Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Roadmap for C++ support #1384

Closed
robinchrist opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Roadmap for C++ support #1384

robinchrist opened this issue Jun 7, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale

Comments

@robinchrist
Copy link

Hey,

I would like to use Modelina for C++ and I'm getting ready to contribute to the C++ support.

But before I really get into it, I'd like to hear whether there's already some kind of roadmap?

I think the most important feature, which I'll be mainly working on, is (de)serialisation to and from JSON. I'd like to use the yyjson library for that, because it is fast (to the level of SIMDJSON, but without the SIMD hassles), powerful and MIT licensed.

@robinchrist robinchrist added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2023

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

There is not, so you can see it as a blank slate, your own drawing board 😄

If you want a specific library for serialization go for it, if others want a different one, they can contribute a different preset, so no worries 👍

@oavitzur
Copy link

Hi
Im looking for a way to generate from asyncapi yml, message payloads in json format, similar to what is done for programming languages using modelina.
I saw above that @robinchrist might have some information on this issue. Is this correct ?

Thanks!

@robinchrist
Copy link
Author

@oavitzur I have to admit that right now, I have stopped working on this, as using Protobuf instead of JSON seems to be a sensible option for us. So right now we're most likely going with Protobuf instead of JSON; because Protobuf Codegen already exists.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Oct 22, 2023
@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Closing as no further involvement 🙂

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants