Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

postscript filter (pstops) doesn't honor %%IncludeFeature #1212

Closed
michaelrsweet opened this issue Jun 27, 2005 · 2 comments
Closed

postscript filter (pstops) doesn't honor %%IncludeFeature #1212

michaelrsweet opened this issue Jun 27, 2005 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator

Version: 1.2-feature
CUPS.org User: carlosayam

It seems the pstops filter (Postscript to Postscript) is not processing %%IncludeFeature as per Adobe specs.

---- Adobe specs fragment about %%IncludeFeature -----
%%IncludeFeature: ...

This comment specifies the need for a particular printer feature, as described in the PostScript printer description (PPD) file. Its use specifies a requirement a document manager must fulfill before printing (see also the discussion under %%BeginFeature)....

It's however, inserting into the stream other processing DSC from the PPD; so I think this is guy in charge of doing this.

regards
Carlos

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CUPS.org User: mike

Changed to RFE for CUPS 1.2.

This processing directive is not supported by the current pstops filter; I will look into the possibility of supporting this directive in a future CUPS release.

@michaelrsweet
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CUPS.org User: mike

Fixed in Subversion repository.

@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 17, 2016
@michaelrsweet michaelrsweet added this to the Stable milestone Mar 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant