Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide config split recipe? #3011

Closed
TravisCarden opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Provide config split recipe? #3011

TravisCarden opened this issue Aug 14, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@TravisCarden
Copy link
Contributor

The BLT config split documentation is pretty cut and dried. At least in terms of the environment split, there doesn't seem to be anything that couldn't be automated. Should we create a recipe for it?

@lcatlett
Copy link
Contributor

@TravisCarden are you referring to the blt recipes:config:init:splits task itself or creating recipes enhancing the default config with common things like adding the devel module to the local split?

@TravisCarden
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh! Look at that: I completely overlooked the existence of the blt recipes:config:init:splits task. Maybe we should mention it on the documentation page.

@ba66e77
Copy link
Contributor

ba66e77 commented Aug 17, 2018

I wonder if a unified recipes page in the docs would be helpful; not that we don't need the specific documentation for the config split recipe, but a recipe index page might help people more easily find out what recipes there are.

@TravisCarden
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't have an opinion on the question of a unified recipes docs page, but as to the matter of surfacing the config split recipe, in particular, I think it should be mentioned on the config split documentation page. That's where I started with my setup, and given all the manual steps there I dove right in without considering whether there might already be a command for it. I've submitted a pull request accordingly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants