Test: src/lib/utilities/reuploadDuplicateCheck.ts

[palisadoes]

• Please coordinate issue assignment and PR reviews with the contributors listed in this issue Student Internship Programs talawa#359

The Talawa-API code base needs to be 100% reliable. This means we need to have 100% test code coverage.

• Tests need to be written for file src/lib/utilities/reuploadDuplicateCheck.ts
• We will need the API to be refactored for all methods, classes and/or functions found in this file for testing to be correctly executed.
• When complete, all all methods, classes and/or functions in the refactored file will need to be tested. These tests must be placed in a
  single file with the name __tests__/utilities/reuploadDuplicateCheck.spec.ts. You may need to create the appropriate directory structure to do this.

IMPORTANT:

Please refer to the parent issue on how to implement these tests correctly:

• Create all API Resolver Tests #490

PR Acceptance Criteria

• When complete this file must show 100% coverage when merged into the code base. This will be clearly visible when you submit your PR.
• The current code coverage for the file can be found by visting this page. Login using your GitHub credentials.
• Create your own codecov.io to help with testing.
• The PR you create will show a report for the code coverage for the file you have added. You can also use that as a guide.

[kb-0311]

please assign this to me. I had written an original approach and achieved complete coverage for uploadImage this one is somewhat similar to that

[palisadoes]

@kb-0311 Please check slack. When resolved return here.

[palisadoes]

Please create the bug discussed in the PR

[kb-0311]

Please create the bug discussed in the PR

Thanks for the assignment, I will submit the PR for this tomorrow, now it is nighttime, where I am from.

What do you mean by "create the bug" discussed in which PR?

[palisadoes]

#948

[kb-0311]

So just to confirm you want me to create an issue - about changing and refactoring how we currently handling file uploads which is a historical flaw in the codebase, with this approach and make a PR for the same, right?

[palisadoes]

Yes.