affairs. Almost everything we believe we know beyond this is mediated through relationships, schooling and, most of the time, "media", especially journalism (radio, television, newspapers) and social media, as well as directed small or large group communications such as email and group chats. An important promise of digital technology has been to transform media, a possibility we take up here with keen awareness of the dangers and harms to media that are widely attributed to digital technology and social media. We explore how ⿻ could help correct many of these harms and help achieve something of the potential that pioneers like Lick and Taylor saw in digital media. +The direct experiences most of us have in our everyday lives exposes us to only a tiny sliver of global affairs. Almost everything we believe we know beyond this is mediated through relationships, schooling and, most of the time, "media", especially journalism (radio, television, newspapers) and social media, as well as directed small or large group communications such as email and group chats. An important promise of digital technology has been to transform media, a possibility we take up here with keen awareness of the dangers and harms to media that are widely attributed to digital technology and social media. We explore how ⿻ could help correct many of these harms and help achieve something of the potential that internet pioneers like J. C. R. Licklider and Robert Taylor saw in digital media.[^licktaylor] -In particular, we highlight how the coming wave of ⿻ may help increase empathy across social distance even more dramatically than photography and television did; how it could increase by an order of magnitude or more the number of people who can meaningfully and helpfully participate in the journalistic process; how it could help restore level of trust in media, as well as norms of respect for confidentiality, much of the way towards what they were at their mid-twentieth-century peak; how they could they could undo most of the rises in levels of "affective polarization" (viz. dislike across lines of political division) not just within national polities but across a range of other social organizations; and how it could help restore sustainable and aligned funding for media. In short, we show how ⿻ can help address and reverse many of the crises media face today. +[^licktaylor]: Licklider and Taylor, op. cit. + +In particular, we highlight how the coming tide of ⿻ may help increase empathy across social distance even more dramatically than photography and television did; how it could increase by an order of magnitude or more the number of people who can meaningfully and helpfully participate in the journalistic process; how it could help restore level of trust in media, as well as norms of respect for confidentiality, much of the way towards what they were at their mid-twentieth-century peak; how they could they could undo most of the rises in levels of "affective polarization" (viz. dislike across lines of political division) not just within national polities but across a range of other social organizations; and how it could help restore sustainable and aligned funding for media. In short, we show how ⿻ can help address and reverse many of the crises media face today. ### Walking in others' shoes -As noted above, a central role of journalism is to allow people to experience the events and sensations of parts of the world they may never visit. Every generation of technology has made this more vivid and thus created a "smaller world". Abolitionists like Frederick Douglass harnessed photography to bring the experience of slaves to Northerner whites. Radio helped make the Great War a truly World War by allowing the sounds of conflict to echo around the world. Television allowed millions to share Neil Armstrong's landing on the moon. +As noted above, a central role of journalism is to allow people to experience the events and sensations of parts of the world they may never visit. Every generation of technology has made this more vivid and thus created a "smaller world". Abolitionists like [Frederick Douglass](https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/frederick-douglass-and-the-power-of-photography.htm) harnessed photography to bring the experience of slaves to Northerner whites.[^picturing] Radio helped make the Great War a truly World War by allowing the sounds of conflict to echo around the world. Television allowed millions to share [Neil Armstrong's landing on the moon](https://www.space.com/17307-neil-armstrong-one-small-step-quote.html). + +[^picturing]: John Stauffer, Zoe Trodd, and Celeste-Marie Bernier, *Picturing Frederick Douglass: An Illustrated Biography of the Nineteenth Century's Most Photographed American* (New York: Liveright, 2015). -Remote shared reality technologies promise to create even deeper empathetic connections. If, as Courtney Cogburn's research suggests, years worth of connections through other media are possible in a short empathetic shared reality experience, journalists will soon be able to bridge social divides with vivid empathy as never before. While they have reached a limited audience so far given the image quality and nausea-related challenges of existing virtual reality (VR) headsets, journalists and artists have already begun to pioneer a variety of empathetic VR experiences. Examples include Winslow Porter work to help people experience life as non-human life like a tree, Decontee Davis's portrait of one of the world's most horrific diseases from the eyes of an Ebola survivor and Yasmin Eyalat's animated immersion within the world of cyber-security. +[Immerisve shared reality](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-2/eng/?mode=dark) promise to create even deeper empathetic connections. Journalists may soon be able to bridge social divides with vivid empathy as never before. While they have reached a limited audience so far given the image quality and nausea-related challenges of existing virtual reality (VR) headsets, journalists and artists have already begun to pioneer a variety of empathetic VR experiences. Examples include Milica Zec and Winslow Porter's work to help people experience life as [non-human life like a tree](https://www.treeofficial.com/), Decontee Davis's [portrait](https://www.wired.com/2015/09/vr-ebola-film/) of one of the world's most horrific diseases from the eyes of an Ebola survivor and Yasmin Eyalat's animated immersion within the [world of cyber-security](https://elayat.com/portfolio/zero-days-vr/).[^VRexperiences] + +[^VRexperiences]: Milica Zec and Winslow Porter, *Tree* (2017). Decontee Davis, *Surviving Ebola* (2015). Yasmin Elayat, *Zero Days VR* (2017). Yet these are only the first successful forays into an emerging medium. As shared reality technologies branch out into other senses (smell, touch and taste), far more complete multisensory connections will be possible with even more surprising and enlightening results. Brain interfaces will be transformative in a way that is hard to even describe. The future of journalism empowering us to know things that are profoundly different is therefore bright. @@ -43,11 +49,13 @@ Of course, the precise details vary greatly depending on which precise tools are ### Stories that bring us together -While many Americans look back with nostalgia on the history of the press, the era of "press responsibility" against which they judge the harms of anti-social media, dates only to the 1940s. This was when the "Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press" developed a code of social responsibility under which the press would act as the "common carriers of public discussion", creating a baseline of shared understanding on which public debate could proceed. That commission argued that a central role of a free press in a democratic society is to clarify to all citizens both the points of consensus and fact and those of divergence in a balance matter in order to allow self-government to thrive. While many appreciate what this era achieved at the national level for one country, the essence of ⿻ is that we live (especially today) in a much richer and more diverse world, with many loci of democracy across, between, within and beyond nations. Whatever the many failings of social media, one thing it has achieved is to allow this diversity to shape the media ecosystem. How might it do this while still being pro-social media in the sense of the Hutchins report? +While many Americans look back with nostalgia on the history of the press, the era of "press responsibility" against which they judge the harms of anti-social media, dates only to the 1940s. This was when the "[Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutchins_Commission)" developed a code of social responsibility under which the press would act as the "common carriers of public discussion", creating a baseline of shared understanding on which public debate could proceed.[^Hutchins] That commission argued that a central role of a free press in a democratic society is to clarify to all citizens both the points of consensus (viz. the "Walter Cronkite effect" of commonly watched, consensual news) and fact and those of divergence (viz. the "[fairness doctrine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine)" and practice of balancing diverging perspectives) to allow self-government to thrive. While many appreciate what this era achieved at the national level for one country, the essence of ⿻ is that we live (especially today) in a much richer and more diverse world, with many loci of democracy across, between, within and beyond nations. Whatever the many failings of social media, one thing it has achieved is to allow this diversity to shape the media ecosystem. How might it do this while still being pro-social media in the sense of the Hutchins report? + +[^Hutchins]: The Commission on Freedom of the Press, *A Free and Responsible Press: A General Report on Mass Communications* (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947). -The ["Deliberation"](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-1/eng/) chapter above suggests a natural strategy. Social media algorithms could create "communities" based both on patterns of behavior internal to the platform (e.g. views, likes, responses, propagation, choices to join) and on external data such as social science or group explicit self-identification (more on this below). For each such community, the algorithms could highlight "common content" (commonly agreed facts and values) of the group that span the divides internally, as well as important points of division within the community. Content could then be highlighted to citizens of the communities within this social context, making clear which content is rough consensus in communities that citizen is a member and which content is divisive, as well as offering opportunities for the citizen to explore content that is consensus on the other side of each divide from the one she is on within that community. +Our [Augmented Deliberation](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/5-4/eng/) chapter above suggests a natural strategy. Social media algorithms could create "communities" based both on patterns of behavior internal to the platform (e.g. views, likes, responses, propagation, choices to join) and on external data such as social science or group explicit self-identification (more on this below). For each such community, the algorithms could highlight "common content" (commonly agreed facts and values) of the group that span the divides internally, as well as important points of division within the community. Content could then be highlighted to members of the communities within this social context, making clear which content is rough consensus in communities that citizen is a member and which content is divisive, as well as offering opportunities for the citizen to explore content that is consensus on the other side of each divide from the one she is on within that community. -Such a design would continue to offer individuals and communities the agency social media affords them to respectively shape their own intersectional identities and self-govern. Yet at the same time it would avoid the rampant "false consensus" effect where netizens come to believe that extreme or idiosyncratic views are widely shared, fueling demonization of those who do not share them and a feeling of resentment when associated political outcomes are not achieved or "⿻istic ignorance" where netizens are unable to act collectively on "silent majority" views.[^Note] Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, it would reshape the incentives of journalists and other creators away from divisive content and towards stories that bring us together. It is relevant beyond "hard journalism" *per se* as many other cultural forms (e.g. music) benefit from audiences who want to share cultural objects and fandom with others. +Such a design would continue to offer individuals and communities the agency social media affords them to respectively shape their own intersectional identities and self-govern. Yet at the same time it would avoid the rampant "false consensus" effect where netizens come to believe that extreme or idiosyncratic views are widely shared, fueling demonization of those who do not share them and a feeling of resentment when associated political outcomes are not achieved or "pluralistic ignorance" where netizens are unable to act collectively on "silent majority" views.[^Note] Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, it would reshape the incentives of journalists and other creators away from divisive content and towards stories that bring us together. It is relevant beyond "hard journalism" *per se* as many other cultural forms (e.g. music) benefit from audiences who want to share cultural objects and fandom with others. ### ⿻ public media @@ -65,7 +73,7 @@ This might play out in a variety of ways, but a simple one would be for particip Overall, the examples above show how ⿻ can empower a new pro-social, ⿻ media environment: one where we can connect deeply with others from very different backgrounds as us, where people come together to tell their stories in authoritative and verifiable ways without compromising community or individual privacy and where we come to understand what unites and divides us in the interests of the dynamism and solidarity of all our communities. -[^Note]: An example of false consensus is that many observers believe SARS-Cov-2 escaped from a laboratory ('lab leak' hypothesis). The rationalist web site Rootclaim (https://www.rootclaim.com/) even assessed 'lab leak' at 89% probability (~8 to 1 in favour). Subsequently, educated laypersons were exposed to the evidence (e.g. Pekar et al., Science 377, 960–966, 2022 and Worobey et al., Science 377, 951–959, 2022.) in over 18 hours of adversarial debate and found posterior probabilities on the order of ~800 to 1 *against* lab leak, implying a Bayes factor of ~100,000 to 1 against lab leak. Despite the strength of the evidence, the lab leak claim persists since not only does zoonosis lack emotional resonance but it also requires hard work to evaluate and offers no cathartic pay-off. Similarly, due to ⿻istic ignorance, despite the fact that more than 81 million people in the United States voted for Joe Biden in 2020, a small crowd of several thousand highly motivated individuals almost succeeded in disrupting the Electoral College vote count on 6 January 2021. +[^Note]: Gary Marks and Norman Miller, "Ten Years of Research on the False-Consensus Effect: An Empirical and Theoretical Review, *Psyhcological Bulletin* 102, no. 1: 72-90. Deborah A. Prentice and Dale T. Miller, "Pluralistic Ignorance and the Perpetuation of Social Norms by Unwitting Actors", *Advances in Social Psychology* 28 (1996): 161-209. An example of false consensus is that many observers believe SARS-Cov-2 escaped from a laboratory ('lab leak' hypothesis). The rationalist web site [Rootclaim](https://www.rootclaim.com/) even assessed 'lab leak' at 89% probability (~8 to 1 in favour). Subsequently, educated laypersons were exposed to the evidence in over 18 hours of adversarial debate and found posterior probabilities on the order of ~800 to 1 *against* lab leak, implying a Bayes factor of ~100,000 to 1 against lab leak. Despite the strength of the evidence, the lab leak claim persists since not only does zoonosis lack emotional resonance but it also requires hard work to evaluate and offers no cathartic pay-off. Similarly, due to pluralistic ignorance, despite the fact that more than 81 million people in the United States voted for Joe Biden in 2020, a small crowd of several thousand highly motivated individuals almost succeeded in disrupting the Electoral College vote count on 6 January 2021. Jonathan E. Pekar et al., "The Molecular Epidemiology of Multiple Zoonotic Origins of SARS-CoV-2", *Science* 377, no. 6609 960-966. Michael Worobey et al., "The Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan was the Early Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic", *Science* 377, no. 6609: 951-959. [^Publicmedia]: Kleis Nielsen, Rasmus, and Geert Linnebank, “Public Support for the Media: A Six-Country Overview of Direct and Indirect Subsidies,” (Oxfordshire: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: University of Oxford, 2011), https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/Public%20support%20for%20Media.pdf. [^Religiousmedia]: “Grants for Religious Media Organizations,” Cause IQ, n.d., https://www.causeiq.com/directory/grants/grants-for-religious-media-organizations/. [^Twitterrev]: “Advertising Revenue of X (Formerly Twitter) Worldwide from 2017 to 2027,” Statista, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/271337/twitters-advertising-revenue-worldwide/. From 6e237a0361fa093973f683bb7212f42962b94512 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:50:13 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 06/17] update README --- scripts/index/README.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/README.md b/scripts/index/README.md index efe0f6e0..a70fbfec 100644 --- a/scripts/index/README.md +++ b/scripts/index/README.md @@ -17,4 +17,5 @@ - no_occurence: Some looks mistake (e.g. `W. Mitchell Waldrop` does not occur but `M. Mitchell Waldrop` occurs), some may because of acronym in palens (e.g. `Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT)`) - Changed `Universal Record Locator` to `Uniform Resource Locator`, and fixed `W. Mitchell Waldrop`. - Fix some upper/lower diversity (e.g. `Virtual Reality` and `Virtual reality`) -- Keywords with acronym such as `Artificial Intelligence (AI)`: If it does not occerred, remove after palens and search again. \ No newline at end of file +- Keywords with acronym such as `Artificial Intelligence (AI)`: If it does not occerred, remove after palens and search again. +- Keywords with quotes such as `Diversity of "groups"`: remove quotes \ No newline at end of file From 3509a82c50d8d2e0f99a7effb712896eaf071a31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 14:53:08 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 07/17] update data --- ...lurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv | 339 +++++++++++-- scripts/index/contributors.tsv | 6 +- scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 453 +++++++++++++----- scripts/index/no_occurence.txt | 27 +- scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv | 64 +-- 5 files changed, 713 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv index 134a3c9d..522ab492 100644 --- a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv +++ b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv @@ -1,37 +1,60 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,(anti-)social media,02-02,cFQ ,(In)dividual identity,03-02,tsuzumik +,⿻,03-00,cFQ ,⿻ Artist,05-03,cFQ +,⿻ Book,05-07,cFQ ,⿻ Conversational and Funding Tools,06-01,cFQ ,⿻ Cryptography,06-03,cFQ +,⿻ Funding Across Boundaries,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Funding Formula,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ funding:,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Future,05-07,cFQ ,⿻ good,06-02,cFQ -,⿻ health agency,06-02,cFQ +,⿻ Governance,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Group,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Health Agency,06-02,cFQ ,⿻ Health Association,06-02,cFQ -,⿻ hiring,06-01,cFQ +,⿻ Hiring,06-01,cFQ +,⿻ Identity Systems,05-06,cFQ +,⿻ Identity Systems,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Image,03-00,cFQ ,⿻ Interaction,06-04,cFQ +,⿻ Management,05-07,cFQ ,⿻ Marketing,06-00,cFQ ,⿻ mechanism,06-02,cFQ ,⿻ Media,06-03,cFQ -,⿻ practic,05-03,cFQ -,⿻ public,06-02,cFQ +,⿻ Money,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Practic,05-03,cFQ +,⿻ Principles,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Property,05-07,cFQ +,⿻ Public,06-02,cFQ +,⿻ Public,06-04,cFQ ,⿻ Public Media,06-03,cFQ -,⿻ publics,06-04,cFQ -,⿻ structure,06-03,cFQ +,⿻ Rule,05-06,cFQ +,⿻ Structure,06-03,cFQ ,⿻ Technologist,05-04,cFQ -,⿻ technology,06-00,cFQ -,⿻ vision,06-02,cFQ -,⿻-goods financing,06-02,cFQ +,⿻ Technology,06-00,cFQ +,⿻ Thinking,05-06,cFQ +,⿻ Vision,06-02,cFQ +,⿻ 數位 Plurality,03-00,cFQ +,⿻-goods Financing,06-02,cFQ ,⿻istic,05-04,cFQ -,⿻istic ignorance,06-03,cFQ +,⿻istic,05-06,cFQ +,⿻istic Ignorance,06-03,cFQ ,12-Year Basic Education Curriculum,02-02,cFQ ,20% time model,06-01,cFQ ,2050 net zero,02-02,cFQ ,3D Audio,05-01,nishio ,4Chan,02-00,cFQ +,51% Attack,05-06,cFQ ,5G,02-00,cFQ +,A Connected Society,03-00,cFQ ,a priori,06-00,cFQ ,Abolitionist,06-03,cFQ ,Abundance technocracy (AT),04-00,tsuzumik +,Abuses Of Monopoly,05-07,cFQ +,Abusus,05-07,cFQ ,Academia Sinica,02-01,cFQ ,Academic Peer Review,05-04,cFQ ,Accelerationist,02-00,cFQ @@ -39,6 +62,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Active Listening,05-04,cFQ ,ActivityPub,02-00,cFQ ,ActivityPub,03-03,nishio +,Adaptive Representation,05-06,cFQ ,Administration,05-04,cFQ ,Administrative Application,05-05,cFQ ,Administrative Practice,05-05,cFQ @@ -61,21 +85,24 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,AIDS,06-02,cFQ ,Ainulindalë,01-01,cFQ ,Air pollution,06-04,cFQ +,Albert Hirschman,05-07,cFQ ,Alexis de Tocqueville,02-00,cFQ ,Algorithmic Ranking System,05-04,cFQ ,Alien Art,05-03,cFQ ,Alien Intelligence,05-03,cFQ ,Alignment assemblies,02-02,cFQ -,All Our Ideas,06-01,cFQ ,All Our Ideas,05-04,cFQ +,All Our Ideas,06-01,cFQ ,AlphaGo,05-03,cFQ ,AlphaGo Zero,05-03,cFQ +,Amartya Sen,05-06,cFQ ,American Democracy,03-02,nishio ,American Legislative Capitol,02-01,cFQ ,American Revolution,06-00,cFQ ,Analysis Paralysis,05-04,cFQ ,Android,04-00,tsuzumik ,Anthropic,05-04,cFQ +,Anthropic,05-07,cFQ ,Anthropocene,06-04,cFQ ,Anthropologist,05-05,cFQ ,Anti-authoritarianism,02-01,cFQ @@ -84,14 +111,18 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Antipathy,02-00,cFQ ,Antiretroviral Therapie,06-02,cFQ ,Antisocial,02-00,cFQ +,Antitrust,05-07,cFQ ,Apple's Torus Spaceship,06-01,cFQ ,Application Ecosystem,06-02,cFQ +,Approval Voting,05-06,cFQ ,Arab Spring,02-00,cFQ ,Ariana Zetlin,05-05,cFQ ,Arms Race,06-00,cFQ ,Arms Race,06-03,cFQ +,Arnold Harberger,05-07,cFQ ,ARPANET,02-00,cFQ ,ARPANET,03-03,nishio +,Arrow's Theorem,05-06,cFQ ,Articles 145 of the ROC,02-01,cFQ ,Artificial General Intelligence,02-00,cFQ ,Artificial Intelligence,02-00,cFQ @@ -102,12 +133,14 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Asia Development Bank,02-02,cFQ ,Aspirations to equality,04-00,tsuzumik ,Assimilation,02-01,cFQ +,Assisted Real-time Voting,05-06,cFQ ,Asynchronous Communication,06-01,cFQ ,Athena's tapestry,01-01,cFQ ,Athenian Marketplace,05-04,cFQ ,Atomist,03-03,nishio ,Attention auction,04-00,tsuzumik ,attention exchange tax,07-00,gnomevan +,Audrey Tang,03-00,cFQ ,Augmented Reality,04-00,tsuzumik ,Augmented Reality,05-02,nishio ,Australia,06-02,cFQ @@ -124,8 +157,10 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Aviv Ovadya,05-04,cFQ ,Awe,05-03,cFQ ,Ayn Rand,02-00,cFQ +,Background Signals,05-06,cFQ ,Badges,05-05,cFQ ,Balaji Srinavasan,02-00,cFQ +,Banks,04-03,gnomevan ,Basic Antigen,06-02,cFQ ,BBN,03-03,nishio ,BCI,06-02,cFQ @@ -146,7 +181,10 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Blindness of Justice,05-05,cFQ ,Blitzscaling,06-00,cFQ ,Blockchain,02-00,cFQ +,Blockchain,05-07,cFQ ,Blockchains,02-00,cFQ +,Bluesky,04-02,gnomevan +,Bottom-up,05-06,cFQ ,Brain interface,06-03,cFQ ,Brain-Computer Interfaces,05-01,nishio ,Braver Angels,05-04,cFQ @@ -159,7 +197,9 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Buddhism,02-02,cFQ ,Bureaucracies,05-05,cFQ ,Bureaucratic Rules,05-05,cFQ +,By An Invisible Hand,05-07,cFQ ,Campus Athletics,06-01,cFQ +,Canada,05-07,cFQ ,Canada,06-02,cFQ ,Canada,06-04,cFQ ,Cancel Culture,02-00,cFQ @@ -167,6 +207,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Capitalism,05-07,gnomevan ,Carbon Credit,06-02,cFQ ,Casey Handmer,05-03,cFQ +,Cash,04-03,gnomevan ,Catastrophic Risks,02-00,cFQ ,Cathy O’Neil,02-00,cFQ ,Cellphone Addiction,02-02,cFQ @@ -177,13 +218,16 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Centralized Surveillance,02-00,cFQ ,Centralized Top-down,02-00,cFQ ,Centralizing,02-00,cFQ +,Charity,05-07,cFQ ,Charter Cities,05-05,cFQ ,charter town,03-03,nishio ,Chen Shui-bian,02-01,cFQ +,Cheques,04-03,gnomevan ,Chiang Ching-Kuo,02-01,cFQ ,Chiang Kai-shek,02-01,cFQ ,Child Mortality,06-02,cFQ ,Chinese Communist Party,02-01,cFQ +,Circular investment,05-07,cFQ ,Citizen co-journalism,06-03,cFQ ,Citizen Journalism,06-03,cFQ ,Citizen Volunteers,02-02,cFQ @@ -197,7 +241,10 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Civil IoT,06-04,cFQ ,Civil Livelihood,02-01,cFQ ,Civil Rights movement,02-01,cFQ +,Civilization,05-06,cFQ ,Civilization VI,02-00,cFQ +,Civilization VI,05-06,cFQ +,Civilizing,05-07,cFQ ,Claude,05-04,cFQ ,Clean Energy,06-04,cFQ ,Climate Change,06-04,cFQ @@ -208,10 +255,13 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Co-decision Making Processe,06-02,cFQ ,Co-edited Project,05-03,cFQ ,Co-writing,05-03,cFQ +,Codetermination,05-07,cFQ ,Cofacts,02-02,cFQ ,Cold War,02-00,cFQ ,Collaboration Across Difference,06-04,cFQ +,Collaboration Across Diversity,05-07,cFQ ,Collaborative Diversity,02-01,cFQ +,Collaborative Exchange,05-07,cFQ ,Collaborative Filtering,05-04,cFQ ,Collaborative Innovation,05-03,cFQ ,Collaborative Journalism,06-03,cFQ @@ -219,27 +269,35 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Collaborative Platform,05-03,cFQ ,Collaborative Platform,05-03,cFQ ,Collaborative Problem Solving,02-01,cFQ +,Collaborative Technologies,05-06,cFQ ,Collaborative Technology,01-01,cFQ ,Collaborative Technology,05-00,nishio ,Collective Alignment,05-04,cFQ ,Collective Consciousness,05-03,cFQ ,Collective Creativity,05-03,cFQ +,Collective Decision,05-06,cFQ ,Collective Deliberation,05-05,cFQ ,Collective Intelligence,06-01,cFQ +,Collective Organization,03-00,cFQ ,Collective Problem-solving,06-04,cFQ ,Collective Response Model,05-04,cFQ ,Collective Response Systems,05-04,cFQ ,Collegia,06-02,cFQ ,Colonial Outsider,05-05,cFQ +,Colorado State Legislature,05-06,cFQ ,Commanding Heights,02-00,cFQ ,Common Belief,06-00,cFQ ,Common Carriers of Public Discussion,06-03,cFQ ,Common Content,06-03,cFQ ,Common Corporate Infrastructure,06-01,cFQ +,Common Good,05-07,cFQ +,Common Knowledge,04-02,gnomevan ,Common Will,05-04,cFQ +,Common Will,05-06,cFQ ,Commons-Based Property,03-03,nishio ,Communism,02-00,cFQ ,Community Currency,05-00,nishio +,Community Donation,05-07,cFQ ,Community Notes (CN)　,05-04,cFQ ,Community-based,06-00,cFQ ,Community-Based Identity,03-03,nishio @@ -247,20 +305,28 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Competitive authoritarian regimes,04-00,tsuzumik ,Competitive Effect,06-00,cFQ ,Complexity,05-05,cFQ +,Compulsory Purchase,05-07,cFQ ,Computer-simulated Neuron,05-05,cFQ +,Confidential Computing,04-02,gnomevan ,Conformity,05-05,cFQ ,Confucian Tradition,02-01,cFQ ,Connected Society,03-02,nishio +,Consociational,05-06,cFQ ,Consociationalism,03-03,nishio +,Consociationalism,05-06,cFQ ,Constitutional Court,02-02,cFQ ,Contribution,06-01,cFQ ,Cooperative Enterprise,02-01,cFQ +,Cooperatives,05-07,cFQ ,Copyright,02-00,cFQ ,Corporate Bureaucracy,05-05,cFQ ,Corporate Campuse,06-01,cFQ ,Corporate Control,05-02,nishio ,Corporate Libertarianism,02-00,cFQ +,Corporations,05-07,cFQ +,Correlation discounting,05-06,cFQ ,Cortico,05-04,cFQ +,Countervail,05-07,cFQ ,Coursera,05-03,cFQ ,Courtney Cogburn,06-03,cFQ ,COVID-19,06-02,cFQ @@ -281,6 +347,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Cryptographic,06-03,cFQ ,Cryptographic Hypercapitalism,02-00,cFQ ,Cryptographic Principle,06-02,cFQ +,Cryptographic Standards,04-02,gnomevan ,Cryptography,02-00,cFQ ,Cryptonomicon,02-00,cFQ ,Cultural Diversity,05-03,cFQ @@ -288,12 +355,16 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Cultural Homogenization,05-03,cFQ ,Cultural Norm,05-05,cFQ ,Cultural Practice,05-05,cFQ +,Currency,04-03,gnomevan ,Curriculum Vitae (CV),05-05,cFQ ,Curtis Yarvin,02-00,cFQ ,Cybernetic Society,03-02,nishio ,Cybernetics,03-02,nishio ,Danielle Allen,04-00,tsuzumik ,Danielle Allen,05-05,cFQ +,Danielle Allen,05-07,cFQ +,Danielle Allen,03-00,cFQ +,DAO,05-06,cFQ ,Daoism,02-01,cFQ ,dApps,06-00,cFQ ,Darkening Clouds,06-02,cFQ @@ -308,20 +379,30 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Data-driven Actors,06-04,cFQ ,Dave Egger,05-03,cFQ ,David Kidd,05-05,cFQ +,"De Tocqueville, Alexis",04-02,gnomevan +,Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP),04-02,gnomevan ,Decentralized Social Technologies,02-00,cFQ ,Decentralized Web,03-03,nishio ,Decentralized Web,04-00,tsuzumik ,Decision Trees,05-05,cFQ +,Declaration for the Future of the Internet,04-05,gnomevan ,Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace,02-00,cFQ ,Decontee Davis,06-03,cFQ +,Decreasing Marginal Returns,05-07,cFQ +,Decreasing Returns,05-07,cFQ +,Deepfakes,04-05,gnomevan ,DeepMind,02-00,cFQ ,Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,02-00,cFQ ,Deforestation,06-04,cFQ ,Degressive Proportionality,03-03,nishio +,Degressive Proportionality,05-06,cFQ +,Degressive Proportionality,05-06,cFQ ,Deliberation,05-00,nishio -,Deliberation,06-03,cFQ ,Deliberation,05-04,cFQ +,Deliberation,06-03,cFQ ,Democracy,02-00,cFQ +,Democracy,05-06,cFQ +,Democracy,03-00,cFQ ,Democracy in America,02-00,cFQ ,Democratic Advocates,02-01,cFQ ,Democratic freedom,02-01,cFQ @@ -332,11 +413,16 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Democratic Progressive Party,02-01,cFQ ,Democratic Republican Government,06-00,cFQ ,Demonization,06-03,cFQ +,Descriptive,03-00,cFQ ,Designated Verifier Proofs (DVP),04-02,gnomevan ,Deweyian pragmatism,02-01,cFQ +,Difference,03-00,cFQ +,Differential Privacy,04-02,gnomevan +,Differing Degrees,05-06,cFQ ,Diffusion of Information,05-04,cFQ ,Digital Archaeology,05-03,cFQ ,Digital asset taxes,07-00,gnomevan +,Digital Assistant,05-06,cFQ ,Digital Certificate,06-02,cFQ ,Digital Civic Engagement,02-02,cFQ ,Digital competence education,02-02,cFQ @@ -348,6 +434,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Digital Democracy Initiative,01-01,cFQ ,Digital Divide,05-02,nishio ,Digital Divide,05-03,cFQ +,Digital Infrastructure,04-05,gnomevan ,Digital interaction,04-00,tsuzumik ,Digital land tax,07-00,gnomevan ,Digital Legacies,05-03,cFQ @@ -363,11 +450,14 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Digital Social Engagement,06-04,cFQ ,Digital Stagnation,02-00,cFQ ,Digital Technology,05-05,cFQ -,Digital Twins,06-04,cFQ +,Digital Technology,03-00,cFQ ,Digital Twins,05-03,cFQ +,Digital Twins,06-04,cFQ ,Digital Workspace,05-03,cFQ ,Digital Yuan,02-00,cFQ ,Digital-native currencies,04-00,tsuzumik +,Diplomatic Decisions,05-06,cFQ +,Diplomatic Favor,05-06,cFQ ,Diplomatic Nuance,02-01,cFQ ,Direct Collective Representative,05-04,cFQ ,Direct Election of the President,02-01,cFQ @@ -378,10 +468,12 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Displacement,02-00,cFQ ,Disruption,06-01,cFQ ,Distributed Autonomous Organizations (DAOs),05-05,cFQ +,Distributed Autonomous Organizations (DAOs),05-07,cFQ ,Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT),04-02,gnomevan ,Distributed Ledgers,05-05,cFQ ,Distributed Network of Signals,05-05,cFQ ,Distributed Participation,06-03,cFQ +,Distribution,05-07,cFQ ,Diverse Legal System,05-05,cFQ ,Diverse Perspective,05-03,cFQ ,Diversification,05-05,cFQ @@ -397,6 +489,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Dr. Seuss,05-04,cFQ ,Driverless Cars,02-00,cFQ ,Durkheim,06-02,cFQ +,Duverger's Law,05-06,cFQ +,Dynamic,05-07,cFQ ,Dystopian Outcome,05-03,cFQ ,e-citizenship,06-01,cFQ ,E-Government,02-00,cFQ @@ -408,6 +502,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Ebola,06-03,cFQ ,Echo Chamber,06-03,cFQ ,Echo Chambers,05-04,cFQ +,Economies Esteem,05-07,cFQ ,Economist Intelligence Unit,02-02,cFQ ,Edmund Burke,06-04,cFQ ,Educational Psychology,05-05,cFQ @@ -415,19 +510,26 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,edX,05-03,cFQ ,Egalitarianism,02-01,cFQ ,EGDI,02-00,cFQ +,Eigenvalues,05-06,cFQ +,Eigenvoting,05-06,cFQ ,Election,04-00,tsuzumik ,Election,05-04,cFQ +,Election,05-06,cFQ ,Elite Universities,05-05,cFQ ,Elon Musk,02-00,cFQ ,Emergent Publics,03-02,nishio +,Emergent Publics,05-07,cFQ +,Eminent Domain,05-07,cFQ ,Emmanuel Saez,02-02,cFQ ,Emotion Tracking,05-01,nishio ,Emotional Connectivity,05-02,nishio ,Empathetic Technology,05-01,nishio ,Empathy Amplifiers,05-02,nishio ,Encounter with the East,05-03,cFQ +,Endowments,05-07,cFQ ,Enlightenment,03-03,nishio ,Entrepreneurial Sovereignty (ES),04-00,tsuzumik +,Entrepreneurship,05-07,cFQ ,Environment,06-00,cFQ ,Environment Sensing Network,06-04,cFQ ,Environmental Devastation,02-00,cFQ @@ -441,6 +543,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Ethereum Attestation Service,06-02,cFQ ,Ethnic Pluralism,02-01,cFQ ,Ethnographer,05-05,cFQ +,European Union,05-06,cFQ ,Excessive Fragmentation,06-01,cFQ ,Excessive Segregation,06-01,cFQ ,Existential Risks,02-00,cFQ @@ -450,6 +553,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Expert,05-05,cFQ ,Export-orientation,02-01,cFQ ,Extended Reality,06-02,cFQ +,Externalities,05-07,cFQ +,Externalities,05-07,cFQ ,Extreme Sports,06-01,cFQ ,Extreme underinvestment,06-02,cFQ ,Extremist Parties,02-00,cFQ @@ -465,13 +570,17 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Fascism,02-00,cFQ ,"Fast, Fun and Fair",02-02,cFQ ,Feature Phone,05-05,cFQ +,Federal,05-06,cFQ ,Federal Pension Insurance system,05-05,cFQ ,FIDES,06-02,cFQ ,Financial Capitalism,02-00,cFQ ,Financial Innovation,02-00,cFQ +,Financial Markets,05-07,cFQ +,Financial markets,05-07,cFQ ,Financial Technology,02-00,cFQ ,Finnish government,05-05,cFQ ,Fintech,02-00,cFQ +,First Additional Vote,05-06,cFQ ,Five Star Rating System,05-04,cFQ ,Fluidity,06-04,cFQ ,Folk Religion,02-02,cFQ @@ -480,20 +589,28 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Foundation Model,02-00,cFQ ,Foundation Models,02-00,cFQ ,Foxconn,02-02,cFQ +,Fractional Reserve Banking,04-03,gnomevan ,Fragile Democracies,02-00,cFQ ,Franz Kafka,05-05,cFQ ,Freddy Lim,02-02,cFQ ,free China,02-01,cFQ ,Free Markets Know Best,02-00,cFQ ,Free speech,04-00,tsuzumik +,Free Trade,05-07,cFQ +,Free Trade Agreements,05-07,cFQ ,Freedom House,02-02,cFQ ,Freedom of association,04-00,tsuzumik ,Freedom of the Press,06-03,cFQ ,French Revolution,06-00,cFQ +,Frictions,05-07,cFQ +,Fructus,05-07,cFQ ,Full Multisensory Shared Experience,05-03,cFQ +,Full-time Employment,05-07,cFQ +,Fundamental Welfare Theorems,05-07,cFQ ,Funder,06-02,cFQ ,Funding Pool,06-02,cFQ ,Fusion,05-00,nishio +,Futarchy,05-06,cFQ ,Future Collaborator,05-03,cFQ ,g0v,02-02,cFQ ,g0v,06-02,cFQ @@ -502,6 +619,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Gamification,06-02,cFQ ,Ganga River,06-04,cFQ ,Gathering Storm,02-00,cFQ +,Gathering Storm,05-06,cFQ ,Gavi,06-02,cFQ ,GDP,06-01,cFQ ,General Data Protection Regulation,02-00,cFQ @@ -531,9 +649,14 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,GitHub Sponsors,05-07,gnomevan ,GitLab,05-03,cFQ ,Global Anti-colonial Movement,02-01,cFQ +,Global Capitalism,05-07,cFQ ,Global Consciousness Networks,05-02,nishio ,Global Crossroad,02-01,cFQ +,Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online,04-05,gnomevan ,Global Fund,06-02,cFQ +,Global Government,05-07,cFQ +,Global Legitimacy,05-06,cFQ +,Global Policies,05-06,cFQ ,Global Positioning,05-05,cFQ ,Global Warming,06-04,cFQ ,Globarization,01-01,cFQ @@ -542,6 +665,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Gold Card,06-01,cFQ ,Golden Age,02-00,cFQ ,Good Old-fashioned AI (GOFAI),05-05,cFQ +,Google,05-07,cFQ ,Google,06-01,cFQ ,Google DeepMind,05-03,cFQ ,Gov4Git,06-02,cFQ @@ -557,6 +681,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,HackMD,06-02,cFQ ,Hakka,02-01,cFQ ,Hannah Arendt,06-00,cFQ +,Hannah Arendt,03-00,cFQ ,Hanson,06-02,cFQ ,Haptic Feedback,05-01,nishio ,Haptic Feedback,05-02,nishio @@ -571,7 +696,10 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Henry George,02-01,cFQ ,Henry George,02-02,cFQ ,Henry George,03-02,nishio +,Henry George,05-07,cFQ +,Henry George,03-00,cFQ ,Henry George Theorem,03-02,tsuzumik +,Henry George Theorem States,05-07,cFQ ,Her,02-00,cFQ ,Herbert Simon,05-04,cFQ ,Herculaneum,05-03,cFQ @@ -579,6 +707,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Heritage Foundation,02-02,cFQ ,High Modernism,03-03,nishio ,High-Bandwidth Communication,05-01,nishio +,Higher-fidelity Signals,05-06,cFQ ,HiredScore,05-05,cFQ ,Hiring Manager,05-05,cFQ ,Hit Rates,06-01,cFQ @@ -591,10 +720,13 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Homogenization,05-01,nishio ,Homogenization,05-05,cFQ ,Homogenization of Ideas,05-03,cFQ +,Homogenize,05-07,cFQ +,Homomorphic Encryption,04-02,gnomevan ,Horizontal Dialogue,06-01,cFQ ,Hsieh Tsung-min,02-01,cFQ ,Hu Shih,02-01,cFQ ,Hugging Face,05-03,cFQ +,Human Cooperation,05-07,cFQ ,Human Resources Platform,05-05,cFQ ,Human Rights,03-03,nishio ,Human Rights,05-00,nishio @@ -607,6 +739,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,HyperCerts,06-02,cFQ ,Hypertext,03-03,nishio ,Ian Banks,02-00,cFQ +,Iceland,05-06,cFQ ,ID2020,05-05,cFQ ,Ideathons,02-02,cFQ ,Identity and Access,06-00,cFQ @@ -622,7 +755,9 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Impact,06-02,cFQ ,Impact-investing,06-02,cFQ ,Impartial,05-05,cFQ +,Imperfections,05-07,cFQ ,Implementer,06-02,cFQ +,Impossibility Theorem,05-06,cFQ ,In-person Meeting,05-04,cFQ ,In-person Team,06-01,cFQ ,In-silico,05-03,cFQ @@ -636,28 +771,36 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation,05-05,cFQ ,Individual Identity,03-03,nishio ,individuality loss,05-01,nishio +,Industrial,05-07,cFQ ,Industry 1.0,02-00,cFQ ,Industry 2.0,02-00,cFQ ,Industry 3.0,02-00,cFQ ,Industry 4.0,02-00,cFQ ,Inequality,05-03,cFQ ,Infodemic,02-02,cFQ +,Information Age,04-05,gnomevan ,Information commons,04-00,tsuzumik +,Information Integrity,04-05,gnomevan ,Information Technology,02-00,cFQ ,Information Technology,04-00,tsuzumik +,Infrastructure,05-07,cFQ ,Insurer,06-02,cFQ ,Intelligence Augmentation,02-00,cFQ ,Inter-species Communication,05-02,nishio ,Interactive Agent,05-04,cFQ ,Intergalactic Computer Network,03-03,nishio ,International Monetary Fund,02-02,cFQ +,International Trade Treaties,05-07,cFQ ,Internet,05-04,cFQ +,Internet,03-00,cFQ +,Internet of Beings,04-05,gnomevan ,Internet of Things,02-00,cFQ ,Internet Tidal Wave,02-01,cFQ ,Internet-mediated Writing,05-04,cFQ ,Interoperability,02-00,cFQ ,Interoperability Across Legal Regime,05-05,cFQ ,Interplanetary File System (IPFS),04-04,gnomevan +,Intersectional,03-00,cFQ ,Intersectional Identity,03-02,nishio ,Intrapreneurship,06-01,cFQ ,iOS,04-00,tsuzumik @@ -667,6 +810,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,J. D. Vance,02-00,cFQ ,J.C.R. Licklider,02-00,cFQ ,J.C.R. Licklider,03-03,nishio +,J.C.R. Licklider,05-06,cFQ ,J.R.R. Tolkien,01-01,cFQ ,Jack Ma,02-00,cFQ ,Jaclyn Tsai,02-01,cFQ @@ -682,20 +826,25 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,"Jobs, Steve",06-01,gnomevan ,John Dewey,02-01,cFQ ,John Dewey,03-02,nishio +,John Dewey,05-07,cFQ +,John Dewey,03-00,cFQ ,John Perry Barlow,02-00,cFQ ,Joint Learning,06-01,cFQ ,Joseph Gordon-Levitt,05-03,cFQ +,Joseph Stiglitz,05-07,cFQ ,Josh Hawley,02-00,cFQ ,Jothons,02-02,cFQ ,Journalism,06-03,cFQ ,Journey of Humanity,05-00,nishio ,Julian Schilliger,05-03,cFQ +,Jurisdictional Boundaries,05-07,cFQ ,Just,05-05,cFQ ,Kao Chia-liang,02-02,cFQ ,Kaohsiung Incident,02-01,cFQ ,Karya,05-05,cFQ ,Kazakhstan,02-00,cFQ ,Kela-Kelpo project,05-05,cFQ +,Kenneth Arrow,05-06,cFQ ,Kevin Scott,06-01,cFQ ,Khan Academy,05-03,cFQ ,Kickstarter,05-03,cFQ @@ -705,6 +854,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Labor Augmentation,02-00,cFQ ,Labor Automation,02-00,cFQ ,Labor Law,02-00,cFQ +,Labor Markets,05-07,cFQ ,Labor Unions,05-07,gnomevan ,Land to the Tiller,02-01,cFQ ,Large Language Model (LLM),05-05,cFQ @@ -715,20 +865,27 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Legal Agent,06-04,cFQ ,Legal Jurisdiction,05-05,cFQ ,Legal Robot,05-05,cFQ +,Legal Tender,04-03,gnomevan ,Legislative Yuan,02-02,cFQ ,Legitimacy,06-00,cFQ ,Legitimation,02-00,cFQ +,Lego,05-07,cFQ +,Lesser of Two Evils,05-06,cFQ ,Lex Fridman,05-04,cFQ ,Liberal Democracy,03-03,nishio ,Liberalization of Taiwan,02-01,cFQ ,Liberating Structures,05-04,cFQ ,Libertarian Ideology,02-00,cFQ ,Libertarianism,02-00,cFQ +,Libertarianism,03-00,cFQ ,Life Expectancy,06-02,cFQ ,Life-support System,06-04,cFQ +,Limited Cultural Groups,05-07,cFQ ,LinkedIn,06-00,cFQ ,Linux,04-00,tsuzumik +,Lionel Penrose,05-06,cFQ ,Liquid Democracy,05-04,cFQ +,Liquid Democracy,05-06,cFQ ,Little Platoons,06-04,cFQ ,Livestream-based communication,02-02,cFQ ,LLM-based Representative,05-04,cFQ @@ -736,6 +893,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Local Language,05-05,cFQ ,Location Aware Sensor System,06-04,cFQ ,Long-distance Cooperation,02-01,cFQ +,Long-term Work Permits,05-07,cFQ ,Lorax,05-04,cFQ ,Los Alamos,05-03,cFQ ,Low-skilled Workers,02-00,cFQ @@ -754,8 +912,12 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Mandarin,02-01,cFQ ,Manipulation,05-01,nishio ,Mao Zedong,02-01,cFQ +,Marginal Revolution,05-07,cFQ ,Mark Zuckerberg,05-04,cFQ +,Market,05-07,cFQ +,Market Design,05-07,cFQ ,Market Power,02-00,cFQ +,Market power,05-07,cFQ ,Marxism,02-01,cFQ ,Marxist Vision of Socialism,02-01,cFQ ,Mask App,02-02,cFQ @@ -766,11 +928,13 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Masters of Scale,06-00,cFQ ,Mastodon,02-00,cFQ ,Mat Dryhurst,05-03,cFQ +,Matching Fund,05-07,cFQ ,Matching Fund,06-01,cFQ ,Material Redistribution,02-00,cFQ ,Maternal Mortality,06-02,cFQ ,Matthew Yglesias,02-00,cFQ ,Max Weber,05-05,cFQ +,Mechanism Design,05-07,cFQ ,Media,06-00,cFQ ,Media,06-03,cFQ ,Media Ecosystem,06-03,cFQ @@ -780,18 +944,21 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Mencius Moldbug,02-00,cFQ ,Mental Health,06-02,cFQ ,Meta,05-04,cFQ +,Meta,05-07,cFQ ,Metaverse,02-00,cFQ ,Metaverses,04-00,tsuzumik ,Mezzo Badges,05-05,cFQ ,Michelle Wu,05-04,cFQ +,Microsoft,05-05,cFQ ,Microsoft,06-01,cFQ ,Microsoft,06-03,cFQ -,Microsoft,05-05,cFQ ,Military Scenario,06-01,cFQ ,Millennium Development Declaration,06-02,cFQ +,Mimetic Models,04-05,gnomevan ,Minister of Digital Affairs,02-01,cFQ ,Minister without portfolio,02-02,cFQ ,Ministry for the Future,05-04,cFQ +,Ministry For The Future,05-07,cFQ ,Ministry of Digital Affairs,02-02,cFQ ,Minitel,02-00,cFQ ,Minquán,02-01,cFQ @@ -806,6 +973,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,modernity,03-03,nishio ,Monarchy,02-01,cFQ ,Monist,03-03,nishio +,Monist Atomism,03-00,cFQ ,Monolithic Threat,02-00,cFQ ,Monopolization,05-02,nishio ,Monopoly,03-02,nishio @@ -840,6 +1008,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Negative freedom of speech,04-00,tsuzumik ,Neil Armstrong,06-03,cFQ ,Neoliberal,02-00,cFQ +,Neoliberal Reaction,05-07,cFQ +,Neoliberalism,05-07,cFQ ,Neom,02-00,cFQ ,Netflix Prize,05-03,cFQ ,Netherlands,06-03,cFQ @@ -849,9 +1019,9 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Networked Value,03-02,nishio ,Networks of Human Minds,05-05,cFQ ,Neural Interfaces,05-01,nishio -,Neural Network,06-02,cFQ ,Neural Network,05-03,cFQ ,Neural network,05-05,cFQ +,Neural Network,06-02,cFQ ,Neurofeedback,05-01,nishio ,Neuromodulation,05-01,nishio ,New England town hall,05-04,cFQ @@ -859,7 +1029,6 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,New Zealand,06-04,cFQ ,News feed algorithm,05-04,cFQ ,Nicholas Bostrom,02-00,cFQ -,nishio,05-02,nishio ,Nixon's visit to PRC,02-01,cFQ ,Noah Smith,02-00,cFQ ,Nobody Movement,02-02,cFQ @@ -868,12 +1037,14 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,non-believers,02-02,cFQ ,Non-colonialist Model,06-02,cFQ ,Non-communicable Disease,06-02,cFQ +,Non-fungible Token (NFT),05-07,cFQ ,Non-human Perspective,05-03,cFQ ,Non-market,02-00,cFQ ,Non-renewable Energy Sources,06-04,cFQ ,Non-Verbal Communication,05-01,nishio ,Non-verbal Communication,05-04,cFQ ,Norbert Wiener,03-02,nishio +,Normative,03-00,cFQ ,North Atlantic Treaty Organization,02-00,cFQ ,North Star,06-00,cFQ ,Notion,05-03,cFQ @@ -893,6 +1064,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,"One Country, Two Systems",02-01,cFQ ,One-dimensional Spectrum,05-04,cFQ ,One-Person-One-Vote,03-03,nishio +,One-Share-One-Vot,05-06,cFQ +,One-share-one-vote,05-07,cFQ ,Online collaboration platform,05-03,cFQ ,Online Deliberation,03-03,nishio ,Online Gaming,05-02,nishio @@ -904,10 +1077,12 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Open Recognition Community,03-03,nishio ,Open Source,02-00,cFQ ,Open Source,05-00,nishio +,Open Source,05-07,cFQ ,Open Source Intelligence,06-03,cFQ ,Open Source Observer,06-02,cFQ ,Open Source Software,02-00,cFQ ,Open Source Software,03-03,nishio +,Open Source Software (OSS),05-07,cFQ ,Open Space Technology,05-04,cFQ ,Open Standard,03-03,nishio ,Open-source project,05-03,cFQ @@ -915,9 +1090,10 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Open-source Technology,05-03,cFQ ,OpenAI,02-00,cFQ ,OpenAI,02-02,cFQ +,OpenAI,05-04,cFQ +,OpenAI,05-07,cFQ ,OpenAI,06-00,cFQ ,OpenAI,06-01,cFQ -,OpenAI,05-04,cFQ ,Operating System,05-00,nishio ,Operating systems,04-00,tsuzumik ,Optimism Collective,06-02,gnomevan @@ -928,12 +1104,15 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Output,06-02,cFQ ,Packet Switching,03-03,nishio ,Packet-switching,05-05,cFQ +,Page Rank,05-06,cFQ ,Paradigm Shift,05-04,cFQ ,Paradox.ai,05-05,cFQ ,PARC,03-03,nishio ,Park of Aging,05-01,nishio +,Partial Common Ownership,05-07,cFQ ,Participation,02-00,cFQ ,Participative Production,02-01,cFQ +,Participatory Design,05-07,cFQ ,Participedia,05-04,cFQ ,Pascual Restrepo,02-00,cFQ ,Paul Jozef Crutzen,06-04,cFQ @@ -942,22 +1121,28 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,People's Republic of China (PRC),02-00,cFQ ,People's Republic of China (PRC),02-01,cFQ ,Peripheral,02-00,cFQ +,Personal Identities,03-00,cFQ ,Peter Thiel,02-00,cFQ ,Phishing Attack,06-02,cFQ ,Physical Work,06-01,cFQ +,Pigouvian Taxes,05-07,cFQ ,Pixar's headquarters,06-01,cFQ ,Place of Convergence,02-01,cFQ +,Plural Funding,05-07,cFQ ,Plural Future,01-01,cFQ +,Plural Management Protocol,05-07,cFQ ,Plural Spirit,02-01,cFQ ,Plural workplace,06-01,cFQ ,Pluralism,02-01,cFQ ,Polarization,02-00,cFQ -,Polis,06-01,cFQ ,Polis,02-02,cFQ -,Polis,06-02,cFQ ,Polis,05-04,cFQ +,Polis,06-01,cFQ +,Polis,06-02,cFQ ,Political Polarization,05-04,cFQ +,Polypolitan Migration Policy,05-07,cFQ ,Pompeii,05-03,cFQ +,Populist Movement ,05-07,cFQ ,Portals Policing Project,05-02,gnomevan ,Portals Policing Project,05-04,cFQ ,Positive freedom of speech,04-00,tsuzumik @@ -966,27 +1151,36 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Post-gender,02-00,cFQ ,Post-state,02-00,cFQ ,Post-symbolic Communication,05-01,nishio -,Post-symbolic Communication,06-00,cFQ ,Post-symbolic Communication,05-01,gnomevan ,Post-symbolic Communication,05-03,cFQ ,Post-symbolic Communication,05-05,cFQ +,Post-symbolic Communication,06-00,cFQ +,Power Concentration,05-06,cFQ ,Pragmatic,02-01,cFQ ,PRC Surveillance Regime,02-00,cFQ +,Precious Metals,04-03,gnomevan ,Prediction Market,05-00,nishio +,Prediction Markets,05-06,cFQ +,Prediction Markets,05-07,cFQ ,Predictive Futurism,02-00,cFQ ,Predictive Voting,06-02,cFQ ,Premature Optimization,05-00,nishio ,Prepayment,06-02,cFQ +,Prescriptive,03-00,cFQ ,Presidential Hackathon,02-02,cFQ ,Press Freedom,06-00,cFQ ,Press Responsibility,06-03,cFQ ,Principles of ⿻,05-03,cFQ ,Privacy,05-03,cFQ +,Private Community-based Sponsorship,05-07,cFQ ,Private Health Insurance,06-02,cFQ ,Private Information,06-02,cFQ ,Private Key,06-03,cFQ +,Private Organizations,05-07,cFQ ,Private Property,03-02,nishio ,Private Property,03-03,nishio +,Private Property,05-07,cFQ +,Private Property,05-07,cFQ ,Private Sector,02-00,cFQ ,Pro-social Media,06-03,cFQ ,Production Possibilities Frontier,05-00,nishio @@ -994,14 +1188,18 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Programmer,05-05,cFQ ,Progress and Poverty,03-02,nishio ,Progress Prizes,05-03,cFQ +,Project Liberty,04-02,gnomevan ,Projection Mapping,05-01,nishio ,Property Rights,03-02,nishio +,Property Rights,05-07,cFQ +,Proportional Representation,05-06,cFQ ,Proprioceptive Communication,05-01,nishio ,Public Consent,02-00,cFQ ,Public Digital Innovation Space,02-02,cFQ ,Public Expenditure,05-05,cFQ ,Public Good,06-02,cFQ ,Public Goods,05-05,cFQ +,Public Goods,05-07,cFQ ,Public Health Policy,06-02,cFQ ,Public Key Cryptography,04-02,gnomevan ,Public Participation,02-00,cFQ @@ -1009,21 +1207,32 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Public Sector,02-00,cFQ ,Public Service,05-05,cFQ ,Public Square,02-00,cFQ +,Public Welfare Shcemes,05-07,cFQ ,Public Will,05-05,cFQ +,Public Will,05-06,cFQ +,Public/Supermodular Goods,05-07,cFQ ,Purchasing Power Parity,02-02,cFQ ,Pythagoras,01-01,cFQ ,Qing,02-01,cFQ +,Quadratic Funding,05-07,cFQ +,Quadratic Liquid Democracy,05-06,cFQ ,Quadratic Voting,02-02,cFQ +,Quadratic Voting,05-06,cFQ +,Quantitative Markers ,05-07,cFQ +,RadicalxChange,05-06,cFQ ,Rainbow Flags,02-01,cFQ ,Rainforest Foundation US,05-05,cFQ ,Raj,06-02,cFQ ,Randomized Controlled Trials,06-00,cFQ +,Ranked Choice,05-06,cFQ ,rationality,03-03,nishio ,Ray Kurzweil,02-00,cFQ ,Ray Kurzweil,02-00,cFQ ,Ready Player One,05-02,nishio ,Realistic Avatar,06-01,cFQ ,Receipts,06-03,cFQ +,Reckless Monopolies,05-07,cFQ +,Redistribution,05-07,cFQ ,Redistribution,06-02,cFQ ,Regenerating Diversity,05-00,nishio ,Regenerative Economies,05-00,nishio @@ -1033,8 +1242,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Reid Hoffman,06-00,cFQ ,Reinstatement,02-00,cFQ ,Relevant public,03-02,tsuzumik -,Remesh,06-01,cFQ ,Remesh,05-04,cFQ +,Remesh,06-01,cFQ ,Remix and Replace,02-00,cFQ ,Remote Collaboration Tool,06-01,cFQ ,Remote Employee,06-01,cFQ @@ -1049,20 +1258,26 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Representative Statement,05-04,cFQ ,Representing Consensus Position,05-04,cFQ ,Research and Development,02-00,cFQ +,Research Policy,05-07,cFQ ,Resolution 2758,02-01,cFQ ,Reverse Mentors,02-01,cFQ ,Revive China Society,02-01,cFQ ,Revolutionary Democratic Direction,02-01,cFQ ,Rich Get Richer,05-05,cFQ +,Richard Arnott,05-07,cFQ ,Richard Nixon,02-01,cFQ ,Rights of free speech,04-00,tsuzumik ,Risk Pooling,06-02,cFQ ,River of Democracy,01-01,cFQ ,Robert Atkinson,02-00,cFQ +,Robin Hanson,05-06,cFQ ,"Robinson, James",02-00,cFQ +,Roblox,05-07,cFQ ,ROC,02-01,cFQ ,Ropes Course,06-01,cFQ ,Rough Consensus,06-03,cFQ +,Rule Of Law,05-07,cFQ +,Run-off,05-06,cFQ ,Rural Land Reform,02-01,cFQ ,Russian revolution,02-01,cFQ ,Sam Altman,02-00,cFQ @@ -1070,23 +1285,28 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,San Francisco,03-02,nishio ,Sardinia,06-01,cFQ ,SARS,02-02,cFQ -,Satya Nadella,06-01,cFQ ,Satya Nadella,05-05,cFQ +,Satya Nadella,06-01,cFQ ,Saudia Arabia,02-00,cFQ +,Scaling Collaboration,05-07,cFQ ,Scandinavian Countries,02-00,cFQ ,Science And Technology Studies,02-00,cFQ ,Science Fiction,02-00,cFQ +,Science Fiction,03-00,cFQ ,Search Engines,02-00,cFQ ,Seasteads,05-05,cFQ ,Sebastian Kurz,02-00,cFQ +,Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC),04-02,gnomevan ,Securities Laws,02-00,cFQ ,Security protocols,04-00,tsuzumik ,Seeds,06-00,cFQ ,Self-determination,02-01,cFQ +,Self-ownership,05-07,cFQ ,Sensory Degradation,05-01,nishio ,Sensory Integration,05-02,nishio ,SERVIR Amazonia,05-05,cFQ ,Seth Parker,05-03,cFQ +,Shared Goods,05-07,cFQ ,Shared Knowledge Base,05-03,cFQ ,Shoshanna Zuboff,02-00,cFQ ,Sidewalk Labs,02-00,cFQ @@ -1094,32 +1314,42 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Silent Majority,06-03,cFQ ,Simon Chang,02-02,cFQ ,Simon Johnson,02-00,cFQ +,"Simon, Herbert",04-02,gnomevan ,Simulated Military Exercise,06-01,cFQ ,Single Tax,03-02,nishio ,Sino-Japanese war,02-01,cFQ ,Siraya language,02-01,cFQ +,Slack,05-03,cFQ ,Slack,06-01,cFQ ,Slack,06-03,cFQ -,Slack,05-03,cFQ ,Smaller World,06-03,cFQ ,Smallpox,06-02,cFQ ,Smart City,02-00,cFQ ,Smart Contract,05-05,cFQ ,Snow Crash,02-00,cFQ +,"Snowden, Edward",04-02,gnomevan ,Social Collapse,02-00,cFQ ,social connectedness,03-01,nishio +,Social Connectedness,03-00,cFQ ,Social Control,02-00,cFQ ,Social Credit Score,02-00,cFQ ,Social Difference,05-00,nishio +,Social Distance,05-07,cFQ ,Social Distancing Measure,06-02,cFQ +,Social Diversity,05-07,cFQ ,Social Divide,06-00,cFQ ,Social Division,05-04,cFQ +,Social Division,05-06,cFQ ,Social Dynamics,03-02,nishio +,Social Equity,05-07,cFQ +,Social Esteem,05-07,cFQ ,Social Fabric,02-00,cFQ ,Social Identity System,06-01,cFQ +,Social Insurance,05-07,cFQ +,Social Interaction,05-07,cFQ ,Social Media,02-00,cFQ -,Social Media,06-03,cFQ ,Social Media,05-04,cFQ +,Social Media,06-03,cFQ ,Social Media Platform,05-04,cFQ ,Social Network,05-03,cFQ ,Social Order,05-05,cFQ @@ -1140,14 +1370,24 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Sortition,05-04,cFQ ,Source Confidentiality,06-03,cFQ ,South China Sea,02-01,cFQ +,Soviet Union,05-07,cFQ ,SpaceX,05-03,cFQ ,Spatial Computing,05-01,nishio ,speak for itself,06-03,cFQ ,Speciation,05-05,cFQ ,Sprightly,04-02,gnomevan +,Square Root,05-06,cFQ +,Square-root Voting,05-06,cFQ ,SSN,03-03,nishio +,Stagnant Democratic Stories,03-00,cFQ +,Stakeholder Corporation,05-07,cFQ +,Stakeholder Remedies,05-07,cFQ +,Stakeholders,05-07,cFQ +,Stakeholding,05-07,cFQ ,Standard Career Paths,06-01,cFQ ,Star Trek,02-00,cFQ +,Star Trek,03-00,cFQ +,Start-ups,05-07,cFQ ,Steve Jobs,06-01,cFQ ,Steven Levitsky,06-00,cFQ ,StoryCorps,05-04,cFQ @@ -1157,9 +1397,15 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Sub-Saharan Africa,06-02,cFQ ,Subcultural translation,05-00,nishio ,Sun Yat-Sen,02-01,cFQ +,Sun Yat-Sen,05-07,cFQ ,Sunflower Movement,02-02,cFQ ,Superintelligence,02-00,cFQ +,Supermodular Collaboration,05-07,cFQ +,Supermodular Investments,05-07,cFQ +,Supermodular Production,05-07,cFQ ,Supermodularity,05-00,nishio +,Supermodularity,05-07,cFQ +,Supermodularity,05-07,cFQ ,Superpower,02-02,cFQ ,Surveillance,02-00,cFQ ,Surveillance,05-02,nishio @@ -1176,9 +1422,11 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Taishō Democratic,02-01,cFQ ,Taivoan,02-01,cFQ ,Taiwan,02-00,cFQ +,Taiwan,05-07,cFQ ,Taiwan,06-01,cFQ ,Taiwan,06-03,cFQ ,Taiwan,06-04,cFQ +,Taiwan,03-00,cFQ ,Taiwan Self-Salvation Manifesto,02-01,cFQ ,Taiwan's Digital Civic Infrastructure,02-02,cFQ ,Talk to the City,05-04,cFQ @@ -1192,8 +1440,12 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Teams,06-01,cFQ ,Tech Left,02-00,cFQ ,Techlash,02-00,cFQ +,Technocracy,03-00,cFQ ,Technocratic Narrative,02-00,cFQ +,Technological Agenda,03-00,cFQ +,Technology,03-00,cFQ ,Technology Addiction,02-02,cFQ +,Technology For Collaboration Across Social Difference,03-00,cFQ ,Technology Investment,02-00,cFQ ,Ted Nelson,03-03,nishio ,Ted Nelson,05-03,cFQ @@ -1206,23 +1458,29 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Temporal Collaboration,05-03,cFQ ,Tensions between technology and democracy,04-00,tsuzumik ,Terminator,02-00,cFQ +,Territorial And Intellectual Property Treaties,05-07,cFQ ,The Age of Surveillance Capitalism,02-00,cFQ ,The Castle,05-05,cFQ ,The Circle,05-03,cFQ ,The Dream Machine,02-00,cFQ +,The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number,05-06,cFQ +,The Human Condition,03-00,cFQ ,The Lost Dao,04-00,tsuzumik ,The Lost Dao,05-03,cFQ ,The Network State,02-00,cFQ ,The New Republic,02-01,cFQ ,the Optimism Collective,06-02,cFQ ,The Parliament of Things,05-04,cFQ +,The Public and its Problems,05-07,cFQ ,The Social Dilemma,02-00,cFQ ,The Sovereign Individual,02-00,cFQ ,The Sovereign Individual,02-00,cFQ ,The World Cafe,05-04,cFQ ,Theocracy,02-00,cFQ ,Theory of Change,06-00,cFQ +,Thin Shell,05-07,cFQ ,Third Sector,02-01,cFQ +,Third Sector,05-07,cFQ ,Thomas Piketty,02-02,cFQ ,Three Principles of the People,02-01,cFQ ,time sharing,03-03,nishio @@ -1230,10 +1488,13 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Top Employer,05-05,cFQ ,Top-down,05-05,cFQ ,Total Factor Productivity,02-00,cFQ +,Towards a Connected Society,03-00,cFQ +,Tradable Carbon Permits,05-07,cFQ ,Traditional Practice,05-05,cFQ ,Transculturalism,01-01,cFQ ,Transhuman,06-02,cFQ ,Translation,05-05,cFQ +,Transnational Corporations,05-07,cFQ ,Transparent Database,05-05,cFQ ,Trello,06-01,cFQ ,Tridemism,02-01,cFQ @@ -1243,15 +1504,19 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Turing,05-05,cFQ ,Twitter,06-03,cFQ ,Tyranny of Structurelessness,05-04,cFQ +,Tyranny Of The Majority,05-06,cFQ ,UAE,02-00,cFQ ,UN,06-04,cFQ ,UN-Water,06-02,cFQ ,UNDP,06-02,cFQ ,Uniform Resource Locator (URL),04-04,gnomevan +,United Nations,05-06,cFQ ,United States,05-05,cFQ ,Universal Basic Income,02-00,cFQ ,Universal Birth Registration,03-03,nishio +,Universal Coded Character (unicode),03-00,cFQ ,Universal Declaration of Human Rights,04-00,tsuzumik +,Universal Declaration of Human Rights,04-05,gnomevan ,Unorthodox Thinking,06-01,cFQ ,Unstructured Communication,05-01,nishio ,Untapped,05-05,cFQ @@ -1262,11 +1527,15 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,User Experience,05-04,cFQ ,User Perspective,05-04,cFQ ,Ushahidi,05-05,cFQ +,Usus,05-07,cFQ +,Utility Regulation,05-07,cFQ ,V-Dem,02-02,cFQ ,Vaccine Alliance,06-02,cFQ ,Venture Capital,02-00,cFQ +,Venture Capital,05-07,cFQ ,Venture Capital,06-00,cFQ ,Venture Capitalist,06-00,cFQ +,Ventures,05-07,cFQ ,Verifiable Credential,05-05,cFQ ,Vesuvius Challenge,05-03,cFQ ,Violent Revolution,06-00,cFQ @@ -1281,23 +1550,30 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Virtual Tourism,05-02,nishio ,Voice-based Internet,05-05,cFQ ,Volume Cartographer,05-03,cFQ +,Vote,05-06,cFQ ,Voting,02-00,cFQ +,Voting Based On Measures Of Power,05-06,cFQ +,Voting Based On Population Size,05-06,cFQ ,VR Therapy,05-02,nishio ,vTaiwan,02-02,cFQ ,vTaiwan,05-04,cFQ ,Vulcan philosophy,05-00,nishio +,Vulcans,03-00,cFQ +,Wage System,05-07,cFQ ,War of Independence,06-00,cFQ ,Water Management,06-04,cFQ ,Wave of ⿻,06-03,cFQ +,Wealth Taxes,05-07,cFQ ,Weapons of Math Destruction,02-00,cFQ ,Web 2.0,02-00,cFQ ,web of group-affiliation,03-02,nishio ,Web2 application,06-02,cFQ ,Web3,02-00,cFQ -,Web3,02-00,cFQ ,Web3,04-00,tsuzumik +,Web3,05-07,cFQ ,Web3,06-00,cFQ ,Wei Ting-chao,02-01,cFQ +,Weighted-voting,05-06,cFQ ,Weimar Republic,04-00,tsuzumik ,WEIRD societies,03-03,nishio ,Welfare Capitalism,05-00,nishio @@ -1310,12 +1586,14 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Widening Gulf,02-00,cFQ ,Wikipedia,02-00,cFQ ,Wikipedia,03-03,nishio -,Wikipedia,06-03,cFQ ,Wikipedia,05-03,cFQ +,Wikipedia,06-03,cFQ ,wikisurvey,02-02,cFQ ,Wikisurveys,05-04,cFQ +,Will Of The Group,05-06,cFQ ,will.i.am,05-03,cFQ ,William Rees-Mogg,02-00,cFQ +,William Vickrey,05-07,cFQ ,Windows,04-00,tsuzumik ,Winslow Porter,06-03,cFQ ,Wisdom of the Crowd,06-02,cFQ @@ -1328,12 +1606,15 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Workplace,06-00,cFQ ,Workplace,06-01,cFQ ,Workspace,05-03,cFQ +,World Congress,05-06,cFQ ,World Economic Forum,05-05,cFQ ,World Food Programme,06-02,cFQ ,World Health Organization (WHO),02-02,cFQ ,World Health Organization (WHO),06-02,cFQ ,World Press Freedom Index,06-03,cFQ +,"World Trade Organization,",05-07,cFQ ,World War,06-03,cFQ +,World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),04-02,gnomevan ,Writing,05-04,cFQ ,WWII,02-01,cFQ ,X (formerly Twitter),05-04,cFQ @@ -1347,6 +1628,8 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Yuans,02-01,cFQ ,Yushan,02-01,cFQ ,Zero Trust,02-02,cFQ -,Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs),06-03,cFQ ,Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs),04-02,gnomevan -,Zheng Chenggong,02-01,cFQ \ No newline at end of file +,Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs),06-03,cFQ +,Zheng Chenggong,02-01,cFQ +,Zoning Restrictions,05-07,cFQ +,數位,03-00,cFQ \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/scripts/index/contributors.tsv b/scripts/index/contributors.tsv index 1acaa5ac..1f8299c0 100644 --- a/scripts/index/contributors.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/contributors.tsv @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -cFQ 1123 +cFQ 1378 glenweyl 1 -gnomevan 27 -nishio 156 +gnomevan 56 +nishio 155 tsuzumik 44 diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index 54a80e71..5a583d3e 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -5,16 +5,21 @@ 2050 net zero 2-2 3D Audio 5-1 4Chan 2-0, 4-1 +51% Attack 5-6 5G 2-0, 4-4 +A Connected Society 3-0, 3-2 a priori 6-0 -Abolitionist 2-0, 6-3 +Abolitionist 2-0, 5-5, 6-3 Abundance technocracy (AT) +Abuses Of Monopoly 5-7 +Abusus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 Academia Sinica 2-1 Academic Peer Review 5-4 Accelerationist 2-0 Acemoglu, Daron Active Listening 5-4 ActivityPub 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 +Adaptive Representation 5-6 Administration 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 Administrative Application 5-5 Administrative Practice 5-5 @@ -31,11 +36,12 @@ AI Conversation Model 6-4 AI Deep Learning 6-4 AI GOOGLE NGRAMS CHART 2-0 AI researcher 5-5 -AI-driven Intervention 5-4 +AI-driven Intervention AI4Bharat 5-5 AIDS 5-0, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2 Ainulindalë Air pollution 6-4, 7-0 +Albert Hirschman 5-7 Alexis de Tocqueville 2-0, 4-2 Algorithmic Ranking System 5-4 Alien Art 5-3 @@ -44,6 +50,7 @@ Alignment assemblies 2-2, 7-0 All Our Ideas 5-4, 6-1 AlphaGo 5-3 AlphaGo Zero 5-3 +Amartya Sen 5-6 American Democracy 3-2 American Legislative Capitol 2-1 American Revolution 6-0 @@ -58,32 +65,38 @@ Anti-social Media 6-3 Antipathy 2-0 Antiretroviral Therapie 6-2 Antisocial 2-0 +Antitrust 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 7-0 Apple's Torus Spaceship 6-1 Application Ecosystem 6-2 +Approval Voting 5-0, 5-6, 7-1 Arab Spring 2-0 Ariana Zetlin 5-5 Arms Race 4-0, 6-0, 6-3 +Arnold Harberger 5-7 ARPANET 3-3, 4-4, 7-0 +Arrow's Theorem 5-6 Articles 145 of the ROC 2-1 Artificial General Intelligence 2-0 -Artificial Intelligence 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 -Artificial Intelligence (AI). 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 -Artistic co-creation 5-3 +Artificial Intelligence 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Artificial Intelligence (AI). 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Artistic co-creation Artistic Expression 5-3 Asana 4-4, 5-3 Asia Development Bank 2-2 Aspirations to equality 4-0 Assimilation 2-1 +Assisted Real-time Voting 5-6 Asynchronous Communication 6-1 Athena's tapestry Athenian Marketplace 5-4 Atomist 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 7-1 Attention auction attention exchange tax 7-0 +Audrey Tang 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 Augmented Reality 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 Australia 2-0, 5-5, 6-2 Australian Government 5-5 -Author 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Author 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Authoritarian 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 Authoritarian Regimes 1, 2-0 Authoritarian Repressive State 2-1 @@ -91,19 +104,21 @@ Authoritarianism 2-0, 2-1, 4-0 Authority 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 Autodesk 5-3 Automated Clearing House(ACH) 4-3 -Autonomy 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5 +Autonomy 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5 Aviv Ovadya 5-4 Awe 2-0, 5-3, 6-2 Ayn Rand 2-0 +Background Signals 5-6 Badges 5-5, 5-7 Balaji Srinavasan 2-0, 7-1 +Banks 2-0, 4-1, 4-3 Basic Antigen 6-2 BBN 3-3 -BCI 5-1, 6-2 +BCI 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 Benefits Data Trust 5-5 Bertelsmann Foundation 2-2 Bhagavad Gita 5-3 -Bible 3-2, 4-0, 5-3 +Bible 3-2, 4-0, 5-0, 5-3 Bill Gates 2-1 Biodiversity 2-0, 3-1, 6-4 Biodiversity Loss 2-0, 6-4 @@ -118,6 +133,8 @@ Blindness of Justice 5-5 Blitzscaling 6-0 Blockchain 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 7-1 Blockchains 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-7 +Bluesky 3-3, 4-2 +Bottom-up 5-6 Brain interface 5-0, 6-3 Brain-Computer Interfaces 5-1 Braver Angels 5-4 @@ -130,12 +147,14 @@ Bruno Latour 5-4 Buddhism 2-2 Bureaucracies 5-5, 5-7 Bureaucratic Rules 5-5 +By An Invisible Hand 5-7 Campus Athletics 6-1 Canada 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 Cancel Culture 2-0 Capitalism 2-0, 3-2, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 Carbon Credit 6-2 Casey Handmer 5-3 +Cash 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3 Catastrophic Risks Cathy O’Neil 2-0 Cellphone Addiction 2-2 @@ -145,13 +164,16 @@ Central Planning 2-0 Centralized Surveillance 2-0, 4-1 Centralized Top-down 2-0 Centralizing 2-0, 3-1, 4-1 +Charity 4-3, 5-7 Charter Cities 5-5 charter town Chen Shui-bian 2-1 +Cheques 4-3 Chiang Ching-Kuo 2-1 Chiang Kai-shek 2-1 Child Mortality 6-2 Chinese Communist Party 2-0, 2-1, 7-0 +Circular investment 5-7, 7-0 Citizen co-journalism 6-3 Citizen Journalism 6-3 Citizen Volunteers 2-2 @@ -165,47 +187,59 @@ Civil Clan 2-1 Civil IoT 6-4, 7-0 Civil Livelihood 2-1 Civil Rights movement 2-1 +Civilization 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-6 Civilization VI 2-0, 5-6 +Civilizing 5-7 Claude 5-0, 5-4 Clean Energy 6-4 Climate Change 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-6, 6-2, 6-4 -Climate Change Simulations 5-2 +Climate Change Simulations Climate hazard 6-2 Co-construction of Health Agency Co-creation Relationship 6-4 Co-decision Making Processe 6-2 Co-edited Project 5-3 -Co-writing 5-3 +Co-writing +Codetermination 5-7 Cofacts 2-2 Cold War 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 Collaboration Across Difference 5-0, 6-4 +Collaboration Across Diversity 3-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7 Collaborative Diversity 2-1, 3-0 +Collaborative Exchange 5-7 Collaborative Filtering 5-4 Collaborative Innovation 5-3 Collaborative Journalism 6-3 Collaborative Network 6-4 Collaborative Platform 5-3 Collaborative Problem Solving 2-1 +Collaborative Technologies 5-6 Collaborative Technology 1, 4-5, 5-0, 6-2 Collective Alignment 5-4 Collective Consciousness 5-1, 5-3 Collective Creativity 5-2, 5-3 +Collective Decision 4-0, 4-3, 5-6, 7-1 Collective Deliberation 5-5 -Collective Intelligence 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 6-1 +Collective Intelligence 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 +Collective Organization 2-0, 3-0, 6-3 Collective Problem-solving 6-4 -Collective Response Model 5-4 +Collective Response Model Collective Response Systems 5-4 Collegia 3-3, 6-2 Colonial Outsider 5-5 +Colorado State Legislature 5-6 Commanding Heights 2-0 -Common Belief 4-2, 6-0, 6-2 +Common Belief 4-2, 6-2 Common Carriers of Public Discussion 6-3 Common Content 6-3 Common Corporate Infrastructure 6-1 +Common Good 5-0, 5-7 +Common Knowledge 4-2, 5-4 Common Will 5-4, 5-6 Commons-Based Property 3-2 Communism 2-0 Community Currency 4-3, 5-0 +Community Donation 5-7 Community Notes (CN)　 5-4 Community-based 3-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0 Community-Based Identity 3-2 @@ -213,54 +247,64 @@ Compelling Narrative 6-3 Competitive authoritarian regimes Competitive Effect Complexity 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 7-1 +Compulsory Purchase 5-7 Computer-simulated Neuron 5-5 +Confidential Computing 4-2 Conformity 5-5, 7-1 Confucian Tradition 2-1 -Connected Society 3-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1 +Connected Society 3-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 5-7 +Consociational 3-2, 5-6 Consociationalism 3-2, 5-6 Constitutional Court 2-2 -Contribution 0-3, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Contribution 0-3, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Cooperative Enterprise 2-1, 7-0 +Cooperatives 2-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 Copyright 2-0, 2-2 Corporate Bureaucracy 5-5 Corporate Campuse 6-1 Corporate Control 3-3, 4-1, 5-2, 5-7 Corporate Libertarianism 2-0 +Corporations 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +Correlation discounting 5-6 Cortico 5-4 +Countervail 5-7 Coursera 5-3 Courtney Cogburn 5-2, 6-3 COVID-19 2-1, 2-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 COVID-19 pandemic 2-2, 6-1 Crackle 5-3 Creative Collaborations 5-2, 5-3, 5-6 -Creative Commons 5-0 +Creative Commons 3-3, 4-0, 5-0 Creative Process 5-3 Cross-cultural collaboration 5-3 Cross-Cultural Exchanges Cross-cutting Benefit 6-1 Cross-pollination Service 6-1 Cross-Straits Services Trade Agreement 2-2 -Crowdsourcing 5-3 +Crowdsourcing 5-3, 5-5 Crypto 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 Cryptocurrencies 2-0, 4-3 Cryptographic 2-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3 Cryptographic Hypercapitalism 2-0 Cryptographic Principle 6-2 +Cryptographic Standards 4-2 Cryptography 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 6-3 Cryptonomicon 2-0 -Cultural Diversity 4-5, 5-3, 5-5 +Cultural Diversity 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 Cultural Homogenization 5-3 Cultural Norm 5-5 Cultural Practice 4-4, 5-1, 5-5, 7-1 +Currency 2-0, 2-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 Curriculum Vitae (CV) 5-5 Curtis Yarvin 2-0 Cybernetic Society 3-2 Cybernetics 3-2, 3-3 Danielle Allen 3-0, 4-0, 5-5, 5-7 +DAO 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 Daoism 2-1 dApps 6-0 Darkening Clouds 6-2 -Daron Acemoglu 2-0, 3-1, 4-2 +Daron Acemoglu 2-0, 3-1, 4-2, 5-7, 6-0 DARPA 3-3 Data Coalitions 2-2, 6-0, 6-4, 7-0 Data Governance Act 2-0, 4-4 @@ -268,17 +312,23 @@ Data Transparency 2-2 Data-driven Actors 6-4 Dave Egger 4-2, 5-3 David Kidd 5-5 +De Tocqueville, Alexis +Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP) 4-2 Decentralized Social Technologies 2-0 Decentralized Web 3-3, 4-0 Decision Trees 5-5 +Declaration for the Future of the Internet 4-5 Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace 2-0 Decontee Davis 6-3 +Decreasing Marginal Returns 5-7 +Decreasing Returns 5-7 +Deepfakes 4-5 DeepMind 2-0, 5-3 Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Deforestation 5-2, 6-4 Degressive Proportionality 3-2, 5-6 -Deliberation 2-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Democracy 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Deliberation 2-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Democracy 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 Democracy in America 2-0, 4-2 Democratic Advocates 2-1 Democratic freedom 2-1 @@ -288,23 +338,29 @@ Democratic Participation 2-0, 2-1, 3-3 Democratic Progressive Party 2-1 Democratic Republican Government 6-0 Demonization 6-3 +Descriptive 3-0 Designated Verifier Proofs (DVP) 4-2 Deweyian pragmatism 2-1 +Difference 1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-3, 6-4, 7-1 +Differential Privacy 4-2, 4-4 +Differing Degrees 2-0, 3-2, 5-4, 5-6 Diffusion of Information 5-4 Digital Archaeology 5-3 Digital asset taxes 7-0 +Digital Assistant 5-6 Digital Certificate 6-2 Digital Civic Engagement 2-2 Digital competence education 2-2, 3-3, 7-0 Digital Currencies 2-0, 4-3, 7-0 Digital Democracies 2-0 -Digital Democracy 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-5, 5-5, 7-1, 8 +Digital Democracy 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 7-1, 8 Digital Democracy Initiative Digital Divide 4-5, 5-2, 5-3 +Digital Infrastructure 3-3, 4-1, 4-5, 7-0 Digital interaction 4-0 Digital land tax 7-0 Digital Legacies 5-2, 5-3 -Digital Legacy Realms 5-2 +Digital Legacy Realms Digital literacy Digital Mapping Tool 5-5 Digital Markets Act 2-0, 7-0 @@ -320,6 +376,8 @@ Digital Twins 5-3 Digital Workspace 5-3 Digital Yuan 2-0 Digital-native currencies 4-0 +Diplomatic Decisions 5-6 +Diplomatic Favor 5-6 Diplomatic Nuance 2-1 Direct Collective Representative 5-4 Direct Election of the President 2-1 @@ -334,12 +392,13 @@ Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) Distributed Ledgers 4-1, 5-5 Distributed Network of Signals 5-5 Distributed Participation 6-3 +Distribution 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 Diverse Legal System 5-5 Diverse Perspective 5-3, 5-4 Diversification 5-5, 6-0 -Diversification of Seeing 6-0 +Diversification of Seeing Diversity 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Diversity of "groups" 6-0 +Diversity of groups 6-0 Dominant Narrative 5-3 Donald Trump 2-0 DoNotPay 5-5 @@ -348,7 +407,9 @@ DPP 2-1 Dr. Seuss 5-4 Driverless Cars 2-0 Durkheim 3-2, 6-2 -Dystopian Outcome 5-2, 5-3 +Duverger's Law 5-6 +Dynamic 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Dystopian Outcome 5-3 Dōka 2-1 e-citizenship 6-1 E-Government 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 @@ -360,26 +421,32 @@ Early Adopters 6-0 Ebola 6-3 Echo Chamber 2-0, 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 Echo Chambers 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 +Economies Esteem 5-7 Economist Intelligence Unit 2-2 Edmund Burke 6-4 -Educational Psychology 5-5 +Educational Psychology 5-5, 6-0 Edward Deming 2-1 edX 5-3 Egalitarianism 2-1, 6-2 EGDI 2-0 +Eigenvalues 5-6 +Eigenvoting 5-6 Election 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-2 Elite Universities 5-5 Elon Musk 2-0, 4-2, 4-3 Emergent Publics 3-2, 5-7 +Eminent Domain 5-7 Emmanuel Saez 2-2 Emotion Tracking Emotional Connectivity 5-2 Empathetic Technology Empathy Amplifiers 5-2 Encounter with the East 5-3 +Endowments 5-7 Enlightenment 3-2, 4-0 Entrepreneurial Sovereignty (ES) -Environment 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 8 +Entrepreneurship 2-1, 3-3, 5-7 +Environment 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 8 Environment Sensing Network 6-4 Environmental Devastation 2-0 Environmental Justice 6-4 @@ -391,6 +458,7 @@ ETH Zurich 5-3 Ethereum Attestation Service 6-2 Ethnic Pluralism 2-1 Ethnographer 5-5 +European Union 2-0, 4-4, 5-6, 7-0 Excessive Fragmentation 6-1 Excessive Segregation 6-1 Existential Risks 2-0 @@ -400,6 +468,7 @@ Experimentation with 2-2, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0 Expert 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-1 Export-orientation 2-1 Extended Reality 6-2 +Externalities 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 Extreme Sports 6-1 Extreme underinvestment 6-2 Extremist Parties 2-0 @@ -408,42 +477,54 @@ Fabric of Trust Facial Recognition 2-0 Fact Checkers 2-2 Fact-checking 2-2, 5-4 -Fair 0-1, 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Fair 0-1, 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 Fairness 3-2, 5-5 Faith in Democratic Institutions 2-0 False Consensus 6-3 Fascism 2-0 Fast, Fun and Fair 2-2 Feature Phone 5-5 +Federal 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 5-6, 7-0 Federal Pension Insurance system 5-5 FIDES 6-2 Financial Capitalism 2-0 Financial Innovation 2-0 +Financial Markets 2-0, 5-7 +Financial markets 2-0, 5-7 Financial Technology 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 Finnish government 5-5 Fintech 2-0, 4-3 +First Additional Vote 5-6 Five Star Rating System 5-4 Fluidity 6-4 Folk Religion 2-2 Fora 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-4, 6-3, 7-0 Forms of Diversity 5-0, 7-1 -Foundation Model 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Foundation Models 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Foundation Model 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Foundation Models 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 Foxconn 2-2 +Fractional Reserve Banking 4-3 Fragile Democracies 2-0 Franz Kafka 5-5 Freddy Lim 2-2 free China 2-1 Free Markets Know Best 2-0 Free speech 4-0 +Free Trade 5-0, 5-7 +Free Trade Agreements 5-7 Freedom House 2-2 Freedom of association 4-0, 4-1, 4-2 Freedom of the Press 6-3 French Revolution 6-0 +Frictions 5-7 +Fructus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 Full Multisensory Shared Experience 5-3 -Funder 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 +Full-time Employment 5-7 +Fundamental Welfare Theorems 5-7 +Funder 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 Funding Pool 6-2 Fusion 2-1, 3-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 +Futarchy 5-6 Future Collaborator 5-3 g0v 2-2, 3-3, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0 Gabriel Zucman 2-2 @@ -455,13 +536,13 @@ Gavi 6-2 GDP 1, 2-0, 2-2, 5-6, 6-1, 7-0 General Data Protection Regulation 2-0, 4-2, 7-0 General Reticence 2-0 -Generative AI 4-2, 4-5, 5-1 +Generative AI 4-2, 4-5 Generative Art 5-3 Generative Artists 5-3 -Generative Foundation Model 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative foundation models 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative Foundation Models(GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Model 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative foundation models 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models(GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 Generative Pretrained Transformer 2-0 Geographical Information System 5-5 Geopolitics 2-0, 2-2, 4-3, 7-1 @@ -472,13 +553,18 @@ GFM-driven Process 5-3 Git 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 GitCoin 3-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2 GitCoin Grants 5-7, 6-2 -GitHub 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +GitHub 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 GitHub Sponsors 5-7 GitLab 3-3, 5-3 Global Anti-colonial Movement 2-1 +Global Capitalism 5-7 Global Consciousness Networks 5-2 Global Crossroad 2-1 +Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online 4-5 Global Fund 6-2 +Global Government 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Global Legitimacy 5-6 +Global Policies 5-6 Global Positioning 2-0, 5-5 Global Warming 6-4 Globarization @@ -486,7 +572,7 @@ Gogolook 2-2 Gold Card 2-2, 6-1 Golden Age 2-0 Good Old-fashioned AI (GOFAI) 5-5 -Google 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Google 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Google DeepMind 5-3 Gov4Git 6-2 GovTech 3-3 @@ -497,7 +583,7 @@ Green Technologies 6-4 Gross Domestic Product 2-0, 2-2, 6-1 Group Works 5-4 Hackathon 2-2, 4-0, 4-2, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -HackMD 3-3, 6-2 +HackMD 3-3 Hakka 2-1 Hannah Arendt 3-0, 4-1, 6-0 Hanson 5-6, 6-2 @@ -512,6 +598,7 @@ Health Savings Plan 6-2 healthy minds in healthy bodies 6-2 Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 Henry George Theorem 3-2, 5-7 +Henry George Theorem States 5-7 Her 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 Herbert Simon 4-2, 5-4 Herculaneum 5-3 @@ -519,6 +606,7 @@ Herculaneum scrolls 5-3 Heritage Foundation 2-2 High Modernism 3-1, 3-2 High-Bandwidth Communication 5-1 +Higher-fidelity Signals 5-6 HiredScore 5-5 Hiring Manager 5-5, 6-1 Hit Rates 6-1 @@ -529,36 +617,42 @@ Holly Herndon 5-3, 7-1 Homerian epics 5-3 Homogenization 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7 Homogenization of Ideas 5-3 +Homogenize 3-3, 5-0, 5-7 +Homomorphic Encryption 4-2, 4-4 Horizontal Dialogue 6-1 Hsieh Tsung-min 2-1 Hu Shih 2-1 Hugging Face 5-3 +Human Cooperation 5-7 Human Resources Platform 5-5 Human Rights 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 7-0 -Humanocracy 5-7, 6-1 +Humanocracy 5-7 Humor over Rumor 2-2 Hunter-gatherer Model Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press 6-3 Hybrid Reality Environments 5-2 Hybrid Work Style 6-1 HyperCerts 6-2 -Hypertext 3-3, 4-1, 4-3 +Hypertext 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4 Ian Banks 2-0 +Iceland 3-3, 5-6 ID2020 5-5 Ideathons 2-2, 7-0, 7-1 Identity and Access 6-0 Ideologies of the Twenty-First Century 2-0 Ideology 2-0, 2-1, 5-0, 7-0 Idiosyncratic Project 6-1 -Immersive Education 5-2 +Immersive Education Immersive Shared Realities 5-4 Immersive Shared Reality 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Immersive Shared Reality Campuse 6-1 +Immersive Shared Reality Campuse Immersive Soundscapes 5-1 -Impact 0-0, 0-2, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Impact 0-0, 0-2, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 Impact-investing 6-2 Impartial 5-5 +Imperfections 5-7 Implementer 6-2 +Impossibility Theorem 5-6 In-person Meeting 5-4 In-person Team 6-1 In-silico 5-3 @@ -571,30 +665,37 @@ Indigeneous Community 6-2 Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation 5-5 Individual Identity 3-2, 4-2 individuality loss +Industrial 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-7, 7-0 Industry 1.0 Industry 2.0 Industry 3.0 Industry 4.0 -Inequality 2-0, 2-2, 4-0, 4-5, 5-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 8 +Inequality 2-0, 2-2, 4-0, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 8 Infodemic 2-0, 2-2, 8 +Information Age 2-0, 3-3, 4-5 Information commons 4-0, 4-5 +Information Integrity 2-2, 4-2, 4-5 Information Technology 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 6-1, 7-0 +Infrastructure 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 Insurer 6-2 Intelligence Augmentation 2-0 -Inter-species Communication 5-2 +Inter-species Communication Interactive Agent 5-4 Intergalactic Computer Network 3-3, 4-4 International Monetary Fund 2-2 -Internet 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +International Trade Treaties 5-7 +Internet 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Internet of Beings 2-2, 4-5 Internet of Things 2-0, 2-2 Internet Tidal Wave 2-1 Internet-mediated Writing 5-4 -Interoperability 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-5, 7-0 +Interoperability 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-2, 5-5, 7-0 Interoperability Across Legal Regime 5-5 Interplanetary File System (IPFS) 4-4 +Intersectional 3-0, 3-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 Intersectional Identity Intrapreneurship 6-1, 7-1 -iOS 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-6, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +iOS 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 Isaac Asimov 2-0 IVR Junction 5-5 J. D. Vance 2-0 @@ -611,21 +712,24 @@ Jennifer Prah Ruger 6-2 Jeremy Corbyn 2-0 Jetsons 2-0 Jobs, Steve -John Dewey 2-1, 3-0, 3-2 +John Dewey 2-1, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 John Perry Barlow 2-0 Joint Learning 6-1 Joseph Gordon-Levitt 5-3 +Joseph Stiglitz 5-7 Josh Hawley 2-0 Jothons 2-2 Journalism 2-2, 6-3 Journey of Humanity 5-0 Julian Schilliger 5-3 +Jurisdictional Boundaries 4-4, 5-7 Just 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Kao Chia-liang 2-2 Kaohsiung Incident 2-1 Karya 5-5 Kazakhstan 2-0 -Kela-Kelpo project 5-5 +Kela-Kelpo project +Kenneth Arrow 5-6, 6-2 Kevin Scott 6-1 Khan Academy 5-3 Kickstarter 5-3 @@ -635,19 +739,23 @@ Kuomintang 2-1 Labor Augmentation 2-0 Labor Automation 2-0 Labor Law 2-0, 7-0 +Labor Markets 2-0, 5-7 Labor Unions 2-1, 4-2, 5-7 Land to the Tiller 2-1 -Large Language Model (LLM) 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2 -Large Language Models (LLMs) 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 +Large Language Model (LLM) 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2 +Large Language Models (LLMs) 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 Laurie Anderson 5-3 Lee Teng-hui 2-1 Left-right Divide Legal Agent 6-4 Legal Jurisdiction 5-5 Legal Robot 5-5 +Legal Tender 4-3 Legislative Yuan 2-2 Legitimacy 2-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 Legitimation 2-0 +Lego 5-7 +Lesser of Two Evils 5-6 Lex Fridman 5-4 Liberal Democracy 2-2 Liberalization of Taiwan 2-1 @@ -656,16 +764,19 @@ Libertarian Ideology 2-0 Libertarianism 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 7-1 Life Expectancy 2-2, 5-2, 6-2, 6-4 Life-support System 6-4 +Limited Cultural Groups 5-7 LinkedIn 4-1, 6-0 Linux 3-3, 4-0 +Lionel Penrose 5-6 Liquid Democracy 5-4, 5-6 Little Platoons 6-4 Livestream-based communication 2-2 -LLM-based Representative 5-4 +LLM-based Representative LLMs 2-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 Local Language 5-5 Location Aware Sensor System 6-4 Long-distance Cooperation 2-1 +Long-term Work Permits 5-7 Lorax 5-4 Los Alamos 5-3 Low-skilled Workers 2-0 @@ -674,16 +785,20 @@ Luke Farritor 5-3 Luke Thorburn 5-4 m-health 6-2 M. Mitchell Waldrop 3-1, 3-3 -Machine Learning 2-0, 2-2, 4-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Machine Learning 2-0, 2-2, 4-2, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5 Machine Translation Tool 5-4 Macro Badges 5-5 Magpie River 6-4 Malaria 6-2 -Man-Computer Symbiosis 3-3, 5-6, 7-0 +Man-Computer Symbiosis 3-3, 7-0 Mandarin 1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0 -Manipulation 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3 +Manipulation 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-6 Mao Zedong 2-1 +Marginal Revolution 5-7 Mark Zuckerberg 5-4 +Market 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 8 +Market Design 4-4, 5-7 +Market power 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 Market Power 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 Marxism 2-1 Marxist Vision of Socialism 2-1 @@ -700,23 +815,26 @@ Material Redistribution 2-0 Maternal Mortality 6-2 Matthew Yglesias 2-0 Max Weber 3-2, 5-5 -Media 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Mechanism Design 4-4, 5-7 +Media 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 Media Ecosystem 6-3 Mediated Reality 5-1, 5-2 Meetings Deemed Unproductive 6-1 Mencius Moldbug 2-0 Mental Health 5-1, 5-2, 6-2 Meta 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Metaverse 2-0, 4-0, 7-1 +Metaverse 2-0, 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 Metaverses 4-0 Mezzo Badges 5-5 Michelle Wu 5-4 -Microsoft 0-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-2, 5-5, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Microsoft 0-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 Military Scenario 6-1 Millennium Development Declaration 6-2 +Mimetic Models 4-5 Minister of Digital Affairs 0-1, 2-1 Minister without portfolio 2-2 Ministry for the Future 5-4, 5-7 +Ministry For The Future 5-4, 5-7 Ministry of Digital Affairs 2-2, 4-4, 7-0 Minitel 2-0, 3-3 Minquán 2-1 @@ -729,6 +847,7 @@ MMOLs 5-2 modernity 3-2, 5-5, 7-1 Monarchy 2-1 Monist 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 5-6, 7-1 +Monist Atomism 3-0, 3-1 Monolithic Threat Monopolization 3-3, 5-2, 7-0 Monopoly 2-1, 3-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 @@ -760,10 +879,12 @@ Natural Language Processing 5-4, 6-1 Natural Leadership 6-1 Natural Legal Personhood 6-4 Natural sciences 3-1, 3-2, 3-3 -Neal Stephenson 2-0, 5-0 +Neal Stephenson 2-0, 5-0, 5-2 Negative freedom of speech 4-0 Neil Armstrong 6-3 Neoliberal 2-0, 3-3, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0 +Neoliberal Reaction 5-7 +Neoliberalism 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 Neom 2-0 Netflix Prize 5-3 Netherlands 6-3 @@ -773,8 +894,8 @@ Networked and Probabilistic Structure 5-5 Networked Value 3-2 Networks of Human Minds 5-5 Neural Interfaces 5-1, 6-1 -Neural network 3-1, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 -Neural Network 3-1, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 +Neural network 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 +Neural Network 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 Neurofeedback 5-1 Neuromodulation 5-1 New England town hall 5-4 @@ -782,7 +903,6 @@ New Public 3-2 New Zealand 3-3, 6-4 News feed algorithm 5-3, 5-4 Nicholas Bostrom 2-0 -nishio Nixon's visit to PRC 2-1 Noah Smith 2-0 Nobody Movement 2-2 @@ -791,12 +911,14 @@ Non-aligned incentives 6-2 non-believers 2-2 Non-colonialist Model 6-2 Non-communicable Disease 6-2 +Non-fungible Token (NFT) 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 Non-human Perspective 5-3 Non-market 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 Non-renewable Energy Sources 6-4 -Non-verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 Non-Verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 +Non-verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 Norbert Wiener 3-2 +Normative 3-0, 4-4, 6-2 North Atlantic Treaty Organization North Star 6-0 Notion 2-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-4 @@ -816,7 +938,9 @@ One China 2-1 One Country, Two Systems 2-1 One-dimensional Spectrum 4-2, 5-4 One-Person-One-Vote 3-2, 5-6 -Online collaboration platform 5-3 +One-Share-One-Vot 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +One-share-one-vote 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +Online collaboration platform Online Deliberation 3-3 Online Gaming 5-2 Online Platform 5-0, 5-2, 5-3 @@ -825,10 +949,11 @@ Open Conversation 6-1 Open Government Movement 2-2 Open Impact Pool 6-2 Open Recognition Community -Open Source 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Open Source 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 Open Source Intelligence 6-3 Open Source Observer 6-2 Open Source Software 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Open Source Software (OSS) 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 Open Space Technology 5-4 Open Standard 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5 Open-source project 5-3 @@ -841,16 +966,19 @@ Optimism Collective 6-2 Organizational Chart 6-1 Oscar Wilde 5-4 Out-of-pocket Payment 6-2 -Outcome 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Output 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Outcome 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Output 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Packet Switching 3-3, 4-1 Packet-switching 3-3, 5-5 +Page Rank Paradigm Shift 5-1, 5-4 Paradox.ai 5-5 PARC 3-3, 7-0 Park of Aging 5-1 -Participation 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Partial Common Ownership 5-7 +Participation 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Participative Production 2-1 +Participatory Design 5-7 Participedia 5-4 Pascual Restrepo 2-0 Paul Jozef Crutzen 6-4 @@ -858,19 +986,25 @@ Peer Production 3-3 Peng Ming-min 2-1 People's Republic of China (PRC) 2-0, 2-1, 4-3 Peripheral 2-0 +Personal Identities 3-0 Peter Thiel 2-0, 4-3, 7-1 Phishing Attack 4-2, 6-2 Physical Work 6-1 -Pixar's headquarters 6-1 +Pigouvian Taxes +Pixar's headquarters Place of Convergence 2-1 +Plural Funding 5-6, 5-7 Plural Future +Plural Management Protocol 5-7 Plural Spirit 2-1 -Plural workplace 6-1 +Plural workplace Pluralism 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-1 Polarization 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3, 8 -Polis 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-4, 5-7, 7-0 +Polis 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Political Polarization 2-0, 2-2, 5-4 +Polypolitan Migration Policy 5-7 Pompeii 5-3 +Populist Movement Portals Policing Project 5-2, 5-4 Positive freedom of speech 4-0 Post-capitalist World 2-0 @@ -878,21 +1012,27 @@ Post-colonial Futurism 2-0 Post-gender 2-0 Post-state 2-0 Post-symbolic Communication 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +Power Concentration 5-6 Pragmatic 2-1, 3-3, 5-0 PRC Surveillance Regime 2-0 +Precious Metals 4-3 Prediction Market 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 +Prediction Markets 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 Predictive Futurism 2-0 Predictive Voting 5-6, 6-2 Premature Optimization 5-0 Prepayment 6-2 +Prescriptive 3-0, 5-6 Presidential Hackathon 2-2, 7-0 Press Freedom 6-0, 6-3 Press Responsibility 6-3 Principles of ⿻ 4-0, 5-3 -Privacy 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Privacy 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Private Community-based Sponsorship 5-7 Private Health Insurance 6-2 Private Information 4-1, 6-2 Private Key 4-2, 6-3 +Private Organizations 5-7 Private Property 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 5-7 Private Sector 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 6-1, 7-0 Pro-social Media 6-3 @@ -901,8 +1041,10 @@ Productivity Software 6-3 Programmer 5-5, 6-4 Progress and Poverty 3-2 Progress Prizes 5-3 +Project Liberty 4-0, 4-2 Projection Mapping 5-1 Property Rights 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 +Proportional Representation 3-2, 5-6 Proprioceptive Communication Public Consent 2-0 Public Digital Innovation Space 2-2 @@ -914,22 +1056,30 @@ Public Key Cryptography 4-2 Public Participation 2-0, 4-5, 5-4, 7-0 Public Perception 6-4 Public Sector 2-0, 2-2, 6-0, 7-0 -Public Service 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-5, 5-5, 7-0 +Public Service 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 Public Square 2-0, 4-0, 4-2, 7-0 +Public Welfare Shcemes Public Will 5-5, 5-6 +Public/Supermodular Goods 5-7 Purchasing Power Parity 2-2 Pythagoras Qing 2-1 +Quadratic Funding 5-7 +Quadratic Liquid Democracy 5-6 Quadratic Voting 2-2, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Quantitative Markers 5-7 +RadicalxChange 0-1, 4-3, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 Rainbow Flags 2-1 Rainforest Foundation US 5-5 -Raj 2-0, 6-2 +Raj 2-0, 5-0, 6-2 Randomized Controlled Trials 6-0 -rationality 3-1, 3-2, 5-0 +Ranked Choice 5-6 +rationality 3-1, 3-2, 5-0, 5-5 Ray Kurzweil 2-0 Ready Player One 5-2 Realistic Avatar 6-1 Receipts 4-3, 6-3 +Reckless Monopolies 5-7 Redistribution 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 Regenerating Diversity 5-0, 7-1 Regenerative Economies @@ -953,20 +1103,26 @@ Representation 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 Representative Statement 5-4 Representing Consensus Position 5-4 Research and Development 2-0, 3-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 +Research Policy 5-7 Resolution 2758 2-1 Reverse Mentors 2-1 Revive China Society 2-1 Revolutionary Democratic Direction 2-1 Rich Get Richer 5-5 +Richard Arnott 5-7 Richard Nixon 2-1 Rights of free speech 4-0 Risk Pooling 6-2 River of Democracy 1 Robert Atkinson 2-0 +Robin Hanson 5-6, 6-2 Robinson, James +Roblox 5-7 ROC 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Ropes Course 6-1 Rough Consensus 5-4, 6-3 +Rule Of Law 5-7 +Run-off 5-6 Rural Land Reform 2-1 Russian revolution 2-1 Sam Altman 2-0, 4-1, 7-1 @@ -976,27 +1132,32 @@ Sardinia 6-1 SARS 2-0, 2-2, 6-3 Satya Nadella 5-5, 6-1 Saudia Arabia 2-0 +Scaling Collaboration 5-7 Scandinavian Countries 2-0, 2-2, 4-0 Science And Technology Studies 2-0 -Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0, 5-1, 6-2 -Search Engines 2-0, 4-4 +Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 +Search Engines 2-0, 4-4, 5-5 Seasteads 2-0, 5-5 Sebastian Kurz 2-0 +Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) 4-2 Securities Laws 2-0 Security protocols 4-0 Seeds 2-1, 3-3, 6-0, 7-0 Self-determination 2-1, 6-2 +Self-ownership 5-7 Sensory Degradation Sensory Integration 5-2 SERVIR Amazonia 5-5 Seth Parker 5-3 +Shared Goods 5-7, 7-0 Shared Knowledge Base 5-3 Shoshanna Zuboff 2-0 Sidewalk Labs 2-0 Signal 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 Silent Majority 6-3 Simon Chang 2-2 -Simon Johnson 2-0 +Simon Johnson 2-0, 5-6 +Simon, Herbert Simulated Military Exercise 6-1 Single Tax 3-2 Sino-Japanese war 2-1 @@ -1006,21 +1167,29 @@ Smaller World 6-3 Smallpox 6-2 Smart City 2-0 Smart Contract 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5 -Snow Crash 2-0 +Snow Crash 2-0, 5-2 +Snowden, Edward Social Collapse 2-0 +Social Connectedness 3-0 social connectedness 3-0 Social Control 2-0 Social Credit Score 2-0 Social Difference 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 +Social Distance 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 Social Distancing Measure 6-2 +Social Diversity 3-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 7-1, 8 Social Divide 5-6, 6-0, 6-3 Social Division 5-4, 5-6 Social Dynamics +Social Equity 5-7 +Social Esteem 4-3, 5-7 Social Fabric 2-0, 4-0, 4-2 Social Identity System 6-1 +Social Insurance 5-7, 6-2 +Social Interaction 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-2 Social Media 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-1 Social Media Platform 2-0, 4-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 -Social Network 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 7-0, 8 +Social Network 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0, 8 Social Order 5-5, 6-2, 7-1 Social Organization 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7, 6-3 Social Responsibility 6-3 @@ -1029,9 +1198,9 @@ Social sciences 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 6-0 Social Sector 0-2, 3-3, 6-0, 7-1 Social Security Numbers 3-2, 4-1 Social Solidarity 6-2 -social welfare function 5-0, 6-2 +social welfare function 5-0, 5-6, 6-2 Social Worker 5-5 -Socialism 2-1, 5-4 +Socialism 2-1, 5-4, 5-7 Socialism Takes Too Many Evenings 5-4 Socially Isolated 2-0 Society Library 5-4 @@ -1039,14 +1208,23 @@ Solidarity and Dynamism 6-1, 6-3 Sortition 5-0, 5-4 Source Confidentiality 6-3 South China Sea 2-1 +Soviet Union 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 SpaceX 5-3 Spatial Computing 5-1 speak for itself 6-3 Speciation 5-5 Sprightly +Square Root 5-6, 5-7, 6-0 +Square-root Voting 5-6 SSN 4-1, 5-2, 5-4 +Stagnant Democratic Stories 3-0 +Stakeholder Corporation 5-7 +Stakeholder Remedies 5-7 +Stakeholders 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Stakeholding 5-7 Standard Career Paths 6-1 Star Trek 2-0, 3-0, 5-0 +Start-ups 3-3, 5-7, 6-0 Steve Jobs 3-3, 6-1 Steven Levitsky 2-0, 4-0, 6-0 StoryCorps 5-4 @@ -1058,6 +1236,9 @@ Subcultural translation 5-0 Sun Yat-Sen 2-1, 5-7 Sunflower Movement 2-1, 2-2 Superintelligence 2-0 +Supermodular Collaboration 5-7 +Supermodular Investments 5-7 +Supermodular Production 4-3, 5-7 Supermodularity 3-2, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 Superpower 2-0, 2-2 Surveillance 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 6-2, 7-0 @@ -1072,7 +1253,7 @@ Systems of rights 4-0 Taigi 2-1 Taishō Democratic 2-1 Taivoan 2-1 -Taiwan 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Taiwan 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 Taiwan Self-Salvation Manifesto 2-1 Taiwan's Digital Civic Infrastructure 2-2 Talk to the City 5-4 @@ -1086,8 +1267,12 @@ Taxes 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-7, 7-0 Teams 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 Tech Left 2-0 Techlash 2-0, 3-3 +Technocracy 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 7-0, 7-1 Technocratic Narrative +Technological Agenda 3-0 +Technology 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 Technology Addiction 2-2 +Technology For Collaboration Across Social Difference 3-0 Technology Investment 2-0 Ted Nelson 3-3, 5-3 Telecommuting 2-0 @@ -1099,20 +1284,25 @@ Telepathy 5-1, 8 Temporal Collaboration 5-3 Tensions between technology and democracy Terminator 2-0 +Territorial And Intellectual Property Treaties 5-7 The Age of Surveillance Capitalism 2-0 The Castle 5-5 The Circle 4-2, 5-3 -The Dream Machine 3-3 -The Lost Dao 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 +The Dream Machine 3-3, 4-4 +The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number 5-6 +The Human Condition 3-0, 3-1 +The Lost Dao 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 The Network State 2-0 The New Republic 2-1 the Optimism Collective 6-2 -The Parliament of Things 5-4 +The Parliament of Things +The Public and its Problems 3-2, 5-7 The Social Dilemma 2-0 The Sovereign Individual 2-0 The World Cafe 5-4 Theocracy 2-0 Theory of Change 6-0 +Thin Shell 5-7 Third Sector 2-1, 5-7, 7-1 Thomas Piketty 2-2 Three Principles of the People 2-1 @@ -1121,27 +1311,33 @@ Time Travel 5-3 Top Employer 5-5 Top-down 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 5-5, 6-1, 7-1 Total Factor Productivity 2-0 +Towards a Connected Society 3-0 +Tradable Carbon Permits 5-7 Traditional Practice 5-5 Transculturalism Transhuman 6-2 Translation 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Transnational Corporations 5-7 Transparent Database 5-5 Trello 6-1 Tridemism 2-1, 3-2 True democracy 3-2 Trust Falls 6-1 Tuberculosis 6-2 -Turing 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 +Turing 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 Twitter 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 Tyranny of Structurelessness 5-4 +Tyranny Of The Majority 5-6 UAE 2-0 UN 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 UN-Water 6-2 UNDP 4-0, 4-1, 6-2 Uniform Resource Locator (URL) 4-4 -United States 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +United Nations 2-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +United States 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 Universal Basic Income 2-0, 4-1 Universal Birth Registration 3-2 +Universal Coded Character (unicode) 3-0 Universal Declaration of Human Rights 4-0, 4-5 Unorthodox Thinking 6-1 Unstructured Communication @@ -1150,13 +1346,16 @@ Urgency of innovation leadership Ursula Le Guin 2-0 USAID 6-2 User Engagement 2-0, 5-4 -User Experience 2-2, 4-1, 5-4 +User Experience 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 7-0 User Perspective 5-4 Ushahidi 3-3, 5-5 +Usus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 +Utility Regulation 5-7 V-Dem 1, 2-1, 2-2 Vaccine Alliance 6-2 Venture Capital 2-0, 5-7, 6-0 Venture Capitalist 2-0, 6-0 +Ventures 3-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-7, 6-1 Verifiable Credential 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 Vesuvius Challenge 5-3 Violent Revolution 6-0 @@ -1164,24 +1363,31 @@ Virtual Civic Spaces Virtual Gatherings 5-2 Virtual Meeting 5-4, 6-1 Virtual Music Festivals 5-2 -Virtual Reality 2-2, 3-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 6-3 +Virtual Reality 2-2, 3-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 Virtual Replica 5-3 Virtual Tourism 5-2 Voice-based Internet 5-5 Volume Cartographer 5-3 -Voting 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Vote 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +Voting 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Voting Based On Measures Of Power 5-6 +Voting Based On Population Size 5-6 VR Therapy vTaiwan 2-2, 3-3, 5-4 Vulcan philosophy +Vulcans 3-0 +Wage System 5-7 War of Independence 6-0 Water Management 6-4 Wave of ⿻ 6-3 -Weapons of Math Destruction 2-0 -Web 2.0 2-0 +Wealth Taxes 5-7 +Weapons of Math Destruction 2-0, 5-5 +Web 2.0 2-0, 5-5 web of group-affiliation 3-2 Web2 application 6-2 -Web3 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0 +Web3 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Wei Ting-chao 2-1 +Weighted-voting 5-6 Weimar Republic 4-0 WEIRD societies Welfare Capitalism 5-0 @@ -1192,26 +1398,31 @@ What's App 5-5 White Collar 6-1 White Terror 2-1 Widening Gulf 2-0, 3-3 -Wikipedia 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-3, 6-3 +Wikipedia 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 wikisurvey 2-2, 5-4 Wikisurveys 5-4 +Will Of The Group 5-6 will.i.am 5-3 William Rees-Mogg 2-0 +William Vickrey 5-7 Windows 3-3, 4-0, 4-1 Winslow Porter 6-3 Wisdom of the Crowd 6-2 -Wised Democracy Pattern Language 5-4 +Wised Democracy Pattern Language Withdrew 2-1 Women Talking 5-4 Words Cannot Capture 5-4 Work-life Balance 6-1 Workplace 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 Workspace 5-3 +World Congress 5-6 World Economic Forum 5-5 World Food Programme 6-2 World Health Organization (WHO) 2-0, 2-2, 6-2 World Press Freedom Index 6-3 +World Trade Organization, World War 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 +World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 4-2 Writing 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 WWII 2-1 X (formerly Twitter) 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 @@ -1222,29 +1433,47 @@ Year of Elections 2-1 Youssef Nader 5-3 Yu Yong-Ding 2-0 Yuans 2-1 -Yushan 2-1, 3-2, 5-4, 7-0 +Yushan 2-1, 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 Zero Trust 2-2 Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs) 4-1, 4-2, 6-3 Zheng Chenggong 2-1 +Zoning Restrictions 5-7 +⿻ 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 ⿻ Artist 5-3 +⿻ Book 5-7 ⿻ Conversational and Funding Tools 6-1 ⿻ Cryptography 6-3 +⿻ Funding Across Boundaries 5-7 +⿻ Funding Formula 5-7 +⿻ funding: 5-7 +⿻ Future 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 ⿻ good 5-7, 6-2 -⿻ health agency 6-2 +⿻ Governance 3-3, 5-2, 5-7 +⿻ Group 5-7 +⿻ Health Agency 6-2 ⿻ Health Association 6-2 -⿻ hiring 6-1 +⿻ Hiring 6-1 +⿻ Identity Systems 4-1, 5-6, 5-7 +⿻ Image 3-0 ⿻ Interaction 6-4 +⿻ Management 5-0, 5-7 ⿻ Marketing 6-0 ⿻ mechanism 6-2 ⿻ Media 6-3 -⿻ practic 5-3 -⿻ public 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 +⿻ Money 4-3, 5-7 +⿻ Practic 5-3, 6-1 +⿻ Principles 3-1, 5-7 +⿻ Property 4-4, 5-7 +⿻ Public 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 ⿻ Public Media 6-3 -⿻ publics 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 -⿻ structure 4-1, 6-3 +⿻ Rule +⿻ Structure 4-1, 6-3 ⿻ Technologist 5-4 -⿻ technology 6-0, 7-0, 7-1 -⿻ vision 4-0, 4-3, 6-2 -⿻-goods financing 6-2 -⿻istic 5-4, 5-6, 6-3 -⿻istic ignorance 6-3 +⿻ Technology 6-0, 7-0, 7-1 +⿻ Thinking 5-6 +⿻ Vision 4-0, 4-3, 6-2 +⿻ 數位 Plurality 3-0 +⿻-goods Financing 6-2 +⿻istic 6-3 +⿻istic Ignorance 6-3 +數位 1, 3-0 diff --git a/scripts/index/no_occurence.txt b/scripts/index/no_occurence.txt index 02339656..2ee3481a 100644 --- a/scripts/index/no_occurence.txt +++ b/scripts/index/no_occurence.txt @@ -1,21 +1,29 @@ +AI-driven Intervention Abundance technocracy (AT) Acemoglu, Daron Aging Simulation Ainulindalë +Artistic co-creation Athena's tapestry Attention auction Bridging the Crowd Catastrophic Risks +Climate Change Simulations Co-construction of Health Agency +Co-writing +Collective Response Model Competitive Effect Competitive authoritarian regimes Cross-Cultural Exchanges +De Tocqueville, Alexis Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Digital Democracy Initiative +Digital Legacy Realms Digital Realpolitik Digital literacy Direct Thought Transmission Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) +Diversification of Seeing Emotion Tracking Empathetic Technology Entrepreneurial Sovereignty (ES) @@ -23,28 +31,42 @@ Fabric of Trust Ganga River Globarization Hunter-gatherer Model +Immersive Education +Immersive Shared Reality Campuse Industry 1.0 Industry 2.0 Industry 3.0 Industry 4.0 +Inter-species Communication Intersectional Identity J.R.R. Tolkien Jefferson, Thomas Jobs, Steve +Kela-Kelpo project +LLM-based Representative Left-right Divide Monolithic Threat National Socialist German Workers party North Atlantic Treaty Organization +Online collaboration platform Open Recognition Community Open-source Technology +Page Rank +Pigouvian Taxes +Pixar's headquarters Plural Future +Plural workplace +Populist Movement Proprioceptive Communication +Public Welfare Shcemes Pythagoras Regenerative Economies Regenerative Plurality Robinson, James Sensory Degradation +Simon, Herbert Siraya language +Snowden, Edward Social Dynamics Sprightly Strava model @@ -52,6 +74,7 @@ Structured Communication Surveillance Risks Technocratic Narrative Tensions between technology and democracy +The Parliament of Things Transculturalism Unstructured Communication Urgency of innovation leadership @@ -60,6 +83,8 @@ Virtual Civic Spaces Vulcan philosophy WEIRD societies Whanganui River +Wised Democracy Pattern Language +World Trade Organization, charter town individuality loss -nishio +⿻ Rule diff --git a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv index b2792f55..fc06a45f 100644 --- a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,34 +1,34 @@ 0-0 2 -0-1 8 -0-2 5 +0-1 13 +0-2 6 0-3 3 -1 17 -2-0 291 -2-1 152 -2-2 143 -3-0 31 -3-1 48 -3-2 84 -3-3 126 -4-0 102 -4-1 91 -4-2 74 -4-3 53 -4-4 71 -4-5 38 -5-0 71 -5-1 52 -5-2 68 -5-3 148 -5-4 145 -5-5 150 -5-6 39 -5-7 80 -6-0 87 -6-1 118 -6-2 173 -6-3 106 -6-4 69 -7-0 115 -7-1 68 -8 17 +1 20 +2-0 315 +2-1 162 +2-2 155 +3-0 57 +3-1 63 +3-2 111 +3-3 148 +4-0 118 +4-1 107 +4-2 95 +4-3 76 +4-4 97 +4-5 58 +5-0 97 +5-1 66 +5-2 75 +5-3 154 +5-4 161 +5-5 166 +5-6 110 +5-7 215 +6-0 100 +6-1 133 +6-2 185 +6-3 113 +6-4 71 +7-0 145 +7-1 78 +8 23 From e84da83897eb79fe1d066b3038ab25791daa1c22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:15:56 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 08/17] Output "by human" keywords and "by script" keywords on the different columns --- scripts/index/README.md | 3 +- scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 2959 +++++++++++++------------- scripts/index/main.py | 13 +- 3 files changed, 1494 insertions(+), 1481 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/README.md b/scripts/index/README.md index a70fbfec..c7aadb55 100644 --- a/scripts/index/README.md +++ b/scripts/index/README.md @@ -18,4 +18,5 @@ - Changed `Universal Record Locator` to `Uniform Resource Locator`, and fixed `W. Mitchell Waldrop`. - Fix some upper/lower diversity (e.g. `Virtual Reality` and `Virtual reality`) - Keywords with acronym such as `Artificial Intelligence (AI)`: If it does not occerred, remove after palens and search again. -- Keywords with quotes such as `Diversity of "groups"`: remove quotes \ No newline at end of file +- Keywords with quotes such as `Diversity of "groups"`: remove quotes +- `keyword_occurrence.tsv`: Output "by human" keywords and "by script" keywords on the different columns diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index 5a583d3e..89d98a61 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,1479 +1,1480 @@ -(anti-)social media 2-2 -(In)dividual identity 3-2 -12-Year Basic Education Curriculum 2-2 -20% time model 6-1 -2050 net zero 2-2 -3D Audio 5-1 -4Chan 2-0, 4-1 -51% Attack 5-6 -5G 2-0, 4-4 -A Connected Society 3-0, 3-2 -a priori 6-0 -Abolitionist 2-0, 5-5, 6-3 -Abundance technocracy (AT) -Abuses Of Monopoly 5-7 -Abusus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 -Academia Sinica 2-1 -Academic Peer Review 5-4 -Accelerationist 2-0 -Acemoglu, Daron -Active Listening 5-4 -ActivityPub 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 -Adaptive Representation 5-6 -Administration 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 -Administrative Application 5-5 -Administrative Practice 5-5 -Administrative State 5-5 -Adobe Creative Cloud 5-3 -Advanced Research Projects Agency 3-3, 7-0 -Adverse Selection 6-2 -Affective Polarization 2-0, 2-2, 6-3 -Affinity 5-4, 6-2 -African Model 2-0 -Agglomeration 6-1 -Aging Simulation -AI Conversation Model 6-4 -AI Deep Learning 6-4 -AI GOOGLE NGRAMS CHART 2-0 -AI researcher 5-5 -AI-driven Intervention -AI4Bharat 5-5 -AIDS 5-0, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2 -Ainulindalë -Air pollution 6-4, 7-0 -Albert Hirschman 5-7 -Alexis de Tocqueville 2-0, 4-2 -Algorithmic Ranking System 5-4 -Alien Art 5-3 -Alien Intelligence 2-0, 5-3 -Alignment assemblies 2-2, 7-0 -All Our Ideas 5-4, 6-1 -AlphaGo 5-3 -AlphaGo Zero 5-3 -Amartya Sen 5-6 -American Democracy 3-2 -American Legislative Capitol 2-1 -American Revolution 6-0 -Analysis Paralysis 5-4 -Android 3-3, 4-0 -Anthropic 4-0, 5-4, 5-7, 7-0 -Anthropocene 6-4 -Anthropologist 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 -Anti-authoritarianism 2-1 -Anti-social 2-0, 3-1, 6-3 -Anti-social Media 6-3 -Antipathy 2-0 -Antiretroviral Therapie 6-2 -Antisocial 2-0 -Antitrust 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 7-0 -Apple's Torus Spaceship 6-1 -Application Ecosystem 6-2 -Approval Voting 5-0, 5-6, 7-1 -Arab Spring 2-0 -Ariana Zetlin 5-5 -Arms Race 4-0, 6-0, 6-3 -Arnold Harberger 5-7 -ARPANET 3-3, 4-4, 7-0 -Arrow's Theorem 5-6 -Articles 145 of the ROC 2-1 -Artificial General Intelligence 2-0 -Artificial Intelligence 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 -Artificial Intelligence (AI). 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 -Artistic co-creation -Artistic Expression 5-3 -Asana 4-4, 5-3 -Asia Development Bank 2-2 -Aspirations to equality 4-0 -Assimilation 2-1 -Assisted Real-time Voting 5-6 -Asynchronous Communication 6-1 -Athena's tapestry -Athenian Marketplace 5-4 -Atomist 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 7-1 -Attention auction -attention exchange tax 7-0 -Audrey Tang 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 -Augmented Reality 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 -Australia 2-0, 5-5, 6-2 -Australian Government 5-5 -Author 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Authoritarian 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 -Authoritarian Regimes 1, 2-0 -Authoritarian Repressive State 2-1 -Authoritarianism 2-0, 2-1, 4-0 -Authority 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 -Autodesk 5-3 -Automated Clearing House(ACH) 4-3 -Autonomy 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5 -Aviv Ovadya 5-4 -Awe 2-0, 5-3, 6-2 -Ayn Rand 2-0 -Background Signals 5-6 -Badges 5-5, 5-7 -Balaji Srinavasan 2-0, 7-1 -Banks 2-0, 4-1, 4-3 -Basic Antigen 6-2 -BBN 3-3 -BCI 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 -Benefits Data Trust 5-5 -Bertelsmann Foundation 2-2 -Bhagavad Gita 5-3 -Bible 3-2, 4-0, 5-0, 5-3 -Bill Gates 2-1 -Biodiversity 2-0, 3-1, 6-4 -Biodiversity Loss 2-0, 6-4 -Biomedical engineering 6-2 -Biomedicine 6-2 -Biometrics 3-2, 4-1, 6-4 -Bioweapons 2-0 -Bitcoin 2-0, 3-3, 4-3 -Blake Masters 2-0 -Blended-finance Agreement 6-2 -Blindness of Justice 5-5 -Blitzscaling 6-0 -Blockchain 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 7-1 -Blockchains 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-7 -Bluesky 3-3, 4-2 -Bottom-up 5-6 -Brain interface 5-0, 6-3 -Brain-Computer Interfaces 5-1 -Braver Angels 5-4 -Brent Seales 5-3 -Bricolage 5-0 -Bridging the Crowd -British Colonial Development Corporation 6-2 -Broadcast 2-2, 4-4, 5-4 -Bruno Latour 5-4 -Buddhism 2-2 -Bureaucracies 5-5, 5-7 -Bureaucratic Rules 5-5 -By An Invisible Hand 5-7 -Campus Athletics 6-1 -Canada 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 -Cancel Culture 2-0 -Capitalism 2-0, 3-2, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 -Carbon Credit 6-2 -Casey Handmer 5-3 -Cash 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3 -Catastrophic Risks -Cathy O’Neil 2-0 -Cellphone Addiction 2-2 -Center for Constructive Communication 5-4 -Central Bank Digital Currencies 2-0, 4-3 -Central Planning 2-0 -Centralized Surveillance 2-0, 4-1 -Centralized Top-down 2-0 -Centralizing 2-0, 3-1, 4-1 -Charity 4-3, 5-7 -Charter Cities 5-5 -charter town -Chen Shui-bian 2-1 -Cheques 4-3 -Chiang Ching-Kuo 2-1 -Chiang Kai-shek 2-1 -Child Mortality 6-2 -Chinese Communist Party 2-0, 2-1, 7-0 -Circular investment 5-7, 7-0 -Citizen co-journalism 6-3 -Citizen Journalism 6-3 -Citizen Volunteers 2-2 -Citizen-led Online Initiative 6-2 -Citizens of the Free Area 2-1 -Civic hackers 2-2 -Civic Hacking Culture 6-4 -Civic Tech 3-3, 6-0, 6-4, 7-0 -Civic Technology Movement 6-4 -Civil Clan 2-1 -Civil IoT 6-4, 7-0 -Civil Livelihood 2-1 -Civil Rights movement 2-1 -Civilization 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-6 -Civilization VI 2-0, 5-6 -Civilizing 5-7 -Claude 5-0, 5-4 -Clean Energy 6-4 -Climate Change 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-6, 6-2, 6-4 -Climate Change Simulations -Climate hazard 6-2 -Co-construction of Health Agency -Co-creation Relationship 6-4 -Co-decision Making Processe 6-2 -Co-edited Project 5-3 -Co-writing -Codetermination 5-7 -Cofacts 2-2 -Cold War 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 -Collaboration Across Difference 5-0, 6-4 -Collaboration Across Diversity 3-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7 -Collaborative Diversity 2-1, 3-0 -Collaborative Exchange 5-7 -Collaborative Filtering 5-4 -Collaborative Innovation 5-3 -Collaborative Journalism 6-3 -Collaborative Network 6-4 -Collaborative Platform 5-3 -Collaborative Problem Solving 2-1 -Collaborative Technologies 5-6 -Collaborative Technology 1, 4-5, 5-0, 6-2 -Collective Alignment 5-4 -Collective Consciousness 5-1, 5-3 -Collective Creativity 5-2, 5-3 -Collective Decision 4-0, 4-3, 5-6, 7-1 -Collective Deliberation 5-5 -Collective Intelligence 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 -Collective Organization 2-0, 3-0, 6-3 -Collective Problem-solving 6-4 -Collective Response Model -Collective Response Systems 5-4 -Collegia 3-3, 6-2 -Colonial Outsider 5-5 -Colorado State Legislature 5-6 -Commanding Heights 2-0 -Common Belief 4-2, 6-2 -Common Carriers of Public Discussion 6-3 -Common Content 6-3 -Common Corporate Infrastructure 6-1 -Common Good 5-0, 5-7 -Common Knowledge 4-2, 5-4 -Common Will 5-4, 5-6 -Commons-Based Property 3-2 -Communism 2-0 -Community Currency 4-3, 5-0 -Community Donation 5-7 -Community Notes (CN)　 5-4 -Community-based 3-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0 -Community-Based Identity 3-2 -Compelling Narrative 6-3 -Competitive authoritarian regimes -Competitive Effect -Complexity 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 7-1 -Compulsory Purchase 5-7 -Computer-simulated Neuron 5-5 -Confidential Computing 4-2 -Conformity 5-5, 7-1 -Confucian Tradition 2-1 -Connected Society 3-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 5-7 -Consociational 3-2, 5-6 -Consociationalism 3-2, 5-6 -Constitutional Court 2-2 -Contribution 0-3, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Cooperative Enterprise 2-1, 7-0 -Cooperatives 2-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 -Copyright 2-0, 2-2 -Corporate Bureaucracy 5-5 -Corporate Campuse 6-1 -Corporate Control 3-3, 4-1, 5-2, 5-7 -Corporate Libertarianism 2-0 -Corporations 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 -Correlation discounting 5-6 -Cortico 5-4 -Countervail 5-7 -Coursera 5-3 -Courtney Cogburn 5-2, 6-3 -COVID-19 2-1, 2-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 -COVID-19 pandemic 2-2, 6-1 -Crackle 5-3 -Creative Collaborations 5-2, 5-3, 5-6 -Creative Commons 3-3, 4-0, 5-0 -Creative Process 5-3 -Cross-cultural collaboration 5-3 -Cross-Cultural Exchanges -Cross-cutting Benefit 6-1 -Cross-pollination Service 6-1 -Cross-Straits Services Trade Agreement 2-2 -Crowdsourcing 5-3, 5-5 -Crypto 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Cryptocurrencies 2-0, 4-3 -Cryptographic 2-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3 -Cryptographic Hypercapitalism 2-0 -Cryptographic Principle 6-2 -Cryptographic Standards 4-2 -Cryptography 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 6-3 -Cryptonomicon 2-0 -Cultural Diversity 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 -Cultural Homogenization 5-3 -Cultural Norm 5-5 -Cultural Practice 4-4, 5-1, 5-5, 7-1 -Currency 2-0, 2-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 -Curriculum Vitae (CV) 5-5 -Curtis Yarvin 2-0 -Cybernetic Society 3-2 -Cybernetics 3-2, 3-3 -Danielle Allen 3-0, 4-0, 5-5, 5-7 -DAO 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 -Daoism 2-1 -dApps 6-0 -Darkening Clouds 6-2 -Daron Acemoglu 2-0, 3-1, 4-2, 5-7, 6-0 -DARPA 3-3 -Data Coalitions 2-2, 6-0, 6-4, 7-0 -Data Governance Act 2-0, 4-4 -Data Transparency 2-2 -Data-driven Actors 6-4 -Dave Egger 4-2, 5-3 -David Kidd 5-5 -De Tocqueville, Alexis -Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP) 4-2 -Decentralized Social Technologies 2-0 -Decentralized Web 3-3, 4-0 -Decision Trees 5-5 -Declaration for the Future of the Internet 4-5 -Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace 2-0 -Decontee Davis 6-3 -Decreasing Marginal Returns 5-7 -Decreasing Returns 5-7 -Deepfakes 4-5 -DeepMind 2-0, 5-3 -Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency -Deforestation 5-2, 6-4 -Degressive Proportionality 3-2, 5-6 -Deliberation 2-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Democracy 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Democracy in America 2-0, 4-2 -Democratic Advocates 2-1 -Democratic freedom 2-1 -Democratic Input to AI project 2-2 -Democratic Inputs 5-4 -Democratic Participation 2-0, 2-1, 3-3 -Democratic Progressive Party 2-1 -Democratic Republican Government 6-0 -Demonization 6-3 -Descriptive 3-0 -Designated Verifier Proofs (DVP) 4-2 -Deweyian pragmatism 2-1 -Difference 1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-3, 6-4, 7-1 -Differential Privacy 4-2, 4-4 -Differing Degrees 2-0, 3-2, 5-4, 5-6 -Diffusion of Information 5-4 -Digital Archaeology 5-3 -Digital asset taxes 7-0 -Digital Assistant 5-6 -Digital Certificate 6-2 -Digital Civic Engagement 2-2 -Digital competence education 2-2, 3-3, 7-0 -Digital Currencies 2-0, 4-3, 7-0 -Digital Democracies 2-0 -Digital Democracy 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 7-1, 8 -Digital Democracy Initiative -Digital Divide 4-5, 5-2, 5-3 -Digital Infrastructure 3-3, 4-1, 4-5, 7-0 -Digital interaction 4-0 -Digital land tax 7-0 -Digital Legacies 5-2, 5-3 -Digital Legacy Realms -Digital literacy -Digital Mapping Tool 5-5 -Digital Markets Act 2-0, 7-0 -Digital Nomads 6-1 -Digital public infrastructure 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 7-0 -Digital Public Services 2-0, 4-5 -Digital Realpolitik -Digital Services Act 2-0, 7-0 -Digital Social Engagement 6-4 -Digital Stagnation 2-0 -Digital Technology 1, 2-0, 3-0, 3-2, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-3, 7-0, 8 -Digital Twins 5-3 -Digital Workspace 5-3 -Digital Yuan 2-0 -Digital-native currencies 4-0 -Diplomatic Decisions 5-6 -Diplomatic Favor 5-6 -Diplomatic Nuance 2-1 -Direct Collective Representative 5-4 -Direct Election of the President 2-1 -Direct Neural Interface 6-1 -Direct Thought Transmission -Discrimination Law 2-0 -Disinformation 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 5-4, 6-2, 7-1 -Displacement 2-0 -Disruption 2-0, 3-3, 6-1 -Distributed Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) 4-1, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 -Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) -Distributed Ledgers 4-1, 5-5 -Distributed Network of Signals 5-5 -Distributed Participation 6-3 -Distribution 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 -Diverse Legal System 5-5 -Diverse Perspective 5-3, 5-4 -Diversification 5-5, 6-0 -Diversification of Seeing -Diversity 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Diversity of groups 6-0 -Dominant Narrative 5-3 -Donald Trump 2-0 -DoNotPay 5-5 -Douglas Engelbart 3-3, 4-4 -DPP 2-1 -Dr. Seuss 5-4 -Driverless Cars 2-0 -Durkheim 3-2, 6-2 -Duverger's Law 5-6 -Dynamic 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Dystopian Outcome 5-3 -Dōka 2-1 -e-citizenship 6-1 -E-Government 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 -e-health 6-2 -e-sports 5-2, 6-1 -E-Sports Tournaments 5-2 -Early Adopted Community 6-0 -Early Adopters 6-0 -Ebola 6-3 -Echo Chamber 2-0, 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 -Echo Chambers 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 -Economies Esteem 5-7 -Economist Intelligence Unit 2-2 -Edmund Burke 6-4 -Educational Psychology 5-5, 6-0 -Edward Deming 2-1 -edX 5-3 -Egalitarianism 2-1, 6-2 -EGDI 2-0 -Eigenvalues 5-6 -Eigenvoting 5-6 -Election 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-2 -Elite Universities 5-5 -Elon Musk 2-0, 4-2, 4-3 -Emergent Publics 3-2, 5-7 -Eminent Domain 5-7 -Emmanuel Saez 2-2 -Emotion Tracking -Emotional Connectivity 5-2 -Empathetic Technology -Empathy Amplifiers 5-2 -Encounter with the East 5-3 -Endowments 5-7 -Enlightenment 3-2, 4-0 -Entrepreneurial Sovereignty (ES) -Entrepreneurship 2-1, 3-3, 5-7 -Environment 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 8 -Environment Sensing Network 6-4 -Environmental Devastation 2-0 -Environmental Justice 6-4 -Environmental Problem 6-0, 6-4 -Environmental Sustainability 6-4 -Environmental, Social and Governance 5-7, 6-3 -Estonia 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-5, 6-1 -ETH Zurich 5-3 -Ethereum Attestation Service 6-2 -Ethnic Pluralism 2-1 -Ethnographer 5-5 -European Union 2-0, 4-4, 5-6, 7-0 -Excessive Fragmentation 6-1 -Excessive Segregation 6-1 -Existential Risks 2-0 -Experimentalism 2-1 -Experimentation on 6-0 -Experimentation with 2-2, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0 -Expert 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-1 -Export-orientation 2-1 -Extended Reality 6-2 -Externalities 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 -Extreme Sports 6-1 -Extreme underinvestment 6-2 -Extremist Parties 2-0 -Ezra Klein 2-0 -Fabric of Trust -Facial Recognition 2-0 -Fact Checkers 2-2 -Fact-checking 2-2, 5-4 -Fair 0-1, 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 -Fairness 3-2, 5-5 -Faith in Democratic Institutions 2-0 -False Consensus 6-3 -Fascism 2-0 -Fast, Fun and Fair 2-2 -Feature Phone 5-5 -Federal 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 5-6, 7-0 -Federal Pension Insurance system 5-5 -FIDES 6-2 -Financial Capitalism 2-0 -Financial Innovation 2-0 -Financial Markets 2-0, 5-7 -Financial markets 2-0, 5-7 -Financial Technology 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 -Finnish government 5-5 -Fintech 2-0, 4-3 -First Additional Vote 5-6 -Five Star Rating System 5-4 -Fluidity 6-4 -Folk Religion 2-2 -Fora 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-4, 6-3, 7-0 -Forms of Diversity 5-0, 7-1 -Foundation Model 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Foundation Models 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Foxconn 2-2 -Fractional Reserve Banking 4-3 -Fragile Democracies 2-0 -Franz Kafka 5-5 -Freddy Lim 2-2 -free China 2-1 -Free Markets Know Best 2-0 -Free speech 4-0 -Free Trade 5-0, 5-7 -Free Trade Agreements 5-7 -Freedom House 2-2 -Freedom of association 4-0, 4-1, 4-2 -Freedom of the Press 6-3 -French Revolution 6-0 -Frictions 5-7 -Fructus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 -Full Multisensory Shared Experience 5-3 -Full-time Employment 5-7 -Fundamental Welfare Theorems 5-7 -Funder 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 -Funding Pool 6-2 -Fusion 2-1, 3-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 -Futarchy 5-6 -Future Collaborator 5-3 -g0v 2-2, 3-3, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0 -Gabriel Zucman 2-2 -Gaia-X 4-0, 4-4, 7-0 -Gamification 6-2 -Ganga River -Gathering Storm 2-0, 5-6 -Gavi 6-2 -GDP 1, 2-0, 2-2, 5-6, 6-1, 7-0 -General Data Protection Regulation 2-0, 4-2, 7-0 -General Reticence 2-0 -Generative AI 4-2, 4-5 -Generative Art 5-3 -Generative Artists 5-3 -Generative Foundation Model 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative foundation models 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative Foundation Models(GFMs) 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Generative Pretrained Transformer 2-0 -Geographical Information System 5-5 -Geopolitics 2-0, 2-2, 4-3, 7-1 -Georg Simmel 3-2 -Georgist land value tax 2-1 -Germany 4-0, 5-2, 5-5, 6-3 -GFM-driven Process 5-3 -Git 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -GitCoin 3-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2 -GitCoin Grants 5-7, 6-2 -GitHub 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 -GitHub Sponsors 5-7 -GitLab 3-3, 5-3 -Global Anti-colonial Movement 2-1 -Global Capitalism 5-7 -Global Consciousness Networks 5-2 -Global Crossroad 2-1 -Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online 4-5 -Global Fund 6-2 -Global Government 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 -Global Legitimacy 5-6 -Global Policies 5-6 -Global Positioning 2-0, 5-5 -Global Warming 6-4 -Globarization -Gogolook 2-2 -Gold Card 2-2, 6-1 -Golden Age 2-0 -Good Old-fashioned AI (GOFAI) 5-5 -Google 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Google DeepMind 5-3 -Gov4Git 6-2 -GovTech 3-3 -GPT 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 6-0 -Graphical user interface 3-3, 4-0 -Great Firewall 4-0 -Green Technologies 6-4 -Gross Domestic Product 2-0, 2-2, 6-1 -Group Works 5-4 -Hackathon 2-2, 4-0, 4-2, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -HackMD 3-3 -Hakka 2-1 -Hannah Arendt 3-0, 4-1, 6-0 -Hanson 5-6, 6-2 -Haptic Feedback 5-1, 5-2 -Hard Journalism 6-3 -Health 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 8 -Health Financing 6-2 -Health Insurance 4-1, 6-2 -Health Objectivism 6-2 -Health Savings Account 6-2 -Health Savings Plan 6-2 -healthy minds in healthy bodies 6-2 -Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 -Henry George Theorem 3-2, 5-7 -Henry George Theorem States 5-7 -Her 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Herbert Simon 4-2, 5-4 -Herculaneum 5-3 -Herculaneum scrolls 5-3 -Heritage Foundation 2-2 -High Modernism 3-1, 3-2 -High-Bandwidth Communication 5-1 -Higher-fidelity Signals 5-6 -HiredScore 5-5 -Hiring Manager 5-5, 6-1 -Hit Rates 6-1 -HIV 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-1, 6-2 -Hokkien 2-1 -Hollowing-out 2-0 -Holly Herndon 5-3, 7-1 -Homerian epics 5-3 -Homogenization 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7 -Homogenization of Ideas 5-3 -Homogenize 3-3, 5-0, 5-7 -Homomorphic Encryption 4-2, 4-4 -Horizontal Dialogue 6-1 -Hsieh Tsung-min 2-1 -Hu Shih 2-1 -Hugging Face 5-3 -Human Cooperation 5-7 -Human Resources Platform 5-5 -Human Rights 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 7-0 -Humanocracy 5-7 -Humor over Rumor 2-2 -Hunter-gatherer Model -Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press 6-3 -Hybrid Reality Environments 5-2 -Hybrid Work Style 6-1 -HyperCerts 6-2 -Hypertext 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4 -Ian Banks 2-0 -Iceland 3-3, 5-6 -ID2020 5-5 -Ideathons 2-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Identity and Access 6-0 -Ideologies of the Twenty-First Century 2-0 -Ideology 2-0, 2-1, 5-0, 7-0 -Idiosyncratic Project 6-1 -Immersive Education -Immersive Shared Realities 5-4 -Immersive Shared Reality 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Immersive Shared Reality Campuse -Immersive Soundscapes 5-1 -Impact 0-0, 0-2, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Impact-investing 6-2 -Impartial 5-5 -Imperfections 5-7 -Implementer 6-2 -Impossibility Theorem 5-6 -In-person Meeting 5-4 -In-person Team 6-1 -In-silico 5-3 -Incompetent Manager 6-1 -Independent Stake 6-2 -India 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 6-2, 6-4, 7-0 -India stack 4-0, 4-1, 7-0 -Indiegogo 5-3 -Indigeneous Community 6-2 -Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation 5-5 -Individual Identity 3-2, 4-2 -individuality loss -Industrial 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-7, 7-0 -Industry 1.0 -Industry 2.0 -Industry 3.0 -Industry 4.0 -Inequality 2-0, 2-2, 4-0, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 8 -Infodemic 2-0, 2-2, 8 -Information Age 2-0, 3-3, 4-5 -Information commons 4-0, 4-5 -Information Integrity 2-2, 4-2, 4-5 -Information Technology 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 6-1, 7-0 -Infrastructure 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Insurer 6-2 -Intelligence Augmentation 2-0 -Inter-species Communication -Interactive Agent 5-4 -Intergalactic Computer Network 3-3, 4-4 -International Monetary Fund 2-2 -International Trade Treaties 5-7 -Internet 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Internet of Beings 2-2, 4-5 -Internet of Things 2-0, 2-2 -Internet Tidal Wave 2-1 -Internet-mediated Writing 5-4 -Interoperability 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-2, 5-5, 7-0 -Interoperability Across Legal Regime 5-5 -Interplanetary File System (IPFS) 4-4 -Intersectional 3-0, 3-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 -Intersectional Identity -Intrapreneurship 6-1, 7-1 -iOS 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Isaac Asimov 2-0 -IVR Junction 5-5 -J. D. Vance 2-0 -J.C.R. Licklider 3-3, 5-6 -J.R.R. Tolkien -Jack Ma 2-0 -Jaclyn Tsai 2-1, 2-2 -Jacob Rees-Mogg 2-0 -James Dale Davidson 2-0 -Japanese Empire 2-1 -Japanese Occupation 2-1 -Jefferson, Thomas -Jennifer Prah Ruger 6-2 -Jeremy Corbyn 2-0 -Jetsons 2-0 -Jobs, Steve -John Dewey 2-1, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 -John Perry Barlow 2-0 -Joint Learning 6-1 -Joseph Gordon-Levitt 5-3 -Joseph Stiglitz 5-7 -Josh Hawley 2-0 -Jothons 2-2 -Journalism 2-2, 6-3 -Journey of Humanity 5-0 -Julian Schilliger 5-3 -Jurisdictional Boundaries 4-4, 5-7 -Just 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Kao Chia-liang 2-2 -Kaohsiung Incident 2-1 -Karya 5-5 -Kazakhstan 2-0 -Kela-Kelpo project -Kenneth Arrow 5-6, 6-2 -Kevin Scott 6-1 -Khan Academy 5-3 -Kickstarter 5-3 -Kim Stanley Robinson 5-4 -Knappschaften 6-2 -Kuomintang 2-1 -Labor Augmentation 2-0 -Labor Automation 2-0 -Labor Law 2-0, 7-0 -Labor Markets 2-0, 5-7 -Labor Unions 2-1, 4-2, 5-7 -Land to the Tiller 2-1 -Large Language Model (LLM) 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2 -Large Language Models (LLMs) 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 -Laurie Anderson 5-3 -Lee Teng-hui 2-1 -Left-right Divide -Legal Agent 6-4 -Legal Jurisdiction 5-5 -Legal Robot 5-5 -Legal Tender 4-3 -Legislative Yuan 2-2 -Legitimacy 2-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 -Legitimation 2-0 -Lego 5-7 -Lesser of Two Evils 5-6 -Lex Fridman 5-4 -Liberal Democracy 2-2 -Liberalization of Taiwan 2-1 -Liberating Structures 5-4 -Libertarian Ideology 2-0 -Libertarianism 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 7-1 -Life Expectancy 2-2, 5-2, 6-2, 6-4 -Life-support System 6-4 -Limited Cultural Groups 5-7 -LinkedIn 4-1, 6-0 -Linux 3-3, 4-0 -Lionel Penrose 5-6 -Liquid Democracy 5-4, 5-6 -Little Platoons 6-4 -Livestream-based communication 2-2 -LLM-based Representative -LLMs 2-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 -Local Language 5-5 -Location Aware Sensor System 6-4 -Long-distance Cooperation 2-1 -Long-term Work Permits 5-7 -Lorax 5-4 -Los Alamos 5-3 -Low-skilled Workers 2-0 -Lucan Way 6-0 -Luke Farritor 5-3 -Luke Thorburn 5-4 -m-health 6-2 -M. Mitchell Waldrop 3-1, 3-3 -Machine Learning 2-0, 2-2, 4-2, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5 -Machine Translation Tool 5-4 -Macro Badges 5-5 -Magpie River 6-4 -Malaria 6-2 -Man-Computer Symbiosis 3-3, 7-0 -Mandarin 1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0 -Manipulation 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-6 -Mao Zedong 2-1 -Marginal Revolution 5-7 -Mark Zuckerberg 5-4 -Market 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 8 -Market Design 4-4, 5-7 -Market power 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 -Market Power 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 -Marxism 2-1 -Marxist Vision of Socialism 2-1 -Mask App 2-2 -Mass Extinction 6-4 -Mass Surveillance 2-0 -Massachusetts Institute of Technology 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 7-0 -Massive Multi-user Online Laboratories (MMOLs) 5-2 -Masters of Scale 6-0 -Mastodon 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 -Mat Dryhurst 5-3, 7-1 -Matching Fund 5-7, 6-1 -Material Redistribution 2-0 -Maternal Mortality 6-2 -Matthew Yglesias 2-0 -Max Weber 3-2, 5-5 -Mechanism Design 4-4, 5-7 -Media 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Media Ecosystem 6-3 -Mediated Reality 5-1, 5-2 -Meetings Deemed Unproductive 6-1 -Mencius Moldbug 2-0 -Mental Health 5-1, 5-2, 6-2 -Meta 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Metaverse 2-0, 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 -Metaverses 4-0 -Mezzo Badges 5-5 -Michelle Wu 5-4 -Microsoft 0-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 -Military Scenario 6-1 -Millennium Development Declaration 6-2 -Mimetic Models 4-5 -Minister of Digital Affairs 0-1, 2-1 -Minister without portfolio 2-2 -Ministry for the Future 5-4, 5-7 -Ministry For The Future 5-4, 5-7 -Ministry of Digital Affairs 2-2, 4-4, 7-0 -Minitel 2-0, 3-3 -Minquán 2-1 -Minzú 2-1 -Miraikan 5-1, 7-0, 7-1 -Misinformation 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-4, 5-7 -Misleading 2-2, 4-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-3 -Mixed Reality 3-3, 5-2, 6-1 -MMOLs 5-2 -modernity 3-2, 5-5, 7-1 -Monarchy 2-1 -Monist 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 5-6, 7-1 -Monist Atomism 3-0, 3-1 -Monolithic Threat -Monopolization 3-3, 5-2, 7-0 -Monopoly 2-1, 3-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 -Moore’s Law for Everything 2-0 -Moral Bio-enhancement 5-1 -Mount Vesuvius 5-3 -Move fast and Break Things 6-0 -Multidisciplinary Renaissance 5-3 -Multiemployer 2-0 -Multiple Perspective 5-3 -Multipolarity 5-0 -Mycorrhizal Fungi 4-5 -MyGoPen 2-2 -Mínshēng 2-1 -Narrow Corridor 2-0, 3-1, 7-1 -Narrow Educational and Career Path 5-5 -NASA 3-3, 6-4 -Nation state 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0, 7-1 -National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation 5-4 -National Insurance Model 6-2 -National Language 5-5 -National Politic 2-1, 6-1, 7-0 -National Socialist German Workers party -Nationalism 2-0, 2-1, 5-7 -Nationalist 2-0, 2-1 -Nationalist Backlash 2-0 -Natural Ecosystem 6-4 -Natural Language Processing 5-4, 6-1 -Natural Leadership 6-1 -Natural Legal Personhood 6-4 -Natural sciences 3-1, 3-2, 3-3 -Neal Stephenson 2-0, 5-0, 5-2 -Negative freedom of speech 4-0 -Neil Armstrong 6-3 -Neoliberal 2-0, 3-3, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0 -Neoliberal Reaction 5-7 -Neoliberalism 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 -Neom 2-0 -Netflix Prize 5-3 -Netherlands 6-3 -Netizen 6-3 -Network States 5-5 -Networked and Probabilistic Structure 5-5 -Networked Value 3-2 -Networks of Human Minds 5-5 -Neural Interfaces 5-1, 6-1 -Neural network 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 -Neural Network 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 -Neurofeedback 5-1 -Neuromodulation 5-1 -New England town hall 5-4 -New Public 3-2 -New Zealand 3-3, 6-4 -News feed algorithm 5-3, 5-4 -Nicholas Bostrom 2-0 -Nixon's visit to PRC 2-1 -Noah Smith 2-0 -Nobody Movement 2-2 -Nodes 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-5, 7-0 -Non-aligned incentives 6-2 -non-believers 2-2 -Non-colonialist Model 6-2 -Non-communicable Disease 6-2 -Non-fungible Token (NFT) 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 -Non-human Perspective 5-3 -Non-market 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 -Non-renewable Energy Sources 6-4 -Non-Verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 -Non-verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 -Norbert Wiener 3-2 -Normative 3-0, 4-4, 6-2 -North Atlantic Treaty Organization -North Star 6-0 -Notion 2-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-4 -Objective Quality 5-4 -Objectivist Model 6-2 -Objectivity 6-3 -Occupy 2-1, 6-1 -Ocean Acidification 2-0, 6-4 -Octavia Butler 2-0 -Oded Galor 5-0 -OECD 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 -Office of Chief Technology Officer 6-1 -Office Politic 6-1 -Olfactory Technology 5-2 -on the ground 6-1, 7-1 -One China 2-1 -One Country, Two Systems 2-1 -One-dimensional Spectrum 4-2, 5-4 -One-Person-One-Vote 3-2, 5-6 -One-Share-One-Vot 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 -One-share-one-vote 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 -Online collaboration platform -Online Deliberation 3-3 -Online Gaming 5-2 -Online Platform 5-0, 5-2, 5-3 -Opacity of Bureaucracy 5-5 -Open Conversation 6-1 -Open Government Movement 2-2 -Open Impact Pool 6-2 -Open Recognition Community -Open Source 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Open Source Intelligence 6-3 -Open Source Observer 6-2 -Open Source Software 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 -Open Source Software (OSS) 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 -Open Space Technology 5-4 -Open Standard 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5 -Open-source project 5-3 -Open-source Rainmaking 6-4 -Open-source Technology -OpenAI 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 -Operating System 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Operating systems 4-0, 5-0, 7-0 -Optimism Collective 6-2 -Organizational Chart 6-1 -Oscar Wilde 5-4 -Out-of-pocket Payment 6-2 -Outcome 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Output 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Packet Switching 3-3, 4-1 -Packet-switching 3-3, 5-5 -Page Rank -Paradigm Shift 5-1, 5-4 -Paradox.ai 5-5 -PARC 3-3, 7-0 -Park of Aging 5-1 -Partial Common Ownership 5-7 -Participation 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Participative Production 2-1 -Participatory Design 5-7 -Participedia 5-4 -Pascual Restrepo 2-0 -Paul Jozef Crutzen 6-4 -Peer Production 3-3 -Peng Ming-min 2-1 -People's Republic of China (PRC) 2-0, 2-1, 4-3 -Peripheral 2-0 -Personal Identities 3-0 -Peter Thiel 2-0, 4-3, 7-1 -Phishing Attack 4-2, 6-2 -Physical Work 6-1 -Pigouvian Taxes -Pixar's headquarters -Place of Convergence 2-1 -Plural Funding 5-6, 5-7 -Plural Future -Plural Management Protocol 5-7 -Plural Spirit 2-1 -Plural workplace -Pluralism 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-1 -Polarization 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3, 8 -Polis 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Political Polarization 2-0, 2-2, 5-4 -Polypolitan Migration Policy 5-7 -Pompeii 5-3 -Populist Movement -Portals Policing Project 5-2, 5-4 -Positive freedom of speech 4-0 -Post-capitalist World 2-0 -Post-colonial Futurism 2-0 -Post-gender 2-0 -Post-state 2-0 -Post-symbolic Communication 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 -Power Concentration 5-6 -Pragmatic 2-1, 3-3, 5-0 -PRC Surveillance Regime 2-0 -Precious Metals 4-3 -Prediction Market 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 -Prediction Markets 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 -Predictive Futurism 2-0 -Predictive Voting 5-6, 6-2 -Premature Optimization 5-0 -Prepayment 6-2 -Prescriptive 3-0, 5-6 -Presidential Hackathon 2-2, 7-0 -Press Freedom 6-0, 6-3 -Press Responsibility 6-3 -Principles of ⿻ 4-0, 5-3 -Privacy 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 -Private Community-based Sponsorship 5-7 -Private Health Insurance 6-2 -Private Information 4-1, 6-2 -Private Key 4-2, 6-3 -Private Organizations 5-7 -Private Property 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 5-7 -Private Sector 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 6-1, 7-0 -Pro-social Media 6-3 -Production Possibilities Frontier 5-0 -Productivity Software 6-3 -Programmer 5-5, 6-4 -Progress and Poverty 3-2 -Progress Prizes 5-3 -Project Liberty 4-0, 4-2 -Projection Mapping 5-1 -Property Rights 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 -Proportional Representation 3-2, 5-6 -Proprioceptive Communication -Public Consent 2-0 -Public Digital Innovation Space 2-2 -Public Expenditure 2-0, 5-5 -Public Good 2-0, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 -Public Goods 2-0, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 -Public Health Policy 6-2 -Public Key Cryptography 4-2 -Public Participation 2-0, 4-5, 5-4, 7-0 -Public Perception 6-4 -Public Sector 2-0, 2-2, 6-0, 7-0 -Public Service 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 -Public Square 2-0, 4-0, 4-2, 7-0 -Public Welfare Shcemes -Public Will 5-5, 5-6 -Public/Supermodular Goods 5-7 -Purchasing Power Parity 2-2 -Pythagoras -Qing 2-1 -Quadratic Funding 5-7 -Quadratic Liquid Democracy 5-6 -Quadratic Voting 2-2, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 -Quantitative Markers 5-7 -RadicalxChange 0-1, 4-3, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 -Rainbow Flags 2-1 -Rainforest Foundation US 5-5 -Raj 2-0, 5-0, 6-2 -Randomized Controlled Trials 6-0 -Ranked Choice 5-6 -rationality 3-1, 3-2, 5-0, 5-5 -Ray Kurzweil 2-0 -Ready Player One 5-2 -Realistic Avatar 6-1 -Receipts 4-3, 6-3 -Reckless Monopolies 5-7 -Redistribution 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 -Regenerating Diversity 5-0, 7-1 -Regenerative Economies -Regenerative Plurality -Regression Discontinuity Design 6-2 -Reid Hoffman 2-0, 6-0, 7-1 -Reinstatement 2-0 -Relevant public 3-2, 5-7 -Remesh 5-4, 6-1 -Remix and Replace 2-0 -Remote Collaboration Tool 6-1 -Remote Employee 6-1 -Remote Fitness Classes 5-2 -Remote Shared Reality 6-1, 6-3 -Remote Shared Reality Technologie 6-1, 6-3 -Remote Teams 6-1 -Renaissance 3-2, 5-3 -Replenishment Round 6-2 -Reporters without Borders 6-3 -Representation 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 -Representative Statement 5-4 -Representing Consensus Position 5-4 -Research and Development 2-0, 3-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 -Research Policy 5-7 -Resolution 2758 2-1 -Reverse Mentors 2-1 -Revive China Society 2-1 -Revolutionary Democratic Direction 2-1 -Rich Get Richer 5-5 -Richard Arnott 5-7 -Richard Nixon 2-1 -Rights of free speech 4-0 -Risk Pooling 6-2 -River of Democracy 1 -Robert Atkinson 2-0 -Robin Hanson 5-6, 6-2 -Robinson, James -Roblox 5-7 -ROC 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 -Ropes Course 6-1 -Rough Consensus 5-4, 6-3 -Rule Of Law 5-7 -Run-off 5-6 -Rural Land Reform 2-1 -Russian revolution 2-1 -Sam Altman 2-0, 4-1, 7-1 -Same-sex Marriage 2-2 -San Francisco 3-2, 3-3, 4-3 -Sardinia 6-1 -SARS 2-0, 2-2, 6-3 -Satya Nadella 5-5, 6-1 -Saudia Arabia 2-0 -Scaling Collaboration 5-7 -Scandinavian Countries 2-0, 2-2, 4-0 -Science And Technology Studies 2-0 -Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 -Search Engines 2-0, 4-4, 5-5 -Seasteads 2-0, 5-5 -Sebastian Kurz 2-0 -Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) 4-2 -Securities Laws 2-0 -Security protocols 4-0 -Seeds 2-1, 3-3, 6-0, 7-0 -Self-determination 2-1, 6-2 -Self-ownership 5-7 -Sensory Degradation -Sensory Integration 5-2 -SERVIR Amazonia 5-5 -Seth Parker 5-3 -Shared Goods 5-7, 7-0 -Shared Knowledge Base 5-3 -Shoshanna Zuboff 2-0 -Sidewalk Labs 2-0 -Signal 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 -Silent Majority 6-3 -Simon Chang 2-2 -Simon Johnson 2-0, 5-6 -Simon, Herbert -Simulated Military Exercise 6-1 -Single Tax 3-2 -Sino-Japanese war 2-1 -Siraya language -Slack 5-3, 6-1, 6-3 -Smaller World 6-3 -Smallpox 6-2 -Smart City 2-0 -Smart Contract 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5 -Snow Crash 2-0, 5-2 -Snowden, Edward -Social Collapse 2-0 -Social Connectedness 3-0 -social connectedness 3-0 -Social Control 2-0 -Social Credit Score 2-0 -Social Difference 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 -Social Distance 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 -Social Distancing Measure 6-2 -Social Diversity 3-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 7-1, 8 -Social Divide 5-6, 6-0, 6-3 -Social Division 5-4, 5-6 -Social Dynamics -Social Equity 5-7 -Social Esteem 4-3, 5-7 -Social Fabric 2-0, 4-0, 4-2 -Social Identity System 6-1 -Social Insurance 5-7, 6-2 -Social Interaction 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-2 -Social Media 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-1 -Social Media Platform 2-0, 4-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 -Social Network 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0, 8 -Social Order 5-5, 6-2, 7-1 -Social Organization 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7, 6-3 -Social Responsibility 6-3 -Social Science Experts 3-2 -Social sciences 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 6-0 -Social Sector 0-2, 3-3, 6-0, 7-1 -Social Security Numbers 3-2, 4-1 -Social Solidarity 6-2 -social welfare function 5-0, 5-6, 6-2 -Social Worker 5-5 -Socialism 2-1, 5-4, 5-7 -Socialism Takes Too Many Evenings 5-4 -Socially Isolated 2-0 -Society Library 5-4 -Solidarity and Dynamism 6-1, 6-3 -Sortition 5-0, 5-4 -Source Confidentiality 6-3 -South China Sea 2-1 -Soviet Union 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 -SpaceX 5-3 -Spatial Computing 5-1 -speak for itself 6-3 -Speciation 5-5 -Sprightly -Square Root 5-6, 5-7, 6-0 -Square-root Voting 5-6 -SSN 4-1, 5-2, 5-4 -Stagnant Democratic Stories 3-0 -Stakeholder Corporation 5-7 -Stakeholder Remedies 5-7 -Stakeholders 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Stakeholding 5-7 -Standard Career Paths 6-1 -Star Trek 2-0, 3-0, 5-0 -Start-ups 3-3, 5-7, 6-0 -Steve Jobs 3-3, 6-1 -Steven Levitsky 2-0, 4-0, 6-0 -StoryCorps 5-4 -Strava model -Structured Communication -Su Tseng-chang 2-2 -Sub-Saharan Africa 6-2 -Subcultural translation 5-0 -Sun Yat-Sen 2-1, 5-7 -Sunflower Movement 2-1, 2-2 -Superintelligence 2-0 -Supermodular Collaboration 5-7 -Supermodular Investments 5-7 -Supermodular Production 4-3, 5-7 -Supermodularity 3-2, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 -Superpower 2-0, 2-2 -Surveillance 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 6-2, 7-0 -Surveillance Risks -Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6-2, 6-4 -Symbiotic Relationship 1, 3-1 -Symphony of Minds 5-3 -Synchronous Meeting 6-1 -Synthetic instrument 5-3 -Synthetic Technocracy 2-0 -Systems of rights 4-0 -Taigi 2-1 -Taishō Democratic 2-1 -Taivoan 2-1 -Taiwan 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Taiwan Self-Salvation Manifesto 2-1 -Taiwan's Digital Civic Infrastructure 2-2 -Talk to the City 5-4 -Tang Jingsong 2-1 -Tangible Potential 6-0 -Taoism 2-2 -Taoist 2-1 -Target Population 6-2 -Taste Retargeting 5-2 -Taxes 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-7, 7-0 -Teams 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 -Tech Left 2-0 -Techlash 2-0, 3-3 -Technocracy 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 7-0, 7-1 -Technocratic Narrative -Technological Agenda 3-0 -Technology 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Technology Addiction 2-2 -Technology For Collaboration Across Social Difference 3-0 -Technology Investment 2-0 -Ted Nelson 3-3, 5-3 -Telecommuting 2-0 -Telehealth 6-2 -Telemedicine 6-2 -Telepathic Creative Exchange 5-3 -Telepathic Exchange 5-3 -Telepathy 5-1, 8 -Temporal Collaboration 5-3 -Tensions between technology and democracy -Terminator 2-0 -Territorial And Intellectual Property Treaties 5-7 -The Age of Surveillance Capitalism 2-0 -The Castle 5-5 -The Circle 4-2, 5-3 -The Dream Machine 3-3, 4-4 -The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number 5-6 -The Human Condition 3-0, 3-1 -The Lost Dao 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 -The Network State 2-0 -The New Republic 2-1 -the Optimism Collective 6-2 -The Parliament of Things -The Public and its Problems 3-2, 5-7 -The Social Dilemma 2-0 -The Sovereign Individual 2-0 -The World Cafe 5-4 -Theocracy 2-0 -Theory of Change 6-0 -Thin Shell 5-7 -Third Sector 2-1, 5-7, 7-1 -Thomas Piketty 2-2 -Three Principles of the People 2-1 -time sharing 3-3, 4-4 -Time Travel 5-3 -Top Employer 5-5 -Top-down 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 5-5, 6-1, 7-1 -Total Factor Productivity 2-0 -Towards a Connected Society 3-0 -Tradable Carbon Permits 5-7 -Traditional Practice 5-5 -Transculturalism -Transhuman 6-2 -Translation 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 -Transnational Corporations 5-7 -Transparent Database 5-5 -Trello 6-1 -Tridemism 2-1, 3-2 -True democracy 3-2 -Trust Falls 6-1 -Tuberculosis 6-2 -Turing 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 -Twitter 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 -Tyranny of Structurelessness 5-4 -Tyranny Of The Majority 5-6 -UAE 2-0 -UN 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -UN-Water 6-2 -UNDP 4-0, 4-1, 6-2 -Uniform Resource Locator (URL) 4-4 -United Nations 2-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 -United States 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Universal Basic Income 2-0, 4-1 -Universal Birth Registration 3-2 -Universal Coded Character (unicode) 3-0 -Universal Declaration of Human Rights 4-0, 4-5 -Unorthodox Thinking 6-1 -Unstructured Communication -Untapped 5-5 -Urgency of innovation leadership -Ursula Le Guin 2-0 -USAID 6-2 -User Engagement 2-0, 5-4 -User Experience 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 7-0 -User Perspective 5-4 -Ushahidi 3-3, 5-5 -Usus 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 -Utility Regulation 5-7 -V-Dem 1, 2-1, 2-2 -Vaccine Alliance 6-2 -Venture Capital 2-0, 5-7, 6-0 -Venture Capitalist 2-0, 6-0 -Ventures 3-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-7, 6-1 -Verifiable Credential 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 -Vesuvius Challenge 5-3 -Violent Revolution 6-0 -Virtual Civic Spaces -Virtual Gatherings 5-2 -Virtual Meeting 5-4, 6-1 -Virtual Music Festivals 5-2 -Virtual Reality 2-2, 3-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 -Virtual Replica 5-3 -Virtual Tourism 5-2 -Voice-based Internet 5-5 -Volume Cartographer 5-3 -Vote 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 -Voting 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Voting Based On Measures Of Power 5-6 -Voting Based On Population Size 5-6 -VR Therapy -vTaiwan 2-2, 3-3, 5-4 -Vulcan philosophy -Vulcans 3-0 -Wage System 5-7 -War of Independence 6-0 -Water Management 6-4 -Wave of ⿻ 6-3 -Wealth Taxes 5-7 -Weapons of Math Destruction 2-0, 5-5 -Web 2.0 2-0, 5-5 -web of group-affiliation 3-2 -Web2 application 6-2 -Web3 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Wei Ting-chao 2-1 -Weighted-voting 5-6 -Weimar Republic 4-0 -WEIRD societies -Welfare Capitalism 5-0 -Western Capitalist Countries 2-0 -Western Liberal Democracies 2-0, 7-1 -Whanganui River -What's App 5-5 -White Collar 6-1 -White Terror 2-1 -Widening Gulf 2-0, 3-3 -Wikipedia 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 -wikisurvey 2-2, 5-4 -Wikisurveys 5-4 -Will Of The Group 5-6 -will.i.am 5-3 -William Rees-Mogg 2-0 -William Vickrey 5-7 -Windows 3-3, 4-0, 4-1 -Winslow Porter 6-3 -Wisdom of the Crowd 6-2 -Wised Democracy Pattern Language -Withdrew 2-1 -Women Talking 5-4 -Words Cannot Capture 5-4 -Work-life Balance 6-1 -Workplace 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 -Workspace 5-3 -World Congress 5-6 -World Economic Forum 5-5 -World Food Programme 6-2 -World Health Organization (WHO) 2-0, 2-2, 6-2 -World Press Freedom Index 6-3 -World Trade Organization, -World War 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 -World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 4-2 -Writing 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 -WWII 2-1 -X (formerly Twitter) 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -Yamuna River 6-4 -Yasmin Eyalat 6-3 -Year of AI 2-1, 5-5 -Year of Elections 2-1 -Youssef Nader 5-3 -Yu Yong-Ding 2-0 -Yuans 2-1 -Yushan 2-1, 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 -Zero Trust 2-2 -Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs) 4-1, 4-2, 6-3 -Zheng Chenggong 2-1 -Zoning Restrictions 5-7 -⿻ 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 -⿻ Artist 5-3 -⿻ Book 5-7 -⿻ Conversational and Funding Tools 6-1 -⿻ Cryptography 6-3 -⿻ Funding Across Boundaries 5-7 -⿻ Funding Formula 5-7 -⿻ funding: 5-7 -⿻ Future 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 -⿻ good 5-7, 6-2 -⿻ Governance 3-3, 5-2, 5-7 -⿻ Group 5-7 -⿻ Health Agency 6-2 -⿻ Health Association 6-2 -⿻ Hiring 6-1 -⿻ Identity Systems 4-1, 5-6, 5-7 -⿻ Image 3-0 -⿻ Interaction 6-4 -⿻ Management 5-0, 5-7 -⿻ Marketing 6-0 -⿻ mechanism 6-2 -⿻ Media 6-3 -⿻ Money 4-3, 5-7 -⿻ Practic 5-3, 6-1 -⿻ Principles 3-1, 5-7 -⿻ Property 4-4, 5-7 -⿻ Public 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 -⿻ Public Media 6-3 -⿻ Rule -⿻ Structure 4-1, 6-3 -⿻ Technologist 5-4 -⿻ Technology 6-0, 7-0, 7-1 -⿻ Thinking 5-6 -⿻ Vision 4-0, 4-3, 6-2 -⿻ 數位 Plurality 3-0 -⿻-goods Financing 6-2 -⿻istic 6-3 -⿻istic Ignorance 6-3 -數位 1, 3-0 +Keywords Section(by Human) Section(by Script) +(anti-)social media 2-2 2-2 +(In)dividual identity 3-2 3-2 +12-Year Basic Education Curriculum 2-2 2-2 +20% time model 6-1 6-1 +2050 net zero 2-2 2-2 +3D Audio 5-1 5-1 +4Chan 2-0 2-0, 4-1 +51% Attack 5-6 5-6 +5G 2-0 2-0, 4-4 +A Connected Society 3-0 3-0, 3-2 +a priori 6-0 6-0 +Abolitionist 6-3 2-0, 5-5, 6-3 +Abundance technocracy (AT) 4-0 +Abuses Of Monopoly 5-7 5-7 +Abusus 5-7 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 +Academia Sinica 2-1 2-1 +Academic Peer Review 5-4 5-4 +Accelerationist 2-0 2-0 +Acemoglu, Daron 2-0 +Active Listening 5-4 5-4 +ActivityPub 2-0, 3-3 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 +Adaptive Representation 5-6 5-6 +Administration 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 +Administrative Application 5-5 5-5 +Administrative Practice 5-5 5-5 +Administrative State 5-5 5-5 +Adobe Creative Cloud 5-3 5-3 +Advanced Research Projects Agency 2-0 3-3, 7-0 +Adverse Selection 6-2 6-2 +Affective Polarization 2-2, 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 6-3 +Affinity 6-2 5-4, 6-2 +African Model 2-0 2-0 +Agglomeration 6-1 6-1 +Aging Simulation 5-1 +AI Conversation Model 6-4 6-4 +AI Deep Learning 6-4 6-4 +AI GOOGLE NGRAMS CHART 2-0 2-0 +AI researcher 5-5 5-5 +AI-driven Intervention 5-4 +AI4Bharat 5-5 5-5 +AIDS 6-2 5-0, 5-3, 6-1, 6-2 +Ainulindalë 1-1 +Air pollution 6-4 6-4, 7-0 +Albert Hirschman 5-7 5-7 +Alexis de Tocqueville 2-0 2-0, 4-2 +Algorithmic Ranking System 5-4 5-4 +Alien Art 5-3 5-3 +Alien Intelligence 5-3 2-0, 5-3 +Alignment assemblies 2-2 2-2, 7-0 +All Our Ideas 5-4, 6-1 5-4, 6-1 +AlphaGo 5-3 5-3 +AlphaGo Zero 5-3 5-3 +Amartya Sen 5-6 5-6 +American Democracy 3-2 3-2 +American Legislative Capitol 2-1 2-1 +American Revolution 6-0 6-0 +Analysis Paralysis 5-4 5-4 +Android 4-0 3-3, 4-0 +Anthropic 5-4, 5-7 4-0, 5-4, 5-7, 7-0 +Anthropocene 6-4 6-4 +Anthropologist 5-5 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 +Anti-authoritarianism 2-1 2-1 +Anti-social 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 6-3 +Anti-social Media 6-3 6-3 +Antipathy 2-0 2-0 +Antiretroviral Therapie 6-2 6-2 +Antisocial 2-0 2-0 +Antitrust 5-7 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 7-0 +Apple's Torus Spaceship 6-1 6-1 +Application Ecosystem 6-2 6-2 +Approval Voting 5-6 5-0, 5-6, 7-1 +Arab Spring 2-0 2-0 +Ariana Zetlin 5-5 5-5 +Arms Race 6-0, 6-3 4-0, 6-0, 6-3 +Arnold Harberger 5-7 5-7 +ARPANET 2-0, 3-3 3-3, 4-4, 7-0 +Arrow's Theorem 5-6 5-6 +Articles 145 of the ROC 2-1 2-1 +Artificial General Intelligence 2-0 2-0 +Artificial Intelligence 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Artificial Intelligence (AI). 5-5 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Artistic co-creation 5-3 +Artistic Expression 5-3 5-3 +Asana 5-3 4-4, 5-3 +Asia Development Bank 2-2 2-2 +Aspirations to equality 4-0 4-0 +Assimilation 2-1 2-1 +Assisted Real-time Voting 5-6 5-6 +Asynchronous Communication 6-1 6-1 +Athena's tapestry 1-1 +Athenian Marketplace 5-4 5-4 +Atomist 3-3 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 7-1 +Attention auction 4-0 +attention exchange tax 7-0 7-0 +Audrey Tang 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 +Augmented Reality 4-0, 5-2 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 +Australia 6-2 2-0, 5-5, 6-2 +Australian Government 5-5 5-5 +Author 5-4 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Authoritarian 1-1 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 +Authoritarian Regimes 2-0 1, 2-0 +Authoritarian Repressive State 2-1 2-1 +Authoritarianism 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 4-0 +Authority 6-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 +Autodesk 5-3 5-3 +Automated Clearing House(ACH) 4-3 4-3 +Autonomy 5-3 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5 +Aviv Ovadya 5-4 5-4 +Awe 5-3 2-0, 5-3, 6-2 +Ayn Rand 2-0 2-0 +Background Signals 5-6 5-6 +Badges 5-5 5-5, 5-7 +Balaji Srinavasan 2-0 2-0, 7-1 +Banks 4-3 2-0, 4-1, 4-3 +Basic Antigen 6-2 6-2 +BBN 3-3 3-3 +BCI 6-2 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 +Benefits Data Trust 5-5 5-5 +Bertelsmann Foundation 2-2 2-2 +Bhagavad Gita 5-3 5-3 +Bible 5-3 3-2, 4-0, 5-0, 5-3 +Bill Gates 2-1 2-1 +Biodiversity 6-4 2-0, 3-1, 6-4 +Biodiversity Loss 6-4 2-0, 6-4 +Biomedical engineering 6-2 6-2 +Biomedicine 6-2 6-2 +Biometrics 6-4 3-2, 4-1, 6-4 +Bioweapons 2-0 2-0 +Bitcoin 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-3 +Blake Masters 2-0 2-0 +Blended-finance Agreement 6-2 6-2 +Blindness of Justice 5-5 5-5 +Blitzscaling 6-0 6-0 +Blockchain 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 7-1 +Blockchains 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-7 +Bluesky 4-2 3-3, 4-2 +Bottom-up 5-6 5-6 +Brain interface 6-3 5-0, 6-3 +Brain-Computer Interfaces 5-1 5-1 +Braver Angels 5-4 5-4 +Brent Seales 5-3 5-3 +Bricolage 5-0 5-0 +Bridging the Crowd 5-4 +British Colonial Development Corporation 6-2 6-2 +Broadcast 5-4 2-2, 4-4, 5-4 +Bruno Latour 5-4 5-4 +Buddhism 2-2 2-2 +Bureaucracies 5-5 5-5, 5-7 +Bureaucratic Rules 5-5 5-5 +By An Invisible Hand 5-7 5-7 +Campus Athletics 6-1 6-1 +Canada 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 6-4 +Cancel Culture 2-0 2-0 +Capitalism 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 +Carbon Credit 6-2 6-2 +Casey Handmer 5-3 5-3 +Cash 4-3 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3 +Catastrophic Risks 2-0 +Cathy O’Neil 2-0 2-0 +Cellphone Addiction 2-2 2-2 +Center for Constructive Communication 5-4 5-4 +Central Bank Digital Currencies 2-0, 4-3 2-0, 4-3 +Central Planning 2-0 2-0 +Centralized Surveillance 2-0 2-0, 4-1 +Centralized Top-down 2-0 2-0 +Centralizing 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 4-1 +Charity 5-7 4-3, 5-7 +Charter Cities 5-5 5-5 +charter town 3-3 +Chen Shui-bian 2-1 2-1 +Cheques 4-3 4-3 +Chiang Ching-Kuo 2-1 2-1 +Chiang Kai-shek 2-1 2-1 +Child Mortality 6-2 6-2 +Chinese Communist Party 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 7-0 +Circular investment 5-7 5-7, 7-0 +Citizen co-journalism 6-3 6-3 +Citizen Journalism 6-3 6-3 +Citizen Volunteers 2-2 2-2 +Citizen-led Online Initiative 6-2 6-2 +Citizens of the Free Area 2-1 2-1 +Civic hackers 2-2 2-2 +Civic Hacking Culture 6-4 6-4 +Civic Tech 3-3 3-3, 6-0, 6-4, 7-0 +Civic Technology Movement 6-4 6-4 +Civil Clan 2-1 2-1 +Civil IoT 6-4 6-4, 7-0 +Civil Livelihood 2-1 2-1 +Civil Rights movement 2-1 2-1 +Civilization 5-6 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-6 +Civilization VI 2-0, 5-6 2-0, 5-6 +Civilizing 5-7 5-7 +Claude 5-4 5-0, 5-4 +Clean Energy 6-4 6-4 +Climate Change 6-4 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-6, 6-2, 6-4 +Climate Change Simulations 5-2 +Climate hazard 6-2 6-2 +Co-construction of Health Agency 6-2 +Co-creation Relationship 6-4 6-4 +Co-decision Making Processe 6-2 6-2 +Co-edited Project 5-3 5-3 +Co-writing 5-3 +Codetermination 5-7 5-7 +Cofacts 2-2 2-2 +Cold War 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 +Collaboration Across Difference 6-4 5-0, 6-4 +Collaboration Across Diversity 5-7 3-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7 +Collaborative Diversity 2-1 2-1, 3-0 +Collaborative Exchange 5-7 5-7 +Collaborative Filtering 5-4 5-4 +Collaborative Innovation 5-3 5-3 +Collaborative Journalism 6-3 6-3 +Collaborative Network 6-4 6-4 +Collaborative Platform 5-3 5-3 +Collaborative Problem Solving 2-1 2-1 +Collaborative Technologies 5-6 5-6 +Collaborative Technology 1-1, 5-0 1, 4-5, 5-0, 6-2 +Collective Alignment 5-4 5-4 +Collective Consciousness 5-3 5-1, 5-3 +Collective Creativity 5-3 5-2, 5-3 +Collective Decision 5-6 4-0, 4-3, 5-6, 7-1 +Collective Deliberation 5-5 5-5 +Collective Intelligence 6-1 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 +Collective Organization 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 6-3 +Collective Problem-solving 6-4 6-4 +Collective Response Model 5-4 +Collective Response Systems 5-4 5-4 +Collegia 6-2 3-3, 6-2 +Colonial Outsider 5-5 5-5 +Colorado State Legislature 5-6 5-6 +Commanding Heights 2-0 2-0 +Common Belief 6-0 4-2, 6-2 +Common Carriers of Public Discussion 6-3 6-3 +Common Content 6-3 6-3 +Common Corporate Infrastructure 6-1 6-1 +Common Good 5-7 5-0, 5-7 +Common Knowledge 4-2 4-2, 5-4 +Common Will 5-4, 5-6 5-4, 5-6 +Commons-Based Property 3-3 3-2 +Communism 2-0 2-0 +Community Currency 5-0 4-3, 5-0 +Community Donation 5-7 5-7 +Community Notes (CN)　 5-4 5-4 +Community-based 6-0 3-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0 +Community-Based Identity 3-3 3-2 +Compelling Narrative 6-3 6-3 +Competitive authoritarian regimes 4-0 +Competitive Effect 6-0 +Complexity 5-5 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 7-1 +Compulsory Purchase 5-7 5-7 +Computer-simulated Neuron 5-5 5-5 +Confidential Computing 4-2 4-2 +Conformity 5-5 5-5, 7-1 +Confucian Tradition 2-1 2-1 +Connected Society 3-2 3-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 5-7 +Consociational 5-6 3-2, 5-6 +Consociationalism 3-3, 5-6 3-2, 5-6 +Constitutional Court 2-2 2-2 +Contribution 6-1 0-3, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Cooperative Enterprise 2-1 2-1, 7-0 +Cooperatives 5-7 2-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 +Copyright 2-0 2-0, 2-2 +Corporate Bureaucracy 5-5 5-5 +Corporate Campuse 6-1 6-1 +Corporate Control 5-2 3-3, 4-1, 5-2, 5-7 +Corporate Libertarianism 2-0 2-0 +Corporations 5-7 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +Correlation discounting 5-6 5-6 +Cortico 5-4 5-4 +Countervail 5-7 5-7 +Coursera 5-3 5-3 +Courtney Cogburn 6-3 5-2, 6-3 +COVID-19 6-2 2-1, 2-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +COVID-19 pandemic 2-2 2-2, 6-1 +Crackle 5-3 5-3 +Creative Collaborations 5-3 5-2, 5-3, 5-6 +Creative Commons 5-0 3-3, 4-0, 5-0 +Creative Process 5-3 5-3 +Cross-cultural collaboration 5-3 5-3 +Cross-Cultural Exchanges 5-2 +Cross-cutting Benefit 6-1 6-1 +Cross-pollination Service 6-1 6-1 +Cross-Straits Services Trade Agreement 2-2 2-2 +Crowdsourcing 5-3 5-3, 5-5 +Crypto 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Cryptocurrencies 2-0 2-0, 4-3 +Cryptographic 6-3 2-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3 +Cryptographic Hypercapitalism 2-0 2-0 +Cryptographic Principle 6-2 6-2 +Cryptographic Standards 4-2 4-2 +Cryptography 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 6-3 +Cryptonomicon 2-0 2-0 +Cultural Diversity 5-3, 5-5 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Cultural Homogenization 5-3 5-3 +Cultural Norm 5-5 5-5 +Cultural Practice 5-5 4-4, 5-1, 5-5, 7-1 +Currency 4-3 2-0, 2-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 +Curriculum Vitae (CV) 5-5 5-5 +Curtis Yarvin 2-0 2-0 +Cybernetic Society 3-2 3-2 +Cybernetics 3-2 3-2, 3-3 +Danielle Allen 3-0, 4-0, 5-5, 5-7 3-0, 4-0, 5-5, 5-7 +DAO 5-6 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 +Daoism 2-1 2-1 +dApps 6-0 6-0 +Darkening Clouds 6-2 6-2 +Daron Acemoglu 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 4-2, 5-7, 6-0 +DARPA 2-0 3-3 +Data Coalitions 2-2, 6-0, 6-4 2-2, 6-0, 6-4, 7-0 +Data Governance Act 2-0 2-0, 4-4 +Data Transparency 2-2 2-2 +Data-driven Actors 6-4 6-4 +Dave Egger 5-3 4-2, 5-3 +David Kidd 5-5 5-5 +De Tocqueville, Alexis 4-2 +Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP) 4-2 4-2 +Decentralized Social Technologies 2-0 2-0 +Decentralized Web 3-3, 4-0 3-3, 4-0 +Decision Trees 5-5 5-5 +Declaration for the Future of the Internet 4-5 4-5 +Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace 2-0 2-0 +Decontee Davis 6-3 6-3 +Decreasing Marginal Returns 5-7 5-7 +Decreasing Returns 5-7 5-7 +Deepfakes 4-5 4-5 +DeepMind 2-0 2-0, 5-3 +Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency 2-0 +Deforestation 6-4 5-2, 6-4 +Degressive Proportionality 3-3, 5-6 3-2, 5-6 +Deliberation 5-0, 5-4, 6-3 2-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Democracy 2-0, 3-0, 5-6 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Democracy in America 2-0 2-0, 4-2 +Democratic Advocates 2-1 2-1 +Democratic freedom 2-1 2-1 +Democratic Input to AI project 2-2 2-2 +Democratic Inputs 5-4 5-4 +Democratic Participation 2-0, 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 3-3 +Democratic Progressive Party 2-1 2-1 +Democratic Republican Government 6-0 6-0 +Demonization 6-3 6-3 +Descriptive 3-0 3-0 +Designated Verifier Proofs (DVP) 4-2 4-2 +Deweyian pragmatism 2-1 2-1 +Difference 3-0 1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-3, 6-4, 7-1 +Differential Privacy 4-2 4-2, 4-4 +Differing Degrees 5-6 2-0, 3-2, 5-4, 5-6 +Diffusion of Information 5-4 5-4 +Digital Archaeology 5-3 5-3 +Digital asset taxes 7-0 7-0 +Digital Assistant 5-6 5-6 +Digital Certificate 6-2 6-2 +Digital Civic Engagement 2-2 2-2 +Digital competence education 2-2 2-2, 3-3, 7-0 +Digital Currencies 2-0 2-0, 4-3, 7-0 +Digital Democracies 2-0 2-0 +Digital Democracy 1-1, 2-0, 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 7-1, 8 +Digital Democracy Initiative 1-1 +Digital Divide 5-2, 5-3 4-5, 5-2, 5-3 +Digital Infrastructure 4-5 3-3, 4-1, 4-5, 7-0 +Digital interaction 4-0 4-0 +Digital land tax 7-0 7-0 +Digital Legacies 5-3 5-2, 5-3 +Digital Legacy Realms 5-2 +Digital literacy 7-0 +Digital Mapping Tool 5-5 5-5 +Digital Markets Act 2-0 2-0, 7-0 +Digital Nomads 6-1 6-1 +Digital public infrastructure 4-0 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 7-0 +Digital Public Services 2-0 2-0, 4-5 +Digital Realpolitik 2-0 +Digital Services Act 2-0 2-0, 7-0 +Digital Social Engagement 6-4 6-4 +Digital Stagnation 2-0 2-0 +Digital Technology 3-0, 5-5 1, 2-0, 3-0, 3-2, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-3, 7-0, 8 +Digital Twins 5-3, 6-4 5-3 +Digital Workspace 5-3 5-3 +Digital Yuan 2-0 2-0 +Digital-native currencies 4-0 4-0 +Diplomatic Decisions 5-6 5-6 +Diplomatic Favor 5-6 5-6 +Diplomatic Nuance 2-1 2-1 +Direct Collective Representative 5-4 5-4 +Direct Election of the President 2-1 2-1 +Direct Neural Interface 6-1 6-1 +Direct Thought Transmission 5-1 +Discrimination Law 2-0 2-0 +Disinformation 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 5-4, 6-2, 7-1 +Displacement 2-0 2-0 +Disruption 6-1 2-0, 3-3, 6-1 +Distributed Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) 5-5, 5-7 4-1, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 +Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) 4-2 +Distributed Ledgers 5-5 4-1, 5-5 +Distributed Network of Signals 5-5 5-5 +Distributed Participation 6-3 6-3 +Distribution 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 +Diverse Legal System 5-5 5-5 +Diverse Perspective 5-3 5-3, 5-4 +Diversification 5-5 5-5, 6-0 +Diversification of Seeing 6-0 +Diversity 6-0 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Diversity of groups 6-0 6-0 +Dominant Narrative 5-3 5-3 +Donald Trump 2-0 2-0 +DoNotPay 5-5 5-5 +Douglas Engelbart 3-3 3-3, 4-4 +DPP 2-1 2-1 +Dr. Seuss 5-4 5-4 +Driverless Cars 2-0 2-0 +Durkheim 6-2 3-2, 6-2 +Duverger's Law 5-6 5-6 +Dynamic 5-7 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Dystopian Outcome 5-3 5-3 +Dōka 2-1 2-1 +e-citizenship 6-1 6-1 +E-Government 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-0 +e-health 6-2 6-2 +e-sports 6-1 5-2, 6-1 +E-Sports Tournaments 5-2 5-2 +Early Adopted Community 6-0 6-0 +Early Adopters 6-0 6-0 +Ebola 6-3 6-3 +Echo Chamber 6-3 2-0, 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 +Echo Chambers 5-4 5-4, 6-3, 7-1 +Economies Esteem 5-7 5-7 +Economist Intelligence Unit 2-2 2-2 +Edmund Burke 6-4 6-4 +Educational Psychology 5-5 5-5, 6-0 +Edward Deming 2-1 2-1 +edX 5-3 5-3 +Egalitarianism 2-1 2-1, 6-2 +EGDI 2-0 2-0 +Eigenvalues 5-6 5-6 +Eigenvoting 5-6 5-6 +Election 4-0, 5-4, 5-6 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-2 +Elite Universities 5-5 5-5 +Elon Musk 2-0 2-0, 4-2, 4-3 +Emergent Publics 3-2, 5-7 3-2, 5-7 +Eminent Domain 5-7 5-7 +Emmanuel Saez 2-2 2-2 +Emotion Tracking 5-1 +Emotional Connectivity 5-2 5-2 +Empathetic Technology 5-1 +Empathy Amplifiers 5-2 5-2 +Encounter with the East 5-3 5-3 +Endowments 5-7 5-7 +Enlightenment 3-3 3-2, 4-0 +Entrepreneurial Sovereignty (ES) 4-0 +Entrepreneurship 5-7 2-1, 3-3, 5-7 +Environment 6-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 8 +Environment Sensing Network 6-4 6-4 +Environmental Devastation 2-0 2-0 +Environmental Justice 6-4 6-4 +Environmental Problem 6-4 6-0, 6-4 +Environmental Sustainability 6-4 6-4 +Environmental, Social and Governance 6-3 5-7, 6-3 +Estonia 2-0, 6-1 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-5, 6-1 +ETH Zurich 5-3 5-3 +Ethereum Attestation Service 6-2 6-2 +Ethnic Pluralism 2-1 2-1 +Ethnographer 5-5 5-5 +European Union 5-6 2-0, 4-4, 5-6, 7-0 +Excessive Fragmentation 6-1 6-1 +Excessive Segregation 6-1 6-1 +Existential Risks 2-0 2-0 +Experimentalism 2-1 2-1 +Experimentation on 6-0 6-0 +Experimentation with 6-0 2-2, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0 +Expert 5-5 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-1 +Export-orientation 2-1 2-1 +Extended Reality 6-2 6-2 +Externalities 5-7 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Extreme Sports 6-1 6-1 +Extreme underinvestment 6-2 6-2 +Extremist Parties 2-0 2-0 +Ezra Klein 2-0 2-0 +Fabric of Trust 1-1 +Facial Recognition 2-0 2-0 +Fact Checkers 2-2 2-2 +Fact-checking 5-4 2-2, 5-4 +Fair 5-5 0-1, 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Fairness 5-5 3-2, 5-5 +Faith in Democratic Institutions 2-0 2-0 +False Consensus 6-3 6-3 +Fascism 2-0 2-0 +Fast, Fun and Fair 2-2 2-2 +Feature Phone 5-5 5-5 +Federal 5-6 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 5-6, 7-0 +Federal Pension Insurance system 5-5 5-5 +FIDES 6-2 6-2 +Financial Capitalism 2-0 2-0 +Financial Innovation 2-0 2-0 +Financial Markets 5-7 2-0, 5-7 +Financial markets 5-7 2-0, 5-7 +Financial Technology 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 +Finnish government 5-5 5-5 +Fintech 2-0 2-0, 4-3 +First Additional Vote 5-6 5-6 +Five Star Rating System 5-4 5-4 +Fluidity 6-4 6-4 +Folk Religion 2-2 2-2 +Fora 5-4 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-4, 6-3, 7-0 +Forms of Diversity 5-0 5-0, 7-1 +Foundation Model 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Foundation Models 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Foxconn 2-2 2-2 +Fractional Reserve Banking 4-3 4-3 +Fragile Democracies 2-0 2-0 +Franz Kafka 5-5 5-5 +Freddy Lim 2-2 2-2 +free China 2-1 2-1 +Free Markets Know Best 2-0 2-0 +Free speech 4-0 4-0 +Free Trade 5-7 5-0, 5-7 +Free Trade Agreements 5-7 5-7 +Freedom House 2-2 2-2 +Freedom of association 4-0 4-0, 4-1, 4-2 +Freedom of the Press 6-3 6-3 +French Revolution 6-0 6-0 +Frictions 5-7 5-7 +Fructus 5-7 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 +Full Multisensory Shared Experience 5-3 5-3 +Full-time Employment 5-7 5-7 +Fundamental Welfare Theorems 5-7 5-7 +Funder 6-2 2-0, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Funding Pool 6-2 6-2 +Fusion 5-0 2-1, 3-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 +Futarchy 5-6 5-6 +Future Collaborator 5-3 5-3 +g0v 2-2, 6-2 2-2, 3-3, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0 +Gabriel Zucman 2-2 2-2 +Gaia-X 4-0 4-0, 4-4, 7-0 +Gamification 6-2 6-2 +Ganga River 6-4 +Gathering Storm 2-0, 5-6 2-0, 5-6 +Gavi 6-2 6-2 +GDP 6-1 1, 2-0, 2-2, 5-6, 6-1, 7-0 +General Data Protection Regulation 2-0 2-0, 4-2, 7-0 +General Reticence 2-0 2-0 +Generative AI 5-1 4-2, 4-5 +Generative Art 5-3 5-3 +Generative Artists 5-3 5-3 +Generative Foundation Model 6-2 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative foundation models 6-3 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) 5-3, 5-5 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models(GFMs) 4-4 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Pretrained Transformer 2-0 2-0 +Geographical Information System 5-5 5-5 +Geopolitics 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 4-3, 7-1 +Georg Simmel 3-2 3-2 +Georgist land value tax 2-1 2-1 +Germany 5-5 4-0, 5-2, 5-5, 6-3 +GFM-driven Process 5-3 5-3 +Git 5-0 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +GitCoin 6-0 3-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2 +GitCoin Grants 5-7, 6-2 5-7, 6-2 +GitHub 5-3 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +GitHub Sponsors 5-7 5-7 +GitLab 5-3 3-3, 5-3 +Global Anti-colonial Movement 2-1 2-1 +Global Capitalism 5-7 5-7 +Global Consciousness Networks 5-2 5-2 +Global Crossroad 2-1 2-1 +Global Declaration on Information Integrity Online 4-5 4-5 +Global Fund 6-2 6-2 +Global Government 5-7 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Global Legitimacy 5-6 5-6 +Global Policies 5-6 5-6 +Global Positioning 5-5 2-0, 5-5 +Global Warming 6-4 6-4 +Globarization 1-1 +Gogolook 2-2 2-2 +Gold Card 2-2, 6-1 2-2, 6-1 +Golden Age 2-0 2-0 +Good Old-fashioned AI (GOFAI) 5-5 5-5 +Google 5-7, 6-1 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Google DeepMind 5-3 5-3 +Gov4Git 6-2 6-2 +GovTech 3-3 3-3 +GPT 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 6-0 +Graphical user interface 4-0 3-3, 4-0 +Great Firewall 4-0 4-0 +Green Technologies 6-4 6-4 +Gross Domestic Product 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 6-1 +Group Works 5-4 5-4 +Hackathon 2-2, 6-4 2-2, 4-0, 4-2, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +HackMD 6-2 3-3 +Hakka 2-1 2-1 +Hannah Arendt 3-0, 6-0 3-0, 4-1, 6-0 +Hanson 6-2 5-6, 6-2 +Haptic Feedback 5-1, 5-2 5-1, 5-2 +Hard Journalism 6-3 6-3 +Health 6-0 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 8 +Health Financing 6-2 6-2 +Health Insurance 6-2 4-1, 6-2 +Health Objectivism 6-2 6-2 +Health Savings Account 6-2 6-2 +Health Savings Plan 6-2 6-2 +healthy minds in healthy bodies 6-2 6-2 +Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 +Henry George Theorem 3-2 3-2, 5-7 +Henry George Theorem States 5-7 5-7 +Her 2-0 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Herbert Simon 5-4 4-2, 5-4 +Herculaneum 5-3 5-3 +Herculaneum scrolls 5-3 5-3 +Heritage Foundation 2-2 2-2 +High Modernism 3-3 3-1, 3-2 +High-Bandwidth Communication 5-1 5-1 +Higher-fidelity Signals 5-6 5-6 +HiredScore 5-5 5-5 +Hiring Manager 5-5 5-5, 6-1 +Hit Rates 6-1 6-1 +HIV 6-2 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-1, 6-2 +Hokkien 2-1 2-1 +Hollowing-out 2-0 2-0 +Holly Herndon 5-3 5-3, 7-1 +Homerian epics 5-3 5-3 +Homogenization 5-1, 5-5 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7 +Homogenization of Ideas 5-3 5-3 +Homogenize 5-7 3-3, 5-0, 5-7 +Homomorphic Encryption 4-2 4-2, 4-4 +Horizontal Dialogue 6-1 6-1 +Hsieh Tsung-min 2-1 2-1 +Hu Shih 2-1 2-1 +Hugging Face 5-3 5-3 +Human Cooperation 5-7 5-7 +Human Resources Platform 5-5 5-5 +Human Rights 3-3, 5-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 7-0 +Humanocracy 6-1 5-7 +Humor over Rumor 2-2 2-2 +Hunter-gatherer Model 6-0 +Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press 6-3 6-3 +Hybrid Reality Environments 5-2 5-2 +Hybrid Work Style 6-1 6-1 +HyperCerts 6-2 6-2 +Hypertext 3-3 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4 +Ian Banks 2-0 2-0 +Iceland 5-6 3-3, 5-6 +ID2020 5-5 5-5 +Ideathons 2-2 2-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Identity and Access 6-0 6-0 +Ideologies of the Twenty-First Century 2-0 2-0 +Ideology 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 5-0, 7-0 +Idiosyncratic Project 6-1 6-1 +Immersive Education 5-2 +Immersive Shared Realities 5-4 5-4 +Immersive Shared Reality 5-2, 6-0 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Immersive Shared Reality Campuse 6-1 +Immersive Soundscapes 5-1 5-1 +Impact 6-2 0-0, 0-2, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Impact-investing 6-2 6-2 +Impartial 5-5 5-5 +Imperfections 5-7 5-7 +Implementer 6-2 6-2 +Impossibility Theorem 5-6 5-6 +In-person Meeting 5-4 5-4 +In-person Team 6-1 6-1 +In-silico 5-3 5-3 +Incompetent Manager 6-1 6-1 +Independent Stake 6-2 6-2 +India 2-0, 6-4 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 6-2, 6-4, 7-0 +India stack 4-0 4-0, 4-1, 7-0 +Indiegogo 5-3 5-3 +Indigeneous Community 6-2 6-2 +Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation 5-5 5-5 +Individual Identity 3-3 3-2, 4-2 +individuality loss 5-1 +Industrial 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Industry 1.0 2-0 +Industry 2.0 2-0 +Industry 3.0 2-0 +Industry 4.0 2-0 +Inequality 5-3 2-0, 2-2, 4-0, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 8 +Infodemic 2-2 2-0, 2-2, 8 +Information Age 4-5 2-0, 3-3, 4-5 +Information commons 4-0 4-0, 4-5 +Information Integrity 4-5 2-2, 4-2, 4-5 +Information Technology 2-0, 4-0 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 6-1, 7-0 +Infrastructure 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Insurer 6-2 6-2 +Intelligence Augmentation 2-0 2-0 +Inter-species Communication 5-2 +Interactive Agent 5-4 5-4 +Intergalactic Computer Network 3-3 3-3, 4-4 +International Monetary Fund 2-2 2-2 +International Trade Treaties 5-7 5-7 +Internet 3-0, 5-4 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Internet of Beings 4-5 2-2, 4-5 +Internet of Things 2-0 2-0, 2-2 +Internet Tidal Wave 2-1 2-1 +Internet-mediated Writing 5-4 5-4 +Interoperability 2-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-2, 5-5, 7-0 +Interoperability Across Legal Regime 5-5 5-5 +Interplanetary File System (IPFS) 4-4 4-4 +Intersectional 3-0 3-0, 3-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 +Intersectional Identity 3-2 +Intrapreneurship 6-1 6-1, 7-1 +iOS 4-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Isaac Asimov 2-0 2-0 +IVR Junction 5-5 5-5 +J. D. Vance 2-0 2-0 +J.C.R. Licklider 2-0, 3-3, 5-6 3-3, 5-6 +J.R.R. Tolkien 1-1 +Jack Ma 2-0 2-0 +Jaclyn Tsai 2-1, 2-2 2-1, 2-2 +Jacob Rees-Mogg 2-0 2-0 +James Dale Davidson 2-0 2-0 +Japanese Empire 2-1 2-1 +Japanese Occupation 2-1 2-1 +Jefferson, Thomas 2-0 +Jennifer Prah Ruger 6-2 6-2 +Jeremy Corbyn 2-0 2-0 +Jetsons 2-0 2-0 +Jobs, Steve 6-1 +John Dewey 2-1, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 2-1, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 +John Perry Barlow 2-0 2-0 +Joint Learning 6-1 6-1 +Joseph Gordon-Levitt 5-3 5-3 +Joseph Stiglitz 5-7 5-7 +Josh Hawley 2-0 2-0 +Jothons 2-2 2-2 +Journalism 6-3 2-2, 6-3 +Journey of Humanity 5-0 5-0 +Julian Schilliger 5-3 5-3 +Jurisdictional Boundaries 5-7 4-4, 5-7 +Just 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Kao Chia-liang 2-2 2-2 +Kaohsiung Incident 2-1 2-1 +Karya 5-5 5-5 +Kazakhstan 2-0 2-0 +Kela-Kelpo project 5-5 +Kenneth Arrow 5-6 5-6, 6-2 +Kevin Scott 6-1 6-1 +Khan Academy 5-3 5-3 +Kickstarter 5-3 5-3 +Kim Stanley Robinson 5-4 5-4 +Knappschaften 6-2 6-2 +Kuomintang 2-1 2-1 +Labor Augmentation 2-0 2-0 +Labor Automation 2-0 2-0 +Labor Law 2-0 2-0, 7-0 +Labor Markets 5-7 2-0, 5-7 +Labor Unions 5-7 2-1, 4-2, 5-7 +Land to the Tiller 2-1 2-1 +Large Language Model (LLM) 5-5 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2 +Large Language Models (LLMs) 5-4 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 +Laurie Anderson 5-3 5-3 +Lee Teng-hui 2-1 2-1 +Left-right Divide 5-4 +Legal Agent 6-4 6-4 +Legal Jurisdiction 5-5 5-5 +Legal Robot 5-5 5-5 +Legal Tender 4-3 4-3 +Legislative Yuan 2-2 2-2 +Legitimacy 6-0 2-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 +Legitimation 2-0 2-0 +Lego 5-7 5-7 +Lesser of Two Evils 5-6 5-6 +Lex Fridman 5-4 5-4 +Liberal Democracy 3-3 2-2 +Liberalization of Taiwan 2-1 2-1 +Liberating Structures 5-4 5-4 +Libertarian Ideology 2-0 2-0 +Libertarianism 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 7-1 +Life Expectancy 6-2 2-2, 5-2, 6-2, 6-4 +Life-support System 6-4 6-4 +Limited Cultural Groups 5-7 5-7 +LinkedIn 6-0 4-1, 6-0 +Linux 4-0 3-3, 4-0 +Lionel Penrose 5-6 5-6 +Liquid Democracy 5-4, 5-6 5-4, 5-6 +Little Platoons 6-4 6-4 +Livestream-based communication 2-2 2-2 +LLM-based Representative 5-4 +LLMs 6-1 2-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Local Language 5-5 5-5 +Location Aware Sensor System 6-4 6-4 +Long-distance Cooperation 2-1 2-1 +Long-term Work Permits 5-7 5-7 +Lorax 5-4 5-4 +Los Alamos 5-3 5-3 +Low-skilled Workers 2-0 2-0 +Lucan Way 6-0 6-0 +Luke Farritor 5-3 5-3 +Luke Thorburn 5-4 5-4 +m-health 6-2 6-2 +M. Mitchell Waldrop 2-0 3-1, 3-3 +Machine Learning 2-0, 5-5 2-0, 2-2, 4-2, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5 +Machine Translation Tool 5-4 5-4 +Macro Badges 5-5 5-5 +Magpie River 6-4 6-4 +Malaria 6-2 6-2 +Man-Computer Symbiosis 3-3 3-3, 7-0 +Mandarin 2-1 1, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0 +Manipulation 5-1 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-6 +Mao Zedong 2-1 2-1 +Marginal Revolution 5-7 5-7 +Mark Zuckerberg 5-4 5-4 +Market 5-7 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 8 +Market Design 5-7 4-4, 5-7 +Market power 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Market Power 2-0 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Marxism 2-1 2-1 +Marxist Vision of Socialism 2-1 2-1 +Mask App 2-2 2-2 +Mass Extinction 6-4 6-4 +Mass Surveillance 2-0 2-0 +Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-4 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 7-0 +Massive Multi-user Online Laboratories (MMOLs) 5-2 5-2 +Masters of Scale 6-0 6-0 +Mastodon 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 +Mat Dryhurst 5-3 5-3, 7-1 +Matching Fund 5-7, 6-1 5-7, 6-1 +Material Redistribution 2-0 2-0 +Maternal Mortality 6-2 6-2 +Matthew Yglesias 2-0 2-0 +Max Weber 5-5 3-2, 5-5 +Mechanism Design 5-7 4-4, 5-7 +Media 6-0, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Media Ecosystem 6-3 6-3 +Mediated Reality 5-1, 5-2 5-1, 5-2 +Meetings Deemed Unproductive 6-1 6-1 +Mencius Moldbug 2-0 2-0 +Mental Health 6-2 5-1, 5-2, 6-2 +Meta 5-4, 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Metaverse 2-0 2-0, 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 +Metaverses 4-0 4-0 +Mezzo Badges 5-5 5-5 +Michelle Wu 5-4 5-4 +Microsoft 5-5, 6-1, 6-3 0-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Military Scenario 6-1 6-1 +Millennium Development Declaration 6-2 6-2 +Mimetic Models 4-5 4-5 +Minister of Digital Affairs 2-1 0-1, 2-1 +Minister without portfolio 2-2 2-2 +Ministry for the Future 5-4 5-4, 5-7 +Ministry For The Future 5-7 5-4, 5-7 +Ministry of Digital Affairs 2-2 2-2, 4-4, 7-0 +Minitel 2-0 2-0, 3-3 +Minquán 2-1 2-1 +Minzú 2-1 2-1 +Miraikan 5-1, 7-0 5-1, 7-0, 7-1 +Misinformation 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-4, 5-7 +Misleading 5-4 2-2, 4-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-3 +Mixed Reality 5-2 3-3, 5-2, 6-1 +MMOLs 5-2 5-2 +modernity 3-3 3-2, 5-5, 7-1 +Monarchy 2-1 2-1 +Monist 3-3 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 5-6, 7-1 +Monist Atomism 3-0 3-0, 3-1 +Monolithic Threat 2-0 +Monopolization 5-2 3-3, 5-2, 7-0 +Monopoly 3-2 2-1, 3-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Moore’s Law for Everything 2-0 2-0 +Moral Bio-enhancement 5-1 5-1 +Mount Vesuvius 5-3 5-3 +Move fast and Break Things 6-0 6-0 +Multidisciplinary Renaissance 5-3 5-3 +Multiemployer 2-0 2-0 +Multiple Perspective 5-3 5-3 +Multipolarity 5-0 5-0 +Mycorrhizal Fungi 4-5 4-5 +MyGoPen 2-2 2-2 +Mínshēng 2-1 2-1 +Narrow Corridor 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 7-1 +Narrow Educational and Career Path 5-5 5-5 +NASA 6-4 3-3, 6-4 +Nation state 3-3 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0, 7-1 +National Coalition for Dialogue and Deliberation 5-4 5-4 +National Insurance Model 6-2 6-2 +National Language 5-5 5-5 +National Politic 6-1 2-1, 6-1, 7-0 +National Socialist German Workers party 4-0 +Nationalism 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 5-7 +Nationalist 2-0 2-0, 2-1 +Nationalist Backlash 2-0 2-0 +Natural Ecosystem 6-4 6-4 +Natural Language Processing 5-4 5-4, 6-1 +Natural Leadership 6-1 6-1 +Natural Legal Personhood 6-4 6-4 +Natural sciences 3-2 3-1, 3-2, 3-3 +Neal Stephenson 2-0 2-0, 5-0, 5-2 +Negative freedom of speech 4-0 4-0 +Neil Armstrong 6-3 6-3 +Neoliberal 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0 +Neoliberal Reaction 5-7 5-7 +Neoliberalism 5-7 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Neom 2-0 2-0 +Netflix Prize 5-3 5-3 +Netherlands 6-3 6-3 +Netizen 6-3 6-3 +Network States 5-5 5-5 +Networked and Probabilistic Structure 5-5 5-5 +Networked Value 3-2 3-2 +Networks of Human Minds 5-5 5-5 +Neural Interfaces 5-1 5-1, 6-1 +Neural Network 5-3, 6-2 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 +Neural network 5-5 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 +Neurofeedback 5-1 5-1 +Neuromodulation 5-1 5-1 +New England town hall 5-4 5-4 +New Public 3-2 3-2 +New Zealand 6-4 3-3, 6-4 +News feed algorithm 5-4 5-3, 5-4 +Nicholas Bostrom 2-0 2-0 +Nixon's visit to PRC 2-1 2-1 +Noah Smith 2-0 2-0 +Nobody Movement 2-2 2-2 +Nodes 5-5 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-5, 7-0 +Non-aligned incentives 6-2 6-2 +non-believers 2-2 2-2 +Non-colonialist Model 6-2 6-2 +Non-communicable Disease 6-2 6-2 +Non-fungible Token (NFT) 5-7 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 +Non-human Perspective 5-3 5-3 +Non-market 2-0 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 +Non-renewable Energy Sources 6-4 6-4 +Non-Verbal Communication 5-1 5-1, 5-4 +Non-verbal Communication 5-4 5-1, 5-4 +Norbert Wiener 3-2 3-2 +Normative 3-0 3-0, 4-4, 6-2 +North Atlantic Treaty Organization 2-0 +North Star 6-0 6-0 +Notion 5-3 2-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-4 +Objective Quality 5-4 5-4 +Objectivist Model 6-2 6-2 +Objectivity 6-3 6-3 +Occupy 2-1 2-1, 6-1 +Ocean Acidification 6-4 2-0, 6-4 +Octavia Butler 2-0 2-0 +Oded Galor 5-0 5-0 +OECD 2-2 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 +Office of Chief Technology Officer 6-1 6-1 +Office Politic 6-1 6-1 +Olfactory Technology 5-2 5-2 +on the ground 6-1 6-1, 7-1 +One China 2-1 2-1 +One Country, Two Systems 2-1 2-1 +One-dimensional Spectrum 5-4 4-2, 5-4 +One-Person-One-Vote 3-3 3-2, 5-6 +One-Share-One-Vot 5-6 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +One-share-one-vote 5-7 3-2, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +Online collaboration platform 5-3 +Online Deliberation 3-3 3-3 +Online Gaming 5-2 5-2 +Online Platform 5-3 5-0, 5-2, 5-3 +Opacity of Bureaucracy 5-5 5-5 +Open Conversation 6-1 6-1 +Open Government Movement 2-2 2-2 +Open Impact Pool 6-2 6-2 +Open Recognition Community 3-3 +Open Source 2-0, 5-0, 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Open Source Intelligence 6-3 6-3 +Open Source Observer 6-2 6-2 +Open Source Software 2-0, 3-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Open Source Software (OSS) 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Open Space Technology 5-4 5-4 +Open Standard 3-3 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5 +Open-source project 5-3 5-3 +Open-source Rainmaking 6-4 6-4 +Open-source Technology 5-3 +OpenAI 2-0, 2-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 +Operating System 5-0 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Operating systems 4-0 4-0, 5-0, 7-0 +Optimism Collective 6-2 6-2 +Organizational Chart 6-1 6-1 +Oscar Wilde 5-4 5-4 +Out-of-pocket Payment 6-2 6-2 +Outcome 6-2 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Output 6-2 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Packet Switching 3-3 3-3, 4-1 +Packet-switching 5-5 3-3, 5-5 +Page Rank 5-6 +Paradigm Shift 5-4 5-1, 5-4 +Paradox.ai 5-5 5-5 +PARC 3-3 3-3, 7-0 +Park of Aging 5-1 5-1 +Partial Common Ownership 5-7 5-7 +Participation 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Participative Production 2-1 2-1 +Participatory Design 5-7 5-7 +Participedia 5-4 5-4 +Pascual Restrepo 2-0 2-0 +Paul Jozef Crutzen 6-4 6-4 +Peer Production 3-3 3-3 +Peng Ming-min 2-1 2-1 +People's Republic of China (PRC) 2-0, 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 4-3 +Peripheral 2-0 2-0 +Personal Identities 3-0 3-0 +Peter Thiel 2-0 2-0, 4-3, 7-1 +Phishing Attack 6-2 4-2, 6-2 +Physical Work 6-1 6-1 +Pigouvian Taxes 5-7 +Pixar's headquarters 6-1 +Place of Convergence 2-1 2-1 +Plural Funding 5-7 5-6, 5-7 +Plural Future 1-1 +Plural Management Protocol 5-7 5-7 +Plural Spirit 2-1 2-1 +Plural workplace 6-1 +Pluralism 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-1 +Polarization 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3, 8 +Polis 2-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Political Polarization 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 5-4 +Polypolitan Migration Policy 5-7 5-7 +Pompeii 5-3 5-3 +Populist Movement 5-7 +Portals Policing Project 5-2, 5-4 5-2, 5-4 +Positive freedom of speech 4-0 4-0 +Post-capitalist World 2-0 2-0 +Post-colonial Futurism 2-0 2-0 +Post-gender 2-0 2-0 +Post-state 2-0 2-0 +Post-symbolic Communication 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +Power Concentration 5-6 5-6 +Pragmatic 2-1 2-1, 3-3, 5-0 +PRC Surveillance Regime 2-0 2-0 +Precious Metals 4-3 4-3 +Prediction Market 5-0 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 +Prediction Markets 5-6, 5-7 5-0, 5-6, 5-7 +Predictive Futurism 2-0 2-0 +Predictive Voting 6-2 5-6, 6-2 +Premature Optimization 5-0 5-0 +Prepayment 6-2 6-2 +Prescriptive 3-0 3-0, 5-6 +Presidential Hackathon 2-2 2-2, 7-0 +Press Freedom 6-0 6-0, 6-3 +Press Responsibility 6-3 6-3 +Principles of ⿻ 5-3 4-0, 5-3 +Privacy 5-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Private Community-based Sponsorship 5-7 5-7 +Private Health Insurance 6-2 6-2 +Private Information 6-2 4-1, 6-2 +Private Key 6-3 4-2, 6-3 +Private Organizations 5-7 5-7 +Private Property 3-2, 3-3, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 5-7 +Private Sector 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 6-1, 7-0 +Pro-social Media 6-3 6-3 +Production Possibilities Frontier 5-0 5-0 +Productivity Software 6-3 6-3 +Programmer 5-5 5-5, 6-4 +Progress and Poverty 3-2 3-2 +Progress Prizes 5-3 5-3 +Project Liberty 4-2 4-0, 4-2 +Projection Mapping 5-1 5-1 +Property Rights 3-2, 5-7 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 +Proportional Representation 5-6 3-2, 5-6 +Proprioceptive Communication 5-1 +Public Consent 2-0 2-0 +Public Digital Innovation Space 2-2 2-2 +Public Expenditure 5-5 2-0, 5-5 +Public Good 6-2 2-0, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 +Public Goods 5-5, 5-7 2-0, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 +Public Health Policy 6-2 6-2 +Public Key Cryptography 4-2 4-2 +Public Participation 2-0 2-0, 4-5, 5-4, 7-0 +Public Perception 6-4 6-4 +Public Sector 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 6-0, 7-0 +Public Service 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 +Public Square 2-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-2, 7-0 +Public Welfare Shcemes 5-7 +Public Will 5-5, 5-6 5-5, 5-6 +Public/Supermodular Goods 5-7 5-7 +Purchasing Power Parity 2-2 2-2 +Pythagoras 1-1 +Qing 2-1 2-1 +Quadratic Funding 5-7 5-7 +Quadratic Liquid Democracy 5-6 5-6 +Quadratic Voting 2-2, 5-6 2-2, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Quantitative Markers 5-7 5-7 +RadicalxChange 5-6 0-1, 4-3, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +Rainbow Flags 2-1 2-1 +Rainforest Foundation US 5-5 5-5 +Raj 6-2 2-0, 5-0, 6-2 +Randomized Controlled Trials 6-0 6-0 +Ranked Choice 5-6 5-6 +rationality 3-3 3-1, 3-2, 5-0, 5-5 +Ray Kurzweil 2-0 2-0 +Ready Player One 5-2 5-2 +Realistic Avatar 6-1 6-1 +Receipts 6-3 4-3, 6-3 +Reckless Monopolies 5-7 5-7 +Redistribution 5-7, 6-2 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 +Regenerating Diversity 5-0 5-0, 7-1 +Regenerative Economies 5-0 +Regenerative Plurality 5-0 +Regression Discontinuity Design 6-2 6-2 +Reid Hoffman 2-0, 6-0 2-0, 6-0, 7-1 +Reinstatement 2-0 2-0 +Relevant public 3-2 3-2, 5-7 +Remesh 5-4, 6-1 5-4, 6-1 +Remix and Replace 2-0 2-0 +Remote Collaboration Tool 6-1 6-1 +Remote Employee 6-1 6-1 +Remote Fitness Classes 5-2 5-2 +Remote Shared Reality 6-1 6-1, 6-3 +Remote Shared Reality Technologie 6-1 6-1, 6-3 +Remote Teams 6-1 6-1 +Renaissance 3-3 3-2, 5-3 +Replenishment Round 6-2 6-2 +Reporters without Borders 6-3 6-3 +Representation 5-4 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 +Representative Statement 5-4 5-4 +Representing Consensus Position 5-4 5-4 +Research and Development 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 +Research Policy 5-7 5-7 +Resolution 2758 2-1 2-1 +Reverse Mentors 2-1 2-1 +Revive China Society 2-1 2-1 +Revolutionary Democratic Direction 2-1 2-1 +Rich Get Richer 5-5 5-5 +Richard Arnott 5-7 5-7 +Richard Nixon 2-1 2-1 +Rights of free speech 4-0 4-0 +Risk Pooling 6-2 6-2 +River of Democracy 1-1 1 +Robert Atkinson 2-0 2-0 +Robin Hanson 5-6 5-6, 6-2 +Robinson, James 2-0 +Roblox 5-7 5-7 +ROC 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Ropes Course 6-1 6-1 +Rough Consensus 6-3 5-4, 6-3 +Rule Of Law 5-7 5-7 +Run-off 5-6 5-6 +Rural Land Reform 2-1 2-1 +Russian revolution 2-1 2-1 +Sam Altman 2-0 2-0, 4-1, 7-1 +Same-sex Marriage 2-2 2-2 +San Francisco 3-2 3-2, 3-3, 4-3 +Sardinia 6-1 6-1 +SARS 2-2 2-0, 2-2, 6-3 +Satya Nadella 5-5, 6-1 5-5, 6-1 +Saudia Arabia 2-0 2-0 +Scaling Collaboration 5-7 5-7 +Scandinavian Countries 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 4-0 +Science And Technology Studies 2-0 2-0 +Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 +Search Engines 2-0 2-0, 4-4, 5-5 +Seasteads 5-5 2-0, 5-5 +Sebastian Kurz 2-0 2-0 +Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) 4-2 4-2 +Securities Laws 2-0 2-0 +Security protocols 4-0 4-0 +Seeds 6-0 2-1, 3-3, 6-0, 7-0 +Self-determination 2-1 2-1, 6-2 +Self-ownership 5-7 5-7 +Sensory Degradation 5-1 +Sensory Integration 5-2 5-2 +SERVIR Amazonia 5-5 5-5 +Seth Parker 5-3 5-3 +Shared Goods 5-7 5-7, 7-0 +Shared Knowledge Base 5-3 5-3 +Shoshanna Zuboff 2-0 2-0 +Sidewalk Labs 2-0 2-0 +Signal 4-2 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +Silent Majority 6-3 6-3 +Simon Chang 2-2 2-2 +Simon Johnson 2-0 2-0, 5-6 +Simon, Herbert 4-2 +Simulated Military Exercise 6-1 6-1 +Single Tax 3-2 3-2 +Sino-Japanese war 2-1 2-1 +Siraya language 2-1 +Slack 5-3, 6-1, 6-3 5-3, 6-1, 6-3 +Smaller World 6-3 6-3 +Smallpox 6-2 6-2 +Smart City 2-0 2-0 +Smart Contract 5-5 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5 +Snow Crash 2-0 2-0, 5-2 +Snowden, Edward 4-2 +Social Collapse 2-0 2-0 +social connectedness 3-1 3-0 +Social Connectedness 3-0 3-0 +Social Control 2-0 2-0 +Social Credit Score 2-0 2-0 +Social Difference 5-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 +Social Distance 5-7 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Social Distancing Measure 6-2 6-2 +Social Diversity 5-7 3-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 7-1, 8 +Social Divide 6-0 5-6, 6-0, 6-3 +Social Division 5-4, 5-6 5-4, 5-6 +Social Dynamics 3-2 +Social Equity 5-7 5-7 +Social Esteem 5-7 4-3, 5-7 +Social Fabric 2-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-2 +Social Identity System 6-1 6-1 +Social Insurance 5-7 5-7, 6-2 +Social Interaction 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-2 +Social Media 2-0, 5-4, 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-1 +Social Media Platform 5-4 2-0, 4-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 +Social Network 5-3 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0, 8 +Social Order 5-5 5-5, 6-2, 7-1 +Social Organization 3-2 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7, 6-3 +Social Responsibility 6-3 6-3 +Social Science Experts 3-2 3-2 +Social sciences 3-2 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 6-0 +Social Sector 6-0 0-2, 3-3, 6-0, 7-1 +Social Security Numbers 3-3 3-2, 4-1 +Social Solidarity 6-2 6-2 +social welfare function 5-0 5-0, 5-6, 6-2 +Social Worker 5-5 5-5 +Socialism 2-1 2-1, 5-4, 5-7 +Socialism Takes Too Many Evenings 5-4 5-4 +Socially Isolated 2-0 2-0 +Society Library 5-4 5-4 +Solidarity and Dynamism 6-1 6-1, 6-3 +Sortition 5-4 5-0, 5-4 +Source Confidentiality 6-3 6-3 +South China Sea 2-1 2-1 +Soviet Union 5-7 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +SpaceX 5-3 5-3 +Spatial Computing 5-1 5-1 +speak for itself 6-3 6-3 +Speciation 5-5 5-5 +Sprightly 4-2 +Square Root 5-6 5-6, 5-7, 6-0 +Square-root Voting 5-6 5-6 +SSN 3-3 4-1, 5-2, 5-4 +Stagnant Democratic Stories 3-0 3-0 +Stakeholder Corporation 5-7 5-7 +Stakeholder Remedies 5-7 5-7 +Stakeholders 5-7 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Stakeholding 5-7 5-7 +Standard Career Paths 6-1 6-1 +Star Trek 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0 +Start-ups 5-7 3-3, 5-7, 6-0 +Steve Jobs 6-1 3-3, 6-1 +Steven Levitsky 6-0 2-0, 4-0, 6-0 +StoryCorps 5-4 5-4 +Strava model 6-2 +Structured Communication 5-1 +Su Tseng-chang 2-2 2-2 +Sub-Saharan Africa 6-2 6-2 +Subcultural translation 5-0 5-0 +Sun Yat-Sen 2-1, 5-7 2-1, 5-7 +Sunflower Movement 2-2 2-1, 2-2 +Superintelligence 2-0 2-0 +Supermodular Collaboration 5-7 5-7 +Supermodular Investments 5-7 5-7 +Supermodular Production 5-7 4-3, 5-7 +Supermodularity 5-0, 5-7 3-2, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 +Superpower 2-2 2-0, 2-2 +Surveillance 2-0, 5-2 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 6-2, 7-0 +Surveillance Risks 5-1 +Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 6-2, 6-4 6-2, 6-4 +Symbiotic Relationship 1-1 1, 3-1 +Symphony of Minds 5-3 5-3 +Synchronous Meeting 6-1 6-1 +Synthetic instrument 5-3 5-3 +Synthetic Technocracy 2-0 2-0 +Systems of rights 4-0 4-0 +Taigi 2-1 2-1 +Taishō Democratic 2-1 2-1 +Taivoan 2-1 2-1 +Taiwan 2-0, 3-0, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 6-4 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Taiwan Self-Salvation Manifesto 2-1 2-1 +Taiwan's Digital Civic Infrastructure 2-2 2-2 +Talk to the City 5-4 5-4 +Tang Jingsong 2-1 2-1 +Tangible Potential 6-0 6-0 +Taoism 2-2 2-2 +Taoist 2-1 2-1 +Target Population 6-2 6-2 +Taste Retargeting 5-2 5-2 +Taxes 7-0 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-7, 7-0 +Teams 6-1 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 +Tech Left 2-0 2-0 +Techlash 2-0 2-0, 3-3 +Technocracy 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 7-0, 7-1 +Technocratic Narrative 2-0 +Technological Agenda 3-0 3-0 +Technology 3-0 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Technology Addiction 2-2 2-2 +Technology For Collaboration Across Social Difference 3-0 3-0 +Technology Investment 2-0 2-0 +Ted Nelson 3-3, 5-3 3-3, 5-3 +Telecommuting 2-0 2-0 +Telehealth 6-2 6-2 +Telemedicine 6-2 6-2 +Telepathic Creative Exchange 5-3 5-3 +Telepathic Exchange 5-3 5-3 +Telepathy 5-1 5-1, 8 +Temporal Collaboration 5-3 5-3 +Tensions between technology and democracy 4-0 +Terminator 2-0 2-0 +Territorial And Intellectual Property Treaties 5-7 5-7 +The Age of Surveillance Capitalism 2-0 2-0 +The Castle 5-5 5-5 +The Circle 5-3 4-2, 5-3 +The Dream Machine 2-0 3-3, 4-4 +The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number 5-6 5-6 +The Human Condition 3-0 3-0, 3-1 +The Lost Dao 4-0, 5-3 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 +The Network State 2-0 2-0 +The New Republic 2-1 2-1 +the Optimism Collective 6-2 6-2 +The Parliament of Things 5-4 +The Public and its Problems 5-7 3-2, 5-7 +The Social Dilemma 2-0 2-0 +The Sovereign Individual 2-0 2-0 +The World Cafe 5-4 5-4 +Theocracy 2-0 2-0 +Theory of Change 6-0 6-0 +Thin Shell 5-7 5-7 +Third Sector 2-1, 5-7 2-1, 5-7, 7-1 +Thomas Piketty 2-2 2-2 +Three Principles of the People 2-1 2-1 +time sharing 3-3 3-3, 4-4 +Time Travel 5-3 5-3 +Top Employer 5-5 5-5 +Top-down 5-5 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 5-5, 6-1, 7-1 +Total Factor Productivity 2-0 2-0 +Towards a Connected Society 3-0 3-0 +Tradable Carbon Permits 5-7 5-7 +Traditional Practice 5-5 5-5 +Transculturalism 1-1 +Transhuman 6-2 6-2 +Translation 5-5 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Transnational Corporations 5-7 5-7 +Transparent Database 5-5 5-5 +Trello 6-1 6-1 +Tridemism 2-1 2-1, 3-2 +True democracy 3-2 3-2 +Trust Falls 6-1 6-1 +Tuberculosis 6-2 6-2 +Turing 5-5 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 +Twitter 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 +Tyranny of Structurelessness 5-4 5-4 +Tyranny Of The Majority 5-6 5-6 +UAE 2-0 2-0 +UN 6-4 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +UN-Water 6-2 6-2 +UNDP 6-2 4-0, 4-1, 6-2 +Uniform Resource Locator (URL) 4-4 4-4 +United Nations 5-6 2-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +United States 5-5 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Universal Basic Income 2-0 2-0, 4-1 +Universal Birth Registration 3-3 3-2 +Universal Coded Character (unicode) 3-0 3-0 +Universal Declaration of Human Rights 4-0, 4-5 4-0, 4-5 +Unorthodox Thinking 6-1 6-1 +Unstructured Communication 5-1 +Untapped 5-5 5-5 +Urgency of innovation leadership 2-0 +Ursula Le Guin 2-0 2-0 +USAID 6-2 6-2 +User Engagement 5-4 2-0, 5-4 +User Experience 5-4 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 7-0 +User Perspective 5-4 5-4 +Ushahidi 5-5 3-3, 5-5 +Usus 5-7 3-2, 4-4, 5-7 +Utility Regulation 5-7 5-7 +V-Dem 2-2 1, 2-1, 2-2 +Vaccine Alliance 6-2 6-2 +Venture Capital 2-0, 5-7, 6-0 2-0, 5-7, 6-0 +Venture Capitalist 6-0 2-0, 6-0 +Ventures 5-7 3-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-7, 6-1 +Verifiable Credential 5-5 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 +Vesuvius Challenge 5-3 5-3 +Violent Revolution 6-0 6-0 +Virtual Civic Spaces 5-2 +Virtual Gatherings 5-2 5-2 +Virtual Meeting 6-1 5-4, 6-1 +Virtual Music Festivals 5-2 5-2 +Virtual Reality 3-3, 4-0, 5-2 2-2, 3-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 +Virtual Replica 5-3 5-3 +Virtual Tourism 5-2 5-2 +Voice-based Internet 5-5 5-5 +Volume Cartographer 5-3 5-3 +Vote 5-6 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +Voting 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Voting Based On Measures Of Power 5-6 5-6 +Voting Based On Population Size 5-6 5-6 +VR Therapy 5-2 +vTaiwan 2-2, 5-4 2-2, 3-3, 5-4 +Vulcan philosophy 5-0 +Vulcans 3-0 3-0 +Wage System 5-7 5-7 +War of Independence 6-0 6-0 +Water Management 6-4 6-4 +Wave of ⿻ 6-3 6-3 +Wealth Taxes 5-7 5-7 +Weapons of Math Destruction 2-0 2-0, 5-5 +Web 2.0 2-0 2-0, 5-5 +web of group-affiliation 3-2 3-2 +Web2 application 6-2 6-2 +Web3 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 6-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Wei Ting-chao 2-1 2-1 +Weighted-voting 5-6 5-6 +Weimar Republic 4-0 4-0 +WEIRD societies 3-3 +Welfare Capitalism 5-0 5-0 +Western Capitalist Countries 2-0 2-0 +Western Liberal Democracies 2-0 2-0, 7-1 +Whanganui River 6-4 +What's App 5-5 5-5 +White Collar 6-1 6-1 +White Terror 2-1 2-1 +Widening Gulf 2-0 2-0, 3-3 +Wikipedia 2-0, 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 +wikisurvey 2-2 2-2, 5-4 +Wikisurveys 5-4 5-4 +Will Of The Group 5-6 5-6 +will.i.am 5-3 5-3 +William Rees-Mogg 2-0 2-0 +William Vickrey 5-7 5-7 +Windows 4-0 3-3, 4-0, 4-1 +Winslow Porter 6-3 6-3 +Wisdom of the Crowd 6-2 6-2 +Wised Democracy Pattern Language 5-4 +Withdrew 2-1 2-1 +Women Talking 5-4 5-4 +Words Cannot Capture 5-4 5-4 +Work-life Balance 6-1 6-1 +Workplace 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 +Workspace 5-3 5-3 +World Congress 5-6 5-6 +World Economic Forum 5-5 5-5 +World Food Programme 6-2 6-2 +World Health Organization (WHO) 2-2, 6-2 2-0, 2-2, 6-2 +World Press Freedom Index 6-3 6-3 +World Trade Organization, 5-7 +World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 +World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 4-2 4-2 +Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 +WWII 2-1 2-1 +X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Yamuna River 6-4 6-4 +Yasmin Eyalat 6-3 6-3 +Year of AI 2-1, 5-5 2-1, 5-5 +Year of Elections 2-1 2-1 +Youssef Nader 5-3 5-3 +Yu Yong-Ding 2-0 2-0 +Yuans 2-1 2-1 +Yushan 2-1 2-1, 3-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Zero Trust 2-2 2-2 +Zero-Knowledge Proofs(ZKPs) 4-2, 6-3 4-1, 4-2, 6-3 +Zheng Chenggong 2-1 2-1 +Zoning Restrictions 5-7 5-7 +⿻ 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +⿻ Artist 5-3 5-3 +⿻ Book 5-7 5-7 +⿻ Conversational and Funding Tools 6-1 6-1 +⿻ Cryptography 6-3 6-3 +⿻ Funding Across Boundaries 5-7 5-7 +⿻ Funding Formula 5-7 5-7 +⿻ funding: 5-7 5-7 +⿻ Future 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 +⿻ good 6-2 5-7, 6-2 +⿻ Governance 5-7 3-3, 5-2, 5-7 +⿻ Group 5-7 5-7 +⿻ Health Agency 6-2 6-2 +⿻ Health Association 6-2 6-2 +⿻ Hiring 6-1 6-1 +⿻ Identity Systems 5-6, 5-7 4-1, 5-6, 5-7 +⿻ Image 3-0 3-0 +⿻ Interaction 6-4 6-4 +⿻ Management 5-7 5-0, 5-7 +⿻ Marketing 6-0 6-0 +⿻ mechanism 6-2 6-2 +⿻ Media 6-3 6-3 +⿻ Money 5-7 4-3, 5-7 +⿻ Practic 5-3 5-3, 6-1 +⿻ Principles 5-7 3-1, 5-7 +⿻ Property 5-7 4-4, 5-7 +⿻ Public 6-2, 6-4 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 +⿻ Public Media 6-3 6-3 +⿻ Rule 5-6 +⿻ Structure 6-3 4-1, 6-3 +⿻ Technologist 5-4 5-4 +⿻ Technology 6-0 6-0, 7-0, 7-1 +⿻ Thinking 5-6 5-6 +⿻ Vision 6-2 4-0, 4-3, 6-2 +⿻ 數位 Plurality 3-0 3-0 +⿻-goods Financing 6-2 6-2 +⿻istic 5-4, 5-6 6-3 +⿻istic Ignorance 6-3 6-3 +數位 3-0 1, 3-0 diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index f44a8f8e..67ffc619 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -8,6 +8,11 @@ from collections import defaultdict +def normalize_section_name(s): + "XX-YY -> X-Y" + return "-".join(str(x) for x in [int(x) for x in s.split("-")]) + + CSV_FILE = "Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv" # This will get the absolute path of the current script file. script_directory = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) @@ -29,10 +34,13 @@ lines = open(os.path.join(script_directory, CSV_FILE)).readlines()[1:] poc_count = defaultdict(int) keywords = set() +keyword_recorded_by_human = defaultdict(set) for row in csv.reader(lines): keywords.add(row[1]) + keyword_recorded_by_human[row[1]].add(normalize_section_name(row[2])) poc_count[row[3]] += 1 + with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "contributors.tsv"), "w") as f: for name in sorted(poc_count): print(f"{name}\t{poc_count[name]}", file=f) @@ -61,10 +69,13 @@ with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "keyword_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: + print(f"Keywords\tSection(by Human)\tSection(by Script)", file=f) + for k in sorted(keyword_occurence, key=lambda x: x.lower()): + human = ", ".join(sorted(keyword_recorded_by_human[k])) occ = ", ".join(sorted(keyword_occurence[k])) k = k.replace('"', "") # care for `Diversity of "groups"` - print(f"{k}\t{occ}", file=f) + print(f"{k}\t{human}\t{occ}", file=f) with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "section_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: for sec in sorted(section_occurence): From 4094f47f05efe60453ba45ed51f468ba241ad720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:25:17 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 09/17] unify lower/upper diversity --- .../Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv | 6 +++--- scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 9 +++------ scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv | 14 +++++++------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv index 522ab492..73a38961 100644 --- a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv +++ b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Market,05-07,cFQ ,Market Design,05-07,cFQ ,Market Power,02-00,cFQ -,Market power,05-07,cFQ +,Market Power,05-07,cFQ ,Marxism,02-01,cFQ ,Marxist Vision of Socialism,02-01,cFQ ,Mask App,02-02,cFQ @@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Minister of Digital Affairs,02-01,cFQ ,Minister without portfolio,02-02,cFQ ,Ministry for the Future,05-04,cFQ -,Ministry For The Future,05-07,cFQ +,Ministry for the Future,05-07,cFQ ,Ministry of Digital Affairs,02-02,cFQ ,Minitel,02-00,cFQ ,Minquán,02-01,cFQ @@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Snow Crash,02-00,cFQ ,"Snowden, Edward",04-02,gnomevan ,Social Collapse,02-00,cFQ -,social connectedness,03-01,nishio +,Social Connectedness,03-01,nishio ,Social Connectedness,03-00,cFQ ,Social Control,02-00,cFQ ,Social Credit Score,02-00,cFQ diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index 89d98a61..be15e93f 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -799,8 +799,7 @@ Marginal Revolution 5-7 5-7 Mark Zuckerberg 5-4 5-4 Market 5-7 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 8 Market Design 5-7 4-4, 5-7 -Market power 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 -Market Power 2-0 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Market Power 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 Marxism 2-1 2-1 Marxist Vision of Socialism 2-1 2-1 Mask App 2-2 2-2 @@ -834,8 +833,7 @@ Millennium Development Declaration 6-2 6-2 Mimetic Models 4-5 4-5 Minister of Digital Affairs 2-1 0-1, 2-1 Minister without portfolio 2-2 2-2 -Ministry for the Future 5-4 5-4, 5-7 -Ministry For The Future 5-7 5-4, 5-7 +Ministry for the Future 5-4, 5-7 5-4, 5-7 Ministry of Digital Affairs 2-2 2-2, 4-4, 7-0 Minitel 2-0 2-0, 3-3 Minquán 2-1 2-1 @@ -1171,8 +1169,7 @@ Smart Contract 5-5 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5 Snow Crash 2-0 2-0, 5-2 Snowden, Edward 4-2 Social Collapse 2-0 2-0 -social connectedness 3-1 3-0 -Social Connectedness 3-0 3-0 +Social Connectedness 3-0, 3-1 3-0 Social Control 2-0 2-0 Social Credit Score 2-0 2-0 Social Difference 5-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 diff --git a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv index fc06a45f..fd21a2e6 100644 --- a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv @@ -3,12 +3,12 @@ 0-2 6 0-3 3 1 20 -2-0 315 +2-0 314 2-1 162 2-2 155 -3-0 57 +3-0 56 3-1 63 -3-2 111 +3-2 110 3-3 148 4-0 118 4-1 107 @@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ 5-1 66 5-2 75 5-3 154 -5-4 161 +5-4 160 5-5 166 5-6 110 -5-7 215 +5-7 213 6-0 100 6-1 133 -6-2 185 +6-2 184 6-3 113 6-4 71 -7-0 145 +7-0 144 7-1 78 8 23 From f7e0c9472aeaadb9f31fc98723747850927dabe2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:25:35 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 10/17] output "too many occurence" data --- scripts/index/main.py | 11 ++ scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index 67ffc619..074cfdcf 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -80,3 +80,14 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "section_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: for sec in sorted(section_occurence): print(f"{sec}\t{section_occurence[sec]}", file=f) + + +with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "too_many_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: + print(f"Keywords\tSection(by Human)\tSection(by Script)", file=f) + + for k in sorted(keyword_occurence, key=lambda x: x.lower()): + if len(keyword_occurence[k]) >= 5: + human = ", ".join(sorted(keyword_recorded_by_human[k])) + occ = ", ".join(sorted(keyword_occurence[k])) + k = k.replace('"', "") # care for `Diversity of "groups"` + print(f"{k}\t{human}\t{occ}", file=f) diff --git a/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..ef06376e --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +Keywords Section(by Human) Section(by Script) +Administration 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 +Anthropologist 5-5 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 +Artificial Intelligence 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Artificial Intelligence (AI). 5-5 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 +Atomist 3-3 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 7-1 +Audrey Tang 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 +Author 5-4 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Authoritarian 1-1 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 +Authority 6-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 +Autonomy 5-3 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5 +Blockchain 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 7-1 +Blockchains 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-7 +Capitalism 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 +Civilization 5-6 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-6 +Climate Change 6-4 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-6, 6-2, 6-4 +Collaboration Across Diversity 5-7 3-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7 +Collective Intelligence 6-1 4-3, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 +Complexity 5-5 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 7-1 +Connected Society 3-2 3-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 5-7 +Contribution 6-1 0-3, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Corporations 5-7 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +COVID-19 6-2 2-1, 2-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +Crypto 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Cryptographic 6-3 2-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-2, 6-3 +Cryptography 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 6-3 +Currency 4-3 2-0, 2-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0 +DAO 5-6 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 +Daron Acemoglu 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 4-2, 5-7, 6-0 +Deliberation 5-0, 5-4, 6-3 2-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Democracy 2-0, 3-0, 5-6 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Difference 3-0 1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-3, 6-4, 7-1 +Digital Democracy 1-1, 2-0, 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 7-1, 8 +Digital Technology 3-0, 5-5 1, 2-0, 3-0, 3-2, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-3, 7-0, 8 +Disinformation 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 5-4, 6-2, 7-1 +Distribution 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 6-2 +Diversity 6-0 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Dynamic 5-7 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Election 4-0, 5-4, 5-6 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-2 +Environment 6-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 8 +Estonia 2-0, 6-1 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-5, 6-1 +Expert 5-5 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-1 +Fair 5-5 0-1, 0-2, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Federal 5-6 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 5-6, 7-0 +Fora 5-4 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-4, 6-3, 7-0 +Foundation Model 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Foundation Models 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Fusion 5-0 2-1, 3-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 +g0v 2-2, 6-2 2-2, 3-3, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0 +GDP 6-1 1, 2-0, 2-2, 5-6, 6-1, 7-0 +Generative Foundation Model 6-2 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative foundation models 6-3 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models (GFMs) 5-3, 5-5 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Generative Foundation Models(GFMs) 4-4 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Git 5-0 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +GitHub 5-3 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +Google 5-7, 6-1 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Hackathon 2-2, 6-4 2-2, 4-0, 4-2, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Health 6-0 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 8 +Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 +Her 2-0 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +HIV 6-2 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-1, 6-2 +Homogenization 5-1, 5-5 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7 +Human Rights 3-3, 5-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 7-0 +Immersive Shared Reality 5-2, 6-0 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Impact 6-2 0-0, 0-2, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +India 2-0, 6-4 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-5, 6-2, 6-4, 7-0 +Industrial 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-2, 5-7, 7-0 +Inequality 5-3 2-0, 2-2, 4-0, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 8 +Information Technology 2-0, 4-0 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 6-1, 7-0 +Infrastructure 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Internet 3-0, 5-4 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Interoperability 2-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-2, 5-5, 7-0 +Intersectional 3-0 3-0, 3-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 +iOS 4-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-2, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Just 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Large Language Model (LLM) 5-5 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2 +Large Language Models (LLMs) 5-4 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 +Legitimacy 6-0 2-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 +Libertarianism 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 7-1 +Machine Learning 2-0, 5-5 2-0, 2-2, 4-2, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5 +Manipulation 5-1 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-1, 5-3, 5-6 +Market 5-7 0-1, 2-0, 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 8 +Market Power 2-0, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-4 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 7-0 +Media 6-0, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Meta 5-4, 5-7 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Microsoft 5-5, 6-1, 6-3 0-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-4, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Misinformation 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-4, 5-7 +Misleading 5-4 2-2, 4-0, 5-4, 5-6, 6-3 +Monist 3-3 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 5-6, 7-1 +Monopoly 3-2 2-1, 3-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Nation state 3-3 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0, 7-1 +Neoliberal 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 5-0, 5-7, 7-0 +Nodes 5-5 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 5-5, 7-0 +Notion 5-3 2-1, 4-0, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-4 +Open Source 2-0, 5-0, 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Open Source Software 2-0, 3-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Open Source Software (OSS) 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 +Open Standard 3-3 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5 +OpenAI 2-0, 2-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 +Operating System 5-0 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Outcome 6-2 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Output 6-2 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Participation 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Polarization 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3, 8 +Polis 2-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Post-symbolic Communication 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 +Privacy 5-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-3, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0, 7-1 +Private Property 3-2, 3-3, 5-7 2-0, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 5-7 +Private Sector 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 6-1, 7-0 +Public Service 5-5 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-5, 5-5, 5-7, 7-0 +Quadratic Voting 2-2, 5-6 2-2, 5-6, 5-7, 6-2, 7-0 +RadicalxChange 5-6 0-1, 4-3, 5-6, 5-7, 7-0 +Representation 5-4 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 +Research and Development 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 +ROC 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 +Signal 4-2 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +Social Difference 5-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 +Social Distance 5-7 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 +Social Diversity 5-7 3-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 7-1, 8 +Social Interaction 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-2, 5-3, 5-7, 6-2 +Social Media 2-0, 5-4, 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-1 +Social Media Platform 5-4 2-0, 4-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0 +Social Network 5-3 2-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 7-0, 8 +Social Organization 3-2 2-1, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-7, 6-3 +Stakeholders 5-7 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Surveillance 2-0, 5-2 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 6-2, 7-0 +Taiwan 2-0, 3-0, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 6-4 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Taxes 7-0 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-7, 7-0 +Teams 6-1 2-2, 3-1, 3-2, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 +Technocracy 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 7-0, 7-1 +Technology 3-0 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +The Lost Dao 4-0, 5-3 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 +Top-down 5-5 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 5-5, 6-1, 7-1 +Translation 5-5 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Turing 5-5 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 +Twitter 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 +UN 6-4 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +United Nations 5-6 2-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +United States 5-5 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 +Ventures 5-7 3-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-7, 6-1 +Virtual Reality 3-3, 4-0, 5-2 2-2, 3-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3 +Vote 5-6 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-3, 7-0 +Voting 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 +Web3 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 6-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Wikipedia 2-0, 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 +Workplace 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 +World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 +Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 +X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +⿻ 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +⿻ Future 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 +⿻ Public 6-2, 6-4 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 From 6ff31011ca69d0de09196773ed5c99720a7e152e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:39:49 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 11/17] output occ per 10k chars --- scripts/index/main.py | 4 +- scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv | 69 ++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index 074cfdcf..249d7484 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -78,8 +78,10 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): print(f"{k}\t{human}\t{occ}", file=f) with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "section_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: + print(f"section\tcount\tcount per 10k chars", file=f) for sec in sorted(section_occurence): - print(f"{sec}\t{section_occurence[sec]}", file=f) + ratio = int(10000 * section_occurence[sec] / len(section_contents[sec])) + print(f"{sec}\t{section_occurence[sec]}\t{ratio}", file=f) with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "too_many_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: diff --git a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv index fd21a2e6..694dc544 100644 --- a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,34 +1,35 @@ -0-0 2 -0-1 13 -0-2 6 -0-3 3 -1 20 -2-0 314 -2-1 162 -2-2 155 -3-0 56 -3-1 63 -3-2 110 -3-3 148 -4-0 118 -4-1 107 -4-2 95 -4-3 76 -4-4 97 -4-5 58 -5-0 97 -5-1 66 -5-2 75 -5-3 154 -5-4 160 -5-5 166 -5-6 110 -5-7 213 -6-0 100 -6-1 133 -6-2 184 -6-3 113 -6-4 71 -7-0 144 -7-1 78 -8 23 +section count count per 10k words +0-0 2 106 +0-1 13 85 +0-2 6 38 +0-3 3 98 +1 20 96 +2-0 314 37 +2-1 162 51 +2-2 155 37 +3-0 56 72 +3-1 63 18 +3-2 110 31 +3-3 148 29 +4-0 118 36 +4-1 107 19 +4-2 95 22 +4-3 76 19 +4-4 97 19 +4-5 58 40 +5-0 97 25 +5-1 66 30 +5-2 75 27 +5-3 154 61 +5-4 160 45 +5-5 166 64 +5-6 110 50 +5-7 213 59 +6-0 100 39 +6-1 133 42 +6-2 184 38 +6-3 113 59 +6-4 71 81 +7-0 144 28 +7-1 78 42 +8 23 130 From c1e2ae118be7eaec1e1b44aff5dbebdea93cafe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 15:51:40 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 12/17] output lower/upper diversity, and fix --- .../index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv | 6 +++--- scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 7 ++----- scripts/index/main.py | 11 +++++++++++ scripts/index/similar_words.tsv | 0 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 scripts/index/similar_words.tsv diff --git a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv index 73a38961..653c9e6c 100644 --- a/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv +++ b/scripts/index/Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Financial Capitalism,02-00,cFQ ,Financial Innovation,02-00,cFQ ,Financial Markets,05-07,cFQ -,Financial markets,05-07,cFQ +,Financial Markets,05-07,cFQ ,Financial Technology,02-00,cFQ ,Finnish government,05-05,cFQ ,Fintech,02-00,cFQ @@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Networks of Human Minds,05-05,cFQ ,Neural Interfaces,05-01,nishio ,Neural Network,05-03,cFQ -,Neural network,05-05,cFQ +,Neural Network,05-05,cFQ ,Neural Network,06-02,cFQ ,Neurofeedback,05-01,nishio ,Neuromodulation,05-01,nishio @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@ Plurality Book Indexing Exercise,Keyword,Chapter,POC ,Non-human Perspective,05-03,cFQ ,Non-market,02-00,cFQ ,Non-renewable Energy Sources,06-04,cFQ -,Non-Verbal Communication,05-01,nishio +,Non-verbal Communication,05-01,nishio ,Non-verbal Communication,05-04,cFQ ,Norbert Wiener,03-02,nishio ,Normative,03-00,cFQ diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index be15e93f..0ee38d48 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -491,7 +491,6 @@ FIDES 6-2 6-2 Financial Capitalism 2-0 2-0 Financial Innovation 2-0 2-0 Financial Markets 5-7 2-0, 5-7 -Financial markets 5-7 2-0, 5-7 Financial Technology 2-0 2-0, 2-2, 7-0 Finnish government 5-5 5-5 Fintech 2-0 2-0, 4-3 @@ -893,8 +892,7 @@ Networked and Probabilistic Structure 5-5 5-5 Networked Value 3-2 3-2 Networks of Human Minds 5-5 5-5 Neural Interfaces 5-1 5-1, 6-1 -Neural Network 5-3, 6-2 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 -Neural network 5-5 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 +Neural Network 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 3-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-2 Neurofeedback 5-1 5-1 Neuromodulation 5-1 5-1 New England town hall 5-4 5-4 @@ -914,8 +912,7 @@ Non-fungible Token (NFT) 5-7 4-4, 5-7, 7-0 Non-human Perspective 5-3 5-3 Non-market 2-0 2-0, 5-7, 6-2 Non-renewable Energy Sources 6-4 6-4 -Non-Verbal Communication 5-1 5-1, 5-4 -Non-verbal Communication 5-4 5-1, 5-4 +Non-verbal Communication 5-1, 5-4 5-1, 5-4 Norbert Wiener 3-2 3-2 Normative 3-0 3-0, 4-4, 6-2 North Atlantic Treaty Organization 2-0 diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index 249d7484..631fa0a0 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -40,7 +40,18 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): keyword_recorded_by_human[row[1]].add(normalize_section_name(row[2])) poc_count[row[3]] += 1 +# find similar words +similar_keywords = defaultdict(set) +for k in keywords: + similar_keywords[k.lower()].add(k) + +with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "similar_words.tsv"), "w") as f: + for k in similar_keywords: + if len(similar_keywords[k]) > 1: # has multiple presentatin + print(similar_keywords[k], file=f) + +# output contributors with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "contributors.tsv"), "w") as f: for name in sorted(poc_count): print(f"{name}\t{poc_count[name]}", file=f) diff --git a/scripts/index/similar_words.tsv b/scripts/index/similar_words.tsv new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e69de29b From f6d9bf63f7d5ac7877d79c50ecb54b65a70eab12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:04:12 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 13/17] fix bug of `X(Twitter)` --- scripts/index/README.md | 3 ++ scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 2 +- scripts/index/main.py | 18 ++++++-- scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv | 66 +++++++++++++-------------- scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv | 1 - 5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/index/README.md b/scripts/index/README.md index c7aadb55..cb8a24b9 100644 --- a/scripts/index/README.md +++ b/scripts/index/README.md @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ - `keyword_occurrence.tsv`: occurrence of each keywords in each sections - `section_occurrence.tsv`: number of occurrences in each sections of any keywords. It is to find less-covered sections. - `no_occurence.txt`: Keywords which does not occur in the contents. +- `too_many_occurrence.tsv`: Keywords which occur in more than 5 sections. +- `similar_keywords.txt`: Output if there are keywords like `Neural network` and `Neural Network`. ## memo @@ -20,3 +22,4 @@ - Keywords with acronym such as `Artificial Intelligence (AI)`: If it does not occerred, remove after palens and search again. - Keywords with quotes such as `Diversity of "groups"`: remove quotes - `keyword_occurrence.tsv`: Output "by human" keywords and "by script" keywords on the different columns +- Fix bug: I ignored `X` derived from `X (formerly Twitter)` but the comparison was done after lower(). \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index 0ee38d48..7b440626 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 4-2 4-2 Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 WWII 2-1 2-1 -X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 6-3 Yamuna River 6-4 6-4 Yasmin Eyalat 6-3 6-3 Year of AI 2-1, 5-5 2-1, 5-5 diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index 631fa0a0..9697eb4e 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -7,12 +7,20 @@ import csv from collections import defaultdict +# keywords which should avoid mechine search +IGNORE = ["x"] # such as `X(Twitter)` + def normalize_section_name(s): "XX-YY -> X-Y" return "-".join(str(x) for x in [int(x) for x in s.split("-")]) +def remove_palen(s): + "`AAA (BBB)` -> `AAA`" + return k.split("(")[0].strip() + + CSV_FILE = "Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv" # This will get the absolute path of the current script file. script_directory = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)) @@ -59,14 +67,18 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): keyword_occurence = defaultdict(list) section_occurence = defaultdict(int) for k in keywords: + # find occurence in other sections + if k in IGNORE: + continue + for section in section_contents: if k.lower() in section_contents[section]: keyword_occurence[k].append(section) section_occurence[section] += 1 elif "(" in k: # if keywords looks `AAA (BBB)` style, use occurrence of `AAA` instead - k2 = k.split("(")[0].strip().lower() - if k2 in ["", "X"]: # exception, such as `X(Twitter)` + k2 = remove_palen(k).lower() + if not k2 or k2 in IGNORE: continue if k2 in section_contents[section]: keyword_occurence[k].append(section) @@ -88,6 +100,7 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): k = k.replace('"', "") # care for `Diversity of "groups"` print(f"{k}\t{human}\t{occ}", file=f) + with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "section_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: print(f"section\tcount\tcount per 10k chars", file=f) for sec in sorted(section_occurence): @@ -97,7 +110,6 @@ def normalize_section_name(s): with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "too_many_occurrence.tsv"), "w") as f: print(f"Keywords\tSection(by Human)\tSection(by Script)", file=f) - for k in sorted(keyword_occurence, key=lambda x: x.lower()): if len(keyword_occurence[k]) >= 5: human = ", ".join(sorted(keyword_recorded_by_human[k])) diff --git a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv index 694dc544..de479b6f 100644 --- a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@ -section count count per 10k words +section count count per 10k chars 0-0 2 106 -0-1 13 85 -0-2 6 38 -0-3 3 98 -1 20 96 -2-0 314 37 -2-1 162 51 -2-2 155 37 -3-0 56 72 -3-1 63 18 -3-2 110 31 -3-3 148 29 -4-0 118 36 -4-1 107 19 -4-2 95 22 -4-3 76 19 -4-4 97 19 -4-5 58 40 -5-0 97 25 -5-1 66 30 -5-2 75 27 -5-3 154 61 -5-4 160 45 -5-5 166 64 -5-6 110 50 -5-7 213 59 -6-0 100 39 -6-1 133 42 -6-2 184 38 +0-1 12 78 +0-2 5 32 +0-3 2 65 +1 19 91 +2-0 312 37 +2-1 161 51 +2-2 154 37 +3-0 55 71 +3-1 61 18 +3-2 109 31 +3-3 147 29 +4-0 117 36 +4-1 106 19 +4-2 94 22 +4-3 75 18 +4-4 96 19 +4-5 57 39 +5-0 96 25 +5-1 64 29 +5-2 74 27 +5-3 152 60 +5-4 158 44 +5-5 164 64 +5-6 109 49 +5-7 211 58 +6-0 99 39 +6-1 132 41 +6-2 182 38 6-3 113 59 -6-4 71 81 -7-0 144 28 -7-1 78 42 -8 23 130 +6-4 70 80 +7-0 143 28 +7-1 77 42 +8 22 125 diff --git a/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv index ef06376e..791c3fac 100644 --- a/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv @@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ Wikipedia 2-0, 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4 Workplace 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 -X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 0-1, 0-2, 0-3, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 ⿻ 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 ⿻ Future 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 ⿻ Public 6-2, 6-4 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 From fb4a5018967dc38a6fa30315ffef0c698ee3d033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: NISHIO Hirokazu Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:27:46 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 14/17] better way to suppress auto-pickup --- scripts/index/README.md | 1 + scripts/index/ignore.txt | 11 +++++ scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv | 20 ++++---- scripts/index/main.py | 13 +++--- scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv | 66 +++++++++++++-------------- scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv | 10 ---- 6 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) create mode 100644 scripts/index/ignore.txt diff --git a/scripts/index/README.md b/scripts/index/README.md index cb8a24b9..df0f343d 100644 --- a/scripts/index/README.md +++ b/scripts/index/README.md @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ - `Plurality Book Indexing Exercise - Main.csv`: raw file exported from [Spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1gmyjFbErt_CW8-qLKChSpciLlCDGUhLriYFov0HO3qA/edit#gid=0) - `main.py`: output POC count, occurence of each keywords in each sections, and the count of occurences +- `ignore.txt`: keywords which should avoid mechine search ## output - `contributors.tsv`: number of contribution on the spreadsheet diff --git a/scripts/index/ignore.txt b/scripts/index/ignore.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..d3c0d2da --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/index/ignore.txt @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +X +Her +UN +Author +Writing +Translation +Signal +Participation +Outcome +Output +Administration \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv index 7b440626..ae005a25 100644 --- a/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/keyword_occurrence.tsv @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Acemoglu, Daron 2-0 Active Listening 5-4 5-4 ActivityPub 2-0, 3-3 2-0, 3-3, 4-2 Adaptive Representation 5-6 5-6 -Administration 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 +Administration 5-4 Administrative Application 5-5 5-5 Administrative Practice 5-5 5-5 Administrative State 5-5 5-5 @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Audrey Tang 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 Augmented Reality 4-0, 5-2 4-0, 5-2, 7-1 Australia 6-2 2-0, 5-5, 6-2 Australian Government 5-5 5-5 -Author 5-4 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Author 5-4 Authoritarian 1-1 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 Authoritarian Regimes 2-0 1, 2-0 Authoritarian Repressive State 2-1 2-1 @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ healthy minds in healthy bodies 6-2 6-2 Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 Henry George Theorem 3-2 3-2, 5-7 Henry George Theorem States 5-7 5-7 -Her 2-0 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +Her 2-0 Herbert Simon 5-4 4-2, 5-4 Herculaneum 5-3 5-3 Herculaneum scrolls 5-3 5-3 @@ -962,8 +962,8 @@ Optimism Collective 6-2 6-2 Organizational Chart 6-1 6-1 Oscar Wilde 5-4 5-4 Out-of-pocket Payment 6-2 6-2 -Outcome 6-2 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Output 6-2 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 +Outcome 6-2 +Output 6-2 Packet Switching 3-3 3-3, 4-1 Packet-switching 5-5 3-3, 5-5 Page Rank 5-6 @@ -972,7 +972,7 @@ Paradox.ai 5-5 5-5 PARC 3-3 3-3, 7-0 Park of Aging 5-1 5-1 Partial Common Ownership 5-7 5-7 -Participation 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 +Participation 2-0 Participative Production 2-1 2-1 Participatory Design 5-7 5-7 Participedia 5-4 5-4 @@ -1149,7 +1149,7 @@ Shared Goods 5-7 5-7, 7-0 Shared Knowledge Base 5-3 5-3 Shoshanna Zuboff 2-0 2-0 Sidewalk Labs 2-0 2-0 -Signal 4-2 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 +Signal 4-2 Silent Majority 6-3 6-3 Simon Chang 2-2 2-2 Simon Johnson 2-0 2-0, 5-6 @@ -1311,7 +1311,7 @@ Tradable Carbon Permits 5-7 5-7 Traditional Practice 5-5 5-5 Transculturalism 1-1 Transhuman 6-2 6-2 -Translation 5-5 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 +Translation 5-5 Transnational Corporations 5-7 5-7 Transparent Database 5-5 5-5 Trello 6-1 6-1 @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ Twitter 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 Tyranny of Structurelessness 5-4 5-4 Tyranny Of The Majority 5-6 5-6 UAE 2-0 2-0 -UN 6-4 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 +UN 6-4 UN-Water 6-2 6-2 UNDP 6-2 4-0, 4-1, 6-2 Uniform Resource Locator (URL) 4-4 4-4 @@ -1418,7 +1418,7 @@ World Press Freedom Index 6-3 6-3 World Trade Organization, 5-7 World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 4-2 4-2 -Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 +Writing 5-4 WWII 2-1 2-1 X (formerly Twitter) 5-4 6-3 Yamuna River 6-4 6-4 diff --git a/scripts/index/main.py b/scripts/index/main.py index 9697eb4e..6329c42b 100644 --- a/scripts/index/main.py +++ b/scripts/index/main.py @@ -7,9 +7,6 @@ import csv from collections import defaultdict -# keywords which should avoid mechine search -IGNORE = ["x"] # such as `X(Twitter)` - def normalize_section_name(s): "XX-YY -> X-Y" @@ -29,6 +26,10 @@ def remove_palen(s): # This moves up two levels from the script's directory and then into the "contents/english" directory. target_directory = os.path.join(script_directory, "..", "..", "contents", "english") +# keywords which should avoid mechine search, such as `X`(Twitter) or `her`(Movie name) +ignore_file = os.path.join(script_directory, "ignore.txt") +IGNORE = open(ignore_file).read().strip().splitlines() + # List the contents of the target directory. sections = os.listdir(target_directory) sections.remove("Plurality Book Ownership List.md") @@ -77,17 +78,17 @@ def remove_palen(s): section_occurence[section] += 1 elif "(" in k: # if keywords looks `AAA (BBB)` style, use occurrence of `AAA` instead - k2 = remove_palen(k).lower() + k2 = remove_palen(k) if not k2 or k2 in IGNORE: continue - if k2 in section_contents[section]: + if k2.lower() in section_contents[section]: keyword_occurence[k].append(section) section_occurence[section] += 1 with open(os.path.join(script_directory, "no_occurence.txt"), "w") as warn_no_occurence: for k in sorted(keywords): - if not keyword_occurence[k]: + if not keyword_occurence[k] and k not in IGNORE: print(k, file=warn_no_occurence) diff --git a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv index de479b6f..16300538 100644 --- a/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/section_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@ section count count per 10k chars -0-0 2 106 -0-1 12 78 -0-2 5 32 +0-0 1 53 +0-1 10 65 +0-2 4 25 0-3 2 65 -1 19 91 -2-0 312 37 -2-1 161 51 -2-2 154 37 -3-0 55 71 -3-1 61 18 -3-2 109 31 -3-3 147 29 -4-0 117 36 -4-1 106 19 -4-2 94 22 -4-3 75 18 -4-4 96 19 -4-5 57 39 -5-0 96 25 -5-1 64 29 -5-2 74 27 -5-3 152 60 -5-4 158 44 -5-5 164 64 -5-6 109 49 -5-7 211 58 -6-0 99 39 -6-1 132 41 -6-2 182 38 -6-3 113 59 -6-4 70 80 -7-0 143 28 -7-1 77 42 -8 22 125 +1 16 77 +2-0 304 36 +2-1 154 49 +2-2 147 35 +3-0 52 67 +3-1 56 16 +3-2 103 29 +3-3 140 27 +4-0 112 34 +4-1 100 18 +4-2 88 20 +4-3 70 17 +4-4 89 17 +4-5 52 36 +5-0 87 23 +5-1 60 27 +5-2 71 26 +5-3 146 58 +5-4 149 42 +5-5 156 60 +5-6 104 47 +5-7 205 56 +6-0 92 36 +6-1 126 40 +6-2 174 36 +6-3 108 56 +6-4 66 75 +7-0 136 26 +7-1 72 39 +8 20 113 diff --git a/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv index 791c3fac..23f6b508 100644 --- a/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv +++ b/scripts/index/too_many_occurrence.tsv @@ -1,11 +1,9 @@ Keywords Section(by Human) Section(by Script) -Administration 5-4 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2 Anthropologist 5-5 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-5 Artificial Intelligence 2-0 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 Artificial Intelligence (AI). 5-5 2-0, 3-1, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 5-0, 5-3, 5-5 Atomist 3-3 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 7-1 Audrey Tang 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 5-4, 8 -Author 5-4 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Authoritarian 1-1 1, 2-0, 2-1, 4-0, 7-1 Authority 6-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-3, 5-0, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 Autonomy 5-3 2-1, 4-0, 4-1, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5 @@ -58,7 +56,6 @@ Google 5-7, 6-1 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Hackathon 2-2, 6-4 2-2, 4-0, 4-2, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Health 6-0 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 4-4, 5-1, 5-2, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 8 Henry George 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-2, 5-7 -Her 2-0 0-2, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 HIV 6-2 2-0, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-2, 4-4, 6-1, 6-2 Homogenization 5-1, 5-5 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 5-7 Human Rights 3-3, 5-0 2-0, 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 7-0 @@ -100,9 +97,6 @@ Open Source Software (OSS) 5-7 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 5-7, 7-0 Open Standard 3-3 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5 OpenAI 2-0, 2-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 2-2, 4-1, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 Operating System 5-0 3-3, 4-0, 5-0, 6-2, 7-0, 7-1 -Outcome 6-2 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 -Output 6-2 4-2, 4-4, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 -Participation 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-7, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Polarization 2-0 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 4-5, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3, 8 Polis 2-2, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2 2-2, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Post-symbolic Communication 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-5, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2 @@ -116,7 +110,6 @@ Representation 5-4 3-2, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 7-0 Research and Development 2-0 2-0, 3-3, 5-7, 6-1, 7-0 ROC 2-1 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1 Science Fiction 2-0, 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-1, 6-2 -Signal 4-2 2-1, 2-2, 4-1, 4-2, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 Social Difference 5-0 2-0, 3-0, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5 Social Distance 5-7 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 6-1, 6-3, 7-0 Social Diversity 5-7 3-1, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 5-7, 7-1, 8 @@ -134,10 +127,8 @@ Technocracy 3-0 2-0, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 4-0, 7-0, 7-1 Technology 3-0 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 The Lost Dao 4-0, 5-3 2-0, 3-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 5-3, 5-6, 6-0, 7-0 Top-down 5-5 2-0, 3-3, 4-1, 5-5, 6-1, 7-1 -Translation 5-5 2-0, 3-2, 3-3, 5-0, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 Turing 5-5 2-1, 3-1, 4-0, 4-3, 4-4, 5-4, 5-5, 6-2, 7-0 Twitter 6-3 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 5-4, 6-3 -UN 6-4 0-0, 0-1, 1, 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 United Nations 5-6 2-0, 2-1, 3-2, 4-0, 4-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-2, 7-0 United States 5-5 2-0, 2-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-3, 5-1, 6-2, 6-3, 7-0 Ventures 5-7 3-1, 4-3, 4-4, 5-1, 5-7, 6-1 @@ -148,7 +139,6 @@ Web3 2-0, 4-0, 5-7, 6-0 2-0, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 7-0 Wikipedia 2-0, 3-3, 5-3, 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 2-2, 3-1, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-3 Workplace 6-0, 6-1 2-0, 4-0, 6-0, 6-1, 7-0 World War 6-3 2-0, 2-1, 3-3, 4-0, 6-3 -Writing 5-4 2-0, 2-1, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 5-0, 5-3, 5-4, 6-0, 6-1, 7-1 ⿻ 3-0 0-1, 2-2, 3-0, 3-1, 3-2, 3-3, 4-0, 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, 4-5, 5-0, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-6, 5-7, 6-0, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0, 7-1, 8 ⿻ Future 5-7 4-0, 4-1, 4-5, 5-0, 5-7, 7-1 ⿻ Public 6-2, 6-4 4-2, 4-4, 6-0, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 7-0 From 05df41e54b229dd1780a563a4cc73ceea42c9e00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:21:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 15/17] Final copyedit of 6-4 --- contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) create mode 100644 contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup diff --git a/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup b/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup new file mode 100644 index 00000000..c0c0520e --- /dev/null +++ b/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Environment + +⿻ may be even more core to addressing the most pressing environmental problems we face, from climate change to biodiversity loss, than even "green technologies" like clean energy are, because it provides a basis both for cooperation on developing those technologies and for establishing a positive communication with natural features that represents their interests in social decisions. As such, ⿻ may be central to the survival of the earth as a human-supporting habitat. + +--- + +What does "Collaboration Across Difference" have to do with the environment? Local legends, stories, traditional religions, and many contemporary religions, spanning the length of human history, emphasize nature as a target of respect and a participant in cooperation with just as much as other humans are. + +This chapter explores how ⿻ can transform our technological relationship with nature. In the past, technology has often been conceived of as a means to master nature, just as sometimes technology has previously been seen as a means to master fellow humans. Instead we explore how ⿻ can facilitate communication, cooperation and synergy with nature, empowered by data Whether we see these ecosystems as alive and sentient in their own right, or as indispensable life-support systems for human societies, these approaches will enable us to co-exist with nature more sustainably. + +Human activities — particularly our reliance on non-renewable energy sources — have profoundly altered the Earth since the 1950s. Deforestation, global warming, ocean acidification, and mass extinctions have all escalated as the climate changes. At the beginning of the 21st century, Nobel laureate Paul Jozef Crutzen proposed the term "[Anthropocene](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene)" to recognize this new epoch driven primarily by human influence.[^anthro] Biodiversity has plummeted; between [2001 and 2014](https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/01/world/sixth-mass-extinction-accelerating-intl/index.html) alone, approximately 173 species vanished—25 times the historical extinction rate. During the 20th century, some 543 vertebrate species disappeared, an event that would typically unfold over 10,000 years.[^extinction] + +[^anthro]: Will Steffan, Paul J. Crutzen and John R. McNeill, "The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?" in Ross E. Dunn, Laura J. Mitchell and Kerry Ward, eds., *The New World History* (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2016). Note that this proposal was recently rejected by the [International Union of Geological Sciences](https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/mar/22/geologists-reject-declaration-of-anthropocene-epoch#:~:text=The%20guardians%20of%20the%20world's,planet%2Dchanging%20impact%20of%20humanity.). + +[^extinction]: Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, and Peter H. Raven, "Vertebrates on the Brink as Indicators of Biological Annihilation and the Sixth Mass Extinction", *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 117, no. 24: 13596-13602. + +Of course, we humans are not immune to the effects. Air pollution alone kills nearly [6.7 million people every year](https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/world-must-band-together-combat-air-pollution-which-kills-7-million-year#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20air%20pollution%20significantly,million%20premature%20deaths%20a%20year.), including half a million infants. In severely polluted countries, average life expectancy falls by up to six years.[^WHO] + +[^WHO]: World Health Organization, "Air Pollution Resource Guide" at https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1. + +### Data coalitions for environmental action + +Climate, air quality, and water data, which often rely on government agencies for input and maintenance, are resources that benefit each other internationally. Environmental awareness has become a distinctive feature of the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, driven by open data organizations and environmental groups. The civic technology movement has opened up a new space for digital social engagement; not simply providing tools, but also actively supporting civil society to work with the government to create more environmental knowledge, which can then be developed into a public movement that coordinates the interests of multiple parties. + +In Taiwan, the [Location Aware Sensor System](https://directory.civictech.guide/listing/location-aware-sensing-system-lass-environmental-sensor-network) (LASS), an open-source environment sensing network, empowers ordinary citizens to gather and share information freely, developing into a model of digital communication that incorporates local wisdom through citizen science. Instead of relying on authoritative organizations to shape public perceptions, LASS embraces direct action, extending community values into environmental care. + +This type of citizen science community, which covers air, forest, and river sensing, is based on the spirit of open-source rainmaking, and also contributes to the "Civil IoT" data coalition, which provides real-time sensing information updated every 3-5 minutes across the country, serving as a common ground for activists, and making it easier for ideas to solve problems to be examined and disseminated. + +Data coalitions are interconnected with social movement-based civic technologies; a series of hackathon-themed fields have begun around the globe that will serve as mutually supportive gateways for mobility, acting as a technological conduit between natural environments and volunteers, and facilitating collective action on a global scale. It can be argued that the nature of collaborative networks is not just about information gathering and value re-engineering, but also about the foundation of community knowledge systems and the promotion of environmental justice. + +Before conservationism was a widespread concept, conservative thinkers like Edmund Burke saw community groups as 'little platoons' – social hubs situated between individuals and the state.