You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should keep track of all the relevant works that extend the Gottesman-Knill theorem (preference: qubits, stabilizer formalism). Some may be highly relevant, others might offer low-hanging fruit, and some could simply be interesting to read.
In the first paper, there is interesting discussion about Clifford Normal Form that apparently 'highlights computational 'weakness' of the Clifford circuits'. The Clifford Normal Form, extends GK theorem to encompass full probabilistic classical computation, so it seems different from Ted's work who put emphasis on 'strong simulation' rather than the former, which is about 'weak simulation'. Hopefully, this sounds interesting.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I think we should keep track of all the relevant works that extend the Gottesman-Knill theorem (preference: qubits, stabilizer formalism). Some may be highly relevant, others might offer low-hanging fruit, and some could simply be interesting to read.
In the first paper, there is interesting discussion about Clifford Normal Form that apparently 'highlights computational 'weakness' of the Clifford circuits'. The Clifford Normal Form, extends GK theorem to encompass full probabilistic classical computation, so it seems different from Ted's work who put emphasis on 'strong simulation' rather than the former, which is about 'weak simulation'. Hopefully, this sounds interesting.
Clifford+T
circuits #324. Also: Computing the quantity `⟨ψ|Π|φ⟩` #325Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions