-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inacurate tight focusing with LaserOffset() #201
Comments
Hi I will look into this issue whenever I have time. Thanks for reporting. Could you say whether it is a cosmetic problem or a real issue for you (and why)? Cheers |
Hi, |
Hi @Horymir001 |
Hi @MickaelGrech |
Please pull and try the latest version from github.I think most of the problem is fixed, although there might be something I have missed. |
Hello @mccoys and @MickaelGrech, |
The discrepancy is probably due to some small part of the expanded beam being lost at the boundary, or as you said, by the solver itself. Note that I cannot access the issue you refer to |
@Horymir001, I do not believe that the discrepancy comes from the Maxwell solver, but, as suggested by @mccoys by the fact that the transverse size of your simulation is most likely too small. Did you try increasing by a factor 2 the transverse sizes? I think this should decrease the observed discrepancy. |
Hi, yes, I also find this explanation much more sound. I might check it one day. |
Do not forget to close the issue if resolved for you |
I observe that the current version with LaserOffset() crashes in the 2D simulation when it is run at more cores than a single one. Output from a terminal:
|
I found the bug that was recently introduced, and will fix ASAP. In the future, please open a new issue, as this one was on a different bug. |
Done in last push. |
Dear developers,
I do observe an inaccuracy with tight focusing implementation based on Thiele's method.
Thank you for any advice on how to overcome that.
Best regards,
Vojtěch Horný
Files.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: