Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect Beta-Oxidation Reaction for (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA #748

Closed
Devlin-Moyer opened this issue Dec 7, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@Devlin-Moyer
Copy link
Collaborator

Devlin-Moyer commented Dec 7, 2023

MAR00965 appears to represent a single round of beta-oxidation of (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA:

(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA [m] + CoA [m] + H2O [m] + NAD+ [m] + O2 [m] ⇒ (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-eicosapentaenoyl-CoA [m] + H+ [m] + H2O2 [m] + NADH [m] + acetyl-CoA [m], GPR: ACADM or ACADS

But one round of beta-oxidation of (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA (already represented by MAR05380 + MAR05404 + MAR05383 + MAR05378) produces 5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraenoyl Coenzyme A, not (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-eicosapentaenoyl-CoA. In addition, it reduces O2 to H2O2, but is associated with ACADM and ACADS, the mitochondrial acyl-CoA dehydrogenases, which reduce FAD to FADH2 (the peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidases ACOX1, ACOX2, and ACOX3 reduce O2 to H2O2), and it appears to represent all 4 steps of a single round of beta-oxidation, but is only associated with the acyl-CoA dehydrogenases that catalyze the first of those 4 steps.

Since MAR05380 + MAR05404 + MAR05383 + MAR05378 already accurately represent a single round of beta-oxidation of (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA, and (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-eicosapentaenoyl-CoA can also be (accurately) produced from (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)-docosahexaenoyl-CoA in MAR00970, I think MAR00965 should be removed.

MAR00970: (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)-docosahexaenoyl-CoA [m] + CoA [m] + H2O [m] + NAD+ [m] ⇒ (5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)-eicosapentaenoyl-CoA [m] + H+ [m] + NADH [m] + acetyl-CoA [m]

@haowang-bioinfo
Copy link
Member

haowang-bioinfo commented Dec 7, 2023

thanks for careful checking of this case

it does appear that MAR00965 is duplicate to MAR00970. But both probably should be removed based on annotation of ACADM and ACADS, or the GPR needs to be modified?

@Devlin-Moyer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Devlin-Moyer commented Dec 7, 2023

This paper found that ACAD9 was 1) localized to the inner mitochondrial membrane and 2) capable of oxidizing C22:6 (i.e. docosahexaenoyl-CoA). While (4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)-docosapentaenoyl-CoA is C22:5 and not C22:6, it doesn't seem like much of a stretch to suggest that ACAD9 could catalyze MAR00970.

@Devlin-Moyer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah I just realized that MAR00970 represents a full round of beta-oxidation, not just the first step, but following the rationale I presented in #772 for the GPR of MAR00923, I think the GPR of MAR00970 should be (ACADL or ACAD9) and (ECI1 or ECI2) and ECH1 and DECR1 and HADHA and HADHB

@Devlin-Moyer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fixed in #794

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants