Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using a negative value for horizonal expansion causes infill to not generate in thin walls #19886

Closed
5o6 opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Status: Duplicate Duplicate of another issue. Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.

Comments

@5o6
Copy link

5o6 commented Nov 10, 2024

Cura Version

5.8.1

Operating System

Windows 10

Printer

Ender 3 (Klipper, All-metal hotend, z probe)

Reproduction steps

Slice a model with thin walls (less than 3mm) with a horizonal expansion value under 0 (-0.05 in my case). Notice missing infill.

Actual results

Infill does not generate within the walls

Expected results

Infill should generate within the walls

Add your .zip and screenshots here ⬇️

Screenshot 2024-11-10 003432
CE3PRO_Bolt Pinning Jig - Imperial.zip

@5o6 5o6 added Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior. labels Nov 10, 2024
@GregValiant GregValiant added Status: Duplicate Duplicate of another issue. Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. and removed Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team labels Nov 10, 2024
@GregValiant
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the report.
I don't think this really had anything to do with Horizontal Expansion other than it dropped the size of the "model feature" below a point that affected the infill generator filter. This looks like a duplicate of #19478 (and #19802).
A repair has been made in 5.9.0-beta.2.
This is layer 455 in 5.8.1
image

And this is layer 455 in 5.9.0-beta.2 (the beta.1 release does not have this fix in it).
image

I'll mark this as a duplicate and go ahead and close it. I hope you understand.

@5o6
Copy link
Author

5o6 commented Nov 10, 2024

Thanks for the quick response, I'll go ahead and use the beta for now then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Duplicate Duplicate of another issue. Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants