-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request] Hide specific languages in Top Languages Card #140
Comments
We currently have the option to hide languages below a certain percentage. Either we implement the option to hide languages above a percentage or we add the option to hide specific languages and forget the idea of hiding languages that fall into a percentage category. |
Yes, as title says, what I want is to hide a specific language 😃 |
I suggested this when adding this feature, but Anurag preferred to add the below percentage option. I think this would be a nice option to have. |
I think we can remove the below percentage option maybe? if we are adding specific language hiding features they i don't think hide_langs_below option would be useful anymore. |
I agree. I think it would be a bit redundant to keep hide_langs_below if we add the hide languages option. |
This might not make sense for this specific issue actually, because in this particular issue (Jupyter Notebook being a predominant language that the person does not want to see) the percentage for other languages will need to be recomputed. So ignoring specific languages might be better, I remember Github linguist can do something like this, I suppose this is what github-readme-stats uses for generating those numbers. |
Ideally we could remove multiple languages? |
resolved in #150 |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Because some languages inherently have more code lines than other languages,
I want to hide these exaggerated language statistics. 😥
Thanks!
Describe the solution you'd like
Maybe add a option like
Hiding individual stats
does, e.g.,Describe alternatives you've considered
Not yet 😅
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: