Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AsyncAPI native support #486

Closed
vongosling opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

AsyncAPI native support #486

vongosling opened this issue Aug 6, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
discussion This issue requires further discussion feature improvement Improve the mechanism or performance

Comments

@vongosling
Copy link
Member

AsyncAPI is an open specification meant to be an industry standard for defining asynchronous APIs. Its design is very close to OpenMessaging but has more complete API lifecycle support. It could help unify documentation automation and code generation and manages, testing, and monitoring asynchronous APIs. The specification provides a language for describing event-driven systems' interfaces regardless of the underlying technology and supports event-driven architecture's complete development cycle. I think we need to work more on programming interfaces in the next step, so we don't have too many migration costs later on.

@vongosling vongosling added feature discussion This issue requires further discussion labels Aug 6, 2021
@qqeasonchen
Copy link
Contributor

qqeasonchen commented Aug 6, 2021

Good suggestion, I was keeping paying attention to this technology.

@vongosling
Copy link
Member Author

So far, we've had so many choices that we've made less progress in multi-language supports. Whether to use GRPC to meet this requirement based on the AsyncAPI spec, also we could refer to the structures of CloudEvents and OpenSchema are used.

@vongosling vongosling added the improvement Improve the mechanism or performance label Oct 25, 2021
@qqeasonchen
Copy link
Contributor

That would be a good choice, here is the compare between asyncAPI and cloudevents, https://www.asyncapi.com/blog/async_standards_compare

@vongosling
Copy link
Member Author

All discuss have transfer to issue #417

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion This issue requires further discussion feature improvement Improve the mechanism or performance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants