From d247194e3a49b91e59cc9e31ca4cf1a6d0f48037 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Kopp <kopp.dev@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:01:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add link to SPDX howto

---
 docs/decisions/0001-use-CC0-or-MIT-as-license.md | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/decisions/0001-use-CC0-or-MIT-as-license.md b/docs/decisions/0001-use-CC0-or-MIT-as-license.md
index 7ea6268..0a49004 100644
--- a/docs/decisions/0001-use-CC0-or-MIT-as-license.md
+++ b/docs/decisions/0001-use-CC0-or-MIT-as-license.md
@@ -47,3 +47,7 @@ With the SPDX identifier `MIT OR CC0-1.0`, the receiver of the documents can dec
 
 * Good, because offers freedom at the receiver
 * Bad, because dual licensing is not widely known
+
+## More Information
+
+See <https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/a/371435/52607> for a solution how to properly declare dual-licensing on a repository.