Skip to content

Actions: asyncapi/spec

Actions

Label PRs

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Show workflow options

Create status badge

Loading
automerge-for-humans-add-ready-to-merge-or-do-not-merge-label.yml
731 workflow runs
731 workflow runs

Filter by Event

Filter by Status

Filter by Branch

Filter by Actor

application issue Label PRs #3570: Issue comment #1079 (comment) created by Anam-shaikh2003
November 24, 2024 16:28 3s
November 24, 2024 16:28 3s
application issue Label PRs #3569: Issue comment #1079 (comment) created by adityakalburgi
November 24, 2024 10:28 3s
November 24, 2024 10:28 3s
Ensure consistency when using either Application or API terms Label PRs #3568: Issue comment #949 (comment) created by Anam-shaikh2003
November 23, 2024 17:50 4s
November 23, 2024 17:50 4s
Consolidate the JSON and YAML examples in the specs into one codeblock to reduce the readers scroll effort Label PRs #3567: Issue comment #1067 (comment) created by AaryaBalwadkar
November 17, 2024 07:24 4s
November 17, 2024 07:24 4s
Add message type to describe Event/Command/Other Label PRs #3566: Issue comment #1074 (comment) created by ishyverma
November 16, 2024 16:16 4s
November 16, 2024 16:16 4s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @asyncapi/parser in /scripts/validation Label PRs #3565: Issue comment #1078 (comment) created by sonarqubecloud bot
November 12, 2024 16:44 7s
November 12, 2024 16:44 7s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @stoplight/spectral-core in /scripts/converter Label PRs #3564: Issue comment #1077 (comment) created by sonarqubecloud bot
November 12, 2024 16:42 5s
November 12, 2024 16:42 5s
chore(deps): bump jsonpath-plus and @asyncapi/parser in /scripts/converter Label PRs #3563: Issue comment #1076 (comment) created by sonarqubecloud bot
November 12, 2024 12:08 3s
November 12, 2024 12:08 3s
ci: update update-maintainers-trigger.yaml workflow from global .github repo Label PRs #3562: Issue comment #1075 (comment) created by sonarqubecloud bot
November 12, 2024 12:05 4s
November 12, 2024 12:05 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3561: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
November 10, 2024 11:44 4s
November 10, 2024 11:44 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3560: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
November 8, 2024 12:21 4s
November 8, 2024 12:21 4s
Need for fine-grained per-channel authn/authz Label PRs #3559: Issue comment #306 (comment) created by derberg
November 4, 2024 16:11 5s
November 4, 2024 16:11 5s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3558: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
November 4, 2024 13:25 6s
November 4, 2024 13:25 6s
Need for fine-grained per-channel authn/authz Label PRs #3557: Issue comment #306 (comment) created by devthejo
October 27, 2024 13:06 3s
October 27, 2024 13:06 3s
Add minimal support for v3 code generation Label PRs #3556: Issue comment #954 (comment) created by vordimous
October 22, 2024 16:37 5s
October 22, 2024 16:37 5s
trait vs. allOf ref vs. component ref - CloudEvents Label PRs #3555: Issue comment #1057 (comment) created by black-snow
October 19, 2024 09:05 4s
October 19, 2024 09:05 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3554: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
October 14, 2024 08:40 4s
October 14, 2024 08:40 4s
Label PRs Label PRs #3553: created by catosaurusrex2003
October 12, 2024 14:25 4s
October 12, 2024 14:25 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3552: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 12, 2024 10:24 3s
October 12, 2024 10:24 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3551: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by chrispatmore
October 11, 2024 15:16 6s
October 11, 2024 15:16 6s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3550: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 4, 2024 09:30 5s
October 4, 2024 09:30 5s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3549: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by derberg
October 3, 2024 22:48 3s
October 3, 2024 22:48 3s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3548: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 2, 2024 22:26 4s
October 2, 2024 22:26 4s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3547: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by derberg
October 2, 2024 15:51 5s
October 2, 2024 15:51 5s
Proposal to add a 'version' value into the message object to support a more granular versioning Label PRs #3546: Issue comment #1068 (comment) created by IsmaelMartinez
October 1, 2024 17:34 5s
October 1, 2024 17:34 5s