-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to get the output of a large model instead of through the response #1469
Comments
@dosubot |
The codebase currently handles different output types such as plot, string, number, and dataframe by defining specific classes for each type. These classes inherit from a base class However, there is no specific function or method in the codebase that allows for the combination of different output types into a single response, nor are there examples or test cases demonstrating the simultaneous return of multiple output types [1]. If you need to return multiple output types simultaneously, you might consider creating a custom function or class that can handle multiple outputs by packaging them into a single response object or dictionary. This would involve modifying the existing structure to accommodate multiple types and ensuring that each type is correctly validated and formatted. To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu. Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Other |
@dosubot If I want to output both number and dataframe types, how can I ensure the consistency of the output? For example, is the number of dataframes consistent with the number? |
To ensure the consistency of outputs when dealing with both number and dataframe types, you would need to implement a mechanism that checks the relationship between these outputs. Here are some steps you could consider:
By implementing these steps, you can ensure that the number and dataframe outputs are consistent with each other. To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu. Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Other |
@dosubot I want to have the description variable when I get the result. What should I do? Now there is only type and value, and most of the time there is no description. |
To include a description variable in the output when it is often missing, you can modify the serialization methods to handle cases where the description is not provided. The existing code already includes checks for the presence of a description and adds it to the output if available. Here's how you can ensure that the description is included when available:
If the description is missing, the current implementation simply omits it from the output. To include a placeholder or a default value when the description is missing, you can modify the code to add a default description like this: # Example modification for JSON serialization
df_info = {
"name": df.name,
"description": df.description if df.description is not None else "No description available",
"type": (
df.type
if "is_direct_sql" in extras and extras["is_direct_sql"]
else extras["type"]
),
} This approach can be applied similarly to other serialization methods if you want to ensure that a description is always included, even if it's just a placeholder [1]. To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu. Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Other |
@dosubot result = self.execute_code(code_to_run, code_context) |
To modify the code so that it can handle a list of multiple type objects, such as
By implementing these changes, you can modify the code to handle and process multiple type objects in a list format. To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu. Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Other |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
How to get the output of a large model instead of through the response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: