-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 869
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Debian packaging and fonts #332
Comments
That would be a good thing. Also, that would require the packager to research the licensing status of the fonts involved. Which would also be a good thing. |
$ git log --stat --no-merges -- '**fonts**' '*.ttf' '*.TTF' '*.otf' '*.OTF' Urk. |
@barak i do the separate package building here http://phd-sid.ethz.ch/debian/cool-retro-term/VERYNEW/ but see the @pazos post at #240 (comment) that is what we need for linux (system fonts being used, and not the font embedded into the binary) |
Cool, thanks @alexmyczko, that's great. I've merged most of your changes into my I'd really like to get this into Debian proper. But, I'm thinking we need a proper strategy to make that happen. How does this sound to you? Let's make a To make life easy, All the fonts get moved to their own repo (or multiple repos), or at least their own branch. Maybe package the not-too-nonfree ones for uploading into non-free. Or maybe we kick out a tiny "contrib" package which just downloads/installs all the fonts at install time. Or just include a shell script to do that, which people can invoke if they get the urge. The package proper Recommends: the non-free font packages, but can run without them. Maybe put some verbiage somewhere encouraging people to make free versions of these archaic fonts, from scratch based on screen captures and such. Also, need to fix |
(Fixed that last sterr/stout thing, #569) |
it is already in NEW queue https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html |
things in main can not depend (and imho should not recommend nor suggest) on stuff in non-free or contrib |
can we get an amigashell mode? https://github.com/rewtnull/amigafonts/ and the typewriter one? #425 if we could set a separate color for the cursor? what is the reason pixels/scanlines (not default) is limited to a set of fonts and not all system fonts? |
We could set up a stub package Or, just ship a shell script to download the font files to The whole font issue seems like a "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good" sort of issue. Let's get the package proper into plain old Debian, and have it use non-free fonts if available. Make life easy... |
I suggest you don't need that branch as it might happen to land in salsa.debian.org,
So do I.
The debian package is free-by-Debian-standards (it's called DFSG):
If no other software needs that, that doesn't make sense. Keep it like it is (or this should have happened 4+ years ago)
Why mess around with repos. This is not Ubuntu with PPAs (besides I recommend sticking with No downloaderscript, that's why there's debian packages. And no non-free stuff, please.
No it doesn't, and yes it runs just fine. It's just some fonts that are non-free right, feel free to find/create free alternatives that later replace the non-free ones.
Good idea, there's plenty of free software tools to do so. autotrace/potrace/fontforge
Sounds good. |
I will not. And I discourage anyone to do so.
No for the reasons already mentioned.
shrug |
@barak meanwhile i updated the packaging to create a separate package, but i don't call it qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects, but qml-module-qmltermwidget |
It seems like you're doing a great job. Please feel free to merge any of my mods as you wish. If you need someone to dput a new version I'm happy to do so, although I guess you already have a DD who's doing that job. |
@barak was that an offer for general packages or only crt? are you on irc? |
Can do others too if you'd like, sure. (Within reason etc) |
i guess this issue can be closed now? |
I have a debian-packaging-related question.
Should the debian binary package require the
fonts-3270
package, and use the font from there, and ditch the corresponding.ttf
file from the binary package?Or even more radically, perhaps all the fonts in the repo should be packaged into a
fonts-cool-retro-term
package, upon which the binary package containing the executable depends, thus allowing their proper installation in the system and use from elsewhere?Currently the fonts get baked into the binary executable file itself, I believe---either of the above would require that to change, either for just one font (
--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/41552036-debian-packaging-and-fonts?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F479407&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F479407&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).IBM 3270 Medium
) or for all of them.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: