You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I carefully read through the official KEGG documentation, and I could not find any explicit statement regarding the distinction between metabolic and non-metabolic pathways. Even in metabolic pathways, such as map00965, there are still signaling pathway components.
When using the KGML2igraph function and setting parse.as = "meta", the script still processes all KGML files and iterates through all reactions. However, there seems to be a specific rule that determines whether a reaction is metabolic or non-metabolic. Is this correct?
Since the corresponding logic for this is implemented in a C++ file, I am unable to read and fully understand it. I would like to know the exact logic or criteria the author used to make this distinction. This is extremely important to me. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I carefully read through the official KEGG documentation, and I could not find any explicit statement regarding the distinction between metabolic and non-metabolic pathways. Even in metabolic pathways, such as map00965, there are still signaling pathway components.
When using the KGML2igraph function and setting parse.as = "meta", the script still processes all KGML files and iterates through all reactions. However, there seems to be a specific rule that determines whether a reaction is metabolic or non-metabolic. Is this correct?
Since the corresponding logic for this is implemented in a C++ file, I am unable to read and fully understand it. I would like to know the exact logic or criteria the author used to make this distinction. This is extremely important to me. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: