Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: Option to use already running IPFS on $PATH instead of using the bundled one #107

Closed
unbeatable-101 opened this issue Aug 24, 2021 · 8 comments · Fixed by #140 or #161
Closed
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request idea Nive to have in progress Work in progress stale

Comments

@unbeatable-101
Copy link

I would rather not run two instances of IPFS.

@geolffreym geolffreym added enhancement New feature or request idea Nive to have labels Aug 24, 2021
@geolffreym
Copy link
Member

geolffreym commented Aug 24, 2021

Hi @unbeatable-101, thanks for reaching out and let us know your issue. We have been working in a "Improvements Proposal" repo, we would love to see some suggestions on this use case
https://github.com/ZorrillosDev/WEISP

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 24, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Oct 24, 2021
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Nov 23, 2021
@geolffreym geolffreym reopened this Nov 23, 2021
@stale stale bot removed the stale label Nov 23, 2021
@cjemorton
Copy link

I agree with this. It'd be nice to be able to point it to a custom IPFS.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 6, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Feb 6, 2022
@unbeatable-101
Copy link
Author

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

I hate this bot

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Feb 7, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 8, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 8, 2022
@unbeatable-101
Copy link
Author

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

I hate this bot

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 8, 2022
@geolffreym geolffreym added the in progress Work in progress label Apr 8, 2022
@geolffreym geolffreym linked a pull request Apr 12, 2022 that will close this issue
@geolffreym geolffreym reopened this Apr 30, 2022
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 31, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request idea Nive to have in progress Work in progress stale
Projects
None yet
4 participants