[^Burke] Effective communication and cultivation are particularly important given that environmental problems often hit the most vulnerable first and hardest, such as low-income families or indigenous communities. The key is to ensure, through law and policy, that community members have an equal participation and voice in the development, resource allocation and implementation process, and that they are transformed from research subjects to data-driven actors. + +[^Burke]: Edmund Burke, *Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event* (London: James Dodley, 1790). + +### Conversations with nature + +Recent years have seen a growing movement to grant waterways 'natural legal personhood.' These waterways, with inherent rights and appointed guardians, include the Magpie River ([Muteshekau Shipu](https://nonprofitquarterly.org/environmental-personhood-a-radical-approach-to-climate-justice/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20the%20Canadian%20government,and%20the%20rights%20of%20nature.)) in Canada, the [Whanganui](https://apnews.com/article/religion-sacred-rivers-new-zealand-86d34a78f5fc662ccd554dd7f578d217) in New Zealand, and the Ganga and [Yamuna](https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/india-s-yamuna-river-now-enjoys-legal-personhood-will-be-enough-clean-it) rivers in India.[^rivers] This signifies a shared commitment to preserving these ecosystems for future generations. + +[^rivers]: Mihnea Tanasescu, "When a River is a Person: From Ecuador to New Zealand, Nature Gets its Day in Court", *Open Rivers* 8, Fall 2017 at https://openrivers.lib.umn.edu/article/when-a-river-is-a-person-from-ecuador-to-new-zealand-nature-gets-its-day-in-court. + +Shared data can be transformed by data coalitions using generative foundation models (GFMs) into means of conversation with nature. These can serve as valuable tools for knowledge sharing and collective problem-solving regarding complex, cross-border problems. In promoting environmental sustainability, GFMs demonstrate a new model of co-existence between technology and humanity. As environmental data flows through verifiable relationships, it generates value (e.g., air and water quality monitoring), sending pulses of images, sounds, and messages to engage people, offering real-time feedback to ideas and encouraging more nature-conscious partners to join the effort. + +It is important to emphasize that such advances can promote a mutually beneficial cocreation relationship, allowing all parties to work more closely together with the common goal of protecting the planet. Particularly in addressing transjurisdictional environmental issues, they offer unprecedented opportunities to analyze and address complex challenges such as global climate change, biodiversity loss and water management. By engaging in direct dialogues with nature, we are able to better understand environmental change and develop effective strategies and solutions based on it. + +### Cogovernance across borders + +Fluidity defines our natural world; oceans, rivers, and the atmosphere flow without regard for borders. Environmental solutions must transcend rigid hierarchical approaches that work within single towns, cities, or even countries. In response, we can draw from civic hacking culture, which celebrates cross-disciplinary teamwork among programmers, designers, and citizens across diverse communities. + +Building GFMs models for natural environments involves challenges: open-source governance, capital and compute investments, and collaboration are key. Through GFMs, we can unlock deeper insights into our complex natural world. Scientific research and environmental management benefit from these insights, improving both and potentially reshaping society, as we have seen in the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration's ongoing collaboration with IBM on a [Geospatial Foundation Model](https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model) based on NASA's earth observation data, tackling crucial notions of environmental justice for natural spaces and human communities alike.[^NASA] + +[^NASA]: Josh Blumenfeld, "NASA and IBM Openly Release Geospatial AI Foundation Model for NASA Earth Observation Data", *NASA Earth Data* August 3, 2023 at https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model. + +Just as biometrics and sociometrics help establish identity, we need better ways to establish and protect the identity of natural ecosystems like rivers. A new conceptualization of identity is in order – one that factors in the connections between individual people and the ecosystems they rely on. [⿻ publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/?mode=dark), as explored earlier in this book, also establish and protect identity of collective entities, often devoted to cultural and care relationships. Some of these relate to natural ecosystems and can offer a foundation for conceptualizing of the identity of such an ecosystem. + +Notably, this perspective transcends the often contentious debate around whether GFM systems can become legal agents; data coalitions can be viewed both as “little platoons” created by the people who benefit from the ecosystem, but also at the same time, through the legal positioning of natural personhood, the river’s digital twin can be seen as a subject with rights and responsibilities. Similarly a GFM created for whatever purpose of, by and for a community can exist both as a "person" and as a shared ⿻ good, depending on the perspective one adopts. + From 1e3dbe0eff216ea69f914ac20b6ffcb6a51be26c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:04:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 16/17] Delete redundant file --- contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup | 56 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 56 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup diff --git a/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup b/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup deleted file mode 100644 index c0c0520e..00000000 --- a/contents/english/6-4-environment.md.backup +++ /dev/null @@ -1,56 +0,0 @@ -# Environment - -⿻ may be even more core to addressing the most pressing environmental problems we face, from climate change to biodiversity loss, than even "green technologies" like clean energy are, because it provides a basis both for cooperation on developing those technologies and for establishing a positive communication with natural features that represents their interests in social decisions. As such, ⿻ may be central to the survival of the earth as a human-supporting habitat. - ---- - -What does "Collaboration Across Difference" have to do with the environment? Local legends, stories, traditional religions, and many contemporary religions, spanning the length of human history, emphasize nature as a target of respect and a participant in cooperation with just as much as other humans are. - -This chapter explores how ⿻ can transform our technological relationship with nature. In the past, technology has often been conceived of as a means to master nature, just as sometimes technology has previously been seen as a means to master fellow humans. Instead we explore how ⿻ can facilitate communication, cooperation and synergy with nature, empowered by data Whether we see these ecosystems as alive and sentient in their own right, or as indispensable life-support systems for human societies, these approaches will enable us to co-exist with nature more sustainably. - -Human activities — particularly our reliance on non-renewable energy sources — have profoundly altered the Earth since the 1950s. Deforestation, global warming, ocean acidification, and mass extinctions have all escalated as the climate changes. At the beginning of the 21st century, Nobel laureate Paul Jozef Crutzen proposed the term "[Anthropocene](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene)" to recognize this new epoch driven primarily by human influence.[^anthro] Biodiversity has plummeted; between [2001 and 2014](https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/01/world/sixth-mass-extinction-accelerating-intl/index.html) alone, approximately 173 species vanished—25 times the historical extinction rate. During the 20th century, some 543 vertebrate species disappeared, an event that would typically unfold over 10,000 years.[^extinction] - -[^anthro]: Will Steffan, Paul J. Crutzen and John R. McNeill, "The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?" in Ross E. Dunn, Laura J. Mitchell and Kerry Ward, eds., *The New World History* (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2016). Note that this proposal was recently rejected by the [International Union of Geological Sciences](https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/mar/22/geologists-reject-declaration-of-anthropocene-epoch#:~:text=The%20guardians%20of%20the%20world's,planet%2Dchanging%20impact%20of%20humanity.). - -[^extinction]: Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, and Peter H. Raven, "Vertebrates on the Brink as Indicators of Biological Annihilation and the Sixth Mass Extinction", *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 117, no. 24: 13596-13602. - -Of course, we humans are not immune to the effects. Air pollution alone kills nearly [6.7 million people every year](https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/world-must-band-together-combat-air-pollution-which-kills-7-million-year#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20air%20pollution%20significantly,million%20premature%20deaths%20a%20year.), including half a million infants. In severely polluted countries, average life expectancy falls by up to six years.[^WHO] - -[^WHO]: World Health Organization, "Air Pollution Resource Guide" at https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1. - -### Data coalitions for environmental action - -Climate, air quality, and water data, which often rely on government agencies for input and maintenance, are resources that benefit each other internationally. Environmental awareness has become a distinctive feature of the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, driven by open data organizations and environmental groups. The civic technology movement has opened up a new space for digital social engagement; not simply providing tools, but also actively supporting civil society to work with the government to create more environmental knowledge, which can then be developed into a public movement that coordinates the interests of multiple parties. - -In Taiwan, the [Location Aware Sensor System](https://directory.civictech.guide/listing/location-aware-sensing-system-lass-environmental-sensor-network) (LASS), an open-source environment sensing network, empowers ordinary citizens to gather and share information freely, developing into a model of digital communication that incorporates local wisdom through citizen science. Instead of relying on authoritative organizations to shape public perceptions, LASS embraces direct action, extending community values into environmental care. - -This type of citizen science community, which covers air, forest, and river sensing, is based on the spirit of open-source rainmaking, and also contributes to the "Civil IoT" data coalition, which provides real-time sensing information updated every 3-5 minutes across the country, serving as a common ground for activists, and making it easier for ideas to solve problems to be examined and disseminated. - -Data coalitions are interconnected with social movement-based civic technologies; a series of hackathon-themed fields have begun around the globe that will serve as mutually supportive gateways for mobility, acting as a technological conduit between natural environments and volunteers, and facilitating collective action on a global scale. It can be argued that the nature of collaborative networks is not just about information gathering and value re-engineering, but also about the foundation of community knowledge systems and the promotion of environmental justice. - -Before conservationism was a widespread concept, conservative thinkers like Edmund Burke saw community groups as 'little platoons' – social hubs situated between individuals and the state.[^Burke] Effective communication and cultivation are particularly important given that environmental problems often hit the most vulnerable first and hardest, such as low-income families or indigenous communities. The key is to ensure, through law and policy, that community members have an equal participation and voice in the development, resource allocation and implementation process, and that they are transformed from research subjects to data-driven actors. - -[^Burke]: Edmund Burke, *Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event* (London: James Dodley, 1790). - -### Conversations with nature - -Recent years have seen a growing movement to grant waterways 'natural legal personhood.' These waterways, with inherent rights and appointed guardians, include the Magpie River ([Muteshekau Shipu](https://nonprofitquarterly.org/environmental-personhood-a-radical-approach-to-climate-justice/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20the%20Canadian%20government,and%20the%20rights%20of%20nature.)) in Canada, the [Whanganui](https://apnews.com/article/religion-sacred-rivers-new-zealand-86d34a78f5fc662ccd554dd7f578d217) in New Zealand, and the Ganga and [Yamuna](https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/india-s-yamuna-river-now-enjoys-legal-personhood-will-be-enough-clean-it) rivers in India.[^rivers] This signifies a shared commitment to preserving these ecosystems for future generations. - -[^rivers]: Mihnea Tanasescu, "When a River is a Person: From Ecuador to New Zealand, Nature Gets its Day in Court", *Open Rivers* 8, Fall 2017 at https://openrivers.lib.umn.edu/article/when-a-river-is-a-person-from-ecuador-to-new-zealand-nature-gets-its-day-in-court. - -Shared data can be transformed by data coalitions using generative foundation models (GFMs) into means of conversation with nature. These can serve as valuable tools for knowledge sharing and collective problem-solving regarding complex, cross-border problems. In promoting environmental sustainability, GFMs demonstrate a new model of co-existence between technology and humanity. As environmental data flows through verifiable relationships, it generates value (e.g., air and water quality monitoring), sending pulses of images, sounds, and messages to engage people, offering real-time feedback to ideas and encouraging more nature-conscious partners to join the effort. - -It is important to emphasize that such advances can promote a mutually beneficial cocreation relationship, allowing all parties to work more closely together with the common goal of protecting the planet. Particularly in addressing transjurisdictional environmental issues, they offer unprecedented opportunities to analyze and address complex challenges such as global climate change, biodiversity loss and water management. By engaging in direct dialogues with nature, we are able to better understand environmental change and develop effective strategies and solutions based on it. - -### Cogovernance across borders - -Fluidity defines our natural world; oceans, rivers, and the atmosphere flow without regard for borders. Environmental solutions must transcend rigid hierarchical approaches that work within single towns, cities, or even countries. In response, we can draw from civic hacking culture, which celebrates cross-disciplinary teamwork among programmers, designers, and citizens across diverse communities. - -Building GFMs models for natural environments involves challenges: open-source governance, capital and compute investments, and collaboration are key. Through GFMs, we can unlock deeper insights into our complex natural world. Scientific research and environmental management benefit from these insights, improving both and potentially reshaping society, as we have seen in the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration's ongoing collaboration with IBM on a [Geospatial Foundation Model](https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model) based on NASA's earth observation data, tackling crucial notions of environmental justice for natural spaces and human communities alike.[^NASA] - -[^NASA]: Josh Blumenfeld, "NASA and IBM Openly Release Geospatial AI Foundation Model for NASA Earth Observation Data", *NASA Earth Data* August 3, 2023 at https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model. - -Just as biometrics and sociometrics help establish identity, we need better ways to establish and protect the identity of natural ecosystems like rivers. A new conceptualization of identity is in order – one that factors in the connections between individual people and the ecosystems they rely on. [⿻ publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/?mode=dark), as explored earlier in this book, also establish and protect identity of collective entities, often devoted to cultural and care relationships. Some of these relate to natural ecosystems and can offer a foundation for conceptualizing of the identity of such an ecosystem. - -Notably, this perspective transcends the often contentious debate around whether GFM systems can become legal agents; data coalitions can be viewed both as “little platoons” created by the people who benefit from the ecosystem, but also at the same time, through the legal positioning of natural personhood, the river’s digital twin can be seen as a subject with rights and responsibilities. Similarly a GFM created for whatever purpose of, by and for a community can exist both as a "person" and as a shared ⿻ good, depending on the perspective one adopts. - From cdb9a447b53a45fc3a906330014b3562363bcfb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pluralitybook Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 07:09:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 17/17] Final copyedit of 6-4 --- contents/english/6-4-environment.md | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/contents/english/6-4-environment.md b/contents/english/6-4-environment.md index 5644e8c2..c0c0520e 100644 --- a/contents/english/6-4-environment.md +++ b/contents/english/6-4-environment.md @@ -1,50 +1,56 @@ # Environment -⿻ may be even more core to addressing the most pressing environmental problems we face, from climate change to biodiversity loss, than even "green technologies" like clean energy are, because they provide a basis both for cooperation on developing those technologies and for establishing a positive communication with natural features that represents their interests in social decisions. As such, ⿻ may be central to the survival of the earth as a human-supporting habitat. +⿻ may be even more core to addressing the most pressing environmental problems we face, from climate change to biodiversity loss, than even "green technologies" like clean energy are, because it provides a basis both for cooperation on developing those technologies and for establishing a positive communication with natural features that represents their interests in social decisions. As such, ⿻ may be central to the survival of the earth as a human-supporting habitat. --- -Readers may ask, "Collaboration Across Difference" is about cooperation between people, so what does it have to do with the environment? Yet local legends, stories, traditional religions, and many contemporary religions, spanning the length of human history, emphasize nature as an object to be respected and cooperated with. +What does "Collaboration Across Difference" have to do with the environment? Local legends, stories, traditional religions, and many contemporary religions, spanning the length of human history, emphasize nature as a target of respect and a participant in cooperation with just as much as other humans are. -This chapter explores how ⿻ can transform our technological relationship with nature, shifting from domination to a synergy of ⿻ interactions, facilitated by data. Whether we see these ecosystems as alive and sentient in their own right, or as indispensable life-support systems for human societies, these approaches will enable us to co-exist with nature more sustainably. +This chapter explores how ⿻ can transform our technological relationship with nature. In the past, technology has often been conceived of as a means to master nature, just as sometimes technology has previously been seen as a means to master fellow humans. Instead we explore how ⿻ can facilitate communication, cooperation and synergy with nature, empowered by data Whether we see these ecosystems as alive and sentient in their own right, or as indispensable life-support systems for human societies, these approaches will enable us to co-exist with nature more sustainably. -### Today's environment +Human activities — particularly our reliance on non-renewable energy sources — have profoundly altered the Earth since the 1950s. Deforestation, global warming, ocean acidification, and mass extinctions have all escalated as the climate changes. At the beginning of the 21st century, Nobel laureate Paul Jozef Crutzen proposed the term "[Anthropocene](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene)" to recognize this new epoch driven primarily by human influence.[^anthro] Biodiversity has plummeted; between [2001 and 2014](https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/01/world/sixth-mass-extinction-accelerating-intl/index.html) alone, approximately 173 species vanished—25 times the historical extinction rate. During the 20th century, some 543 vertebrate species disappeared, an event that would typically unfold over 10,000 years.[^extinction] -Is sacrificing the environment for high economic growth an irreversible dilemma? Human activities — particularly our reliance on non-renewable energy sources — have profoundly altered the Earth since the 1950s. Deforestation, global warming, ocean acidification, and mass extinctions have all escalated as the climate changes. - -At the beginning of the 21st century, Nobel laureate Paul Jozef Crutzen proposed the term "Anthropocene" to recognize this new epoch driven primarily by human influence. Biodiversity has plummeted; between 2001 and 2014 alone, approximately 173 species vanished—25 times the historical extinction rate. During the 20th century, some 543 vertebrate species disappeared, an event that would typically unfold over 10,000 years. +[^anthro]: Will Steffan, Paul J. Crutzen and John R. McNeill, "The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?" in Ross E. Dunn, Laura J. Mitchell and Kerry Ward, eds., *The New World History* (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2016). Note that this proposal was recently rejected by the [International Union of Geological Sciences](https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/mar/22/geologists-reject-declaration-of-anthropocene-epoch#:~:text=The%20guardians%20of%20the%20world's,planet%2Dchanging%20impact%20of%20humanity.). -Of course, we humans aren't immune to the effects. Air pollution alone kills nearly 6.7 million people every year, including half a million infants. In severely polluted countries, average life expectancy falls by up to six years. +[^extinction]: Gerardo Ceballos, Paul R. Ehrlich, and Peter H. Raven, "Vertebrates on the Brink as Indicators of Biological Annihilation and the Sixth Mass Extinction", *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 117, no. 24: 13596-13602. -### Data Coalitions and Collective Action +Of course, we humans are not immune to the effects. Air pollution alone kills nearly [6.7 million people every year](https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/world-must-band-together-combat-air-pollution-which-kills-7-million-year#:~:text=Exposure%20to%20air%20pollution%20significantly,million%20premature%20deaths%20a%20year.), including half a million infants. In severely polluted countries, average life expectancy falls by up to six years.[^WHO] -Climate, air quality, and water data, which often rely on government agencies for input and maintenance, are resources that benefit each other internationally. Environmental awareness has become a distinctive feature of the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, driven by open data organizations and environmental groups. The civic technology movement in the Internet community has opened up a new space for digital social engagement; not simply providing tools, but also actively supporting civil society to work with the government to create more environmental knowledge, which can then be developed into a public movement that coordinates the interests of multiple parties. +[^WHO]: World Health Organization, "Air Pollution Resource Guide" at https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_1. -In Taiwan, the Location Aware Sensor System (LASS), an open-source environment sensing network, empowers ordinary citizens to gather and share information freely, developing into a model of digital communication that incorporates local wisdom through citizen science. Instead of relying on authoritative organizations to shape public perceptions, LASS embraces direct action, extending community values into environmental care. +### Data coalitions for environmental action + +Climate, air quality, and water data, which often rely on government agencies for input and maintenance, are resources that benefit each other internationally. Environmental awareness has become a distinctive feature of the implementation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals, driven by open data organizations and environmental groups. The civic technology movement has opened up a new space for digital social engagement; not simply providing tools, but also actively supporting civil society to work with the government to create more environmental knowledge, which can then be developed into a public movement that coordinates the interests of multiple parties. + +In Taiwan, the [Location Aware Sensor System](https://directory.civictech.guide/listing/location-aware-sensing-system-lass-environmental-sensor-network) (LASS), an open-source environment sensing network, empowers ordinary citizens to gather and share information freely, developing into a model of digital communication that incorporates local wisdom through citizen science. Instead of relying on authoritative organizations to shape public perceptions, LASS embraces direct action, extending community values into environmental care. This type of citizen science community, which covers air, forest, and river sensing, is based on the spirit of open-source rainmaking, and also contributes to the "Civil IoT" data coalition, which provides real-time sensing information updated every 3-5 minutes across the country, serving as a common ground for activists, and making it easier for ideas to solve problems to be examined and disseminated. Data coalitions are interconnected with social movement-based civic technologies; a series of hackathon-themed fields have begun around the globe that will serve as mutually supportive gateways for mobility, acting as a technological conduit between natural environments and volunteers, and facilitating collective action on a global scale. It can be argued that the nature of collaborative networks is not just about information gathering and value re-engineering, but also about the foundation of community knowledge systems and the promotion of environmental justice. -Historically, theorists like Edmund Burke saw community groups as 'little platoons' – social hubs situated between individuals and the state. Effective communication and cultivation are particularly important given that environmental problems often hit the most vulnerable first and hardest, such as low-income families or indigenous communities. The key is to ensure, through law and policy, that community members have an equal participation and voice in the development, resource allocation and implementation process, and that they are transformed from research subjects to data-driven actors. +Before conservationism was a widespread concept, conservative thinkers like Edmund Burke saw community groups as 'little platoons' – social hubs situated between individuals and the state.[^Burke] Effective communication and cultivation are particularly important given that environmental problems often hit the most vulnerable first and hardest, such as low-income families or indigenous communities. The key is to ensure, through law and policy, that community members have an equal participation and voice in the development, resource allocation and implementation process, and that they are transformed from research subjects to data-driven actors. + +[^Burke]: Edmund Burke, *Reflections on the Revolution in France and on the Proceedings in Certain Societies in London Relative to that Event* (London: James Dodley, 1790). ### Conversations with nature -Recent years have seen a growing movement to grant waterways 'natural legal personhood.' These waterways, with inherent rights and appointed guardians, include the Magpie River (Muteshekau Shipu) in Canada, the Whanganui in New Zealand, and the Ganga and Yamuna rivers in India. This signifies a shared commitment to preserving these ecosystems for future generations. +Recent years have seen a growing movement to grant waterways 'natural legal personhood.' These waterways, with inherent rights and appointed guardians, include the Magpie River ([Muteshekau Shipu](https://nonprofitquarterly.org/environmental-personhood-a-radical-approach-to-climate-justice/#:~:text=In%202021%2C%20the%20Canadian%20government,and%20the%20rights%20of%20nature.)) in Canada, the [Whanganui](https://apnews.com/article/religion-sacred-rivers-new-zealand-86d34a78f5fc662ccd554dd7f578d217) in New Zealand, and the Ganga and [Yamuna](https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/india-s-yamuna-river-now-enjoys-legal-personhood-will-be-enough-clean-it) rivers in India.[^rivers] This signifies a shared commitment to preserving these ecosystems for future generations. -A common understanding of shared evidence is central to a democratic society. The combination of natural personhood, data coalitions, and AI-powered direct dialogues can bring environmental rights issues into existing democratic processes. This covers areas like air quality, ocean protection, river management, and land use. +[^rivers]: Mihnea Tanasescu, "When a River is a Person: From Ecuador to New Zealand, Nature Gets its Day in Court", *Open Rivers* 8, Fall 2017 at https://openrivers.lib.umn.edu/article/when-a-river-is-a-person-from-ecuador-to-new-zealand-nature-gets-its-day-in-court. -AI conversation models, built by data coalitions, can inspire people to relate to nature with more empathy. They serve as valuable tools for knowledge sharing and collective problem-solving regarding complex, cross-border problems. In promoting environmental sustainability, AI demonstrates a new model of co-existence between technology and humanity. As environmental data flows through verifiable relationships, it generates value (e.g., air and water quality monitoring), sending pulses of images, sounds, and messages to engage people, offering real-time feedback to ideas and encouraging more nature-conscious partners to join the effort. +Shared data can be transformed by data coalitions using generative foundation models (GFMs) into means of conversation with nature. These can serve as valuable tools for knowledge sharing and collective problem-solving regarding complex, cross-border problems. In promoting environmental sustainability, GFMs demonstrate a new model of co-existence between technology and humanity. As environmental data flows through verifiable relationships, it generates value (e.g., air and water quality monitoring), sending pulses of images, sounds, and messages to engage people, offering real-time feedback to ideas and encouraging more nature-conscious partners to join the effort. -It is important to emphasize that such advances can promote a mutually beneficial co-creation relationship based on empathy, allowing all parties to work more closely together with the common goal of protecting the planet. Particularly in addressing transboundary environmental issues, they offer unprecedented opportunities to analyze and address complex challenges such as global climate change, biodiversity loss and water management. By engaging in direct dialogues with nature, we are able to better understand environmental change and develop effective strategies and solutions based on it. +It is important to emphasize that such advances can promote a mutually beneficial cocreation relationship, allowing all parties to work more closely together with the common goal of protecting the planet. Particularly in addressing transjurisdictional environmental issues, they offer unprecedented opportunities to analyze and address complex challenges such as global climate change, biodiversity loss and water management. By engaging in direct dialogues with nature, we are able to better understand environmental change and develop effective strategies and solutions based on it. -### Co-governance across borders +### Cogovernance across borders Fluidity defines our natural world; oceans, rivers, and the atmosphere flow without regard for borders. Environmental solutions must transcend rigid hierarchical approaches that work within single towns, cities, or even countries. In response, we can draw from civic hacking culture, which celebrates cross-disciplinary teamwork among programmers, designers, and citizens across diverse communities. -Building foundational AI models for natural environments involves challenges: open-source governance, capital and compute investments, and collaboration are key. Through AI deep learning, we can unlock deeper insights into our complex natural world. Scientific research and environmental management benefit from these insights, improving both and potentially reshaping society, as we have seen in NASA's ongoing Foundation Model projects for the Earth's environment, tackling crucial notions of environmental justice for natural spaces and human communities alike. +Building GFMs models for natural environments involves challenges: open-source governance, capital and compute investments, and collaboration are key. Through GFMs, we can unlock deeper insights into our complex natural world. Scientific research and environmental management benefit from these insights, improving both and potentially reshaping society, as we have seen in the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration's ongoing collaboration with IBM on a [Geospatial Foundation Model](https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model) based on NASA's earth observation data, tackling crucial notions of environmental justice for natural spaces and human communities alike.[^NASA] + +[^NASA]: Josh Blumenfeld, "NASA and IBM Openly Release Geospatial AI Foundation Model for NASA Earth Observation Data", *NASA Earth Data* August 3, 2023 at https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/news/impact-ibm-hls-foundation-model. -Just as biometrics prove a person's identity, we need better ways to understand and recognize natural ecosystems like rivers. A new conceptualization of identity is in order – one that factors in the connections between individual people and the ecosystems they rely on. ⿻ publics, as explored earlier in this book, can encompass cultural and care-based relationships, shaping how citizens perceive and interact with ecosystems in protective ways. +Just as biometrics and sociometrics help establish identity, we need better ways to establish and protect the identity of natural ecosystems like rivers. A new conceptualization of identity is in order – one that factors in the connections between individual people and the ecosystems they rely on. [⿻ publics](https://www.plurality.net/v/chapters/4-2/eng/?mode=dark), as explored earlier in this book, also establish and protect identity of collective entities, often devoted to cultural and care relationships. Some of these relate to natural ecosystems and can offer a foundation for conceptualizing of the identity of such an ecosystem. -Notably, it also overcomes the debate around whether AI systems can become legal agents; data coalitions can be viewed both as “little platoons” created by the people who benefit from the ecosystem, but also at the same time, through the legal positioning of natural personhood, the river’s digital twin can be seen as a subject with rights and responsibilities. +Notably, this perspective transcends the often contentious debate around whether GFM systems can become legal agents; data coalitions can be viewed both as “little platoons” created by the people who benefit from the ecosystem, but also at the same time, through the legal positioning of natural personhood, the river’s digital twin can be seen as a subject with rights and responsibilities. Similarly a GFM created for whatever purpose of, by and for a community can exist both as a "person" and as a shared ⿻ good, depending on the perspective one adopts.