Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
I've added Async IVerb interfaces in this commit. We wont be adding content type suffix interfaces which would cause an explosion of interfaces, but if there are Content-Types you use frequently you can add and use your own local Content-Type Verb interfaces for the same effect. This change is available from v6.11.1+ that's now available in Pre-Release Packages. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
-
Now available in the latest v6.11.1+ pre-release packages. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
ServiceStack's
IService
interface already has methods for verbs such asIGet<T>
,IPost<T>
,IPut<T>
, etc. Could you add*Async
suffix interface methods for these verbs as well as interface methods for specifying Content-Types to increase productivity?Examples:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions