Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance validation of keychain & keychain access transaction #882

Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #932
samuelmanzanera opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #932
Closed
3 tasks done
Tracked by #932

Enhance validation of keychain & keychain access transaction #882

samuelmanzanera opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #932
Assignees
Labels
enhancements mining Involve transaction validation and mining

Comments

@samuelmanzanera
Copy link
Member

samuelmanzanera commented Feb 1, 2023

Proposal

We should increase the level of security of the keychain transactions:

  • forbid the transfers for any sorts in the keychain & keychain access transactions to prevent bad usage of those transactions.
  • for keychain access, the number of secrets should be one
  • for keychain access, no content should be allowed
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera added mining Involve transaction validation and mining enhancements labels Feb 1, 2023
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera moved this to Todo 🚩 in Dev Board Feb 10, 2023
@apoorv-2204 apoorv-2204 moved this from Todo 🚩 to In Progress 🚧 in Dev Board Mar 13, 2023
@apoorv-2204 apoorv-2204 self-assigned this Mar 13, 2023
@apoorv-2204 apoorv-2204 moved this from In Progress 🚧 to Review 💬 in Dev Board Mar 14, 2023
@samuelmanzanera samuelmanzanera linked a pull request Mar 17, 2023 that will close this issue
1 task
@samuelmanzanera
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by #932

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancements mining Involve transaction validation and mining
Projects
Status: Done 🍻
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants