Consistency in Component Naming #1428
Closed
AnaMontes11
started this conversation in
Proposals
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Finally, we decided to standardize the nomenclature following the most "standard" syntax:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Issue: #1445 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Goal
I propose evaluating the pros and cons of the different typologies and selecting one as the "universal" choice.
Context
Currently, we are using various conventions when naming components within the Figma libraries.
This leads to inconsistency in how the components are displayed.
Examples:
Impact
Having this consistency in component naming will make the experience friendlier for library consumers and will help us maintain clarity in how we should name them when adding new ones.
Discussion Questions
...
Additional considerations
No response
Do you have a visual proposal?
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions